Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer has the highest mortality rate of all major cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of about 10%. Early warning signs and symptoms of pancreatic cancer are vague or nonexistent, and most patients are diagnosed in Stage IV, when surgery is not an option for about 80%–85% of patients. For patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer, current conventional treatment modalities such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) have suboptimal efficacy. Tumor progression is closely associated with the tumor microenvironment, which includes peripheral blood vessels, bone marrow-derived inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, immune cells, signaling molecules, and extracellular matrix. Tumor cells affect the microenvironment by releasing extracellular signaling molecules, inducing peripheral immune tolerance, and promoting tumor angiogenesis. In turn, the immune cells of the tumor affect the survival and proliferation of cancer cells. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are key cellular components in the tumor microenvironment and exert immunosuppressive functions by producing cytokines, recognizing other immune cells, and promoting tumor growth and metastasis. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are the main regulator of the tumor immune response and a key target for tumor treatments. Since the combination of RT and immunotherapy is the main strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, it is very important to understand the immune mechanisms which lead to MDSCs generation and the failure of current therapies in order to develop new target-based therapies. This review summarizes the research advances on the role of Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the progression of pancreatic cancer and its treatment application in recent years.

Keywords

pancreatic cancer myeloid-derived suppressor cells immunotherapy radiotherapy tumor microenvironment

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world,¹ though its incidence rate and mortality rate are increasing. It is predicted that by 2030, pancreatic cancer will be the second most common of all cancers.² Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies with extremely poor prognosis and few successful treatment schemes.³ The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of pancreatic cancer patients is abysmal at less than 5%.⁴ Surgical resection is the only curable method for localized pancreatic cancer, but because of the lack of early symptoms and aggressive property of pancreatic cancer, fewer than 20% of tumors can be removed at the time of diagnosis.^5,6 Most patients relapse after operation, even though conventional adjuvant therapy is systematically applied.⁷ Neoadjuvant therapy improves the operative rate, but even in patients with local and resectable tumors, the 5-year OS rate is only about 27%.⁸

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) comprise a heterogeneous population of bone marrow cells having an immunosuppressive phenotype and serving as a key component of the immunosuppressive niche in cancer. The presence of MDSCs in cancer patients is associated with poor survival and tumor recurrence. MDSCs can significantly inhibit the T cell response and regulate the fate of multiple cells in the innate immune system. MDSCs-mediated immunosuppression is mainly due to the up regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase 1 (Arg1), and the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Recently, a variety of inhibitory mechanisms of MDSCs have been identified, including antigen presentation to Tregs and secretion of cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β.⁹ In fact, MDSCs play a central role in controlling and maintaining an inhibitory tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors.¹⁰ Increasing evidence supports that the number of circulating and intratumor MDSCs is related to cancer stage, progression, and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT).¹¹ Therefore, understanding the biological characteristics of MDSCs is an essential step to improve antitumor immunity. Here, we will review the important biological aspects of MDSCs, including their characteristics, development, activation, expansion, and inhibitory mechanisms that support cancer growth and progression. In addition, we will highlight important attempts to target or manipulate MDSCs biology to obtain treatment efficacy. Finally, we will discuss the latest trends and future directions of the studies on MDSCs to target pancreatic cancer.

Epidemiology and Current Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

The various causes of pancreatic cancer remain largely unknown, but several common risk factors have been found. Age is one of the most important risk factors, and most pancreatic cancer patients are over the age of 50.¹² Smokers are two to three times more likely to develop pancreatic cancer than non-smokers.¹³ Chronic pancreatitis, type 1 diabetes, and obesity are other notable risk factors.¹⁴ Only about 10% of pancreatic cancer patients have a positive family history.¹⁵ Most pancreatic cancers are a subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).¹⁶ Like other cancers, PDAC is generally believed to originate from precursor lesions known as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The lesion is formed by the initial mutation of Kras, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, RNF43, ARID1A, TGFβR2, GNAS, RREB1, PBRM1, and other genes.¹⁷ Kras wild-type tumors contain alterations in other oncogenic drivers including GNAS, BRAF, CTNNB1, and other RAS pathway genes.¹⁸ With the subsequent acquisition of additional mutations, the lesion becomes more and more dysplastic and invades through the basement membrane, leading to invasive PDAC.¹⁹

In the past 2 decades, the immune system has been shown to play a vital role in the development and progression of various types of cancers. Immune evasion is considered as a new sign of cancer.²⁰ To survive, tumor cells must be able to escape the immune destruction by innate and adaptive immune cells. Although inflammation usually promotes the clearance of bacteria and foreign debris, and contributes to the repair of damaged tissues, its role in tumor evasion is much more complex.²¹ In the early stages of cancer, the host immune system detects incompatible tumor cells and eliminates them through the action of natural killer cells and CD8⁺ T cells. However, as the cancer develops, this normal monitoring eventually becomes ineffective in curbing tumors.²² Therefore, enhancing the body's own humoral immunity or the positive role of cellular immune pathways to heighten the surveillance role of body immunity to achieve the goal of killing tumor cells is the focus of research on immunotherapy. Because of its potential as a targeted therapy, the mechanism of immunosuppression in the TME has become an important research topic.²³ Several therapeutic drugs have been explored with or without combination with the standard treatment of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5FU), oxaliplatin, nab-paclitaxel, or FOLFIRINOX, that have slightly lengthened the survival time of PDAC.^24,25 Although these therapies are commonly used for pancreatic cancer treatment, their efficacy may be hampered by cell resistance and interference resulting from the contradictory promotion of the immunosuppressive environment of the whole body and the TME.²⁶

