Human resource development (HRD) functions in a world of exploding technology to which it has responded by developing virtual HRD (VHRD). Through appropriate technology, VHRD can lead organizations into more effective learning, both formal and informal. Screen-based virtual reality environments (SVREs) are well suited as a platform for this learning advancement. However, many HRD professionals may be unfamiliar with the technical theories underpinning SVRE design. Understanding these theories is important for using this technology effectively.
The Solution
This article offers HRD professionals an introduction to SVREs and the technical theory inherent within their design, and discusses implications of SVREs for learning and VHRD. It also describes the Theory U leadership model as a framework for researching and using SVREs in VHRD.
The Stakeholders
This article is aimed at both VHRD researchers and practitioners. It encourages researcher/practitioner partnerships as an appropriate strategy for developing, evaluating, and applying this technology.
AusburnF. B.AusburnL. J. (2008). Send students anywhere without leaving the classroom: Virtual reality in CTE. Techniques, 83(7), 43-46.
2.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B. (2008a). Effects of desktop virtual reality on learner performance and confidence in environmental mastery: Opening a line of inquiry. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45, 54-87.
3.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B. (2008b). New desktop virtual reality technology in technical education. i-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 48-61.
4.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B. (2010, December). “Spheres of reality”: A conceptualization of desktop virtual environments in career and technical education and an implementation training model. Paper presented at National Career & Technical Education Research and Professional Development Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
5.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B.DottererG.WashingtonA.KroutterP. (2013, December). Simulation and virtual technologies for workforce learning: Successes from alternate realities. Paper presented at National Career & Technical Education Research and Professional Development Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
6.
AusburnL. J.MartensJ.DottererG.CalhounP. (2009). Avatars, pedagogical agents, and virtual environments: Social learning systems online. i-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 1-13.
7.
BennettE. E. (2009). Virtual HRD: The intersection of knowledge management, culture, and intranets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 362-374. doi:10.1177/1523422309339724
8.
BennettE. E. (2010). The coming paradigm shift: Synthesis and future directions for virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 728-741. doi:10.1177/1523422310394796
9.
BennettE. E. (2011). Informal adult learning in simulated and virtual environments. In Information Resources Management Association (Eds.), Gaming and simulations: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 1914-1932). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-195-9.ch802
10.
BennettE. E. (2014b). How an intranet provides opportunities for learning organizational culture: Implications for virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 296-319.
11.
BennettE. E. (2014a). Introducing new perspectives on virtual human resource department. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 263-280.
12.
BennettE. E.BieremaL. L. (2010). The ecology of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 632-647.
13.
BennettE. E.McWhorterR. R. (in press). Virtual Human Resource Development. In ChalofskyN. E.RoccoT. F.MorrisM. L. (Eds.), The handbook of human resource development: The discipline and the profession. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
BioccaF.HarmsC.BurgoonJ. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measurement of social presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456-480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
15.
BladeR. A.PadgettM. L. (2002). Virtual environments standards and terminology. In StanneyK. M. (Eds.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (pp. 15-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
BouvierP. (2008). The five pillars of presence: Guidelines to reach presence. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Workshop on Presence (pp. 246-249). Cleveland, OH: Starlab.
17.
BrackenC. C.LombardM. (2004). Social presence and children: Praise, intrinsic motivation, and learning with computers. Journal of Communication, 54, 22-37.
18.
CalvertS. L. (2002). The social impact of virtual environment technology. In StanneyK. M. (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (pp. 663-680). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
CantonJ. (1999). TechnoFutures: How leading-edge technology will transform business in the 21st century. Carlsbad, CA: Hay House.
20.
CantonJ. (2006). The extreme future: The top trends that will reshape the world for the next 5, 10, and 20 years. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
21.
ChandlerP.SwellerJ. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
22.
ChapmanD. D.StoneS. J. (2010). Measurement of outcomes in virtual environments. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 665-680. doi:10.1177/1523422310394792
23.
CrossJ. (2007). Informal learning: Rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
24.
DarkenR. P.PetersonB. (2002). Spatial orientation, wayfinding, and representation. In StanneyK. M. (Eds.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (pp. 493-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
DarkenR. P.SibertJ. L. (1996) Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds. In TabuerM. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground (pp. 142-149). New York, NY: AMC. Retrieved from http://www.sigchi.org/chi96/proceedings/papers/Darken/Rpd_txt.htm
26.
DaviesR. (2004). Adapting virtual reality for the participatory design of work environments. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 13(11), 1-33. doi:10.1023/B:COSU.0000014985.12045.9c
27.
DavilaT.EpsteinM.SheltonR. (2006). Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
28.
DelelloJ. A.McWhorterR. R. (2014). New visual social media for the higher education classroom. In MalliaG. (Eds.), The social classroom: Integrating social network use in education (pp. 368-393). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4904-0.ch019
29.
