Stress-Induced Neurodegeneration: The Potential for Coping as Neuroprotective Therapy

Abstract

Stress responses are essential for survival, but become detrimental to health and cognition with chronic activation. Chronic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis release of glucocorticoids induces hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction and neuronal loss, decreases learning and memory, and modifies glucocorticoid receptor/mineralocorticoid receptor expression. Elderly who report increased stress are nearly 3 times more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease, have decreased global cognition and faster cognitive decline than those reporting no stress. Patients with mild cognitive impairment are more sensitive to stress compared to healthy elderly and those with Alzheimer’s disease. Stress may also transduce neurodegeneration via the gut microbiome. Coping styles determine hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptor expression in mice, indicating that coping modifies cortisol’s effect on the brain. Identifying neuroprotective coping strategies that lessen the burden of stress may prevent or slow cognitive decline. Treatments and education designed to reduce stress should be recognized as neuroprotective.

Significance Statement

Normal brain structure and cognitive functioning are compromised by stress which results in increased AD pathology. Choosing appropriate coping mechanisms towards stress may lessen its impact on our health and cognition, possibly preventing disease initiation or progression. This manuscript verifies previous research with novel concepts.

Introduction

Stress plays an integral role in disease, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). ^1,2 Over five million Americans suffer from AD, with an expected increase to 7.7 million by 2030. ³ Exposure to acute or chronic stress affects learning and memory function. Chronic stress accelerates aging, increases inflammation, cortisol, and catecholamines, ^4,5 and induces changes in the gut microbiome. ⁶ In healthy male Wistar rats, maternal separation stress increases Amyloid Beta (Aβ)₄₀ and Aβ₄₂ levels, β secretase enzyme (BACE) 1, hyperphosphorylation of tau, and decreases hippocampal cell survival and proliferation. ⁷ Cell death mediated by tau requires tau hyperphosphorylation and determines Aβ-induced cell death. ⁸ Nineteen stress-responsive genes involved in neuroinflammation and accompanying tau pathology have been identified in rats. ⁹ Chronic stress-induced hippocampal and cortical neuronal atrophy and associated cognitive deficits are not seen in tau knock-out mice compared to controls. ^10,11

The gut-brain axis influences neural development, cognition, and behavior ¹² with chronic stress reducing the gut microbiome’s diversity and richness in mice. ^{13 -15} Germ free (GF) mice have a substantially higher response to restraint stress compared to pathogen free mice with a normal microbiome and mice raised with a selected microbiome. This effect is in part corrected by reconstitution of the microbiome, but only when corrected at an early age. ¹⁶ Changes in microbiome components influences amyloid deposition in mice with AD. ^17,18 Microbiome alterations increase gut permeability, possibly promoting translocation of pathogens through the epithelial lining. This triggers an immunological response inducing proinflammatory cytokine production causing neuroinflammation. ¹⁹ Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a microbiome derived metabolite, was recently found in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of MCI and AD individuals in significantly higher concentrations respectively compared to the unimpaired. Increased TMAO in CSF associates with AD pathology and neuronal degeneration. ²⁰ Stress increases circulating TMAO and choline, a precursor to TMAO, in the blood of healthy mice ²¹ and healthy humans. ²² Stress exposure results in varied systemic effects on the body, inducing neurodegeneration and dysfunction in addition to AD pathogenesis. ^{1,2,4 -6,13 -15}

Chronically elevated glucocorticoid levels cause hippocampal neuronal loss and cognitive impairment in rats, ²³ non-human primates, ²⁴ and humans. ²⁵ Hippocampal volume negatively correlates with plasma cortisol levels in humans. ^25,26 Chronic exposure to cortisol is neurotoxic in humans. ²⁷ The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responds to stress by releasing glucocorticoids. ²⁸ Hypothalamic production of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulates the pituitary gland to secrete adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), activating adrenal glucocorticoid release. Neuroendocrine overstimulation or dysfunction, via this HPA axis, may contribute to AD development and neuronal loss. ²⁹ Stress-induced cortisol elevation is associated with increased Aβ-peptide production, hyperphosphorylation of tau in AD mouse models ^30,31 and healthy rats, ^{32 -34} and synapse loss in healthy rats. ³⁵