Classification of MDSCs

Studies in the early 1900s revealed that cancer is often accompanied by extra-medullary hematopoiesis (EMH) and neutrophilia, these immature leukocytes are characterized by their suppressive activity and are called myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MSCs), this term was further changed to MDSCs.²⁷ MDSCs are an immature population of myeloid cells found mainly in patients and in mice with cancer, and they have also been found in non-human primates such as macaques.²⁸ GR-1 and CD11b are major markers for the typing of murine MDSCs, and GR-1, in turn, consists of a marker molecule representing macrophages (Ly6C) and a marker representing neutrophils (ly6G). Mouse MDSCs were divided into monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) subsets according to the above markers, with surface markers CD11b⁺ Ly6C^high Ly6G^low/−, and granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) /polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSCs) subsets, with surface markers CD11b⁺ ly6C^low/− ly6G⁺. Human MDSCs do not express GR-1 thus their classification characteristics are more complex, usually, the phenotype of MDSCs in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is CD33⁺, CD11b⁺, and HLA-DR ^low/−, and human MDSCs are classified as G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs based on the presence of CD15 and CD14 marker.²⁹ Another human MDSCs subpopulation is early MDSCs (e-MDSCs) that still do not acquire a granulocytic or monocytic phenotype, which is characterized phenotypically by (CD3, CD20, CD56) ⁻, CD33⁺, CD11b⁺, and HLA-DR⁻.^30,31 Additional markers of human MDSCs found by flow cytometry, such as CD16, CD38, and LOX-1, may provide a reference for subsequent typing.³² Several studies have shown that CD56, NKG2a, and NKp46 are important markers for differentiating human and macaque MDSCs, but in fact, the phenotype, function, and distribution of the two MDSCs are not so different.³⁰

All MDSCs subsets have the ability to suppress immune responses, but different subsets of MDSCs have different mechanisms of suppression. G-MDSCs suppress immune responses by producing arginase-1 (Arg-1), reactive oxygen species (ROS), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and peroxynitrite. M-MDSCs respond to growth factors by using regulatory molecules such as PD-L1, TGFβ, IL10, and generates nitric oxide (NO) to exert their immunosuppressive effects.^33,34

Multiple Cytokines Are Involved in Activating the Immunosuppressive Properties of MDSCs

Several different growth factors are involved in the tumor growth, but GM-CSF is the most known one. GM-CSF preferentially increases M-MDSCs.³⁵ GM-CSF is usually produced in response to infection to enhance the innate immune response, but studies have suggested that malignant pancreatic epithelial cells also produce a large amount of GM-CSF.³⁶ Influenced by the increase in GM-CSF, myeloid progenitor cells in bone marrow differentiate into MDSCs, migrate to systemic circulation, and aggregate in the spleen and tumor.³⁷ When antibodies were used to block the increase of GM-CSF, the number of GR1⁺ CD11b⁺ cells recruited by the tumor decreased and the tumor progression was impaired.³⁸ In addition, the latest research shows that this upregulation in mice depends on carcinogenic KrasG12D, which is significant because the Kras mutation is very common in human pancreatic cancer.³⁹ The use of gemcitabine and fluorouracil chemotherapy upregulates GM-CSF in the absence of aseptic inflammation and tumor cell death, which may contribute to the low response of pancreatic cancers to chemotherapy.⁴⁰ In renal cell carcinoma, chemotherapy decreases the number of MDSCs in the spleen but fails to decrease the number of MDSCs in the TME.⁴¹ Perhaps this differential reduction is due to the increased level of GM-CSF caused by chemotherapy itself.⁴² G-CSF is another factor that induces the proliferation of MDSCs, but this factor primarily increases the number of PMN-MDSCs, which are less immunosuppressive.⁴³

Other factors, such as IL-6, IL-1β, CXCL1, and VEGF-A, have also been shown to affect the proliferation of MDSCs in a variety of tumor types.⁴⁴ Studies^45,46 have shown that serum IL-6 can promote MDSCs proliferation and all subsets of MDSCs are associated with immunosuppression in pancreatic cancer patients, with M-MDSCs and G-MDSCs exhibiting immunosuppression mainly through increased expression of ARG-1, PD-L1, and ROS activity. IL-1β, a tumor-associated factor that leads to the proliferation and migration of MDSCs, is regulated by the IL-1 RI/NF-κB pathway, and studies have confirmed that increased serum IL-1β levels correlate with the frequencies of M-MDSCs and Tregs. IL-1β can trigger a transition from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to severe fibrosis, which in turn leads to liver cancer. In addition, IL-1β can also increase cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, which in turn activates tissue endothelial cells to produce vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors to induce endothelial cell proliferation and vascularization within tumor tissues.⁴⁷ Additionally, study of Wang et al.⁴⁸ confirmed that VEGF-A secreted by primary tumor cells stimulated CXCL1 production by tumor-associated macrophages, which recruited CXCR2 positive MDSCs to form a pre-metastatic niche to promote liver metastasis.

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a reversible cellular program that transiently places epithelial cells into quasi-mesenchymal cell states, EMT enables tumor cells to have greater invasion and metastasis potential and generates greater therapeutic resistance.⁴⁹ CCR4⁺ M-MDSCs increased EMT in pancreatic cancer patients by modulating the CCL2-CCR4 axis and then increasing the expression of mesenchymal transition markers N-Cadherin, Snail, and ZEB1.⁵⁰ Recent studies^51,52 have shown that MDSCs play a role in the induction of EMT and that they can promote the generation of cancer stem-like cells and do so by secreting TGFβ and activation of the COX2, EGF, and HGF pathways to promote cancer cell spread. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and their extracellular matrix (ECM) enhance immunosuppression by promoting angiogenesis, ECM remodeling, and secretion of tumor-promoting and immunosuppressive cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors such as EGF, HGF, CCL2, TGFβ1, and VEGF.⁵³ And in recent years there has been a study⁵⁴ showing that the CCL5-CCR5 axis is involved in MDSC recruitment and their immunosuppressive effects, and can promote tissue fibrosis. Collectively, the above cytokines may play a role in promoting fibrosis, EMT, and invasive immunosuppression by activating the immunosuppressive properties of MDSCs.^55,56

Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer

MDSCs mobilized into systemic circulation and spleen and are eventually absorbed into the TME.⁵⁷ MDSCs play critical roles in immunosuppression and tumor promotion in the TME through a variety of mechanisms: blocking lymphocyte homing, inducing immunosuppressive cells, producing reactive oxygen species and nitrogen, consuming metabolites vital to T cell function, expression of external enzymes regulating adenosine metabolism, and expression of negative immune checkpoint molecules.⁵⁸

