Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although electrospinning is considered a powerful and generic tool for the preparation of nanofiber webs, several issues still need to be overcome for real-world applications. Most of these problems are caused by needle-based systems, where the key factor influencing successful electrospinning is limited by the low yield of nanofibers prepared by needle-type electrospinning and the balance between the electric field force and the surface tension of the droplets. In order to solve these two issues, we use the roller type electrospinning system to prepare nanofibers. The characteristic of the system is that the roller is made of glass, and the voltage is connected to the liquid bath and the auxiliary electrode is added. We demonstrate that needle-disk electrospinning produces nanofiber with super-high throughput of 15.9 g/h, which is 177 times higher than traditional electrospinning under similar spinning conditions. Not only does it increase productivity, but also it facilitates handling and cleaning work. In addition, the auxiliary electrode can optimize the electric field and reduce the edge effect of the collecting plate. This method should help expand the range of applications for electrospun nanofiber webs in the near future.

Keywords

Electrospinning nanofiber electric field analysis COMSOL simulation

Introduction

Electrospinning is a mature technology for preparing nanofiber structures, and many studies have addressed the preparation and application of nanofiber webs [1,2]. Although the first patent related to electrospinning was filed in 1902 [3], detailed discussion of electrospinning did not begin to appear until the early 1990s as a result of advances in nanoscience [4]. Electrospun nanofibers can utilize its unique properties (high surface-to-volume ratio, adjustable porosity of fiber structures, and the flexibility to spin into a variety of shapes and sizes) [4,5]. Electrospun nanofibers have been applied to various fields, such as drug delivery [6], tissue engineering [7,8], nanosensor [9 –11], wound dressing [12,13] and energy applications [14]. Lotfian [15] et al. mentioned that in-situ measurement can be achieved through piezoelectric nanofibers.

Although electrospinning has many advantages, electrospinning is limited in practical engineering and production. Analysis of many current papers [16 –24] found that the reasons for limiting the development of electrospinning technology can be summarized as: During the electrospinning process, the droplets are required to balance the surface tension and the tensile force caused by the electrostatic force. Rapid solvent evaporation accompanied by jet stretching due to electric forces and jet instabilities is ultimately responsible for the diameter, structure, and properties of the ﬁnal solidiﬁed nanoﬁbers and core–shell nanoﬁbers [25,26]. In addition to the fact that the electrospinning process also needs to balance the rate at which the solvent evaporates and solidifies at a surface tension to form a sphere. These two reasons cause many problems in traditional single-needle electrospinning (TNE). The needle electrospinning yield is low and the needle is prone to blockage. In order to solve the problem of low output, Liu et al. [27,28] designed a needle disk electrode nozzle, which is 183 times higher than traditional electrostatic spinning under similar spinning conditions. Peng et al. [3] designed bubble models to control fiber morphology, especially nanoporous fibers. Zhao et al. [29] used the bubble model to solve the solvent evaporation problem.

Herein, we report the needle-free electrospinning technology of rotating rollers using additional auxiliary electrodes. This technique provides a facile and versatile means of preparing an electrospun nanofiber web. The 200 mm diameter roller rotates the solution from the tank to the highest point, and the polymer solution droplets can be easily stretched at DC voltage to produce a Taylor cone. The added auxiliary electrode can not only optimize the electric field, but also reduce the edge effect that occurs in the collecting plate. However, the production efficiency of the single needle electrospinning equipment is generally extremely low; the maximum total mass of the nanofiber produced per hour is not more than 300 mg [27,30]. This mode allows the production of 15.6 g of nanofibers per hour. This is 187 times higher than conventional electrostatic spinning under similar spinning conditions.

Theoretical analysis

Boundary conditions

Electrospinning is the use of polymer fluids in the formation of high-voltage electric field in the formation of polymer micro-jet, and ultimately the formation of nanofibers. Electrospinning combined with modern electromagnetics Maxwell's electrostatic equation is given as

\begin{matrix} \nabla \cdot D = ρ_{v} # \end{matrix}

(1)

\begin{matrix} \nabla \times E = - \frac{\partial B}{\partial t} # \end{matrix}

(2)

In the static case, all physical quantities in Maxwell's equations are independent of time ( $\frac{\partial}{\partial t} = 0$ ). In this case, all charges are required to be permanent in space, and if they are to move, they should also move at a constant rate, keeping $ρ_{v}$ constant over time.

