From participation to provision: How civil society secures procedural rights through peace negotiations

Abstract

Civil society inclusion in peace processes has many positive externalities, but does inclusion lead to improved rights for civil society actors themselves? We theorize how civil society actors leverage peace processes to secure state commitments to an improved advocacy environment after conflict. Using new data on civil society participation in peace negotiations (1990–2020), we show that participation significantly increases the likelihood of a provision formalizing these actors’ procedural rights in the resulting peace agreement. This relationship is conditional on relatively low pre-agreement repression of civil society, suggesting a minimal threshold of freedoms for effective advocacy during negotiations. Civil society actors in conflict settings may allocate scarce advocacy resources to secure procedural protections of their post-conflict survival, not only principled outcomes. Our findings suggest a possible mechanism allowing civil society to influence longer-term policy outcomes after conflict.

Keywords

civil society human rights NGOs peace processes peace agreements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aall

(1996) NGOs and conflict management. United States Institute of Peace, Peaceworks Report No. 5. Available at: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/pwks5.pdf (accessed 19 November 2023).

Anderlini

(2007) Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why it Matters. Boulder. CO: Lynne Rienner.

Anderson

(2016) Windows of Opportunity: How Women Seize Peace Negotiations for Political Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arnault

(2014) Legitimacy and peace processes: International norms and local realities. Conciliation Resources ACCORD Issue 25, “Legitimacy and peace processes: From coercion to consent.” Available at: https://bit.ly/3WCJdop (accessed 20 May 2023).

Bakke

Mitchell

Smidt

(2020) When states crack down on human rights defenders. International Studies Quarterly 64(1): 85–96.

Bell

Badanjak

(2019) Introducing PA-X: A new peace agreement database and dataset. Journal of Peace Research 56(3): 452–466.

Bell

Badanjak

Beaujouan

, et al. (2021) PA-X Peace Agreements Database and Dataset, Version 5. Available at: www.peaceagreements.org.

Bell

Keenan

(2004) Human rights nongovernmental organizations and the problems of transition. Human Rights Quarterly 26(2): 330–374.

Bell

Bhasin

Clay

, et al. (2014) Taking the fight to them: Neighborhood human rights organizations and domestic protest. British Journal of Political Science 44(4): 853–875.

10.

Bell

Kitagawa

(2023) Human rights organizations and transitional justice agenda-setting: Evidence from peace agreement provisions. Conflict Management and Peace Science 40(1): 65–87.

11.

Berkovitch

Gordon

(2008) The political economy of transnational regimes: The case of human rights. International Studies Quarterly 52(4): 881–904.

12.

Brambor

Clark

Golder

(2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.

13.

Chaudhry

(2022) The assault on civil society: Explaining state crackdown on NGOs. International Organization 76(3): 549–590.

14.

Cooley

Ron

(2002) The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security 27(1): 5–39.

15.

Coppedge

Gerring

Knutsen

, et al. (2021) V-Dem Dataset 2021. Available at: https://www.v-dem.net/dsarchive.html.

16.

Druckman

Wagner

(2019) Justice matters: Peace negotiations, stable agreements, and durable peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63(2): 287–316.

17.

Dupuy

Ron

Prakash

(2016) Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development 84: 299–311.

18.

Elfversson

Nilsson

(2022) The pursuit of inclusion: Conditions for civil society inclusion in peace processes in communal conflicts in Kenya. Cooperation and Conflict 57(2): 171–190.

19.

Ellerby

(2013) (En)gendered security? The complexities of women’s inclusion in peace processes. International Interactions 39(4): 435–460.

20.

Eschmann

Nilsson

(2023) Better together? Civil society coordination during peace negotiations. Cooperation and Conflict 58(1): 42–60.

21.

Fafchamps

Owens

(2009) The determinants of funding to Ugandan nongovernmental organizations. The World Bank Economic Review 23(2): 295–321.

22.

Fariss

(2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review 108(2): 297–318.

23.

Finnemore

Sikkink

(1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.

24.

Fleshman

(2003) African women struggle for a seat at the peace table. African Renewal, February. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/february-2003/african-women-struggle-seat-peace-table.

25.

Fortna

(2003) Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace. International Organization 57(2): 337–372.

26.

Gleditsch

Wallensteen

Eriksson

, et al. (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39(5): 615–637.

27.

Gourevitch

Lake

Gross Stein

(2012) The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue is not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Hellmüller

(2020) Meaning-making in peace-making: The inclusion norm at the interplay between the United Nations and civil society in the Syrian peace process. Swiss Political Science Review 26(4): 407–428.

29.

Hughes

Tripp

(2015) Civil war and trajectories of change in women’s political representation in Africa, 1985–2010. Social Forces 93(4): 1513–1540.

30.