Myeloid cells constitute the main body of the innate immune system, performing a plethora of functions ranging from engulfment to processing antigens and delivering antigens to more specialized immune cells.⁵⁹ Recent studies^60,61 suggest that crosstalk with MDSCs may play a role in the functional regulation of these cells, which in turn create a suppressive microenvironment that supports tumor growth. MDSCs may affect macrophage polarization, function, and activation status through crosstalk with macrophages. The crosstalk of MDSCs can promote the polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype by producing interleukin-10 (IL-10). Crosstalk with MDSCs may also lead to reduced expression of macrophage MHC II, which in turn reduces the antigen-presenting capacity of macrophages, further causing immunosuppression.^62,63 Crosstalk between MDSCs and dendritic cell (DC) also results in impaired antigen uptake, presentation, and migration by DC, which ultimately skews DC toward an anti-inflammatory component, leading to decreased interferonγ production by T cells.⁶⁴ The tumor-promoting activity of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) is closely associated with PMN-MDSCs, and crosstalk between them would polarize neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment toward an N2 type biased immunosuppressive effect.⁶⁵ At the same time, MDSCs can also interact with unconventional and innate type lymphoid lineage cells (eg, NK T cells, γδ T cells, and NK cells) crosstalk to exert immunosuppressive effects.^66,67 In PDAC patients, the number of MDSCs in the systemic circulation has been shown to be associated with the stage of the disease.⁶⁸ Pancreatic stellate cells secrete chemokines in vitro and induce peripheral blood myeloid cells to differentiate into MDSCs through a STAT3-dependent mechanism.⁶⁹ There is evidence that some of these factors depend on specific microRNAs to cause proliferation. In the myeloid cells surrounding pancreatic cancer, the level of miRNA-21 has been found to increase, whereas blocking miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 is related to a decrease in MDSCs levels.⁷⁰

The Significance of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy in Preclinical Studies

Several studies have demonstrated the role of MDSCs in masking the antineoplastic immune response in pancreatic cancer models. Our study shows that some factors such as interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), antibodies against the PDA-associated antigena-enolase-1 (ENO1), Src Homology-2 (SH2) domain-containing inositol 5’-phosphatase-1 (SHIP-1), and CXCR2 inhibition can exert positive antitumor effects by inhibiting MDSCs, and some factors such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), lactate, the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), STAT3, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can play a negative anti-tumor role. (The details of the studies are summarized in Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Preclinical Studies Defining the Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and/or Therapy Efficacy.

Mouse Models	Cells Lines	Therapeutic Agent	Targets	Findings	Ref.
Global IRF4-deficient mice, B6	T110299 tumor cells	—	—	IRF4 plays a role in the generation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer that is independent of IRF4 expression in PMN-MDSCs.	104
CD11b-DTR,iKras,iKrasP53,iKras;CD11b-DTR,iKras; p53;CD11b-DTR mice	Primary human(1319,UM2,UM5,UM18 and UM19) and primary mouse(iKras1,iKras2,iKra*3,65 671, 7940B) cell lines	—	KrasG12D,PD-L1	Myeloid cells support immune evasion of pancreatic cancer through EGFR/MAPK dependent regulation of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells	105
Female C57BL/6 mice，Hif-1αflox mice andPdx-1-Cre (KC) mice	LTPA or Panc-02 cells	GSK2837808Aand RT	(mTOR)/HIF-1α/STAT3 pathway	Lactate regulated immunosuppression of myeloid derived suppressor cells contributes to pancreatic cancer radioresistance	106
KCR,KC, RAGE-null, and C57BL/6- wild type mice	—	—	RAGE	RAGE ablation leads to accumulation of MDSCs	107
Female C57BL/6 and nude mice age 5–8 weeks	Mouse KPC pancreatic cancer cell lines FC1242 and PK5L1940 cells	STAT3 antisense- oligonucleotide and RT	STAT3	The response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to RT is enhanced by the suppression of myeloid derived suppressor cells using STAT3 antisense oligonucleotides	108
GCSFR − /−, NU/J and C57BL/6-WT mice	KCM,KCKO, Panc-1, BxPANCREATICCANCER3and Pan02 cell lines	—	STAT3	STAT3 signaling pathway in M-MDSCs in pancreatic cancer promotes stemness of CSCs.	109
NOD/SCID mice	HumanHs766t, and MIA PaCa-2 cell lines	Serp-1, neuroserpin, and M-T7	uPA	Serp-1 and neuroserpin treatment reduced pancreatic tumor growth by reducing MDSCs of spleen and tumor and infiltration of tumor macrophages	110
LSL-KrasG12D; Pdx-1/Cre (KC) and pdx-1/Cre (Cre) mice	Murine PDA cell line	Monoclonal antibody targeting ENO1	ENO1	Anti-ENO1 inhibited MDSCs invasion and induced sustained effector T cell function	111
C57BL/6 mice	Murine Panc02 cell line	Sildenafil	VEGF	Sildenafil treatment decreased MDSCs frequency and VEGF levels and increased the survival of tumor bearing female mice	112
C57BL/6 mice	Mice PAN02 cell lines	Phenylboronic acid modified nanoparticles simultaneously	P-selectin/ PSGL-1 pathway	PLT NPs effectively inhibited the recruitment of MDSCs in pancreatic cancer through the P-selectin/PSGL-1 pathway, thereby improving the body's immune function	113
KPANCREATIC CANCER Cxcr2 − /−and KPANCREATIC CANCER mice	-	CXCR2 inhibitor, gemcitabine, and anti-PD1 immunotherapy	CXCR2	CXCR2 inhibits metastasis, enhances chemo - and immunotherapeutic responses, and prolongs mouse survival	114
C57BL/6N mice	murine Panc02 adenocarcinoma cell lineandmurine UN-KC-6141 cell line	Apigenin	SHIP-1	Apigenin increases SHIP-1 expression and promotes T cell killing by macrophages and anti-T tumor immune responses in murine pancreatic cancer	115
NOD/SCID mice	PANC-1, CFPAC-1 and EL4 cell lines	Neutralizing antibodies against PAUF and TLR4, and inhibitor of the MAPK pathway	PAUF	PAUF regulated the functional activation of MDSCs through TLR4 and MAPK dependent pathways	116

The Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy in Clinical Studies

Multiple clinical studies have evaluated MDSCs in patients with PDAC and explored ways to target MDSCs with or without therapeutic agents, such as anti PD-1 (Novartis), anti-IL-1, chemotherapy, DS-82373a, splenectomy, Zoledronic Acid (ZA), gemcitabine, Epothilone A, Cabozantinib, and CDDO-Me in this population (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of Clinical Studies Defining the Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and/or Therapy Efficacy.