The HPA axis and autonomic nervous system are responsible for our adaptive stress response. ³⁶ The autonomic nervous system is comprised of the sympathetic pathway, responsible for “fight or flight.” and the parasympathetic pathway, responsible for “resting and digesting.” Each acts in concert maintaining homeostasis. Hypersympathetic stimulation, or too much stress is fatal. ³⁷ Yet, an adequate stress response is integral for survival, allowing us to adapt and respond to immediate threats. ³⁸ Stressful stimuli activate HPA axis production of glucocorticoids and other hormones, ²⁸ and initiate sympathetic stimulation with catecholamine production. ³⁹ During stress, attention is enhanced, cardiac and respiratory output accelerates, and catabolism increases. ⁴⁰ Allostasis is the appropriate stress level needed to actively maintain stability; awakening and rising from bed in the morning, or running from a predator. Allostatic overload is the detrimental wear and tear on the body from stress dysregulation. ³⁶ Primates experience more stress-related diseases than any other animal, likely from our increased intellect, social ties, and emotional complexities. ⁴¹ Fish, birds, and reptiles secrete the same stress hormones as primates, however, our stress is predominantly socially generated and ambiguous. Many stressors are psychological, ⁴² such as economic worry or social rejection (see Figure 1). In animal models, allosteric overload induces hippocampal and prefrontal atrophy and amygdala hypertrophy. ⁴³

Figure 1.

The response to stress in relation to allostasis or allostatic overload. The brain, our main controller of stress, regulates the autonomic nervous system, sympathetic nervous system, and neuroendocrine system. The status of these systems in conjunction with individual behaviors and differences determines the effect that stress has on health. (Adapted from. ⁴⁴ ).

In mammals, cortisol and corticosterone are the main glucocorticoids found in the brain, circulating at 100-1000-fold total the concentration of aldosterone. ⁴⁵ Cortisol, key in our stress response, is transduced by 2 ligand-dependent receptors ⁴⁶ : a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and a glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Both are found in the amygdala responsible for emotional processing, the prefrontal cortex responsible for executive function, and the hippocampus responsible for memory and learning; they are also involved in HPA axis feedback regulation. ^46,47 Glucocorticoids have a high-affinity for MR, nearing saturation at basal cortisol levels, whereas GRs activate with high cortisol levels. ⁴⁸ In the brain, GRs cortisol affinity is one tenth that of MR, and aldosterone’s GR affinity is approximately one tenth that of cortisol. ⁴⁵ MRs are important in initializing appraisal and choosing the most appropriate behavior to follow. GRs are responsible for memory storage and behavioral adaptations. ⁴⁹ Although these receptors result in differing effects, both act to regulate synaptic plasticity during stress. ⁴⁸ High circulating cortisol impairs spatial memory in aged rats ^50,51 implicating GR stimulation in age-related cognitive decline. Yet, no consistent associations exist between either receptor and declining cognition. ^{52 -54} Cortisol bound GR or MR instigates a conformational change with the receptor/ligand complex entering the nucleus and binding directly to DNA or physically interacting with other transcription factors regulating gene expression. ^{55 -57} The receptor/ligand complex also induces non-genomic affects mediated by membrane receptors. ⁵⁸

Over 80% of cortisol responsive genes are regulated by either GR or MR, or less commonly both. Activated MR or GR differentially influences calcium channel protein encoded mitochondrial RNA expression and calcium signaling. ⁵⁹ MR activation in CA1 hippocampal neurons elicits small, ion-gated calcium currents ⁶⁰ that significantly increase calcium output when GR is also activated, ⁶¹ suggesting that both receptors modulate calcium-dependent signal transduction. GR stimulation leads to oxidative damage as found in the mitochondrial DNA of aged brain models with high cortisol levels. ⁶² More research is needed to clarify the unique mechanisms involved in specific GR and MR gene transcription to better understand how a shift in the ratio of these chronically activated receptors allows cortisol’s role to switch from protective to harmful.

