Use of nonwords is a potentially more appropriate method of assessment for English second language (EL2) learners. A mixed comparative design was used to compare the effects when using nonwords instead of picture-based stimuli to assess articulation of EL2 learners. Subaims were to compare results between two tests and age groups. In all, 16 Setswana L1 children assigned to two age cohorts were assessed using the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation–second edition (GFTA-2), and nonword list was created via a registered Speech Motor Learning website. Results of the two assessments differed significantly, indicating that lack of semantic information may yield different outcomes for articulation assessments of EL2 learners. Speech sound differences on the GFTA-2 were sounds not found in L1. This agrees with previous research indicating incorrect diagnosis due to speech and language differences. There was no significant difference between the two age cohorts. This research forms the basis for investigations into nonwords as a more accurate method for assessment of EL2 learners.
BarrattJ.Khoza-ShangaseK.MsimangK. (2012). Speech-language assessment in a linguistically diverse setting: Preliminary exploration of the possible impact of informal “solutions” within the South African context. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 34–44.
2.
BekkerI. (2009). The vowels of South African English. Potchefstroom, South Africa: Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education.
3.
BekkerI.EleyG. (2007). An acoustic analysis of White South African English (WSAfE) monophthongs. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25, 107–114.
4.
BishopD.NorthT.DonlanC. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 391–403.
5.
BortzM. A. (1997). Tswana expressive receptive language assessment. St Mabyn, UK: STASS Publications.
6.
CaesarL.KohlerP. (2007). The state of school-based bilingual assessment: Actual practice versus recommended guidelines. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 190–200.
7.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (2014). Test of auditory comprehension of language (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
8.
ColeD. T. (1955). An introduction to Tswana grammar. Capetown, South Africa: Longman Penguin S.A.
9.
EdmondsL. A.MarquardtT. P. (2004). Syllable use in apraxia of speech: Preliminary findings. Aphasiology, 18, 1121–1134.
10.
EdwardsM.ShribergL. (1983). Phonology: Applications in communicative disorders. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
GoldmanR.FristoeM. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
13.
GoldsteinB. A.Gildersleeve-NeumannC. E. (2015). Bilingualism and speech sound disorders. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 237–244.
14.
GollanT.MontoyaR.CeraC.SandovalT. (2008). More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814.
15.
Gutierrez-ClellenV.ConboyB.BrownS.Robinson-ZañartuC. (1998). Modifiability a dynamic approach to assessing immediate language change. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 19, 31–42.
16.
HermansD.BongaertsT.De BotK.SchreuderR. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-229.
17.
HowieS.CombrinckC.TsheleM.RouxK.McLeod PalaneN.MokoenaG. (2017). PIRLS literacy 2016: South African highlights report. Pretoria, South Africa: Centre for Evaluation & Assessment, University of Pretoria.
18.
KadyamusumaM. R. (2016). Limitations to practicing as a bilingual speech-language-pathologist in the United States. Journal of Speech Pathology & Therapy, 1(2), Article e103.
19.
KovasY.Hayiou-ThomasM.OliverB.DaleP.BishopD.PlominR. (2005). Genetic influences in different aspects of language development: The etiology of language skills in 4.5-year-old twins. Child Development, 76, 632–651.
20.
LeeM.WilliamsJ. (2001). Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: Evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 233–248.
21.
Le RouxM. (2016). An acoustic investigation of English vowels as produced by English L1 and Setswana L1 foundation phase learners. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria.
22.
MálekH. L. (2013). The acquisition of English prepositions in first language speakers of Northern Sotho and Afrikaans: A cognitive linguistic study. Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Johannesburg.
23.
MartinN. A.BrownellR. (2005). Test of auditory processing skills (3rd ed.). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
24.
McLeodS.VerdonS.BowenC. (2013). International aspirations for speech-language pathologists’ practice with multilingual children with speech sound disorders: Development of a position paper. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 375–387.
25.
MiltiņaI.AugstkalneD. (2015). Factors, influencing the emergence of child speech disorder. Society. Integration. Education, 3, 153–164.
26.
MoonsamyS.KathardH. (2015). Speech-language therapy in a school context: Principles and practices. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik Publishers.
27.
NieslerT.LouwP.RouxJ. (2005). Phonetic analysis of Afrikaans, English, Xhosa and Zulu using South African speech databases. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 23, 459–474.
28.
PascoeM.NormanV. (2011). Contextually relevant resources in speech-language therapy and audiology in South Africa—Are there any?South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 58, 2–5.
29.
PascoeM.RogersC.NormanV. (2013). Are we there yet? On a journey towards more contextually relevant resources in speech-language therapy and audiology. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 60, 2–9.
30.
PeñaE.QuinnR.IglesiasA. (1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A nonbiased procedure. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 269–280.
31.
PrestonJ. L.SekiA. (2011). Identifying residual speech sound disorders in bilingual children: A Japanese-English case study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 73–86.
32.
ReuterskiöldC.GrigosM. I. (2015). Non-word repetition and speech motor control in children. New York: New York University.
33.
RobertsonC.SalterW. (2007). Phonological awareness test (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
34.
Seeff-GabrielB. (2003). Phonological processing: A platform for assisting second-language learners with English spelling. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 291–310.
ShribergL. D.LohmeierH. L.CampbellT. F.DollaghanC. A.GreenJ. R.MooreC. A. (2009). A nonword repetition task for speakers with misarticulations: The Syllable Repetition Task (SRT). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1189–1212.
37.
SnymanJ. W. (1989). An introduction to Tswana phonetics. Hout Bay, South Africa: Marius Lubbe.
38.
South African Statistics. (2011). Statistics South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa.
39.
SouthwoodF. (2013). Towards a dialect-neutral assessment instrument for the language skills of Afrikaans-speaking children: The role of socioeconomic status. Journal of Child Language, 40, 415–437.
40.
SouthwoodF.Van DulmO. (2015). The challenge of linguistic and cultural diversity: Does length of experience affect South African speech-language therapists’ management of children with language impairment. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 62, 1–14.
41.
Van BiljonS.NolteB.Van der LindeJ.ZsilaveczU.NaudeE. (2015). Performance of EAL learners on a non-South African Articulation Test (GFTA-2). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33, 129–139.
42.
Van der MerweA. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25, 1174–1206.
43.
Van der MerweA.Le RouxM. (2014). Idiosyncratic sound systems of the South African Bantu languages: Research and clinical implications for speech-language pathologists and audiologists. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 61, 1–8.
44.
Wen-HuiQ. (2016). A review of studies on bilingual children’s word awareness development. Sino-US English Teaching, 13, 324–331.
45.
WilsenachC. (2016). Identifying phonological processing deficits in Northern Sotho-speaking children: The use of non-word repetition as a language assessment tool in the South African context. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 63, 1–11.
46.
YochimB. P.KaneK. D.MuellerA. E. (2009). Naming test of the neuropsychological assessment battery: Convergent and discriminant validity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 575–583.
47.
ZającM. (2016). Variability in L2 English pronunciation examined through the prism of phonetic imitation. In Waniek-KlimczakA. C. E. (Ed.), Variability in English across time and space (pp. 141–159). Łódź, Poland: University of Lodz Press.
48.
ZiervogelD. (1967). Handbook of the speech sounds and sound changes of the Bantu languages of South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: University of South Africa.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