Therapeutic Agents	Findings	Ref.
anti PD-1 (Novartis)，anti-IL-1	IL1B expression or post-translational treatment leads to increased tumor infiltration of immunosuppressive macrophages and MDSCs.	117
Chemotherapy + Cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) immunotherapy	MDSCs-targeting chemotherapy improved the survival response of CIK immunotherapy	118
DS-82373a, an agonistic TRAIL-R2 antibody	DS-82373a selectively reduced the MDSCs subpopulation in the peripheral blood and tumor tissues of cancer patients including pancreatic cancer.	119
Chemotherapy	Analysis of MDSCs in peripheral blood may be a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy failure in pancreatic cancer patients.	120
Splenectomy	The spleen, a major site of PMN-MDSCs accumulation in pancreatic cancer, is an immunomodulatory role of the spleen in tumors, where neutrophils acquire MDSCs function and may interact with T cells.	121
Zoledronic Acid (ZA)	No differences were observed in the prevalence of G-MDSCs in the blood and bone marrow of PDAC patients treated (pre- and post) with ZA.	122
Gemcitabine, Epothilone A,Cabozantinib	MDSCs block anti-tumor CD8 + T cell immune responses in various cancers including pancreas.	123
CDDO-Me alone and CDDO-Me combination with gemcitabine	CDDO-Me abrogated the immune suppressive effects of MDSCs and improved immune response.	124
Gemcitabine + Capecitabine alone versus GV1001 vaccine with gemcitabine + capecitabine along with GM-CSF as adjuvant	Gemcitabine and capecitabine combination did not result in a consistent reduction in MDSCs levels. High levels of MDSCs pre-vaccination do not prevent the development of an immune response to tumor antigens.	125

Treatment of Targeted MDSCs

In the past, RT has been the front-line treatment for cancer patients. At present, about 60% of newly diagnosed cancer patients regard it as the first-line treatment.⁷¹ By exposing the tumor to different energy rays, RT can cause irreversible damage to the DNA of tumor cells, promote the release of tumor antigens, activate anti-tumor immune response, increase the production of cytokines, and inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells.⁷² RT can promote local and systemic antitumor immunity.⁷³ However, bone marrow-derived cells (including TAMs and MDSCs) in tumors often counteract with the immune responses.⁷⁴ Radiotherapy can have antitumor or tumor promoting effects, depending on the doses, grades, and tumors, through recruitment, removal, repolarization, and recombination, and using bone marrow-derived cells in tumors to induce antigen representation.⁷⁵ For MDSCs, cancer RT has two possible effects: either increase or decrease MDSCs function. On one hand, recruitment of bone marrow cells to the tumor because of RT is proposed to occur through the CSF1/CSFR signaling pathway.⁷⁶ The number of MDSCs and the level of macrophage colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) in the spleen, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood increase systematically after radiation exposure.⁷⁷ Further studies found that the sharp increase of CSF1 gene expression after RT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was through the recruitment of the DNA damage induced kinase ABL1 into the nucleus, where it binds to the CSF1 gene promoter to enhance its transcription.⁷⁸ Local RT increases the tumor infiltration of MDSCs through the CSF1/CSF1R signaling pathway. If the CSF1/CSF1R signaling pathway is blocked, tumor recurrence after local RT can be inhibited.⁷⁹ In addition, the STING-type I interferon pathway was also found to enhance inflammation and tumor inhibition.⁸⁰ Stimulation of NF-kappaB by radiation can upregulate COX2, induce the production of the immunosuppressive factor PGE2, and trigger the production of MDSCs.⁸¹

On the other hand, RT in combination with immunotherapy can effectively inhibit the function of MDSCs and promote the cytotoxic effect of CD8⁺ T cells in tumors.⁸² Targeting MDSCs to enhance antitumor immunity is known as ablative hypofractionated radiation therapy (AHFRT).⁸³ AHFRT is more effective in cancer treatment when combined with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.⁸⁴ One study found that the combination of stereotactic body RT (SBRT) and sunitinib (an oral, small molecule, multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor) can rapidly reduce the proportion of Treg and MDSCs.⁸⁵ In animal models of spontaneous breast cancer (TUBO tumor) and colon cancer (CT26 and MC38), anti-PD-L1 combined with RT can effectively decrease the accumulation of MDSCs, activate CD8 + T cells, and finally, inhibit the growth of tumors.^86,87 In addition, the local up-regulation of PD-L1/PD-1 axis after RT inhibits the radiation-induced immune response, thus limiting the expression of antitumor immunity and promoting recurrence. The combination of RT and PD-L1 blockers can optimize antitumor immunity, resulting in the elimination of MDSCs by enhancing the production of T cell-derived TNF.⁸⁸

The important roles in MDSCs in regulating tumor growth have stimulated the research on targeted therapy of these cells. MDSCs accumulation is closely associated with the clinical outcome of cancer patients,⁸⁹ and MDSCs are associated with drug resistance to antitumor therapies, including cisplatin, sunitinib, and other chemotherapeutic drugs in lung cancer, and doxorubicin and melphalan in multiple myeloma.^90,91 Recent studies have shown that MDSCs levels are related to patients’ response to CTLA4/ipilimumab and PD-1.⁹² MDSCs can be eliminated by chemotherapy with relatively low doses of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil.⁹³ Recent studies have shown that targeting the TRAIL receptor may be an effective and selective method to deplete MDSCs population.⁹⁴ The peptide body composed of S100A9 derived peptide and antibody Fc fragment shows the potential to eliminate MDSCs in a mouse model. MDSCs can be functionally inactivated by targeting its inhibitory mechanism.⁹⁵ Recent clinical reports have shown that patients with head and neck cancers and multiple myeloma when treated with the PDE-5 inhibitor tadalafil have fewer circulating MDSCs, lower expression of iNOS and arginase in these cells, and more spontaneously generated tumor-specific T cells.⁹⁶ Nrf2 is a transcription factor and it plays an important role in protecting cells from free radical damage. The synthesized triterpenoids reduce the production of ROS through MDSCs and inhibit the activity of ROS by up-regulating Nrf2.⁹⁷ Inhibition of COX-2 can down regulate the production of immunosuppressive prostaglandin E2, while nitroaspirin has been shown to down-regulate the production of NO.⁹⁸ The class I HDAC inhibitor entinostat has an inhibitory effect on MDSCs, but its mechanism is not clear.⁹⁹ All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) can target the expansion and differentiation of MDSCs. In patients with lung cancer that receive a short-term ATRA treatment, the immune response to the p53 vaccine is improved.^100,101 Inhibition of STAT3 can induce MDSCs to differentiate into immunogenic DC.¹⁰² A targeted antibody to phosphatidylserine (PS) can reduce the number of MDSCs in tumor-bearing mice, but its mechanism is not clear.¹⁰³

Conclusion

Preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that a variety of immune cells, cytokines/chemokines and signaling pathways play an important role in modulating the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs. MDSCs affect the progression, invasion, metastasis, and survival of pancreatic cancer patients. In human patients with pancreatic cancer and in mouse pancreatic tumor models, MDSCs inhibit the antitumor immune response of therapeutic drugs. MDSCs can be applied as a potential biomarker for evaluating tumor progression, defining the outcome of immunotherapy or chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. Targeting MDSCs could improve the efficacy of standard chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition, new interventions are aimed to understand the function of MDSCs and the exact mechanism(s) underlying their immunosuppressive activity, with the objective to provide a breakthrough for cancer treatment.