Self-Reported Stress Assessments

Elderly who report increased stress are 2.7 times more likely to develop AD than those who do not. ⁶³ In elderly, less stress correlates with better health, followed by social interaction, socioeconomic factors, marital status, and living situation; but age, sex, race, and employment show no relation. ⁶⁴ Education inversely relates to the frequency and severity of anxiety and stress in AD patients. ⁶⁵ Increased self-reported stress, per the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule (LEDS), correlates with dementia diagnosis, but not cortisol levels. ^66,67 Cortisol-awakening response (CAR) reflects peak cortisol after waking and inversely relates to progression from normal to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but has no relationship with self-reported stress. ⁶⁷ Higher perceived stress scale (PSS) scores correlate with lower global cognitive function and increased rates of cognitive decline in elderly. ⁶⁸ Young, healthy individuals with at least one major life difficulty have poorer memory than those without negative life events within the past year. ⁶⁹ Higher stress scores correlate with increased morning cortisol levels in amnestic MCI patients. ⁶³ Yet episodic memory performance is not predicted by self-reported negative life events in the elderly. ⁷⁰ These varied findings highlight our lack of understanding of how self-reported stress measures relate to cortisol levels and its effect on cognition in health and disease. MCI and AD patients may have difficulty assessing or recalling stress. ⁶⁵ A simple checklist assessing stress is imprecise given the multiple factors linking stress to HPA axis activation. ⁷¹

Cortisol as a Potential Biomarker of Stress

Numerous studies assessed cortisol levels as a biomarker for stress in normal controls, patients with MCI, and AD. Large variations exist in measuring healthy elderly basal cortisol levels. Results show cortisol levels steadily maintaining with age, ^72,73 subtly increasing, ^74,75 or lowering. ^76,77 Compared to controls, patients with MCI and AD can have higher salivary CAR levels, ⁷⁸ with a decreased daily cortisol ratio compared to their CAR, with higher evening cortisol levels. ⁷⁹ Alternatively, Wolf, et al. ⁸⁰ found no significant differences in cortisol levels between healthy elderly, MCI, or AD patients when measured at 6 different points throughout the day, including the CAR. Peavy and colleagues ⁶⁶ found an association between increased cortisol levels and a decreased rate of memory decline in individuals with MCI when followed for 3 years. This may reflect increased cortisol from vigilance and attention, compensating for memory loss. ^81,82 Additionally, a stressful effort may be put forth by those who know they are impaired, resulting in higher cortisol. A better understanding of cortisol’s regulation in individuals with MCI or AD who have HPA axis dysfunction could clarify previous cortisol measurement inconsistencies. These varied findings highlight the inter-individual cortisol measurement variability among the elderly. ⁴⁷ Additionally, timing and methodological differences in sampling cortisol may contribute to contradictory findings, such as location of sampling, time of day of sampling, and salivary versus plasma sampling.

