This trial compares the effects of task-oriented physical therapy (PT) provided with and without the use of rehabilitation technology on locomotor recovery in 63 persons with subacute stroke. Participants in the experimental (EXP) group used a treadmill, a Kinetron isokinetic exerciser, and a limb-load monitor, whereas those in the control (CTL) group did not while engaging in PT 1 h per day, 5 days per week for 2 months. Locomotor recovery was assessed by clinical (gait speed, Fugl Meyer motor leg and arm subscores, the Balance Scale, the Timed Up and Go, and the Barthel ambulation subscore) and laboratory outcomes (gait kinematics and kinetics) pre- and posttherapy and 3 months later. Within groups, gait speed (P < 0.01) and all secondary measures improved posttherapy (P < 0.01-0.05), and improvements in clinical measures were maintained at follow-up, but there was no difference between groups (P > 0.05). When the groups were pooled, the increase in gait speed was associated (r = 0.52, P = 0.003) with an increase in ankle power generation of the affected leg. The results demonstrate that the efficacy of the task-oriented approach is not dependent on rehabilitation technology.
1. Mayo NE, Neville D, Kirkland S, et al. Hospitalization and case-fatality rates for stroke in Canada from 1982 through 1991. The Canadian Collaborative Study Group of Stroke Hospitalizations. Stroke1996;27:1215-1220.
3. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1987;50:177-182.
4.
4. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995;76:27-32.
5.
5. Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Stud1990;12:119-122.
6.
6. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dumas F, Wood-Dauphinee S. The relationship of gait speed to clinical measures of function and muscle activations during recovery post-stroke. In: Proceedings of the Second North American Congress of Biomechanics; 1992:299-302.
7.
7. Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993;74:612-620.
8.
8. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke1994;25:1181-1188.
9.
9. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: Heinemann Medical Books; 1970.
10.
10. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
11.
11. Knott M, Voss D. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. New York: Harper & Row; 1968.
12.
12. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet1999;354:191-196.
13.
13. Teasell RW, Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Topics Stroke Rehabil2003;10:29-58.
14.
14. Gordon J. Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: theoretical and historical perspectives. In: Carr JHet al., eds. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987:1-30.
15.
15. Carr JH, Shepherd R. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987.
16.
16. Horak F. Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In: Lister MJ, ed. Contemporary management of motor problems: proceedings of the II step conference. Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991:11-17.
17.
17. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve2001;24:1000-1019.
18.
18. Malouin F, Potvin M, Prevost J, Richards CL, Wood-Dauphinee S. Use of an intensive task-oriented gait training program in a series of patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther1992;72:781-789; discussion 789-93.
19.
19. Duncan P, Richards L, Wallace D, et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of a home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke1998;29:2055-2060.
20.
20. Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A, et al. Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clin Rehabil2001;15:15-27.
21.
21. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Milliken GW. Adaptive plasticity in primate motor cortex as a consequence of behavioral experience and neuronal injury. Semin Neurosci1997;9:13-23.
22.
22. Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, Leidner O, Weiller C. Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand2000;101:321-326.
23.
23. Sullivan KJ, Dobkin BH, Tavakol M, Davis B, Knowlton BJ, Harkema S. Post-stroke cortical plasticity induced by step training. Proc Soc Neurosci2001;27.
24.
24. Knutsson E, Richards C. Different types of disturbed motor control in gait of hemiparetic patients. Brain1979;102:405-430.
25.
25. Shiavi R, Bugle HJ, Limbird T. Electromyographic gait assessment, Part 2: Preliminary assessment of hemiparetic synergy patterns. J Rehabil Res Dev1987;24:24-30.
26.
26. Lamontagne A, Malouin F, Richards CL. Locomotor-specific measure of spasticity of plantarflexor muscles after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001;82:1696-1704.
27.
27. Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Mechanisms of disturbed motor control in ankle weakness during gait early after stroke. Gait Posture2002;15:244-255.
28.
28. Dietz V, Quintern J, Berger W. Electrophysiological studies of gait in spasticity and rigidity. Brain1981;104:431-449.
29.
29. Malouin F, Doyon J, Dumas F, Jackson PL, Evans AC, Richards CL. Mental representation of locomotion: a PET study. Neuroimage1997;5:132.
30.
30. Lamontagne A, Malouin F, Richards CL. Contribution of passive stiffness to ankle plantarflexor moment during gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000;81:351-358.
31.
31. Bogårdh E, Richards CL. Gait analysis and relearning of gait control in hemiplegic patients. Physiother Can1981;33:223-230.
32.
32. Knutsson E. Analysis of gait and isokinetic movements for evaluation of antispastic drugs or physical therapies. Adv Neurol1983;39:1013-1034.