The time derivative of B in this formula (2) becomes zero, so

\begin{matrix} \nabla \times E = 0 # \end{matrix}

(3)

Electromagnetic analysis is performed at a macro level by solving Maxwell's equations under certain boundary conditions. These equations can be reduced to partial differential equations, and their successful solutions can be obtained by FEM. The basic electrostatic equation applied here is [31]

\begin{matrix} - \nabla \cdot ɛ_{0} ɛ_{r} \nabla V = ρ_{v} # \end{matrix}

(4)

where V is the potential and

ρ_{v}

is the charge density, which is set to zero here. For a homogeneous medium, the integral form of the differential form of the Poisson equation corresponding to the electrostatic field is [32]

\begin{matrix} Ø (x, y, z) = \frac{1}{4 π ɛ_{0} ɛ_{r}} \int_{Ω} ρ_{v} \nabla (\frac{1}{L}) d Ω # \end{matrix}

(5)

where L is the distance from the field point to the source point and the infinity potential is set as zero; the direction of

\nabla (1 / L)

is from the source point to the field point.

Electric field analysis

The equations for the jet follow from Newton’s Law and the conservation laws obey, namely, conservation of mass and conservation of charge. Due to the viscous dissipation of gravity and electric fields and external forcing, the entire system of jets cannot save energy. The first step in the derivation assumes that the jet is a long, slender object and then uses a perturbative expansion in the aspect ratio. This approximation method rests on expanding the relevant three-dimensional fields in a Taylor series [33]

\begin{matrix} v (x) = f_{0} + f_{1} x + f_{2} x^{2} + \cdot \cdot \cdot + f_{n + 1} x^{n + 1} # \end{matrix}

(6)

where v(x) s the axial velocity, and f_n is the coefficient of McLaughlin formula

(f_{n} = \frac{v^{(n)} (0)}{n!})

We then substitute these extensions into the complete 3D equation and retain only the leading sequence term. Obtaining the mass conservation equation

\begin{matrix} \partial t (π r^{2}) + \partial z (π r^{2} v) = 0 # \end{matrix}

(7)

where r is the jet radius at the axial coordinate z, and v(x)_, the preamble sequence on the jet cross section is constant. Similarly, the conservation of charge also becomes

\begin{matrix} \partial t (2 π r^{2}) + \partial z (π r^{2} KE + 2 π r σ v) = 0 # \end{matrix}

(8)

where K is the electrical conductivity and E is the axial electric field. Due to the volume conduction in the fluid, in addition to the advection, there is now an additional current component.

Now we turn to the conductive field equation. The electric field of the jet can be written down due to the effective linear charge density (including free charge and polarization charge effects) of the charge Q(z) along the z-axis. To find this linear charge density, we perform the same Gauss's law twice. Therefore, it is said that E_r and E_Z evaluate the radial and axial components of the field in the jet on the surface of the jet, and we get [34,35]

0 = \oint_{s_{1}} E \cdot \overset{\land}{n} ds = [(π r^{2} E_{Z})' + 2 π {rE}_{r}] dz

So that

\begin{matrix} - 2 π {hE}_{r} = (π r^{2} E_{Z})' # \end{matrix}

(9)

An equation to predict the critical applied voltage was proposed by Taylor [33], V_c, given by

\begin{matrix} V_{c}^{2} = 4 \ln (\frac{2 d}{R}) (1.3 π R γ) (0.09) # \end{matrix}

(10)

where d is the nozzle-collector distance (cm), R is the outer radius of the nozzle (cm), and γ is the surface tension of the liquid (dyne/cm).

Experiment and modeling

Model building

This paper proposes a needleless electrospinning nanofiber method for adding an auxiliary electrode in space. The system mainly includes high voltage power supply, liquid tank, roller, collecting plate and auxiliary electrode (see Figure 1). The voltage V at the bottom of the receiving plate and the liquid tank is 15 Kv, and the auxiliary electrode is connected to the adjustable DC power source, and the collecting plate and the roller are separated by 20 cm. The roller uses a glass with a relatively high dielectric constant (200 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height) to reduce the interference to the electric field and to easily remove the residue. The auxiliary electrode is used to make the droplets form a Taylor cone to ensure the filament formation of the nanofibers.