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

No.

Data Availability

The datasets presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethics Statement

The data need no ethic statement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tumor prevention and control Joint Fund of Shandong province natural science fund (ZR2019LZL008), Clinical Research Fund of Shandong Medical Association-Qilu Special Project (YXH2022ZX02199), Bethune-Cancer Radiotherapy Translational Medicine Research Fund (flzh202113), Shandong Province Medicine and Health Science and Technology Development Plan Project (202009031334), and Basic Scientific Research Foundation (1191320113 to Y.Z.H).

ORCID iDs

Peng Dong

Yu Yan

Yajuan Lv

Xinshuang Yu

References

Siegel

Miller

Fuchs

Jemal

. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan 2021;71(1):7‐33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654.

McGuigan

Kelly

Turkington

Jones

Coleman

McCain

. Pancreatic cancer: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21 2018;24(43):4846‐4861. doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846.

Torphy

Fujiwara

Schulick

. Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go. Surg Today. Oct 2020;50(10):1117‐1125. doi:10.1007/s00595-020-02028-0.

Zhu

. Pancreatic cancer: challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. Nov 22 2018;16(1):214. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1215-3.

Tempero

. NCCN guidelines updates: pancreatic cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. May 1 2019;17(5.5):603‐605. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.5007.

Zhang

Sanagapalli

Stoita

. Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. May 21 2018;24(19):2047‐2060. doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i19.2047.

Neoptolemos

Kleeff

Michl

Costello

Greenhalf

Palmer

. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jun 2018;15(6):333‐348. doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0005-x.

Versteijne

Vogel

Besselink

, et al. Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. Jul 2018;105(8):946‐958. doi:10.1002/bjs.10870.

Liu

Wei

Cheng

, et al. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Aug 2018;67(8):1181‐1195. doi:10.1007/s00262-018-2175-3.

10.

Hinshaw

Shevde

. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res. Sep 15 2019;79(18):4557‐4566. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962.

11.

Tian

Shen

Wang

. Tumor-derived exosomes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor microenvironment. J Hematol Oncol. Aug 22 2019;12(1):84. doi:10.1186/s13045-019-0772-z.

12.

Mizrahi

Surana

Valle

Shroff

. Pancreatic cancer. The Lancet. 2020;395(10242):2008‐2020. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30974-0.

13.

Lang

Kunovsky

Kala

Trna

. Risk factors of pancreatic cancer and their possible uses in diagnostics. Neoplasma. Mar 2021;68(2):227‐239. doi:10.4149/neo_2020_200706N699.

14.

Klein

. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jul 2021;18(7):493‐502. doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x.

15.

Ilic

. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28 2016;22(44):9694‐9705. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9694.

16.

Fan

Wang

Chen

Shang

Das

Song

. Current advances and outlooks in immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer. Feb 15 2020;19(1):32. doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01151-3.

17.

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network e13, Electronic address aadhe , Cancer Genome Atlas Research N . Integrated genomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. Aug 14 2017;32(2):185–203 e13x. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.007.

18.

Lanfredini

Thapa

O’Neill

. RAS in pancreatic cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. Aug 30 2019;47(4):961‐972. doi:10.1042/BST20170521.

19.

Palta

Godfrey

Goodman

, et al. Radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. PractRadiat Oncol. Sep - Oct 2019;9(5):322‐332. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.016.

20.

Leinwand

Miller

. Regulation and modulation of antitumor immunity in pancreatic cancer. Nat Immunol. Oct 2020;21(10):1152‐1159. doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0761-y.

21.

Padoan

Plebani

Basso

. Inflammation and pancreatic cancer: focus on metabolism, cytokines, and immunity. Int J Mol Sci. Feb 5 2019;20(3):676. doi:10.3390/ijms20030676.

22.

Schizas

Charalampakis

Kole

, et al. Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a 2020 update. Cancer Treat Rev. Jun 2020;86:102016. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102016

23.

Morrison

Byrne

Vonderheide

. Immunotherapy and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Trends Cancer. Jun 2018;4(6):418‐428. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2018.04.001.

24.

Springfeld

Jager

Buchler

, et al. Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Presse Med. Mar 2019;48(3 Pt 2):e159‐e174. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2019.02.025.

25.

Zeng

Pottler

Lan

Grutzmann

Pilarsky

Yang

. Chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Int J Mol Sci. Sep 11 2019;20(18):4504. doi:10.3390/ijms20184504.

26.

Pandey

Storz

. Targeting the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. Jun 2019;19(6):473‐482. doi:10.1080/14737140.2019.1622417.

27.

Talmadge

Gabrilovich

. History of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nat Rev Cancer. Oct 2013;13(10):739‐752. doi:10.1038/nrc3581.

28.

Zarobkiewicz

Kowalska

Chocholska

, et al. High M-MDSC percentage as a negative prognostic factor in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cancers. Sep 14 2020;12(9): 2614. doi:10.3390/cancers12092614.

29.

Sieminska

Baran

. Myeloid-Derived suppressor cells as key players and promising therapy targets in prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:862416. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.862416.

30.

Cassetta

Baekkevold

Brandau

, et al. Deciphering myeloid-derived suppressor cells: isolation and markers in humans, mice and non-human primates. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Apr 2019;68(4):687‐697. doi:10.1007/s00262-019-02302-2.

31.

Sharma

Aggarwal

Jacob

Sahni

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: bridging the gap between inflammation and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Scand J Immunol. May 2021;93(5):e13021. doi:10.1111/sji.13021.

32.

Bronte

Brandau

Chen

, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun. Jul 6 2016;7(1):12150. doi:10.1038/ncomms12150.

33.

