Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Across the nation, political candidates increasingly have engaged publicly with contemporary education issues, in part seeking to attract new voters. Meanwhile, political polarization has grown, including in public opinion regarding controversial education policy topics. In this context, we examine the education policy preferences of marginal voters, those who altered their voting behaviors between the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, by applying data representative of U.S. adults and granular data from Missouri’s voters, an increasingly conservative state with an active education policy agenda. Across a wide policy landscape, marginal voter stances stood out consistently only with respect to their opposition of policies limiting curricula related to race and ethnicity. We find little evidence indicating marginal voters vary from stable voters on additional hot-button issues including Critical Race Theory, school choice expansion, and transgender athlete participation. This evidence contributes to growing debate concerning the role of political polarization in contemporary education policy.

Keywords

marginal voters political polarization education policy politics of education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

(2018). The great alignment: Race, party transformation, and the rise of donald trump. Yale University Press.

Abramowitz

Webster

(2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479

Acree

B. D.

Gross

J. H.

Smith

N. A.

Sim

Boydstun

A. E.

(2020). Etch-a-sketching: Evaluating the post-primary rhetorical moderation hypothesis. American Politics Research, 48(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18800017

Ahl

(2021). Missouri secretary of state Ashcroft wants nonpartisan local elections to become partisan. St. Louis Public Radio. https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2021-09-17/missouri-secretary-of-state-ashcroft-wants-nonpartisan-local-elections-to-become-partisan

Aldrich

J. H.

Sullivan

J. L.

Borgida

(1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates “waltz before a blind audience?”. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956437

Anglum

J. C.

Park

(2021). Keeping up with the Joneses: District adoption of the 4-day school week in rural Missouri. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211002842

Anglum

J. C.

Rhinesmith

(2022). Red for Ed? Heterogeneous support for increased school spending in a conservative state. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13154

Anglum

J. C.

Rhinesmith

(2024). Green with Envy? Heterogeneous Voter and Parent Preferences for Public School Expenditures and Teacher Salaries. Journal of Education Human Resources, 42(3), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2022-0001

Anglum

J. C.

Rhinesmith

(2025). Voters, Parents, and Curricular Control: Preferences for Instruction Related to Racism and Critical Race Theory. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

10.

Ansolabehere

Rodden

Snyder

J. M.

Jr. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080210

11.

Arceneaux

Nickerson

D. W.

(2009). Who is mobilized to vote? A re‐analysis of 11 field experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00354.x

12.

Atterbury

(2023). Florida house passes parental rights bill restricting pronouns in schools. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/31/florida-house-parental-rights-bill-pronouns-lgbtq-00089971

13.

Ballotpedia . (2023). Every student succeeds act. Retrieved from. https://ballotpedia.org/Every_Student_Succeeds_Act

14.

Ballotpedia . (2023). No child left behind act. Retrieved from. https://ballotpedia.org/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act

15.

Bartels

L. M.

(1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111700

16.

Biasi

Sandholtz

W. A.

(2025). The political consequences of a controversial education reform: Lessons from Wisconsin’s act 10. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 33666. https://www.nber.org/papers/w33666

17.

Blad

(2023). More states consider partisan school board races as education debates intensify. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/more-states-consider-partisan-school-board-races-as-education-debates-intensify/2023/04

18.

Blais

(2008). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121

19.

Burden

B. C.

Kimball

D. C.

(2009). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press.

20.

Burke

(2021). Nationalization and its consequences for state legislatures. Social Science Quarterly, 102(1), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12926

21.

Carpini

M. X. D.

Keeter

(1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.

22.

Caughey

Warshaw

(2017). Incremental democracy: The policy effects of partisan control of state government. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1342–1358. https://doi.org/10.1086/692669

23.

Chuck

(2022). Missouri governor responds to criticism of state’s handling of summer meals program. NBCNews.com. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/missouri-governor-responds-criticism-states-handling-summer-meals-prog-rcna42914

24.

Cohen

R. M.

(2022). How education culture wars have shaped the midterms. Vox. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2022/11/4/23436470/education-crt-parents-schools-midterms-desantis

25.

