The emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak can be considered a potential driver of changes not only in academic disciplines but also, as most observers underline, in the teaching mission of higher education. This raises the main question of this article, that is, exactly whether and how an external shock such as COVID-19 can impact the comprehensive profile of academic disciplines. By focusing on European political science, the article assesses the differences among scholars in this community in terms of potential long-term reactions. The study, based on the outcomes of an original survey conducted among 1400 European professional political scientists (EPSs) at the end of 2020, aims at detecting the “predisposition to adaptation” of the community, by examining the attitudes revealed by EPSs during the early phase of pandemic. In this regard, we focus on the explanations of different aspects of ‘professional adaptation’, discussing three dimensions that seem to be present in our sample, although with very different weights: passive, proactive and innovative adaptation.
ArgyrisCSchönDA (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bandola-GillJFlindersMAndersonA (2021) Co-option, Control and Criticality: The Politics of Relevance Regimes for the Future of Political Science. European Political Science20 (1): 218–236.
3.
BecherT (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories. London: Open University Press.
4.
BiglanA (1973) Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments. Journal of Applied Psychology57 (3): 204–213.
5.
CairneyP (2015) How Can Policy Theory Have an Impact on Policymaking? The Role of Theory-Led Academic–Practitioner Discussions. Teaching Public Administration33 (1): 22–39.
6.
CairneyP (2016) The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CapanoGVerzichelliL (2016) Looking for Eclecticism? Structural and Contextual Factors Underlying Political Science’s Relevance Gap: Evidence from the Italian Case. European Political Science15 (2): 211–232.
8.
CohenELloydS (2014) Disciplinary Evolution and the Rise of the Transdiscipline. Informing Science. The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline17: 189–215.
9.
European Universities Association (EUA) (2020) European Higher Education in the COVID-19 Crisis. Paris: EUA.
10.
FarrJ (1988) The History of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science32: 1175–1195.
11.
FeldmanMS (2000) Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science11 (6): 611–629.
GoodinRE (ed.) (2011) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
GorskaMKulickaKStaniszewskaZ, et al. (2021) Deepening Inequalities: What Did COVID-19 Reveal about the Gendered Nature of Academic Work?Gender, Work & Organization28 (4): 1546–1561.
15.
International Association of Universities (IAU) (2020) Regional/National Perspectives on the Impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education. Paris: IAU.
16.
JohnstonCS (2016) A Systematic Review of the Career Adaptability Literature and Future Outlook. Journal of Career Assessment26 (1): 3–30.
17.
KlingemanHD (ed.) (2007) The State of Political Science in Western Europe. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
18.
LowiT (1992) The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study. The American Political Science Review86 (1): 1–7.
19.
MarchJC (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science2 (1): 71–87.
20.
MinelloAMartucciSManzoL (2020) The Pandemic and the Academic Mothers: Present Hardships and Future Perspectives. European Societies23 (1): 1–13.
21.
MyersKRThamWYYinY, et al. (2020) Unequal Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Scientists. Nature Human Behaviour4: 880–883.
22.
O’LearyVEIckovicsJR (1995) Resilience and Thriving in Response to Challenge: An Opportunity for a Paradigm Shift in Women’s Health. Women Health1 (2): 121–142.
23.
ParentJDLevittK (2009) Manager vs. Employee Perceptions of Adaptability and Work Performance. Business Renaissance Quarterly4 (4): 23–48.
24.
PaternotteDVerlooM (2020) Political Science at Risk in Europe: Frailness and the Study of Power. In: BouncourtTEngeliIGarziaD (eds) Political Science in Europe. Achievements, Challenges, Prospects. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.287–310.
25.
RaabeIJEhlertAJohannD, et al. (2020) Satisfaction of Scientists during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications7: 139.
26.
Real DatoJVerzichelliL (2021) In Search of Relevance: European Political Scientists and the Public Sphere in Critical Times. European Political Science. Epub ahead of print 10 June. DOI: 10.1057/s41304-021-00335-9.
27.
SartaADurandRVergneJP (2021) Organizational Adaptation. Journal of Management47 (1): 43–75.
StaniscuaskiFReichertFWerneckFP, et al. (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on Academic Mothers. Science368 (6492): 724.
30.
StokerG (2010) Blockages on the Road to Relevance: Why Has Political Science Failed to Deliver?European Political Science9 (1): 72–84.
31.
WalkerJTFontinhaRHaak-SaheemW, et al. (2020) The Effects of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Teaching and Engagement in UK Business Schools. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3717423
32.
WatermeyerRCrickTKnightC, et al. (2021) COVID-19 and Digital Disruption in UK Universities: Afflictions and Affordances of Emergency Online Migration. Higher Education81 (3): 623–641.