Iwata

Furuichi

Kitagawa

, et al. Involvement of CD11b + GR-1 low cells in autoimmune disorder in MRL-faslpr mouse. Clin Exp Nephrol. Oct 2010;14(5):411‐417. doi:10.1007/s10157-010-0309-9.

34.

Nagaraj

Gupta

Pisarev

, et al. Altered recognition of antigen is a mechanism of CD8 + T cell tolerance in cancer. Nat Med. Jul 2007;13(7):828‐835. doi:10.1038/nm1609.

35.

Horikawa

Abiko

Matsumura

, et al. Anti-VEGF therapy resistance in ovarian cancer is caused by GM-CSF-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment. Br J Cancer. Mar 2020;122(6):778‐788. doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0725-x.

36.

Yan

Shen

Tien

Chen

Liu

. Recent progress in GM-CSF-based cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy. Mar 2017;9(4):347‐360. doi:10.2217/imt-2016-0141.

37.

Park

Lim

Kim

Sohn

Kim

. GM-CSF promotes the expansion and differentiation of cord blood myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which attenuate Xenogeneic graft-vs.-host disease. Front Immunol. 2019;10:183. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00183.

38.

Choi

Sun

Cho

. IL-12 Enhances immune response by modulation of myeloid derived suppressor cells in tumor microenvironment. Chonnam Med J. Jan 2019;55(1):31‐39. doi:10.4068/cmj.2019.55.1.31.

39.

Ludwig

Kojima

Bowersock

, et al. Surveying the serologic proteome in a tissue-specific kras(G12D) knockin mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Proteomics. Feb 2016;16(3):516‐531. doi:10.1002/pmic.201500133.

40.

Liu

, et al. Combined blockade of TGf-beta1 and GM-CSF improves chemotherapeutic effects for pancreatic cancer by modulating tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Aug 2020;69(8):1477‐1492. doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02542-7.

41.

Cannarile

Weisser

Jacob

Jegg

Ries

Ruttinger

. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Immunother Cancer. Jul 18 2017;5(1):53. doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0257-y.

42.

Orillion

Hashimoto

Damayanti

, et al. Entinostat neutralizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhances the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibition in murine models of lung and renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. Sep 1 2017;23(17):5187‐5201. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0741.

43.

Tanikawa

Kryczek

, et al. Aerobic glycolysis controls myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor immunity via a specific CEBPB isoform in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metab. Jul 3 2018;28(1):87‐103 e6. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.022.

44.

Dougan

Dranoff

Dougan

. GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 family of cytokines: regulators of inflammation. Immunity. Apr 16 2019;50(4):796‐811. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.022.

45.

Sharma

Sachdeva

Gupta

, et al. IL-6 is associated with expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhanced immunosuppression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Scand J Immunol. 2021;94(6):13107‐13124. doi:10.1111/sji.13107 63.

46.

Weber

Groth

Lasser

, et al. IL-6 as a major regulator of MDSC activity and possible target for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Immunol. Jan 2021;359:104254. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104254.

47.

Bent

Moll

Grabbe

Bros

. Interleukin-1 Beta-A friend or foe in malignancies? Int J Mol Sci. Jul 24 2018;19(8):2155. doi:10.3390/ijms19082155.

48.

Wang

Sun

Wei

Cen

DuBois

. CXCL1 Is critical for premetastatic niche formation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. Jul 1 2017;77(13):3655‐3665. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3199.

49.

Dongre

Weinberg

. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Feb 2019;20(2):69‐84. doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4.

50.

Sharma

Sachdeva

Gupta

, et al. CCR4( + ) Monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells are associated with the increased epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Immunobiology. May 2022;227(3):152210. doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2022.152210.

51.

Gabrilovich

Nagaraj

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. Mar 2009;9(3):162‐174. doi:10.1038/nri2506.

52.

Sangaletti

Tripodo

Santangelo

, et al. Mesenchymal transition of high-grade breast carcinomas depends on extracellular matrix control of myeloid suppressor cell activity. Cell Rep. Sep 27 2016;17(1):233‐248. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.075.

53.

Kaps

Schuppan

. Targeting cancer associated fibroblasts in liver fibrosis and liver cancer using nanocarriers. Cells. Sep 3 2020;9(9):2027. doi:10.3390/cells9092027.

54.

Qiu

Cao

, et al. Myeloid-Derived suppressor cells alleviate renal fibrosis progression via regulation of CCL5-CCR5 axis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:698894. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.698894.

55.

Hammerich

Tacke

. Emerging roles of myeloid derived suppressor cells in hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Aug 15 2015;6(3):43‐50. doi:10.4291/wjgp.v6.i3.43.

56.

Cai

Cui

Yang

Wang

. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: when tumor cells meet myeloid-derived suppressor cells. BiochimBiophys Acta Rev Cancer. Aug 2021;1876(1):188564. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188564.

57.

Hegde

Leader

Merad

. MDSC: markers, development, states, and unaddressed complexity. Immunity. May 11 2021;54(5):875‐884. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.004.

58.

Dysthe

Parihar

. Myeloid-Derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1224:117‐140. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35723-8_8.

59.

Pramanik

Bhattacharyya

. Myeloid derived suppressor cells and innate immune system interaction in tumor microenvironment. Life Sci. Sep 15 2022;305:120755. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120755.

60.

Sinha

Clements

Bunt

Albelda

Ostrand-Rosenberg

. Cross-talk between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and macrophages subverts tumor immunity toward a type 2 response. J Immunol. Jul 15 2007;179(2):977‐983. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.977.

61.

Poschke

Mao

Adamson

Salazar-Onfray

Masucci

Kiessling

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells impair the quality of dendritic cell vaccines. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Jun 2012;61(6):827‐838. doi:10.1007/s00262-011-1143-y.

62.

Najafi

Hashemi Goradel

Farhood

, et al. Macrophage polarity in cancer: a review. J Cell Biochem. Mar 2019;120(3):2756‐2765. doi:10.1002/jcb.27646.

63.

Zhang

Meng

Cui

Liu

Pang

Wang

. Roles of ubiquitination in the crosstalk between tumors and the tumor microenvironment (Review). Int J Oncol. 2022;61(1):5374‐5391. doi:10.3892/ijo.2022.5374.

64.

Marzagalli

Ebelt

Manuel

. Unraveling the crosstalk between melanoma and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol. Dec 2019;59:236‐250. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.002.

65.

Fridlender

Sun

Kim

, et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell. Sep 8 2009;16(3):183‐194. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.017.

66.