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of electrospinning device with auxiliary electrode.

Experimental

Poly(sulfone amide) (PSA) (12.5 wt%), with average molecular weight of 150,000–200,000 was prepared. N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAc) with molecular weight of 87.12 g/mol was prepared. The PSA solution was prepared by mixing 12.5 wt.% PSA in DMAc by gently stirring for 2 h. All the experiments were conducted under the condition of 25℃, 40–60% RH of humidity.

The flywheel has a dielectric constant of 4 and a rotation speed of 7000 r/h.

Simulation calculation

There are many disadvantages in the traditional needle-injection electrospinning, such as low yield and easy clogging of the needle. We combine needle-type electrospinning and needle-free electrospinning with a glass-made cylinder and a system that puts the voltage into the bottom of the liquid tank. This mode not only solves the problem of needle clogging, but also greatly improves production efficiency, achieving a yield of 13.5 g per hour without sacrificing the quality of the nanofibers. It has the most significant advantage in that the spinning process now depends on the formation of many small droplets on the surface of the roller. Therefore, it is not necessary to maintain the balance of Taylor cone throughout the whole process [1,36].

Figure 2(a) shows the physical model without the auxiliary electrode. When the voltage of the liquid tank and the receiving plate is connected to 15 KV, the electric field distribution of the highest point of the roller is calculated by COMSOL (see Figure 2(b)). It is concluded that the maximum electric field at the highest point of the roller is $5.49 \times 10^{4} V / m$ , which ensures the balance between the electric field pulling force received by the droplet and the surface tension and gravity, and sprays to form nanofibers. Figure 2(c) shows the electric field line distribution of the x-y cross section of the electrospinning device during operation, and (d) shows the current line on the side of the device. With this new type of roller electrospinning, the output of nanofibers can be increased, and it is possible to obtain high quality nanofibers. It is worth emphasizing that the use of relatively high dielectric constant materials so that the roller not only did not destroy the entire electric field distribution, but also the maximum electric field of the droplet at the highest point of the roller is achieved. To evaluate the nanofiber productivity of the facile spinning method, the comparison between single needle and roller electrospinning was carried out. As described in experimental section, the two methods were used to produce nanofibers for 1 h under the same conditions. Using the weight method, the results were obtained, which is presented in Figure 3. The overall nanofiber productivity of roller electrospinning is 13.5 g/h, which are 150-folds higher than TNE. It ensures that the injection can occur only in the droplets that reach the highest point.

Figure 2.

(a) Physical model of roller spinning in COMSOL. (b) Electric field distribution at the highest point of roller. (c) The section of X-Y plane is made along the highest point of roller, and the trend of electric field is obtained. (d) Make the z-x plane section along the highest point of the roller and find the current line distribution.

Figure 3.

Nanofiber productivity of roller electrospinning and traditional single-needle electrospinning (TNE). The inserted figures are the optical images of PSA membrane piece each with an area of 1.0×1.0 cm².

In order to improve the uniformity of the electric field in the whole filamentation region, we hope to suppress the Rayleigh instability. After continuous improvement, it was finally found that a parallel auxiliary electrode was added above the collecting plate (see Figure 4(a)). The auxiliary electrode is connected to different DC voltages, and the electric field on the auxiliary line in Figure 4(b) is obtained. When the auxiliary electrode is connected to 1000 V to 300 V, it is shown in COMSOL software that when the voltage is connected to −600 to −700 V, the electric field changes little and is more uniform (see Figure (d)). In addition, it is found that the amplitude of the electric field at the edge of the collector is also changing. When the auxiliary electrode voltage is −700 V, the electric field at the edge is relatively smooth. Although it is determined that the edge electric field uniformity is improved, we are not sure that the electric field uniformity of the part of the receiving nanofibers or even the whole collecting plate is also improved. Therefore, the auxiliary line in Figure 6(c) is made, and the relationship between the electric field size of the center line of the collecting plate and the auxiliary electrode voltage is obtained (see Figure 6(d)).

Figure 4.

(a) COMSOL model for the auxiliary electrode. (b) Auxiliary line is made at the highest point of the roller and the collecting plate. (c) The auxiliary electrode is connected to different voltages to determine the magnitude of the electric field on the auxiliary line.