The variability of results using cortisol levels could be explained by existing hippocampal damage in MCI and AD that affects cortisol’s impact on hippocampal function and memory. Arbel, et al. ⁸³ utilized year-old Fischer-344 rats to represent normal age-related cognitive impairment and 3-month-old rats to represent controls and further divided them randomly into cortisol pellet implanted and placebo groups. Cognitively unimpaired rats with sustained-release cortisol pellet implants had significantly poorer learning and memory performance than placebo matched animals. The young unimpaired and older impaired pellet treated animals showed no significant differences on the Morris Water Maze (MWM). ⁸³ Older rats with hippocampal loss may have poorer cortisol sensitivity compared to young unimpaired rats with intact hippocampi. Pellet treated young impaired and placebo treated old impaired groups show no behavioral differences in MWM attempts, suggesting that chronic cortisol exposure while young produces early cognitive decline. Histopathological analysis showed a 450% increase in damaged CA1 hippocampal cells in young pellet treated rats compared to baseline. Although present, treated old rats hippocampal cell damage was to a lesser degree, possibly from age-related hippocampal damage already being present at baseline measurements. ⁸³ Thus, cognitive vulnerability to cortisol appears to be regulated by the magnitude of cortisol-induced hippocampal damage, with increased damage resulting in decreased cortisol sensitivity. Hippocampal cell loss in MCI could impair the efficient negative feedback system for the HPA axis, resulting in hypercortisolemia. This would further impair neuronal functioning and contribute to continued neurodegeneration, ⁸⁴ but only to a certain extent, since too much stress-related hippocampal damage induces varied and decreased MR/GR ratio expression, ⁸⁵ lessening the individual’s stress sensitivity in more progressed AD cases. In AD patients, dexamethasone administration, suppressing cortisol release, results in decreased suppression of cortisol compared to healthy elderly individuals, indicating impaired HPA axis regulation. ⁸⁶ In very young mice that overexpress amyloid precursor protein (APP), elevated cortisol appears to be from APP overexpression rather than amyloid plaque deposition and hippocampal neurodegeneration, given that the plaques and neurodegeneration are absent at this early age. ⁸⁷ Additionally, oligomeric, soluble Aβ, not precipitated amyloid plaques, are toxic inducing neurodegeneration. ^88,89 A hyperactive HPA axis may reflect a more advanced disease state with hypercortisolemia due to HPA axis dysfunction continuing to contribute to, and potentially accelerate, cognitive decline. Individuals with below normal cortisol levels may be at greater risk for MCI or AD since both too little and too much cortisol results in deleterious health effects. ⁹⁰

Mental illness is associated with hyper- and hyposecretion of glucocorticoids, ⁹¹ which may also contribute to the high instance of anxiety ⁹² and depression ^92,93 in AD. The prefrontal cortex and hippocampus are involved in HPA axis inhibition, with the amygdala activating it. ^46,94 Since both glucocorticoid receptors are found in these regions and help to regulate the HPA axis, ^46,47 future studies should assess if stress-induced GR or MR expression influences mental disorder initiation. Melancholic patients have a glucocorticoid feedback resistance, ⁹⁵ whereas post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients have a decreased continual stress responses ⁹⁶ with lower basal corticosteroid levels ⁹⁷ indicating HPA axis dysfunction. Insult to these HPA axis regulatory regions, by allosteric overload, may induce behavioral dysfunction in AD patients further impairing their ability to properly regulate cortisol.

Corticotropin releasing-hormone (CRH) may be a better biomarker than cortisol for stress. Like cortisol, CRH is also regulated based on neuroendocrine stress responses and its receptors are expressed in numerous brain regions, including the hippocampus. CRH neurons activate sympathetic stimulation ^98,99 and further regulate adrenal production of catecholamines. ¹⁰⁰ CRH elicits stress-associated behavioral responses and sympathetic stimulation, like anxiety, and decreased appetite. ¹⁰¹ Although CRH is a more general mediator of stress adaptation than cortisol, it adversely impacts hippocampal structures in response to stress ^102,103 similar to cortisol. Early-life stress increases the number of hippocampal neurons expressing CRH. ¹⁰⁴ CRH mutant animals display reduced tau and Aβ related pathologies, ^105,106 and mutations in the main CRH receptor (Crfr1) reduced stress-induced hyperphosphorylation of tau and Aβ deposition. ¹⁰² CRH neurons can also be activated by Aβ, ⁸⁷ further increasing toxic Aβ release. ¹⁰⁷ Although neurotoxic at high concentrations, modest hippocampal release of CRH is essential for long-term potentiation (LTP) priming. ¹⁰⁸ Blocking CRH signaling abolishes stress-induced hippocampal spine density reductions and resultant memory defects in stressed mice. ¹⁰⁹ This suggests that, like cortisol, CRH increases contribute to neurodegeneration. Glucocorticoids, like cortisol, are less involved than CRH in HPA axis control and cognitive health since healthy adrenalectomized Sprague-Dawley rats show no difference in tau phosphorylation compared to controls, ¹¹⁰ supporting CRH as the protein kinase inducer. Furthermore, stress-induced increases in phosphorylated tau is lower in mice deficient in CRH than controls, suggesting a critical role for CRH in AD pathogenesis. ¹⁰⁵ Variability in measuring glucocorticoids is problematic, ¹¹¹ underscoring the difficulty in using cortisol as a direct representation of stress. Therefore, alternative markers of stress should be validated.

