Mine action is essential for long-term peacebuilding and post-conflict reconstruction. Using new data, this article explores the nexus between mine action and peace processes, providing an analysis of trends in the inclusion of mine action provisions in peace agreements. Initial findings indicate that the inclusion of mine action provisions within peace agreements have remained relatively stable at 9.6% over 26 years. This is the case, regardless of efforts by United Nations agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in promoting the inclusion of mine action in ceasefire and peace agreements. Thus, the inclusion of mine action in peace agreements appears determined by the perceived pragmatic needs required to be addressed by conflict parties. Nonetheless, around the ratification period of the 1997 Ottawa Treaty, there was a small peak in the percentage of agreements that referenced mine action. Other trends indicate that mine action is more prevalent in interstate rather than intra-state peace agreements, that NGOs have begun to take a greater role in the negotiation of mine action–specific agreements, and that there is a greater diffusion of mine action awareness to local-level peace agreements.
BellC.O’RourkeC. (2010). Peace agreements or pieces of paper? The impact on UNSC resolution 1325 on peace processes and their agreements. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59, 941–980.
3.
BerheA. A. (2007). The contribution of landmines to land degradation. Land Degradation & Development, 18, 1–15.
4.
BoltonM. (2010). Foreign aid and landmine clearance: Governance, politics and security in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Sudan, international library of post-war reconstruction and development. London, England: I.B. Tauris.
5.
BottomleyR. (2003). Balancing risk: Village de-mining in Cambodia. Third World Quarterly, 24, 823–837.
6.
BradburyM.RyleJ.MedleyM.Sansculotte-GreenidgeK. (2006). Local peace processes in Sudan: A baseline study. London, England: Rift Valley Institute.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
8.
BrydenA. (2005). Optimising mine action policies and practice. In BrydenA.HänggiH. (Eds.), Security governance in post-conflict peacebuilding (pp. 159–184). Münster, Germany: LIT Verlag.
9.
ChapmanJ. (2010). The political economy of landmines: View from a minefield in North-Western Cambodia. Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 67–74.
10.
DavidsonJ.SaidR. (2017). Islamic State defeated in its Syrian capital Raqqa. Canary Wharf, England: Reuters.
11.
EnglishJ. (2013). The Ottawa Convention on Anti-Personnel Landmines. In CooperA. F.HeineJ.ThakurR. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (pp. 797–807), Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
Fabra-MataJ.WilhelmsenA.BellC.ChernickM.LeeuwF.AndersenM. S. (2018). A trusted facilitator: An evaluation of Norwegian engagement in the peace process between the Colombian Government and FARC, 2010–2016(Evaluation Department Rep. No. 10). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
13.
GhaliB. B. (1994). The land mine crisis: A humanitarian disaster. Foreign Affairs, 73, 8–13. doi:10.2307/20046826
14.
Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. (2014). A guide to mine action. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
15.
HarpvikenK. B.SkåraB.A. (2003). Humanitarian mine action and peacebuilding: Exploring the relationship. Third World Quarterly, 24, 809–822.
16.
HartzellC. A.HoddieM. (2007). Crafting peace: Power-sharing institutions and the negotiated settlement of Civil Wars. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
17.
HaugeW. I. (2004). In support of peacemaking: Demining Sri Lanka’s Highway A9. In HarpvikenK. B.RobertsR. (Eds.), Preparing the ground for peace: Mine action in support of peacebuilding (pp. 25–38). Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute.
18.
HtunN. (2004). Landmines prolong conflicts and impede socioeconomic development. In MatthewR. A.McDonaldB.RutherfordK. R. (Eds.), Landmines and human security: International politics and War’s hidden legacy, SUNY Series in global politics (pp. 169–178). Albany: State University of New York Press.
JaramilloL. M. (2017). Making Colombia safe again: Demining mountain communities. London, England and Brussels, Belgium: EU Instrument Contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) and Peace Direct. Retrieved fromhttps://icspmap.eu/assets/photos/4fc49594a23a934ba7e86b30d6e16ba3.pdf
21.
KocseR. (2015). Final detonation: How customary international law can trigger the end of landmines. The Georgetown Law Journal, 103, 749–796.
22.
KreutzJ. (2010). How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47, 243–250.
23.
LeBrunE.DammanS. (2009). Addressing explosive ordinance in peace processes (Briefing Paper No. 2), negotiating disarmament. Geneva, Switzerland: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.
24.
Legal Tools Project at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law. (2016). Language of peace [WWW Document]. Retrieved fromwww.languageofpeace.org
25.
MansfieldI. (2015). Humanitarian mine action in Afghanistan: A history. The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, 19, 42–47.
26.
MathurR. (2012). Practices of legalization in arms control and disarmament: The ICRC, CCW and landmines. Contemporary Security Policy, 33, 413–436.
27.
Moser-PuangsuwanY. (2009). Mine actions obligations in ceasefires and peace accords: A survey of past implementation. Independently Published.
28.
RizerA. (2013). Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan: Is it time for the United States to sign the Ottawa Treaty and end the use of Landmines?Willamette Law Review, 49, 35–76.
29.
RobertsR.FrilanderM. (2004). Preparing for peace: Mine action’s investment in the future of Sudan. In HarpvikenK. B.RobertsR. (Eds.), Preparing the ground for peace: Mine action in support of peacebuilding (pp. 5–24). Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute.
United States Agency for International Development. (2011). People-to-people peacebuilding: A program guide. Washington, DC: USAID Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation.
36.
UnruhJ. D. (2012). The interaction between landmine clearance and land rights in Angola: A volatile outcome of non-integrated peacebuilding. Habitat International, 36, 117–125.
37.
ZellerM.MaspoliG. (2016). Mine action and peace mediation. Geneva, Switzerland: Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining and Swiss Peace.