Figure 5.

Effect of auxiliary electrode voltage on the electric field at the highest point of the roller.

Figure 6.

(a) Collection panel edge line. (b) Variation of electric field with auxiliary electrode voltage in medium red line. (c) Central line in collection panel. (d) Variation of electric field with auxiliary electrode voltage in medium red line.

We can see from Figure 5 that the effect of the auxiliary electrode on the electric field at the top of the roller can be neglected. In the roller electrospinning system, there is no auxiliary electrode. The electric field generated by spinneret is 5.49 V/m. When the auxiliary electrode is connected to −1000 V to 300 V DC voltage, the electric field at the nanofiber injection increases by 20 v/m for every 100 V increase in the auxiliary electrode voltage. However, for the influence of the whole electric field, the influence rate of the auxiliary electrode voltage on the electric field at the spinning line of the roller under the simulation experiment condition is less than 0.0004.

In the above simulation, it can be known that adding auxiliary electrode has little effect on the electric field condition of spinneret. The auxiliary electrode will not cause enough electric field force to form Taylor cone. Then, we need to analyze whether the auxiliary electrode can be used to eliminate or improve the edge effect of the collector panel. The collecting plate is closest to a side of the nanofiber (Figure 6(a)). Figure 5 shows the effect of the auxiliary electrode voltage on this edge. As the voltage increases, the electric field at the edge of the collector plate decreases. It is found that the electric field of the centerline can be regarded as a fixed value when the auxiliary electrode voltage is −700 V. It is easy to conclude that under certain experimental conditions (temperature 25℃, 40–60% RH of humidity, rotating speed of 7000 r/h), when the auxiliary electrode is connected to −700 V, the whole collector plate can be seen as an isoelectric field surface, which is what we want.

Results and discussion

In the whole experiment, we not only studied the influence of auxiliary electrode voltage on the electric field of collecting plate and roller, but also made the experiment of the influence of the distance between the auxiliary electrode and collecting plate on the optimal voltage of auxiliary electrode. The distance between the auxiliary electrode and the collecting plate is 20 cm, and the optimum voltage of the auxiliary electrode is −700 V. Figure 7(a) and (d) shows the electric field distribution and the electric field of the collecting plate receiving the nanofiber plane. When the receiving distance is 25 cm and 30 cm, the optimum voltage at this time can be obtained as −900 V and −1100 V through Figure 7(b) and (c). Figure 7(e) and (f) is the electric field distribution of the plane of the collecting plate at this time. It is indicated that an increase in the distance between the collecting plate and the auxiliary electrode affects the change in the optimum voltage of the auxiliary electrode. The simulation results show that with the increase of the distance between the auxiliary electrode and the collector plate, the reverse voltage of the auxiliary electrode is also increasing, so as to ensure the uniformity of the electric field. It can provide a reference for the electric field optimization of needle-free roller electrostatic spinning and even the whole electrostatic spinning system.

Figure 7.

When the distance between the auxiliary electrode and the collecting plate is 20 cm, 25 cm and 30 cm, the optimum voltage to reduce the edge effect is −700 V, −900 V, −1100 V, respectively. (a) Electric field line distribution. (b, c) Electric field of centerline at different voltage of auxiliary electrode. (d–f) Electric field distribution in the plane of receiving surface of collector plate.

When the gap between the collecting plate and the auxiliary electrode was 20 cm, and the auxiliary electrode was connected to the −700 V, the yield of the nanofiber was found to be increased to 15.9 g/h. The quality of the nanofibers was observed by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 8(a)) without destroying the quality of the nanofibers under the condition of improving the yield. A comparison of the single-needle electrospun nanofiber diameter range (Figure 8(b)) suggested that the roller type electrospinning can fabricate high-quality nanofiber.

Figure 8.

(a) Scanning electron micrograph; (b) Roller-type electrospinning and TNE production of nanofiber diameter distribution map.

For comparison, nanofiber productivity of other method is listed in Table 1. Clearly, the magnet auxiliary method [37], and cleft spinneret [38] achieved a relatively lower nanofiber productivity. Although porous tube [39] and rotary cone [40] spinneret possess high nanofiber productivity, they show a wide fiber diameter distribution. Therefore, roller electrospinning (auxiliary electrode) shows a good equilibrium between nanofiber quality and nanofiber throughput at a lower voltage supply.

