Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals. Many patients have good functional recovery after stroke. The mechanisms of recovery remain largely unknown. Neuroimaging of patients recovering from stroke may provide important insight into the mechanisms of recovery as well as assist in the development of new rehabilitation techniques. The first part of this article reviews previous neuroimaging studies that have monitored the reorganization within the motor and language areas after stroke. In the second section, a unifying theory based on John Hughlings Jackson's “Principles of Compensation” is presented as a possible theory for recovery of function. In the final portion of the article, possible implications and future applications of neuroimaging studies for rehabilitation are presented.
BuchelC. Functional neuroimaging studies of Braille reading: Cross-modal reorganization and its implications. Brain 998; 121(pt 7):1193–4.
2.
SterrAMullerMMElbertT. Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature1998; 391: 134–5.
3.
SadatoNPascual-LeoneAGrafmanJ. Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind. Brain1998; 121(pt 7):1213–29.
4.
ElbertTPantevCWienbruchC.. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science1995; 270: 305–7.
5.
KaasJH. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci1991; 14: 137–67.
6.
WeillerCIsenseeCRijntjesM. Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: A positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol1995; 37: 723–32.
7.
WeillerCRamsaySCWiseRJ. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol1993; 33: 181–9.
8.
WeillerCJuptnerMFellowsS. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage1996; 4: 105–10.
9.
SeitzRJHuangYKnorrU. Large-scale plasticity of the human motor cortex. Neuroreport1995; 6: 742–4.
10.
HeissWDGrafR. The ischemic penumbra. Curr Opin Neurol1994; 7: 11–9.
11.
SiesjoBK. Pathophysiology and treatment of focal cerebral ischemia. Part II: Mechanisms of damage and treatment. J Neurosurg1992; 77: 337–54.
12.
SiesjoBK. The ionic basis of neurocytotoxic damage. Clin Neuropharmocol1992; 15(suppl 1pt A): 128A–9A.
13.
PulsinelliW. Pathophysiology of acute ischemic stroke. Lancet1992; 339: 533–6.
14.
DuncanPWGoldsteinLBMatcharD. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke1992; 23: 1084–9.
SmallSSolodkinA. The neurobiology of stroke rehabilitation. Neuroscientist1998; 4: 426–4.
17.
BoeckerHKleinschmidtARequardtM. Functional co-operativity of human cortical motor areas during self-paced simple finger movements: A high-resolution MRI study. Brain1994; 117(pt 6):1231–9.
18.
KimSGAsheJHendrichK. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: Hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science1993; 261: 615–7.
19.
RaoSMBinderJRBandettiniPA. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements. Neurology1993; 43: 2311–8.
van GelderenPRamseyNFLiuG. Three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1995; 92: 6906–10.
22.
CramerSCNellesGBensonRR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparctic stroke. Stroke1997; 28: 2518–7.
23.
CholletFDiPieroVWiseRJ. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol1991; 29: 63–71.
24.
CholletFWeillerC. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol1994; 4: 226–30.
25.
WeillerCCholletFFristonKJ. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol1992; 31: 463–72.
26.
WeillerC. Imaging recovery from stroke. Exp Brain Res1998; 123: 13–7.
27.
SabatiniUToniDPantanoP. Motor recovery after early brain damage: A case of brain plasticity. Stroke1994; 25: 514–7.
28.
CaoYVikingstadEMHuttenlocherPR. Functional magneti resonance studies of the reorganization of the human hand sensorimotor area after unilateral brain injury in the perinatal period. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1994; 91: 9612–6.
29.
CohenLGBrasil-NetoJPPascual-LeoneA. Plasticity of cortical motor output organization following deafferentation, cerebral lesions, and skill acquisition. In: DevinskyOBericADogaliM, eds. Electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain and spinal cord. New York: Raven Press, 1993: 187–200.
30.
WiesendangerM. The pyramidal tract: Its structure and function. In: TowALLucheiES, eds. Motor coordination: Handbook of behavioural neurobiology 5. New York: Plenum, 1981: 401–91.
31.