Di BlasN.PoggiC. (2007). European virtual classrooms: Building effective “virtual” educational experiences. Virtual Reality, 11, 129-143. doi:10.1007/s10055-006-0060-4
30.
DottererG. (2010a). Effects of assistive technologies combined with desktop virtual reality in instructional procedures (1). In SeokS.MeyenE.DaCostaB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on human cognition and assistive technology: Design, accessibility, and transdisciplinary perspective (pp. 209-305). Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
31.
DottererG. (2010b). Effects of assistive technologies combined with desktop virtual reality in instructional procedures (2). In SeokS.MeyenE.DaCostaB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on human cognition and assistive technology: Design, accessibility, and transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 306-312). Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
32.
DottererG. P. (2011). The effects of multiple-channel technologies and learning styles on proceduralized instruction in a virtual environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
LazarsfeldP.MertonR. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In BergerM.AbelT.PageC. H. (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18-66). New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
40.
LeeK. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
41.
LoftinR. B.ChenJ. X.RosenblumL. (2005). Visualization using virtual reality. In HansenC. D.JohnsonC. R. (Eds.), The visualization handbook (pp. 479-489). New York, NY: Elsevier.
42.
LohrL. L. (2007). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons in visual literacy (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
LombardM.DittonT. B.WeinsteinL. (2009, November). Measuring presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence (pp. 1-15). Los Angeles, CA: Starlab. Available from http://ispr.info
44.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
MancusoD. S.ChlupD. T.McWhorterR. R. (2010). A study of adult learning in a virtual world. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 681-699. doi:10.1177/1523422310395368
46.
MasieE. (2009). Updates on learning, business & technology (Learning TRENDS, Report No. 559). Available from http://www.masie.com
47.
MayerR. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
49.
McWhorterR. R. (2010). Exploring the emergence of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 623-631. doi:10.1177/1523422310395367
50.
McWhorterR. R. (2014). A synthesis of new perspectives on Virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 391-401.
51.
McWhorterR. R.LindhjemK. A. (2013). Virtual learning environments: How they can benefit nanotechnology safety education. IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine, 7(2), 15-17. doi:10.1109/MNANO.2013.2260460
52.
McWhorterR. R.LynhamS. (2014). Initial conceptualization of a theory of virtual scenario planning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3).
53.
MikropoulosT. A. (2006). Presence: A unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 10, 197-206.
54.
MoonY. (1996). Similarity effects in human–computer interactions: Effects of user personality, computer personality, and user control on attraction and attributions of responsibility (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
55.
MoshellJ. M.HughesC. E. (2002). Virtual environments as a tool for academic learning. In StanneyK. M. (Eds.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 893-910). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
NassC.FoggB. J.MoonY. (1996). Can computers be teammates?International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
57.
NassC.MoonY. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
58.
NassC.MoonY.FoggB. J.ReevesB.DryerD. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities?International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
59.
NassC.SteuerJ.HenriksenL.DryerD. C. (1994). Machines, social attributes, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to “self-” or “other-” evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 543-559.
60.
NegroponteN. (1995). Being digital. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
61.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently?On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-9.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
ScharmerC. D. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges—The social technology of presencing. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
65.
SchrageM. (2000). Serious play: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard College Press.
66.
SchroederR. (1997). Networked worlds: Social aspects of multi-user virtual reality technology. Sociological Research Online, 2. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/4/5.html
67.
SengeP.ScharmerC. O.JaworskiJ.FlowersB. S. (2004). Presence: Exploring profound change in people, organizations, and society. New York, NY: Doubleday.
68.
ShankD. (2008, July). Affect toward computers who coerce in social exchange. Paper presented at the American Sociological Annual Meeting. Boston, MA.
69.
ShortD. (2010). Foreword: Reflections on Virtual HRD from a scholar-practitioner. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 619-622. doi:10.1177/1523422310394788
70.
ShortD. C. (2013). Designing a 3D virtual HRD environment from a scholar-practitioner perspective. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 270-283. doi:10.1177/1523422313487838
SwellerJ.AyresP.Kalyuga. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.
74.
TapscottD. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
75.
TapscottD.WilliamsA. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything (Expanded ed.). New York, NY: Penguin Group.
76.
ThomasK. (2014) Workplace technology and the creation of boundaries: The role of VHRD in a 24/7 work environment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 281-295.
77.
WallerD.HuntE.KnappD. (1998). The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 129-143. doi:10.1162/105474698565631
78.
WashingtonA. L. (2013). Effects of desktop virtual reality environment training on state anxiety and vocational identity scores among persons with disabilities during job placement/job readiness activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
79.
WrightS. W.YatesE. L. (1999). Distance learning: The fascination with education via dancing electrons raises questions about access, equality, and outcomes. Community College Week, 11(22), 6-9.
80.
WukitschM.SimmonsR.HuttM. (2013). Rearticulating values through applied theories at Children’s Hospital Colorado. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 252-269. doi:10.1177/1523422313487306