Table 1.

Comparison of nanofiber productivity between roller electrospinning (auxiliary electrode) and other spinning technology.

Spinneret	Productivity	Voltage
Magnet auxiliary [37]	12 times than TNE	105 V/m
Porous tube [39]	250 times than TNE	20 kV
Cleft electrode [38]	7–16 ml/h	32–43 kV
Rotary cone [40]	10 g/min	30 kV
Roller type electrospinning (auxiliary electrode)	177 times than TNE	15 kv

Conclusion

The use of an improved needleless roller electrospinning system is a versatile and simple technique. By changing the material of the roller and the position of the voltage connection, and finally adding the auxiliary electrode, not only the electrospinning conditions are achieved, but also the advantages of many limitations in the large-scale production of electrospinning are overcome. The technique uses a roller that not only increases the productivity of the nanofiber, but also improves the overall electric field distribution; the added auxiliary electrode optimizes the entire electric field and overcomes the edge effect of the collecting plate. This article can promote the development of needleless electrospinning and provide a reference for the electric field optimization of electrospinning devices in the future. This needleless roller electrospinning system is beneficial to fundamental research as well as practical application of nano-materials. Moreover, the system does require additional auxiliary energy to drive the spinneret, which should be a consideration in practical applications.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin (TD13-5035), National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2014BAH03F01) and Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (15JCQNJC41800).

References

Moon

Gil

Lee

. Syringeless electrospinning toward versatile fabrication of nanofiber web. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 41424–41424.

Bhardwaj

Kundu

. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 2010; 28: 325–347.

Peng

Liu

, et al. A Rachford-rice like equation for solvent evaporation in the bubble electrospinning. Therm Sci 2018; 22: 1679–1683.

Reneker

Yarin

Zussman

, et al. Electrospinning of nanofibers from polymer solutions and melts. Adv Appl Mech 2007; 41: 43–195.

Thavasi

Singh

Ramakrishna

. Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications. Energ Environ Sci 2008; 1: 205–221.

Aoki

Miyoshi

Yamagata

. Electrospinning of gelatin nanofiber scaffolds with mild neutral cosolvents for use in tissue engineering. Polym J 2015; 47: 267–277.

Huang

Patel

Thakar

, et al. Myotube assembly on nanofibrous and micropatterned polymers. Nano Lett 2006; 6: 537–542.

Fan

Chu

, et al. Electrospinning of small diameter 3-D nanofibrous tubular scaffolds with controllable nanofiber orientations for vascular grafts. J Mater Sci 2010; 21: 3207–3215.

Wang

Drew

Lee

, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for highly sensitive optical sensors. Nano Lett 2002; 2: 1273–1275.

10.

Sato

Nakazawa

Takahashi

, et al. Small-diameter vascular grafts of Bombyx mori silk fibroin prepared by a combination of electrospinning and sponge coating. Mater Lett 2010; 64: 1786–1788.

11.

Moon

Park

Lee

, et al. Pd-doped TiO2 nanofiber networks for gas sensor applications. Sensor Actuat B 2010; 149: 301–305.

12.

, et al. Silver nanoparticle/chitosan oligosaccharide/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers as wound dressings: a preclinical study. Int J Nanomed 2013; 8: 4131–4145.

13.

Chen

Chang

Chen

. Electrospun collagen/chitosan nanofibrous membrane as wound dressing. Colloid Surf A 2008; 313: 183–188.

14.

Lee

Yun

Choi

, et al. The preparation of primary battery separator using polyamide nonwoven and nanofiber. Adv Mater Res 2013; 724–725: 1079–1079.

15.

Lotfian

Giraudmaillet

Yoosefinejad

, et al. Electrospun piezoelectric polymer nanofiber layers for enabling in situ measurement in high-performance composite laminates. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 8891–8902.

16.

Spagnol

Fragal

Pereira

AGB

, et al. Cellulose nanowhiskers decorated with silver nanoparticles as an additive to antibacterial polymers membranes fabricated by electrospinning. J Colloid Interf Sci 2018; 531: 705–715.

17.