Assessing the Effects of Stress on Cognitive Performance

In AD mouse models, stress accelerates cognitive loss. ^31,112,113 Stress in healthy elderly people results in decreased word recall. ¹¹⁴ MCI patient’s cortisol levels negatively correlate with immediate memory and learning. ¹¹⁵ No correlation between cognitive scores and cortisol was found in AD, ^115,116 suggesting an association between cognitive decline and increased cortisol in healthy elderly individuals and MCI, but not full blown AD. MCI individuals are most sensitive cognitively to glucocorticoids compared to those with AD and the healthy elderly, with sensitivity declining with disease progression. ¹¹⁵ A decrease in MR/GR in MCI, perhaps resultant of hippocampal atrophy, may affect cortisol sensitivity. ¹¹⁷ Initial hippocampal loss of glucocorticoid receptors in MCI could result in impaired cortisol transduction, whereas healthy individuals with similar cortisol concentrations maintain the beneficial to detrimental threshold of cortisol signal transduction. As the disease progresses, continued hippocampal loss of MR/GR receptors substantially diminishes cortisol’s effect on cognition.

Cognitive performance varies depending on the memory process being analyzed. Consolidation is the encoding of new information from short to long-term memory. ¹¹⁸ Memory retrieval refers to accessing already consolidated traces. ^{119 -121} A rise in glucocorticoids enhances consolidation and impairs it with exogenous administration of the cortisol synthesis inhibitor, metyrapone. ¹²² Based on binding affinity, low glucocorticoid levels result in high occupation of the more sensitive MRs but low occupation of GRs, enhancing consolidation. When the ratio is reversed, retrieval is impaired. ^123,124 A “fight or flight” experience is seldom forgotten, but during it, little else is recalled ^{119 -121} (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Stress-induced glucocorticoid levels correlate with changing MR and GR occupancy ratios. Diagonal lines and horizontal lines indicate relative bound MR or GR, respectively. * indicates when consolidation is improved. # indicates when retrieval is impaired. (Adapted from. ¹²⁴ ).

Stress downregulates both MR and GR expression in an uneven distribution, with some local MR upregulations. ¹²⁵ In rats, stress differentially downregulates MR and GR expression, ^85,126 which is also mirrored in primates. ¹²⁷ Differing degrees of downregulated MR and GR alter the MR/GR ratio, ⁸⁵ indicating a pathological process rather than tachyphlaxis from cortisol saturation. Given that GR saturation is linked to age-related cognitive decline, its downregulation could play a neuroprotective role with chronically elevated cortisol levels.