Hannani

Yamazaki

Dechanet-Merville

Kroemer

Zitvogel

. Harnessing gammadelta T cells in anticancer immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. May 2012;33(5):199‐206. doi:10.1016/j.it.2012.01.006.

67.

Drake

Huang

Chiu

Zheng

. Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment: tumor-induced immunosuppressive factors paralyze T cells. Oncoimmunology. Jul 2015;4(7):e1016700. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2015.1016700.

68.

Pergamo

Miller

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their role in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. Mar 2017;24(3):100‐105. doi:10.1038/cgt.2016.65.

69.

Conlon

Miljkovic

Waldmann

. Cytokines in the treatment of cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res. Jan 2019;39(1):6‐21. doi:10.1089/jir.2018.0019.

70.

Muhlberg

Kuhnemuth

Costello

, et al. miRNA dynamics in tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells modulating tumor progression in pancreatic cancer. Oncoimmunology. Jun 2016;5(6):e1160181. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2016.1160181.

71.

Yin

Wang

Xue

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: roles in the tumor microenvironment and tumor radiotherapy. Int J Cancer. Mar 1 2019;144(5):933‐946. doi:10.1002/ijc.31744.

72.

Citrin

. Recent developments in radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. Sep 14 2017;377(11):1065‐1075. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1608986.

73.

Gao

Zheng

Cai

Wei

. Autophagy and tumour radiotherapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1207:375‐387. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4272-5_25.

74.

Wang

Ding

Guo

Wang

. MDSCs: key criminals of tumor pre-metastatic niche formation. Front Immunol. 2019;10:172. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00172.

75.

Vatner

Formenti

. Myeloid-derived cells in tumors: effects of radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. Jan 2015;25(1):18‐27. doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.07.008.

76.

Kumar

Donthireddy

Marvel

, et al. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts neutralize the anti-tumor effect of CSF1 receptor blockade by inducing PMN-MDSC infiltration of tumors. Cancer Cell. Nov 13 2017;32(5):654‐668 e5. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.10.005.

77.

Palmerini

Longhi

Donati

Staals

. Pexidartinib for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor: safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. Jun 2020;20(6):441‐445. doi:10.1080/14737140.2020.1757441.

78.

Shen

. Quantitative tyrosine phosphoproteomic analysis of resistance to radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:12667‐12678. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S260028.

79.

Akkari

Bowman

Tessier

, et al. Dynamic changes in glioma macrophage populations after radiotherapy reveal CSF-1R inhibition as a strategy to overcome resistance. Sci Transl Med. Jul 15 2020;12(552). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw7843.

80.

Liang

Deng

Hou

, et al. Host STING-dependent MDSC mobilization drives extrinsic radiation resistance. Nat Commun. Nov 23 2017;8(1):1736‐1745. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01566-5.

81.

Acheva

Schettino

Prise

. Pro-inflammatory signaling in a 3D organotypic skin model after low LET irradiation-NF-kappaB, COX-2 activation, and impact on cell differentiation. Front Immunol. 2017;8:82. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00082.

82.

Darragh

Oweida

Karam

. Overcoming resistance to combination radiation-immunotherapy: a focus on contributing pathways within the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3154. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.03154.

83.

Lan

Yin

, et al. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells and programmed death ligand 1 confers therapeutic advantage of ablative hypofractionated radiation therapy compared with conventional fractionated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. May 1 2018;101(1):74‐87. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.071.

84.

Kordbacheh

Honeychurch

Blackhall

Faivre-Finn

Illidge

. Radiotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinations in lung cancer: building better translational research platforms. Ann Oncol. Feb 1 2018;29(2):301‐310. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx790.

85.

Oberg

. Management of functional neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Gland Surg. Feb 2018;7(1):20‐27. doi:10.21037/gs.2017.10.08.

86.

Yin

Zhao

Guo

, et al. Aurora A inhibition eliminates myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression and enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res. Jul 1 2019;79(13):3431‐3444. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3397.

87.

Grapin

Richard

Limagne

, et al. Optimized fractionated radiotherapy with anti-PD-L1 and anti-TIGIT: a promising new combination. J Immunother Cancer. Jun 25 2019;7(1):160. doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0634-9.

88.

Sato

Okonogi

Nakano

. Rationale of combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy and radiotherapy for cancer treatment. Int J Clin Oncol. May 2020;25(5):801‐809. doi:10.1007/s10147-020-01666-1.

89.

Tesi

. MDSC; the most important cell you have never heard of. Trends Pharmacol Sci. Jan 2019;40(1):4‐7. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2018.10.008.

90.

Yang

Guo

Weng

Tang

Jin

. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells-new and exciting players in lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. Jan 31 2020;13(1):10. doi:10.1186/s13045-020-0843-1.

91.

Lauret Marie Joseph

Laheurte

Jary

, et al. Immunoregulation and clinical implications of ANGPT2/TIE2( +) M-MDSC signature in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. Feb 2020;8(2):268‐279. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0326.

92.

Loeuillard

Yang

Buckarma

, et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells augments PD-1 blockade in cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Invest. Oct 1 2020;130(10):5380‐5396. doi:10.1172/JCI137110.

93.

Zhang

Bush

Yan

Chen

. Gemcitabine nanoparticles promote antitumor immunity against melanoma. Biomaterials. 2019;189:48‐59. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.022.

94.

Zhang

Kang

, et al. Upregulated TRAIL and reduced DcR2 mediate apoptosis of decidual PMN-MDSC in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1345. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01345.

95.

Feng

Chen

, et al. S100a9( + ) MDSC and TAM-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance in lung adenocarcinoma: the role of RELB. Oncotarget. Jan 26 2018;9(7):7631‐7643. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24146.

96.

Tai

Alkayyal

Leslie

, et al. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition reduces postoperative metastatic disease by targeting surgery-induced myeloid derived suppressor cell-dependent inhibition of natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(6):e1431082. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2018.1431082.

97.

Shi

Wang

, et al. Baicalein ameliorates pristane-induced lupus nephritis via activating Nrf2/HO-1 in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Arthritis Res Ther. Apr 25 2019;21(1):105. doi:10.1186/s13075-019-1876-0.

98.

Porta

Consonni

Morlacchi

, et al. Tumor-Derived prostaglandin E2 promotes p50 NF-kappaB-dependent differentiation of monocytic MDSCs. Cancer Res. Jul 1 2020;80(13):2874‐2888. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2843.