Soares

RMD

Siqueira

Prabhakaram

, et al. Electrospinning and electrospray of bio-based and natural polymers for biomaterials development. Mater Sci Eng C 2018; 92: 969–982.

18.

Bronner

Yamamoto

, et al. Regeneration of cellulose dissolved in ionic liquid using laser-heated melt-electrospinning. Carbohyd Polym 2018; 201: 182–188.

19.

Zong

Xia

Liang

, et al. Designing function-oriented artificial nanomaterials and membranes via electrospinning and electrospraying techniques. Mater Sci Eng C 2018; 92: 1075–1091.

20.

Zhou

Wang

, et al. Novel method for preparation of continuously twisted nanofiber yarn based on a combination of stepped airflow electrospinning and friction twisting. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 15735–15745.

21.

Yuan

Liu

, et al. Humidity sensor based on micro optical fiber array fabricated by electrospinning. Opt Commun 2018; 427: 517–521.

22.

Dorame-Miranda

Rodriguez-Felix

Lopez-Ahumada

, et al. Effect of pH and temperature on the release kinetics of urea from wheat-gluten membranes obtained by electrospinning. Polym Bull 2018; 75: 5305–5319.

23.

Zhou

Tan

. Fabrication of nanofiber mats with microstructure gradient by cone electrospinning. Nanomater Nanotechnol 2017; 7: 1–8.

24.

Ding

Cheng

Zou

, et al. Controllable synthesis of titanium nitride nanotubes by coaxial electrospinning and their application as a durable support for oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 13233–13236.

25.

Veleirinho

Rei

Lopes-da-Silva

. Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats. J Polym Sci Part B 2008; 46: 460–471.

26.

Veleirinho

Rei

Lopes-Da-Silva

. Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats. J Polym Sci Part B 2008; 46: 460–471.

27.

Liu

Ang

KKJ

. Needle-disk electrospinning inspired by natural point discharge. J Mater Sci 2017; 52: 1823–1830.

28.

Liu

Chen

. Active generation of multiple jets for producing nanofibres with high quality and high throughput. Mater Des 2016; 94: 496–501.

29.

Zhao

Liu

. Sudden solvent evaporation in bubble electrospinning for fabrication of unsmooth nanofibers. Therm Sci 2017; 21: 1827–1832.

30.

Gibson

. Perspective for a special issue of polymer reviews on: ionic liquids and their derivatives in polymer science and engineering. Polym Rev 2009; 49: 289–290.

31.

Togni

Cifra

Drizdal

. COMSOL multiphysics in undergraduate education of electromagnetic field biological interactions. IFMBE Proc 2008; 20: 433–436.

32.

Deng

Dai

Wang

. The method of overcoming the edge effect of the collection plate in the electrostatic spinning process: auxiliary plate method. Ferroelectrics 2018; 522: 98–107.

33.

Taylor

. Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc A 1969; 313: 453–475.

34.

Hohman

Shin

Rutledge

, et al. Electrospinning and electrically forced jets. I. Stability theory. Phys Fluids 2001; 13: 2201–2220.

35.

Lukas D, Sarkar A and Pokorny P. Self-organization of jets in electrospinning from free liquid surface: a generalized approach. J Appl Phys 2008; 103(8): Article 084309. DOI: 10.1063/1.2907967.

36.

Yang

, et al. Effect of solution concentration on diameter and morphology of PVA nanofibres in bubble electrospinning process. Mater Sci Tech 2010; 26: 1313–1316.

37.

Yarin

Zussman

. Upward needleless electrospinning of multiple nanofibers. Polymer 2004; 45: 2977–2980.

38.

Kula

Linka

Tunak

, et al. Image analysis of jet structure on electrospinning from free liquid surface. Appl Phys Lett 2014; 104: 243114–243114.

39.

Dosunmu

Chase

Kataphinan

, et al. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers from multiple jets on a porous tubular surface. Nanotechnology 2006; 17: 1123–1123.

40.

Wang

Liu

, et al. Superhigh-throughput needleless electrospinning using a rotary cone as spinneret. Small 2010; 6: 1612–1616.

Application of needle-free roller spinning technology in nanofibers

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Theoretical analysis

Boundary conditions

Electric field analysis

Experiment and modeling

Model building

Experimental

Simulation calculation

Results and discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References