Mice with a global GR deletion rapidly die postnatally from impaired lung function, preventing the endocrine effects from being analyzed ¹²⁸ and indicating that some GR activity is required for development and survival. GR is overexpressed in GRov mice, resulting in a prolonged stress response, decreased mRNA levels of glutamate signaling genes,¹²⁹ reduced excitatory transmission, ¹³⁰ and long-term memory impairment. ^129,130 Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism is effective in enhancing cognition. In middle aged mice chronic GR antagonism, by mifepristone, abolishes the electrophysiological disturbances seen in aged control hippocampi, ¹³¹ but in aged rats, chronic stress-induced morphological changes of pyramidal neurons were not reversed after stress recovery. ¹³² This suggests that aged animals can’t reverse all negative effects of glucocorticoids. 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11β-HSD) are pre-receptor regulators working to modify our cortisol response, with 11β-HSD1 activating cortisol and 11β-HSD2 inactivating cortisol. ⁴⁵ Aged mice, with a 11β-HSD type 1 knockout (11β-HSD1^-/-) preventing conversion of cortisone to active cortisol, given a GR antagonist during stress show no significant reductions in spatial memory ⁴⁸ ; likely resultant of insufficient cortisol levels occupying GR initially. 11β-HSD1 deficient young mice increased GR expression to increase cellular responsiveness in a low cortisol environment, an effect not seen in aged 11β-HSD1^-/- mice ¹³³ suggesting reduced plasticity of GR with aging. In 11β-HSD1^-/- mice given a MR antagonist, like spironolactone, spatial memory is impaired ^134,135 due to below threshold cortisol levels occupying fewer MR. Although cortisol stimulates both hippocampal MR and GR few genes are responsive to both receptors ⁵⁹ supporting separate transduction pathways for the MR and GR cascades. These combined findings suggest that increasing MR activation and decreasing GR activation, by managing cortisol levels or using GR antagonists, may amend memory deficits. Unfortunately, the chronic use of a GR antagonist in humans induces generalized glucocorticoid resistance with hypercortisolemia, ¹³⁶ indicating possible impaired HPA axis regulation, as GRs play a role in shutting the axis off through negative feedback. ¹³⁷ A more selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor, aimed at reducing cortisol levels in the aged brain, restoring the receptor activation balance back to MR from GR, is needed. Cognitive function improved in healthy elderly men using a selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor, without increasing HPA axis activation. ¹³⁸ Alternatively, short-term intermittent GR antagonist treatments may prove effective.

Difficulties in Assessing Stress

Individual differences in our stress responses depend on how we perceive a situation and the quality of our health when we encounter stress. ¹³⁹ Stress responses can be modified by many variables: growth factors, bacterial ligands, cytokines, opioids, and adipokines—all modulate glucocorticoid release independent of pituitary ACTH. ¹⁴⁰ Michaud, et al. ¹⁴¹ asserts that cortisol/stress associations may depend mainly on the types of stressors and stress management mechanisms. In healthy young mice, early stress caused increased BACE and Aβ levels that persisted for the life of the animal. ¹⁴² Thus, stress not only has immediate effects but the specific type or the age at which stress occurs has long-lasting effects. Stressed non-human primate adults downregulate hippocampal GR expression and prefrontal cortical MR expression, whereas early life stress downregulates only prefrontal cortical GR expression. ¹²⁷ The testing environment where cognitive assessments are given will also produce varied results. Older adults have a heightened test environment sensitivity compared to younger adults. ¹⁴³ When the assessment directions are modified, decreasing emphasis on memory, the elderly performed comparable to the young adults. ^143,144 Perhaps assessing the aging population’s cognitive capacities is stressful, stemming from the fear of underlying dementia.

Individualized Modifiable Covariates

When assessing stress and its severity, humans, unlike other animals, have more behavioral complexity and flexibility in our social support and our utilization of art and music as stress reducers. ⁴¹ We all experience some stress in our lifetime. How we manage and cope with stress will determine the magnitude it effects our health. Coping is the ever changing behavioral and cognitive effort used to manage stress. ¹⁴⁵ Prior to coping, primary and secondary appraisals occur. Primary appraisal assesses what, if anything, is at stake in the specific encounter. Secondary appraisal evaluates what, if anything, could be done to overcome, prevent, or improve the outcome. After appraising 2 types of coping can be utilized: 1) regulating stressful emotions and 2) altering the person(s) or environment causing the stress; referred to as emotion-based coping and problem-focused coping respectively. ¹⁴⁶ Successful coping is associated with decreased adrenocortical stress responses. Coping unsuccessfully relates to feelings of helplessness or hopelessness, further increasing cortisol levels in a vicious cycle. ¹⁴⁷