Jarstad

Nilsson

(2008) From words to deeds: The implementation of power-sharing pacts in peace accords. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25(3): 206–223.

31.

Joshi

Quinn

(2017) Implementing the peace: The aggregate implementation of comprehensive peace agreements and peace duration after intrastate armed conflict. British Journal of Political Science 47(4): 869–892.

32.

Keck

Sikkink

(1999) Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51: 89–101.

33.

Krause

Bränfors

(2018) Women’s participation in peace negotiations and the durability of peace. International Interactions 44(6): 985–1016.

34.

Lian

Murdie

(2023) How closing civil society space affects NGO-government interactions. Journal of Human Rights 22(4): 431–450.

35.

Linzer

Staton

(2015) A global measure of judicial independence, 1948–2012. Journal of Law and Courts 3(2): 223–256.

36.

Marshall

Gurr

(2020) Polity5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at: https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html.

37.

Meernik

Aloisi

Sowell

, et al. (2012) The impact of human rights organizations on naming and shaming campaigns. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(2): 233–256.

38.

Menkhaus

Sheikh

Quinn

, et al. (2010) Somalia: Civil society in a collapsed state. In: Paffenholz

(ed) Civil Society and Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment. Boulder. CO: Lynne Rienner, 321–350.

39.

Meyer

Sangar

Michaels

(2018) How do non-governmental organizations influence media coverage of conflict? The case of the Syrian conflict, 2011–2014. Media, War & Conflict 11(1): 149–171.

40.

Mitchell

Schmitz

(2014) Principled instrumentalism: A theory of transnational NGO behaviour. Review of International Studies 40(3): 487–504.

41.

Moolakkattu

(2005) Peace facilitation by small states: Norway in Sri Lanka. Cooperation and Conflict 40(4): 385–402.

42.

Murdie

(2014) Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

43.

Murdie

Bhasin

(2011) Aiding and abetting: Human rights INGOs and domestic protest. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(2): 163–191.

44.

Murdie

Davis

(2012) Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 1–16.

45.

Nilsson

(2012) Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace. International Interactions 38(2): 243–266.

46.

Nilsson

Svensson

(2023) Pushing the doors open: Nonviolent action and inclusion in peace negotiations. Journal of Peace Research 60(1): 58–72.

47.

Nilsson

(2018) Civil society actors in peace negotiations in Central America. Journal of Civil Society 14(2): 135–152.

48.

Paffenholz

(2014) Civil society and peace negotiations: Beyond the inclusion–exclusion dichotomy. Negotiation Journal 30(1): 69–91.

49.

Reid

(2021) Peace agreements and women’s political rights following civil war. Journal of Peace Research 58(6): 1224–1238.

50.

Shair-Rosenfield

Wood

(2017) Governing well after war: How improving female representation prolongs post-conflict peace. The Journal of Politics 79(3): 995–1009.

51.

Simmons

(2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Smidt

Perera

Mitchell

, et al. (2021) Silencing their critics: How government restrictions against civil society affect international ‘naming and shaming’. British Journal of Political Science 51(3): 1270–1291.

53.

Smith

Plummer

Hughes

(2017) Transnational social movements and changing organizational fields in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Global Networks 17(1): 3–22.

54.

Smith

Wiest

(2005) The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces 84(2): 621–652.

55.

Smith

Wiest

Hughes

, et al. (2019) Transnational Social Movement Organizations Dataset (TSMOD), 1953–2013. Available at: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/NRUBSV.

56.

Staton

Linzer

Reenock

, et al. (2019) Update, a global measure of judicial independence, 1900–2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NFXWUO.

57.

Sudan Taskforce on the Engagement of Women (2017) Sudan Taskforce on the Engagement of Women Recommendations. January. Available at: https://inclsvescurity.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Sudan-Taskforce-Recommendations-2017.pdf (accessed 7 November 2022).

58.

Tallberg

Dellmuth

Agné

, et al. (2018) NGO influence in international organizations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science 48(1): 213–238.

59.

Tomz

Wittenberg

King

(2003) CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software 8: 1–30.

60.

United Nations (2020a) United Nations community engagement guidelines on peacebuilding and sustaining peace. August. Available at: https://bit.ly/3AiHqLJ (accessed 7 November 2022).

61.

United Nations (2020b) United Nations guidance note: Protection and promotion of civic space. Available at: https://bit.ly/3FVKpNv (accessed 7 November 2022).

62.

United Nations Development Fund for Women (2005) Securing the peace: Guiding the international community towards women’s effective participation throughout peace processes. October. Available at: https://bit.ly/3u1fk7o (accessed 6 November 2023).

63.

Walter

(1997) The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization 51(3): 335–364.

64.

Wanis-St. John

Kew

(2008) Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiation 13(1): 11–36.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.05 MB

0.00 MB

6.97 MB