Corasaniti

(2024). A pro-trump group’s risky bet on infrequent voters seems to have paid off. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/23/us/politics/trump-turning-point-arizona-2024-election.html

26.

Dalton

R. J.

(1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130780

27.

Davies

(2007). See government grow: Education politics from Johnson to Reagan. University Press of Kansas.

28.

Diliberti

M. K.

Schwartz

H. L.

(2022). District leaders’ concerns about mental health and political polarization in schools: Selected findings from the fourth American school district panel survey. RAND Corporation. Data Note: Insights from the American Educator Panels. Research Report. RR-A956-8.

29.

Downs

(1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897

30.

Ferrer

Thorning

(2023). 2022 primary turnout: Trends and lessons for boosting participation. Bipartisan Policy Center.

31.

Fowler

(2015). Regular voters, marginal voters and the electoral effects of turnout. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.18

32.

Freeder

Lenz

G. S.

Turney

(2019). The importance of knowing “what goes with what”: Reinterpreting the evidence on policy attitude stability. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1086/700005

33.

Gerber

A. S.

Green

D. P.

(2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837

34.

Gerber

A. S.

Green

D. P.

Shachar

(2003). Voting may be habit‐forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/3186114

35.

Gerber

A. S.

Rogers

(2009). Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090117

36.

Goren

Chapp

(2017). Moral power: How public opinion on culture war issues shapes partisan predispositions and religious orientations. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000435

37.

Green

D. P.

Palmquist

Schickler

(2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.

38.

Hanshaw

(2023). Missouri company plays central role in downfall of Biden loan forgiveness program. Missouri Independent. https://missouriindependent.com/2023/06/30/missouri-company-plays-central-role-in-downfall-of-biden-loan-forgiveness-program/

39.

Harvard University . (2023). Cooperative election study. Retrieved from. https://cces.gov.harvard.edu/

40.

Hatfield

(2023). Partisan divides over K-12 education in 8 charts. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/05/partisan-divides-over-k-12-education-in-8-charts/

41.

Hawley

(2021). Hawley introduces parents’ bill of rights to defend parents’ role in education. Josh Hawley, U.S. senator for Missouri. https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-introduces-parents-bill-rights-defend-parents-role-education

42.

Hays

(2024). Missouri passed a $40,000 minimum teacher salary. Some educators worry those raises aren’t guaranteed. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/missouri-passed-a-40000-minimum-teacher-salary-some-educators-worry-those-raises-arent-guaranteed#:∼:text=ST.,the_lowest_in_the_country

43.

Henig

J. R.

Jacobsen

Reckhow

(2019). Outside money in school board elections: The nationalization of education politics: Harvard Education Press.

44.

Hoffman

(1984). Reagan may renew push to abolish education department, official says. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/11/21/reagan-may-renew-push-to-abolish-education-department-official-says/1eb9288f-9413-4210-9790-c9a099082dbc/

45.

Hopkins

D. J.

(2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. University of Chicago Press.

46.

Houston

D. M.

(2021). Polarization and the politics of education: What moves partisan opinion? Educational Policy, 35(4), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818823745

47.

Houston

D. M.

(2024). Polarization, partisan sorting, and the politics of education. American Educational Research Journal, 61(3), 508–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241228280

48.

Huddy

Mason

Aarøe

(2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000604

49.

Iyengar

Sood

Lelkes

(2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

50.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2019). Extreme referendum: Donald trump and the 2018 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly, 134(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12866

51.

Jenke

Huettel

S. A.

(2016). Issues or identity? Cognitive foundations of voter choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 794–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.013

52.

Jenke

Huettel

S. A.

(2020). Voter preferences reflect a competition between policy and identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020

53.

Klein

(2022). Three theories that explain this strange moment. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/12/opinion/election-midterm-pattern.html

54.

Kubin

Von Sikorski

(2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070

55.

Levendusky

(2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. University of Chicago Press.

56.

Lonas

Schnell

(2023). House republicans pass parents bill of rights. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3916114-house-republicans-pass-parents-bill-of-rights/

57.

Lovett

(2022). Voter motivation. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 21(3), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v21i3.1255

58.

Mason

(2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005

59.

