Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Political scientists have long been interested in the effects that media framings have on support or tolerance for controversial speech. In recent years, the concept of cancel culture has complicated our understanding of free speech. In particular, the modern Republican Party under Donald Trump has made “fighting cancel culture” a cornerstone of its electoral strategy. We expect that when extremist groups invoke cancel culture as a reason for their alleged censorship, support for their free speech rights among Republicans should increase. We use a nationally representative survey experiment to assess whether individuals’ opposition to cancel culture is principled or contingent on the ideological identity of the speaker. We show that framing free speech restrictions as the consequence of cancel culture does not increase support for free speech among Republicans. Further, when left-wing groups utilize the cancel culture framing, Republicans become even less supportive of those groups’ free speech rights.

Keywords

cancel culture free speech partisan motivated reasoning survey experiment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolsen

Druckman

J. N.

Cook

F. L.

(2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0

Carter

M. J.

(2013). The hermeneutics of frames and framing: An examination of the media’s construction of reality. SAGE Open, 3(2), 2158244013487915. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013487915

Chong

Druckman

J. N.

(2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

Christiani

(2021). When Are explicit racial Appeals Accepted? Examining the role of racial status threat. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09688-9.

Clark

M. D.

(2020). Drag them: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture”. Communication and the Public, 5(3-4), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562

Cohen

G. L.

(2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808

Darmofal

(2005). Elite cues and citizen disagreement with expert opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800302

Green

Edgerton

Naftel

Shoub

Cranmer

S. J.

(2020). Elusive consensus: polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(28), eabc2717. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2717

Hamilton

L. C.

Safford

T. G.

(2021). Elite cues and the rapid decline in trust in science agencies on COVID-19. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 988–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211022391

10.

Kahan

D. M.

(2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, Part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it (pp. 1–16). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417

11.

Kam

Trussler

(2017). At the nexus of observational and experimental research: Theory, specification, and Analysis of experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects. Political Behavior, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9379-z

12.

Karni

(2020, July 3). Trump uses Mount Rushmore speech to deliver divisive culture war message. New York Times.

13.

Kuklinski

J. H.

Riggle

Ottati

Schwarz

Wyer

R. S.

(1991). The cognitive and Affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111436

14.

Magleby

D. B.

Nelson

(2012). Independent leaners as policy partisans: An examination of party identification and policy views. The Forum, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1522

15.

Miratrix

L. W.

SekhonSekhonTheodoridis

J. S. Alexander G.

Theodoridis

A. G.

Campos

L. F.

(2018). Worth weighting? How to think About and use weights in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.1

16.

Nelson

T. E.

Clawson

R. A.

Oxley

Z. M.

(1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952075

17.

Pew (2021). Americans and ‘cancel culture’: Where some see calls for accountability, others see censorship, punishment. Pewresearch. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/05/19/americans-and-cancel-culture-where-some-see-calls-for-accountability-others-see-censorship-punishment/.

18.

Politico (2020). Morning consult + politico national tracking poll 200766. Politico.

19.

Sniderman

P. M.

Theriault

S. M.

(2004). Chapter 5: the structure of political Argument and the logic of issue framing. In Saris

Willem E.

Sniderman

Paul M.

(Eds), Studies in Public Opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188386-007

20.

UMass (2021). University of Massachusetts amherst/WCVB national poll of president biden’s first 100 days. Umass.edu. https://polsci.umass.edu/sites/default/files/Jan6THCrosstabs.pdf

21.

Zaller

J. R.

(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818691

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.45 MB

Principled or Partisan? The Effect of Cancel Culture Framings on Support for Free Speech

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material