This article reports on the measurement properties of Caregiver Vigilance, a four-item caregiver self-report of perceived oversight demand for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders family caregiving. The self-report uses data from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) project, a multisite National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored study of over 1,200 family caregivers. Results indicate that the items were clearly understood by the racially/ethnically diverse respondents; and, when responses were transformed into a summary scale and analyzed, unidimensionality was evident and internal consistency reliability favorably demonstrated. We suggest using the Caregiver Vigilance Scale in conjunction with traditional burden measures to systematically include the caregiving time associated with protectively watching over care recipients and the daily duration of this responsibility. We also highlight the practical utility of selected items for potential use in the caregiver assessment process.
General Accounting Office (GAO): Alzheimer's disease: Estimates of prevalence in the United States (GAO/HEHS-98-16). United States General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services Division, Washington, DC, 1998.
2.
Ory MG, Hoffman RR 3rd, Yee JL, et al.: Prevalence and impact of caregiving: a detailed comparison between dementia and nondementia caregivers. Gerontologist. 1999; 39(2): 177-185.
3.
Schulz R, Beach S: Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects study. JAMA. 1999; 282(23): 2215-2219.
4.
Schulz R, O'Brien AT, Bookwala J, et al.: Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: Prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist. 1995; 35: 771-791.
5.
Montgomery R, Gonyea J, Hooyman N: Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Fam Relat. 1985; 43: 19-25.
6.
Lawton MP, Kleban MH, Moss M, et al.: Measuring caregiving appraisal. J Gerontol. 1989; 44(3): P61-P71.
7.
Novak M, Guest C: Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. Gerontologist. 1989; 29: 798-803.
8.
Vitaliano P, Russo J, Young H, et al.: The screen for caregiver burden. Gerontologist. 1991; 31: 76-81.
9.
Zarit S, Reever K, Bach-Peterson J: Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980; 26: 260-266.
10.
John R, McMillian B: Exploring caregiver burden among Mexican Americans: Cultural prescriptions, family dilemmas. J Aging Ethnicity. 1998; 1: 93-111.
11.
Hinton L, Levkoff S: Constructing Alzheimer's: Narratives of lost identities, confusion and loneliness in old age. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1999; 23(4): 453-475.
12.
Haley WE, Han B, Henderson JN: Aging and ethnicity: Issues for clinical practice. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1988; 5: 393-409.
13.
Gallagher-Thompson D, Arean P, Coon D, et al.: Development and implementation of intervention strategies for culturally diverse caregivingpopulations. In R Schulz et al. (eds.), Handbook on Dementia Caregiving:Evidence-based Interventions for Family Caregivers. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2000: 151-185.
14.
Yeo G: Background. In G Yeo and D Gallagher-Thompson (eds.), Ethnicity and the Dementias. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996: 3-7.
15.
Mahoney DF: A content analysis of an Alzheimer family caregivers virtual focus group. Am J Alzheimer's Dis Other Demen. 1998; 13(6): 309-316.
16.
Mahoney DF: Vigilance: Evolution and definition for Alzheimer and related disorders caregiving. J Gerontological Nurs. 2003; Scheduled for Jan 2003.
17.
Coon DW, Schulz R, Ory M: Innovative intervention approaches for Alzheimer's disease caregivers. In D Biegel and A Blum (eds.), Innovations in Practice and Service Delivery Across the Lifespan. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999: 295-325.
18.
Nichols L, Martindale-Adams J, Burns R, et al.: A Social Marketing Approach to Recruitment: The Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) study. (Under review.)
19.
Tarlow B, Mahoney DF: The cost of recruiting Alzheimer's disease caregivers for research. J Aging Health. 2000; 12(4): 519-539.
20.
Lawton M, Brody E: Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186.
21.
Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, et al.: Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963; 185: 914-919.
22.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res.1975; 12: 189-198.
23.
Krause N: Negative interaction and satisfaction with social support among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.1995; 50(2): 59-73.
24.
Teri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, et al.: Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychol Aging. 1992; 7: 622-631.
25.
Wisniewski SR, Belle SH, Coon DW, et al.: The Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) project design and baseline characteristics. (Under review.)
26.
STATA Corporation: STATA. College Station, Texas, 1997.
27.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
28.
Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 22: 293-296.
29.
Bowling A: Research Methods in Health. Philadelphia: Open Press, 2000.
30.
McCall W: How to Measure in Education. New York: McMillan. 1922.
