The ideal worker in the Academy devotes most of their lives to scholarly pursuits, which leaves little time for family. This problem leads to work–life conflict, which is particularly concerning for faculty members who are seeking promotion and tenure. Work–life conflict is most challenging in the case of academic mothers, who face professional career challenges in addition to work–life conflict. Rigid organizational policies and non-supportive cultures perpetuate the problem, particularly when the faculty member is an academic mother seeking promotion and tenure.
The Solution
Human resource development (HRD) interventions implemented at the individual, departmental, and institutional levels (e.g., training development, performance management, and career development initiatives) have been shown to reduce work–life conflict, improve overall well-being, and create a more family friendly environment. Organization development (OD) cultural change interventions aimed at changing the Academy to become more family focused and supportive of career flexibility are recommended.
The Stakeholders
Academic faculty, higher education administrators, HRD scholars, and practitioners.
AlegriaM.FukudaM.LapatinS. (2019). Mentoring future researchers: Advice and considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000416.
2.
AlperJ.GibbonsA. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260(5106), 409–412.
BurkeW. W. (1982). Organization development: Principles and practices. Scott, Foresman.
8.
CanettoS. S.TrottC. D.WinterrowdE. M.HaruyamaD.JohnsonA. (2017). Challenges to the choice discourse: Women’s views of their family and academic-science career options and constraints. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 29(1/2), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2016.1273174
9.
CaseyP. R.GrzywaczJ. G. (2008). Employee health and well-being: The role of flexibility and work-family balance. The Pyschologist-manager Journal, 11, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150801963885
10.
ChurchA. H.ShullA. C.BurkeW. W. (2018). A look in the mirror: Current research findings on the values and practice of OD. In JamiesonD. W.ChurchA. H.VogelsangJ. D. (Eds.), Enacting values-based change: Organization development in action (pp. 21–42). Switzerland.
11.
DragoR. W. (2007). Striking a balance: Work, family, life. Dollars & Sense.
12.
ElliottS.PowellR.BrentonJ. (2015). Being a good mom: Low income, Black single mothers negotiate intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues, 36(3), 351–370.
13.
EversoleB. A. W.CrowderC. L.LekchiriS.ClarkA.ZimmermanT. S. (2015). Mothering and professing in the Ivory Tower: Supporting graduate student mothers. In O’ReillyA. (Ed.), Mothers in the academe special issue. Journal of the motherhood initiative for research and community involvement (pp. 65–80). The Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement.
14.
EversoleB. A. W.HantzisD. M.ReidM. A. (2013). Re-imagining the fairytale of motherhood in the academy. In CastenadaM.IsgroK. (Eds.), Mothers in academia (pp. 160–169). Columbia University Press.
GasserC. E.ShafferK. S. (2014). Career development of women in academia: Traversing the leaky pipeline. Professional Counselor, 4(4), 332–352.
17.
Glazer-RaymoJ. (2008). The feminist agenda. In Glazer-RaymoJ. (Ed.), Unfinished agendas: New and continuing gender challenges in higher education (pp. 1–34). Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
19.
HolmJ. M.ProsekE. A.Godwin WeisbergerA. C. (2015). A phenomenological investigation of counselling doctoral students becoming mothers. Counselor Education and Supervision, 54, 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2015.00066.x
20.
JangS. J. (2009). The relationships of flexible work schedules, workplace support, supervisory support, work-life balance, and the well-being of working parents. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488370802678561
21.
KoJ.HurS.U.Smith-WalterA. (2013). Family-friendly work practices and job satisfaction and organizational performance: Moderating effects of managerial support and performance-oriented management. Public Personnel Management, 42(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013505503
22.
KossekE. E.HammerL. B.KellyE. L.MoenP. (2014). Designing work, family & health organizational change initiatives. Organizational Dynamics, 43, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.007
23.
KossekE. E.LewisS.HammerL. B. (2010). Work life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709352385
24.
KramerM. W. (2008). The year of the newborns: A department chair’s reflections. Women’s Studies in Communication, 31(2), 196–202.
25.
LynchK. D. (2008). Gender roles and the American academe: A case study of graduate student mothers. Gender and Education, 20(6), 585–605.
MasonM. A.GouldenM. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. In JacobsJ. A.MaddenJ. F. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Series: Mommies and daddies on the fast track: Success of parents in demanding professions (1st ed.) (pp. 86–103). Sage.
McCutcheonJ. M.MorrisonM. A. (2016). “Eight days a week”: A national snapshot of academic mothers’ realities in Canadian psychology departments. Canadian Psychology, 57(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000049
30.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.de BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilkinson-FlickerS.GebrekristosS.ZhangJ.RathbunA.BarmerA.Bullock MannF.HinzS. (2017). The condition of education, 2017 (NCES 2017-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017144
O’LaughlinE. M.BischoffL. G. (2001). Balancing parenthood and academia: The challenges and contradictions of academic careers. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.18738/awi.v9i1.145
33.
O’ReillyA. (2010). Outlawing motherhood: A theory and politic of maternal empowerment for the twenty-first century. Hecate, 36(1–2), 17–29.
34.
PoelmansS.BehamB. (2008). The moment of truth: Conceptualizing managerial work-life policy allowance decisions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1.1348/096317908X314865
SchlehoferM. (2012). Practicing what we teach? An autobiographical reflection on navigating academia as a single mother. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20490
TrowerC. A.BleakJ. L. (2004). Study of new scholars: Statistical report. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
39.
TrowerC. A.ChaitR. P. (2002). Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine, 104(4), 33–37.
40.
van AndersS. (2004). Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 51(9/10), 511–521.
41.
van SteenbergenE. F.EllemersN. (2009). Is managing the work-family interface worthwhile? Benefits for employee health and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 617–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.569
42.
WardK.Wolf-WendelL. (2016). Academic motherhood: Mid-career perspectives and the ideal worker norm. New Directions for Higher Education, 176, 11–23.
43.
WilliamsJ. C. (1999). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.
44.
WolfingerN. H.MasonM. A.GouldenM. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Gender, marriage, and fertility in the ivory tower. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 388–405.