Mcelwee

Rhodes

J. H.

Schaffner

B. F.

Fraga

B. L.

(2018). The missing Obama millions. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/obama-trump-voters-democrats.html

60.

Meehan

Friedman

Baeta

Magnusson

(2023). School book bans: The mounting pressure to censor. PEN America. https://pen.org/report/book-bans-pressure-to-censor/

61.

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education . (2023). Districts and charters attending a four-day week 2010-11 to 2023-24. https://oembed-dese.mo.gov/media/pdf/districts-and-charters-attending-four-day-week-2010-11-2023-24

62.

O’Connell-Domenech

(2022). Nearly 300 books banned in Missouri since August, PEN America says. The Hill. https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/3738658-nearly-300-books-banned-in-missouri-since-august-pen-america-says/

63.

Pew Research Center . (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows Even wider. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/

64.

Pew Research Center . (2022). As partisan hostility grows, signs of frustration with the two-party system. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2022/08/PP_2022.09.08_partisan-hostility_REPORT.pdf

65.

Reuters . (2016). Obama says transgender bathroom directive based on law. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-obama-lgbt/obama-says-transgender-bathroom-directive-based-on-law-idUSKCN0YO03Y/

66.

Robison

(2021). Does issue importance predict learning about candidates? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(4), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa025

67.

Rogers

(2016). National forces in state legislative elections. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662454

68.

Schwartz

(2024). Map: Where critical race theory is under attack. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/map-where-critical-race-theory-is-under-attack/2021/06

69.

Shelton

A. J.

Anglum

J. C.

Rhinesmith

Burrola

(2022). Who supports MO private school choice? Evidence from likely voters in Missouri. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.7159

70.

Sides

Tausanovitch

Vavreck

(2022). The bitter end: The 2020 presidential campaign and the challenge to American democracy. Princeton University Press.

71.

Sievert

McKee

S. C.

(2019). Nationalization in US senate and gubernatorial elections. American Politics Research, 47(5), 1055–1080. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18792694

72.

Smets

Van Ham

(2013). The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006

73.

Stanford

(2023). Parents’ rights groups have mobilized. What does it mean for students? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/parents-rights-groups-have-mobilized-what-does-it-mean-for-students/2023/08

74.

Stephenson

(2021). What Arizona’s 2010 ban on ethnic studies could mean for the fight over critical race theory. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/07/11/tucson-unified-school-districts-mexican-american-studies-program-498926

75.

Strauss

(2020). Betsy Devos, in anti-government polemic, says America’s public schools are designed to replace home and family. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/10/21/steely-anti-government-polemic-betsy-devos-says-americas-public-schools-are-designed-replace-home-family/

76.

Swasey

Jin

C. H.

(2020). Narrow wins in these key states powered Biden to the presidency. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/940689086/narrow-wins-in-these-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

77.

Tausanovitch

Warshaw

(2018). Does the ideological proximity between candidates and voters affect voting in US house elections? Political Behavior, 40(1), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9437-1

78.

Tyack

Hansot

(1981). Conflict and consensus in American public education. Dædalus.

79.

Ulmer

Layne

Slattery

(2024). In a risky ploy to beat Harris, Trump is targeting voters who don’t usually vote. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-hunts-elusive-2024-election-prize-infrequent-voters-2024-09-09/

80.

Weinberg

(2022). Judge dismisses Missouri AG’s mask lawsuit against St. Charles school district. Missouri Independent. https://missouriindependent.com/2022/05/07/judge-dismisses-missouri-ags-mask-lawsuit-against-st-charles-school-district/#:∼:text=A_St.,from_Schmitt%E2%80%99s_legal_blitz_remaining

81.

Weinschenk

A. C.

(2022). The nationalization of school superintendent elections. Social Science Quarterly, 103(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13143

82.

Wolf

Merrill

Mullery

(2024). Anatomy of three Trump elections: How Americans shifted in 2024 vs 2020 and 2016. CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2024/politics/2020-2016-exit-polls-2024-dg/

83.

Yglesias

(2019). The debate over swing voters versus mobilizing the base, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2019/9/11/20856802/swing-voters-base-democrats-trump-2020-election

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB

The Policy Preferences of Marginal Voters: Complicating Political Polarization in Education Policy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material