Identity Matching in a Patient With Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Difficulties with short-term memory are one of the main problems in patients with dementia. Therefore, one purpose of this study was to examine the effects of simultaneous vs delayed presentation of comparison stimuli in a matching-to-sample (MTS) task using computerized training. By using an identity MTS procedure, the participant was trained to select a comparison stimulus identical to a sample stimulus. A 2nd purpose was to study the effect of the number of choices presented, thereby evaluating short-term memory deficits and possible deterioration of deficits over time. In this study, an 80-year-old-male with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 10 was exposed to 4 experimental conditions. The results showed that using 3 comparison stimuli presented simultaneously with the sample stimulus on the screen resulted in more incorrect responding than when using 2 comparison stimuli. Furthermore, when adding a 0-second delay between the presentation of the sample stimulus and the 2 comparison stimuli, the number of correct responses did not exceed chance level.

Keywords

dementia short-term memory identity MTS delayed MTS

References

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM IV. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.

Katzman R. Alzheimer’s disease. N Eng J Med. 1986 ;314(15):964-973.

Shulman K. , Feinstein A. Quick Cognitive Screening for Clinicians. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2003.

Folstein ME , Folstein SE , McHugh PR ‘‘Mini-mental state’’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198.

Tombaugh TN , McIntyre NJ The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. Am Geriat Soc. 1992;40(9):922-935.

Palmer DC A behavioral interpretation of memory. In: Hayes LJ , Chase PN , eds. Dialogues on Verbal Behavior. Reno, Nevada: Context Press; 1991:261-279.

Blough DS Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959;2(2):151-160.

Arntzen E. Delayed matching to sample and stimulus equivalence: probability of responding in accord with equivalence as a function of different delays. Psychol Rec. 2006;56(1):135-167.

Arntzen E. , Galaen T. , Halvorsen LR Different retention intervals in delayed matching-to-sample: effects of responding in accord with equivalence. Eur J Behav Anal. 2007;8(2):177-191.

10.

Gallagher SM , Keenan M. Stimulus equivalence and the MMSE in the elderly . Eur J Behav Anal. FAL 2009;10(2):159-165.

11.

Sidman M. Two choices are not enough. Behav Anal. 1987 ;22:11-18.

12.

Fowler KS , Saling MM , Conway EL , Semple JM , Louis WJ Computerized delayed matching to sample and paired associate perfornance in the early detection of dementia. Appl Neuropsychol. 1995;2(2):72-78.

13.

Fowler KS , Saling MM , Conway EL , Semple JM , Louis WJ Computerized neuropsychological tests in the early detection of dementia: prospective findings. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997;3(2):139-146.

14.

Arntzen E. Probability of equivalence formation: familiar stimuli and training sequence . Psychol Rec. 2004;54(2):275-291.

15.

Arntzen E. , Lian T. Trained and derived relations with pictures as nodes. Psychol Rec. 2010;60(4):659-677.

16.

Sidman M. , Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982;37(1):5-22.