YorkGKSteinbergDA. Hughlings Jackson's theory of recovery. Neurology1995; 45: 834–8.
32.
Nyberg-HansenRRinivikE. Some comments on the pyramidal tract, with special reference to its individual variations in man. Acta Neurol Scand1963; 39: 1–30.
33.
GleesPColeJ. Ipsilateral representation in the cerebral cortext: Its significance in relation to motor function. Lancet1952; 1: 1191–2.
34.
NathanPWSmithMC. Effects of two unilateral cordotomies on the motility of the lower limbs. Brain1973; 96: 471–94.
35.
TanjiJOkanoKSatoKC. Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. J Neurophysiol1988, 60: 325–43.
36.
GhoshSPorterR. Morphology of pyramidal neurones in monkey motor cortex and the synaptic actions of their intracortical axon collaterals. J Physiol (Lond)1988; 400: 593–615.
37.
FriesWDanekAScheidtmannK. Motor recovery following capsular stroke: Role of descending pathways from multiple motor areas. Brain1993; 116(pt 2):369–2.
38.
NudoRJMillikenGWJenkinsWM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci1996; 16: 785–807.
39.
CramerSCMooreCIFinklesteinSP. A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke2000; 31: 668–71.
40.
MiyaIYasudaTSuzukiT. Docs functional MRI predict functional recovery from severe stroke. Proc Am Acad Neurol2000; 54: A42.
41.
SanesJNDonoghueJPThangarajV. Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. Science1995; 268: 1775–7.
42.
CramerSCNellesGSchaechterJD. Computerized measurement of motor performance after stroke. Stroke1997; 28: 2162–8.
43.
ThulbornKRCarpenterPAJustMA. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke1999; 30: 749–54.
44.
BinderJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: Language mapping. Neurosurg Clin North Am1997; 8: 383–92.
45.
GazzanigaMS. Organization of the human brain. Science1989; 245: 947–52.
46.
GainottiG. The riddle of the right hemisphere's contribution to the recovery of language. Eur J Disord Commun1993; 28: 227–46.
47.
DelisaJAMikulicMAMelnickRR. Stroke rehabilitation: Part II. Recovery and complications. Am Fam Physician1982; 26: 143–51.
48.
DelisaJAMillerRMMelnickRR. Stroke rehabilitation: Part I. Cognitive deficits and prediction of outcome. Am Fam Physician1982; 26: 207–14.
49.
FreedMMWainapelSF. Predictors of stroke outcome. Am Fam Physician1983; 28: 119–23.
50.
KnopmanDSRubensABSeinesOA. Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: Evidence from serial xenon 133 cerebral blood flow studies. Ann Neurol1984; 15: 530–5.
51.
DemeurisseGCaponA. Language recovery in aphasic stroke patients: Clinical, CT, and CBF studies. Aphasiology1987; 1: 307–15.
52.
FrithCDFristonKLiddlePF. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: A study with PET. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci1991; 244: 241–6.
53.
FrackowiakRSJFristonKJFrithCD. The cerebral basis of functional recovery: Human brain function. London: Academic Press, 1997.
54.
HeissWDKesslerJKarbeH. Cerebral glucose metabolism as a predictor of recovery from aphasia in ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol1993; 50: 958–64.
55.
HeissWDThielAGrondM. Contribution of immediate and delayed ischaemic damage to the volume of final infarcts [Letter]. Lancet1999; 353: 1677–8.
56.
OhyamaMSendaMTerashiA. A follow up of PET activation study in aphasia due to cerebral infarction evaluates functional reorganization. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab1995; 15(Suppl 1): S697.
57.
PriceCJWiseRJWatsonJD. Brain activity during reading: The effects of exposure duration and task. Brain1994; 117(pt 6):1255–69.
58.
NaeserMAPalumboCL. Neuroimaging and language recovery in stroke. J Clin Neurophysiol1994; 11: 150–74.
59.
NaeserMABakerEHPalumboCL. Lesion site patterns in severe, nonverbal aphasia to predict outcome with a computer-assisted treatment program. Arch Neurol1998; 55: 1438–48.
60.