Mild to moderate AD patients use a range of coping strategies, with problem-focused coping being the most frequent. Effort put forth by the patient was the leading coping skill observed, such as self-prompting or looking up the answer themselves, followed by attempts to obtain caregiver help. ¹⁴⁸ More impaired patients sought more caregiver help indicating that coping with AD may be assessed as a relational experience, especially with continued progression. ¹⁴⁹ Involving a loved one for support protected patients from emotional detachment. ¹⁵⁰ Coping by isolation or denial may increase stress, highlighting the importance of a support system for newly diagnosed individuals. Avoidance, concealment, minimization, self-blame, and vagueness have also been implemented by individuals with AD. ^151,152 Denial and other defense mechanisms in coping with stress induces increased adrenocortical activity in AD. ¹⁵³ However, these strategies may minimize ones difficulties, maintaining self-esteem, which can lessen stress. ¹⁵²

In healthy individuals following an acute stressor reduced autobiographical memory is a cognitive avoidant coping mechanism, reducing the memory linked with a stressor, preventing the re-experience of associated negative emotions. As cognitive-avoidant coping increases, memory detail decreases from pre to post stressor. ¹⁵⁴ Although healthy individuals use this avoidance strategy in a flexible way, ^155,156 more research is needed to assess its use in individuals with an altered cognition. Assessing whether cognitive avoidant coping lessens the chronic effects of stress by preventing the re-experience of stressful events should be analyzed.

Changes in ways of coping may indicate further cognitive decline. In amnestic MCI patients, increased self-reports of stress and cortisol levels correlated with higher emotion-based coping, rather than problem-focused coping. ⁶³ In AD patients, those with higher Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores used problem-focused coping more frequently than emotion-based. In the lesser impaired, executive functioning remains intact, allowing for problem-focused coping. Decreased cognition compromises executive function, resulting in difficulty selecting strategies to control the stressor. An adaptive shift to control emotions may induce fear and emotional fatigue compared to elderly controls. ⁶⁵ Thus, with worsening cognition a shift from problem-focused to emotion-based coping occurs as an increasing number of problems becomes harder to negotiate.

Individual differences in rodent aggression reflect valuable coping strategies to stress. Aggressive male mice with short attack latencies (SAL) manipulate situations, removing themselves or the source of stress, whereas non-aggressive mice with long attack latencies (LAL) reduce their emotional impact by reacting with immobility or withdrawal. LAL mice with a nonaggressive opponent passively cope, whereas SAL mice actively cope. ^{157 -160} When chronically exposed to an inescapable stressor, LAL mice suffer chronic decreased body weights with elevated corticosterone concentrations compared to SAL mice. Stress reduces hippocampal MR mRNA and the MR/GR ratio in LAL mice, but not in SAL mice. ¹⁶¹ Thus, active coping may be neuroprotective. It’s unknown if increased GR expression in stressed LAL mice changes over time with stress removal. If a healthy coping mechanism can accommodate cognitive decline, patients may be taught to reduce their stress sensitivity. Coping with stress in relation to aging and dementia has yet to be explored along with assessing the caregiver-patient relationship, and their coping strategies. Although coping greatly affects our stress management, personality characteristics do as well. Calmer, more mature, and more energetic teenagers were less likely to be diagnosed with dementia later in life compared to their peers. ¹⁶² Neurotic individuals experience more stressful events ^163,164 and are predisposed to experience distress and negative emotions, regardless of stress level. ¹⁶⁴

Providing MCI and AD patients and families with resources will lessen the stress of living with a neurodegenerative disease. When we believe we are capable of managing a negative event, we are less likely to regard it as threatening or stressful. ¹⁴⁵ MCI or AD families benefit from services like home health care, educational materials, and caregiver support. ¹⁶⁵ Without such resources the uncertainty of their condition could induce additional stress hastening cognitive decline.