99.

Briere

Sudhakar

Woods

, et al. The class I/IV HDAC inhibitor mocetinostat increases tumor antigen presentation, decreases immune suppressive cell types and augments checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Mar 2018;67(3):381‐392. doi:10.1007/s00262-017-2091-y.

100.

Bauer

Udonta

Wroblewski

, et al. Blockade of myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion with all-trans retinoic acid increases the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Cancer Res. Jun 15 2018;78(12):3220‐3232. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3415.

101.

Tobin

Jordan

Robinson

, et al. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells using all-trans retinoic acid in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Int Immunopharmacol. Oct 2018;63:282‐291. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2018.08.007.

102.

Hellsten

Lilljebjörn

Johansson

Leandersson

Bjartell

. The STAT3 inhibitor galiellalactone inhibits the generation of MDSC-like monocytes by prostate cancer cells and decreases immunosuppressive and tumorigenic factors. Prostate. 2019;79(14):1611‐1621. doi:10.1002/pros.23885.

103.

Freimark

Gong

, et al. Antibody-Mediated phosphatidylserine blockade enhances the antitumor responses to CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibodies in melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. Jun 2016;4(6):531‐540. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0250.

104.

Metzger

Kirchleitner

Boehmer

DFR

, et al. Systemic but not MDSC-specific IRF4 deficiency promotes an immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment in a murine pancreatic cancer model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Oct 2020;69(10):2101‐2112. doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02605-9.

105.

Zhang

Velez-Delgado

Mathew

, et al. Myeloid cells are required for PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint activation and the establishment of an immunosuppressive environment in pancreatic cancer. Gut. Jan 2017;66(1):124‐136. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312078.

106.

Yang

Hang

, et al. Lactate-Modulated immunosuppression of myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to the radioresistance of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. Nov 2020;8(11):1440‐1451. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0111.

107.

Vernon

Loux

Schapiro

, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products promotes pancreatic carcinogenesis and accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol. Feb 1 2013;190(3):1372‐1379. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1201151.

108.

Oweida

Mueller

Piper

, et al. Response to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is enhanced by inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells using STAT3 anti-sense oligonucleotide. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Apr 2021;70(4):989‐1000. doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02701-w.

109.

Panni

Sanford

Belt

, et al. Tumor-induced STAT3 activation in monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells enhances stemness and mesenchymal properties in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. May 2014;63(5):513‐528. doi:10.1007/s00262-014-1527-x.

110.

Zheng

Chen

Bartee

, et al. Myxomaviral anti-inflammatory serpin reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells and human pancreatic cancer cell growth in mice. J Cancer Sci Ther. Aug 19 2013;5:291‐299. doi:10.4172/1948-5956.1000219.

111.

Cappello

Tonoli

Curto

Giordano

Giovarelli

Novelli

. Anti-alpha-enolase antibody limits the invasion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and attenuates their restraining effector T cell response. Oncoimmunology. May 2016;5(5):e1112940. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2015.1112940.

112.

Karakhanova

Link

Heinrich

, et al. Characterization of myeloid leukocytes and soluble mediators in pancreatic cancer: importance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncoimmunology. Apr 2015;4(4):e998519. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2014.998519.

113.

Long

Wang

, et al. Phenylboronic acid modified nanoparticles simultaneously target pancreatic cancer and its metastasis and alleviate immunosuppression. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. Aug 2021;165:164‐173. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.05.014.

114.

Steele

Karim

Leach

JDG

, et al. CXCR2 Inhibition profoundly suppresses metastases and augments immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. Jun 13 2016;29(6):832‐845. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.014.

115.

Villalobos-Ayala

Ortiz Rivera

Alvarez

, et al. Apigenin increases SHIP-1 expression, promotes tumoricidal macrophages and anti-tumor immune responses in murine pancreatic cancer. Cancers. Dec 4 2020;12(12):3631. doi:10.3390/cancers12123631.

116.

Song

Lee

Kim

, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor (PAUF) enhances the accumulation and functional activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. Aug 9 2016;7(32):51840‐51853. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10123.

117.

Das

Shapiro

Vucic

Vogt

Bar-Sagi

. Tumor cell-derived IL1beta promotes desmoplasia and immune suppression in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. Mar 1 2020;80(5):1088‐1101. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2080.

118.

Wang

Liu

Zhang

Shang

Gao

. MDSC-decreasing chemotherapy increases the efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. Jan 26 2016;7(4):4760‐4769. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6734.

119.

Dominguez

Condamine

Mony

, et al. Selective targeting of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients using DS-8273a, an agonistic TRAIL-R2 antibody. Clin Cancer Res. Jun 15 2017;23(12):2942‐2950. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1784.

120.

Markowitz

Brooks

Duggan

, et al. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma exhibit elevated levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells upon progression of disease. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Feb 2015;64(2):149‐159. doi:10.1007/s00262-014-1618-8.

121.

Tavukcuoglu

Horzum

Yanik

, et al. Human splenic polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) are strategically located immune regulatory cells in cancer. Eur J Immunol. Dec 2020;50(12):2067‐2074. doi:10.1002/eji.202048666.

122.

Sanford

Porembka

Panni

, et al. A study of zoledronic acid as neo-adjuvant, perioperative therapy in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Ther. May 2013;4(3):797‐803. doi:10.4236/jct.2013.43096.

123.

Holokai

Chakrabarti

Lundy

, et al. Murine- and human-derived autologous organoid/immune cell co-cultures as pre-clinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). Dec 17 2020;12(12):3816. doi:10.3390/cancers12123816.

124.

Nagaraj

Youn

Weber

, et al. Anti-inflammatory triterpenoid blocks immune suppressive function of MDSCs and improves immune response in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Mar 15 2010;16(6):1812‐1823. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3272.

125.

Annels

Shaw

Gabitass

, et al. The effects of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination chemotherapy and of low-dose adjuvant GM-CSF on the levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. Feb 2014;63(2):175‐183. doi:10.1007/s00262-013-1502-y.

The Role of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Epidemiology and Current Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Classification of MDSCs

Multiple Cytokines Are Involved in Activating the Immunosuppressive Properties of MDSCs

Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer

The Significance of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy in Preclinical Studies

The Role of MDSCs in Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy in Clinical Studies

Treatment of Targeted MDSCs

Conclusion

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Ethics Statement

Conflicts of Interest

Funding

ORCID iDs

References