MimuraMKatoMSanoY. Prospective and retrospective studies of recovery in aphasia: Changes in cerebral blood flow and language functions. Brain1998; 121(pt ll):2083–94.
61.
HeissWDKesslerJThielA. Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia [see comments]. Ann Neurol1999; 45: 430–8.
62.
FurlanMMarchalGViaderF. Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Ann Neurol1996; 40: 216–26.
63.
LauterJL. The handshaking model of brain function: Notes toward a theory. Med Hypothese1999; 52: 435–45.
64.
RieseW. The sources of Hughlings Jackson's view on aphasia. Brain1965; 88: 811–22.
WarburtonEPriceCJSwinburnK. Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: Evidence from positron emission tomography studies [see comments]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999; 66: 155–61.
67.
SeinesOA. Recovery from aphasia: Activating the “right” hemisphere [Editorial; comment]. Ann Neurol1999; 45: 419–20.
68.
SeinesOAGoldsboroughMABorowiczLMJr. Determinants of cognitive change after coronary artery bypass surgery: A multifactorial problem. Ann Thorac Surg1999; 67: 1669–76.
69.
FristonKJZarahnEJosephsO. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage1999; 10: 607–19.
AguirreGKZarahnED'EspositoM. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage1998; 8: 360–9.
72.
SarterMBerntsonGGCacioppoJT. Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience. Toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. Am Psychol1996; 51: 13–21.
73.
VazquezALNollDC. Nonlinear aspects of the BOLD response in functional MRI. Neuroimage1998; 7: 108–18.
74.
RossiniPMCaltagironeCCastriota-ScanderbegA. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: A study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport1998; 9: 2141–6.
75.
RossiniPMTecchioFPizzellaV. On the reorganization of sensory hand areas after mono-hemispheric lesion: A functional (MEG)/anatomical (MRI) integrative study. Brain Res1998; 782: 153–66.
76.
PreulMCFeindelWDagiTF. Arthur Roland Elvidge (1899–1985): Contributions to the diagnosis of brain tumors and cerebrovascular diseaseJ Neurosurg1998; 88: 162–71.
77.
NellesGSpiekermannGJueptnerM. Reorganization of sensory and motor systems in hemiplegic stroke patients: A positron emission tomography study. Stroke1999; 30: 1510–6.
78.
FrackowiakRSWeillerCCholletF. The functional anatomy of recovery from brain injury. Ciba Found Symp1991; 163: 235–44.
79.
DobkinBH. Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcome. Arch Neurol1989; 46: 701–3.
80.
LindKA. Synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitation. J Chron Dis1982; 35: 133–49.
81.
WagenaarRCMeyerOG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation, I: A critical review of the literature. J Rehabil Sci1991; 4: 61–73.
82.
WagenaarRCMeyerOG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation, II: A critical review of the literature. J Rehobil Sci1991; 4: 97–109.
83.
KwakkelGWagenaarRCKollenBJ. Predicting disability in stroke: A critical review of the literature. Aging1996; 25: 479–89.
84.
KwakkelGWagenaarRCKoelmanTW. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: A research synthesis. Stroke1997; 28: 1550–6.
85.
KozlowskiDAJamesDCSchallertT. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci1996; 16: 4776–86.
86.
LiepertJMiltnerWHBauderH. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett1998; 250: 5–8.
87.
LiepertJTerborgCWeillerC. Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot movements. Exp Brain Res1999; 125: 435–9.
88.
RobinsonRGShoemakerWJ. Effect of experimental cerebral infarction in rat brain on catecholamines and behavior. Nature1975; 255: 332–4.
89.
FeeneyDMGonzalezALawWA. Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science1982; 217: 855–7.
90.
SmallSL. Pharmacotherapy of aphasia: A critical review. Stroke1994; 25: 1282–9.
91.
BelinPVan EeckhoutPZilboviciusM. Recovery from non-fluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: A PET study. Neurology1996; 47: 1504–11.
92.
MussoMWeillerCKiebelS. Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain1999; 122(pt 9):1781–90.
93.
WarburtonL. Management of stroke: A practical guide for the prevention, evaluation and treatment of acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999; 66: 696A.
