A critical comparison of the agency identifier codes in the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) and FedScope data sets reveals three distinct types of issues will occur when researchers attempt to merge the data sets: (a) a single agency is assigned different codes across data sets; (b) a single code is assigned to different agencies across data sets; and (c) a single code is assigned to two or more agencies in the FEVS data set and a separate agency in the FedScope data set. Between 2013 and 2016, these issues are present in almost all major federal departments. Compatibility issues between the agency identifiers could cause the user to drop observations unnecessarily or unknowingly combine two different agencies’ data improperly. If uncorrected, these issues will distort the analysis of studies that rely on this combination of data. However, researchers can correct for this issue and still use Office of Personnel Management (OPM) identifiers to combine data across multiple data sets.
AlteriA. M. (2018). The impact of representative hiring on employee perceptions and discrimination complaints over time. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 18371). Academy of Management. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.18371abstract
2.
CaillierJ. G. (2016). Does satisfaction with family-friendly programs reduce turnover? A panel study conducted in U.S. Federal Agencies. Public Personnel Management, 45(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026016652424
3.
ChanD. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 421–483.
4.
CohenG.BlakeR. S.GoodmanD. (2016). Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 240–263.
5.
FaveroN.BullockJ. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–30.
6.
FernandezS.ReshW. G.MoldogazievT.OberfieldZ. W. (2015). Assessing the past and promise of the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey for public management research: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 382–394.
7.
JakobsenM.JensenR. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30.
8.
LeeH. W. (2017). Performance-based human resource management and federal employee’s motivation: Moderating roles of goal-clarifying intervention, appraisal fairness, and feedback satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39, 323–348.
9.
LeeS. (2018). Employee turnover and organizational performance in U.S. Federal Agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017715322
10.
LeeS.FernandezS.ChangC. (2018). Job scarcity and voluntary turnover in the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017732798
11.
LewisG. B.PittsD. (2018). Deciding to retire from the federal service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(1), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16639110
12.
LewisG. B.PittsD. W. (2017). LGBT-heterosexual differences in perceptions of fair treatment in the federal service. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015605378
13.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2013). I think (I am doing well), therefore I am: Assessing the validity of administrators’ self-assessments of performance. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 1–27.
14.
MoldogazievT. T.SilviaC. (2015). Fostering affective organizational commitment in public sector agencies: The significance of multifaceted leadership roles. Public Administration, 93(3), 557–575.
15.
MoonK. K. (2018). Examining the relationships between diversity and work behaviors in U.S. federal agencies: Does inclusive management make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 218–247.
ReshW.MoldogazievT.FernandezS.LeslieC. A. (2019). Reversing the lens: Assessing the use of federal employee viewpoint survey in public administration research. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19865012
18.
RubinE. V.AlteriA. M. (2019). Discrimination complaints in the U.S. Federal Government: Reviewing progress under the No FEAR Act. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17744864
19.
RubinE. V.KelloughJ. E. (2011). Does civil service reform affect behavior? Linking alternative personnel systems, perceptions of procedural justice, and complaints. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 121–141.
20.
RubinE. V.WeinbergS. E. (2016). Does changing the rules really matter? Assessing procedural justice perceptions under civil service reform. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 26(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu048
21.
SomersM. J. (2018). Strategies for improving measurement models for secondary data in public administration research: Illustrations from the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 228–239.
22.
StritchJ. M. (2017). Minding the time: A critical look at longitudinal design and data analysis in quantitative public management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 219–244.