Possible AD Treatments Aimed at Regulating Stress

Current AD treatments using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have side effects and a limited window of efficacy in mild to moderate AD. ¹⁶⁶ Lifestyle adaptations reducing or better managing stress may prove protective against neurodegeneration. Memory training including stress management improves activities of daily living (ADL), but not memory performance, for community retirement residents. ¹⁶⁷ Pharmacological therapies, selectively lowering stress hormone levels, have been tested on animals in hopes of their use in humans with neurodegenerative diseases. A Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 (CRFR1) antagonist reduced amyloid pathology and increased synaptic and cognitive function in AD-Tg mice, ¹⁶⁸ however, in humans, elevated liver enzymes induced study termination. ¹⁰⁹ High throughput screening assays have recently been developed to pursue new CRFR1 antagonists. ¹⁶⁸

Cortisol availability and action depends on tissue-specific intracellular metabolism by 11β-HSDs ¹⁶⁹ that catalyze intracellular regeneration of corticosterone and cortisol. Stress suppresses hippocampal LTP ¹⁷⁰ and is prevented by the administration of the 11β-HSD1 inhibitor UE2316. ¹⁷¹ The low hippocampal corticosterone environment maintains even with a hyperactive HPA axis and high circulating cortisol levels. ¹⁷² Although reduced glucocorticoid regeneration in the brain improves cognition, preventing memory decline in an AD mouse model (Tg2576), chronic treatments with UE2316 didn’t prevent Aβ plaque formation; Thus, 11β-HSD1 inhibitors have a potential as a cognitive enhancer in AD. ¹⁷³

A homeostatically stable microbiome appears to be neuroprotective. Six GR receptor pathways are upregulated in germ free mice compared to only 2 being upregulated in specific pathogen free mice treated with E. coli lipopolysaccharide treatment. ¹⁷⁴ Gut dysbiosis inducing gut microbiome alterations may be ameliorated by probiotics, given that they attenuate stress, enhance memory and reduce anxiety-like behavior. ^175,176 Probiotics improve hippocampal dependent spatial memory and synaptic plasticity in rats administered with Aβ injections. ¹⁷⁷ In rats, the probiotic strain Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 amended stress-induced gut alterations, completely restoring gut paracellular permeability compared to Bifidobacterium lactis NCC362 and Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533, emphasizing the importance of specific strains. ¹⁷⁸ Balanced diets high in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids normalize stress-induced microbiome alterations ¹⁷⁹ and resultant memory deficits in mice. ¹⁸⁰ Further research is needed to elucidate the role of the microbiome on cognition in healthy and AD affected individuals and how its modification may correct or prevent AD pathogenesis in mice. Although some positive trends have emerged from natural therapies for AD the underlying mechanisms behind some nootropics modes of action remain unclear. Clinical trials with larger sample sizes and long term efficacy tested with longitudinal studies are needed.

Summary

The brain, our stress response controller and interpreter, suffers physical and functional damage from stress. ^{2,85,117,125 -127} Damage depends on the age we experience stress, ¹²⁷ whether chronic or acute, and how we cope with it. This damage can persist throughout life. ¹⁸¹ Stress accelerates aging, cognitive decline, and neurodegenerative disease. ^4,5 Individuals with MCI, compared to healthy controls and AD, have the highest risk of stress-related cognitive decline, ¹¹⁵ likely due to the changing glucocorticoid sensitivity induced by hippocampal atrophy. Stress and glucocorticoids alter GR/MR expression, ^{85,125 -127} but so can differing coping styles. ¹⁶¹ Coping style affects stress-induced hippocampal changes in mice, ¹⁶¹ however, it is currently unknown if coping affects cognition, and if certain styles of coping could prevent or slow progression of cognitive decline in humans. Investigating whether stress-induced changes in the brain can be reversed with beneficial coping mechanisms needs further study.