33.
33. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dean C. Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation. In: Duncan PW, ed. Clinics in geriatric medicine. vol. 15. New York: W. B. Saunders; 1999:833-855.
34.
34. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, Monga TN, McBride ID. Work and power in gait of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991;72:309-314.
35.
35. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dumas F, Lamontagne A. Recovery of ankle and hip power during walking after stroke. Can J Rehabil1998;11:271-273.
36.
36. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S, McBride I, Olney SJ. Effects of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning training on temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables during gait in chronic stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med2001;33:53-60.
37.
37. Olney SJ, Richards CL. Hemiplegic gait following stroke: Part I. Characteristics. Gait Posture1996;4:136-148.
38.
38. Olney SJ, Nymark J, Zee B, Martin C, Brown S. Effects of BioTrac computer-assisted feedback for gait rehabilitation in subjects with stroke: interim analysis of RTC. Proc World Confed Phys Ther1995;0771.
39.
39. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Multivariate examination of data from gait analysis of persons with stroke. Phys Ther1998;8:814-828.
40.
40. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke. A randomized, controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000;81:409-417.
41.
41. Carr J, Shepherd R. Neurological rehabilitation. Optimizing motor performance. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann; 1998.
42.
42. Richards CL, Malouin F, Bravo G, Dumas F, Wood-Dauphinee S. The role of technology in task-oriented loco-motor training in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Proc World Confed Phys Ther2003;1592.
43.
43. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992.
44.
44. Richards CL, Olney SJ. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: recovery and physical therapy. Gait Posture1996;4:149-162.
45.
45. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Ahmed S, Finch LE, Richards CL. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001;88:1204-1212.
46.
46. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clark BM. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983;64:583-587.
47.
47. Bohannon RW. Decreased isometric knee flexion torque with hip extension in hemiparetic patients. Phys Ther1986;66:521-523.
48.
48. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dumas F, Tardif D. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Craik RL, Oatis CA, eds. Gait analysis: theory and application. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995;25:355-364.
49.
49. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaaskp L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegia patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med1975;7:13-31.
50.
50. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991;39:142-149.
51.
51. Kusoffsky A, Wadell I, Nilsson BY. The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med1982;14:27-32.
52.
52. Mahoney FD, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation of the hemiplegic patient: a clinical evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1954;35:359-362.
53.
53. Granger CV, Greer DS, Liset E, Coulombe J, O’Brien E. Measurement of outcomes of care for stroke patients. Stroke1975;6:34-41.
54.
54. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979;60:14-17.
55.
55. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1980;61:355-358.
56.
56. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can1989;41:304.
57.
57. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Pub Health1992;83(Suppl 2):57-61.
58.
58. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med1995;27:27-36.
59.
59. Wood-Dauphinee S, Berg K, Bravo G, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: responding to clinically meaningful changes. Can J Rehabil1996;10:35-50.
60.
60. Boivin D, Laurendeau D. A computer vision based apparatus for the measurement of planar movement: an application in physiotherapy. Proc Vision Interface Conf1989:1-15.
61.
61. Moffet H, Comeau F, Richards CL, Tardif D. A new gait analysis system using a binary image processor: intra and inter-rater reliability of kinetic and kinematic measurements. Proc 6th Biennial Conf Can Soc Biomechan; 1990;179-180.
62.
62. Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behaviour after stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2000;10:407-415.
63.
63. Richards CL, Dumas F, Malouin F. Hip and ankle strategies during walking after stroke. Proc Soc Neurosci2001;831.6.
64.
64. Olney SJ, Nymark JR, Zee B. Computer-assisted feedback and gait re-education in stroke patients. Can J Rehabil1993;7:31-33.
65.
65. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke1998;29:1122-1128.
66.
66. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet1999;354:191-196.
67.
67. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Olney SJ, Nadeau S, Brouwer B. Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999;80:1211-1218.
68.
68. Kim CM, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL, Dawson AS. Effects of isokinetic strength training on walking in persons with stroke: a double-blind controlled pilot study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2001;10:265-273.
69.
69. Andrews AW, Bohannon RW. Distribution of muscle strength impairments following stroke. Clin Rehabil2000;14:79-87.
70.
70. Engardt M, Knutsson E, Jonsson M, Sternhag M. Dynamic muscle strength training in stroke patients: effects on knee extension torque, EMG activity and motor function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995;76:419-425.
71.
71. Sharp SA, Brouwer BJ. Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: effects on function and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997;78:1231-1236.
72.
72. Byl N, Roderick J, Mohamed O, et al. Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2003;17:176-191.
