The declines in political party memberships along with an increase in direct democracy have drawn numerous scholarly discussions. Previous literature has explored the relationship between direct democracy and party membership, but the role of political efficacy in shaping this relationship has not been systematically examined. In particular, direct democracy can increase political efficacy by enhancing citizens’ civic skills and perceptions about government responsiveness and indirectly raise citizens’ interests in joining political parties. Using the structural equation model, this study shows that political efficacy strongly correlates with direct democracy and plays a significant role in influencing the effect of direct democracy on party membership. Moreover, results from the bootstrap mediation test of examining potential causal inferences suggest that there are distinct differences in the indirect effects of direct democracy mediated by internal efficacy and external efficacy on party membership.
AchurySScarrowSEKosiara-PedersenK, et al. (2020) The Consequences of Membership Incentives: Do Greater Political Benefits Attract Different Kinds of Members?Party Politics26 (1): 56–68.
2.
BauerPCFatkeM (2014) Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust—Or Both?Swiss Political Science Review20 (1): 49–69.
3.
BowlerSDonovanT (2004) Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly4 (3): 345–363.
4.
BowlerSDonovanT (2013) Civic Duty and Turnout on the UK Referendum on AV: What Shapes the Duty to Vote?Electoral Studies32: 265–273.
5.
BowlerSDonovanTKarpJA (2007) Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies. Political Research Quarterly60 (3): 351–362.
6.
BowlerSDonovanT (2002) Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government. British Journal of Political Science32(2): 371–390.
7.
DahlbergSHolmbergS (2014) Democracy and Bureaucracy: How Their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction. West European Politics37 (3): 515–537.
8.
DahlbergSLindeJHolmbergS (2015) Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output. Political Studies63 (S1): 18–37.
9.
DaltonRJWeldonS (2013) Is Direct Democracy a Kinder and Gentler Democracy?Taiwan Journal of Democracy2013: 39–62.
10.
DonovanTKarpJA (2006) Popular Support for Direct Democracy. Party Politics12 (5): 671–688.
11.
DonovanTTolbertCJSmithDA (2009) Political Engagement, Mobilization, and Direct Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly73 (1): 98–118.
12.
DyckJJLascherE (2009) Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered. Political Behavior31 (3): 401–427.
13.
DyckJJSeabrookNR (2010) Mobilized by Direct Democracy: Short-Term Versus Long-Term Effects and the Geography of Turnout in Ballot Measure Elections. Social Science Quarterly91 (1): 188–208.
14.
FatkeM (2014) Allure or Alternative? Direct Democracy and Party Identification. Party Politics20 (2): 248–260.
15.
FaucherF (2015) New Forms of Political Participation: Changing Demands or Changing Opportunities to Participate in Political Parties?Comparative European Politics13 (4): 405–429.
16.
FreyBStutzerA (2000) Happiness, Economy and Institutions. Economic Journal110 (466): 918–938.
GibsonRGreffetFCantijochM (2017) Friend or Foe? Digital Technologies and the Changing Nature of Party Membership. Political Communication34: 89–111.
19.
HayesAFPreacherKJMyersTA (2011) Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Political Communication Research. In: BucyEPHolbertRL (eds) The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research. New York: Routledge, pp.434–465.
20.
HoffmannHSpringerF (2019) The Individual-Level Determinants of German Party Membership. German Politics28 (2): 242–226.
21.
HoogheMKöllnA-K (2020) Types of Party Affiliation and the Multi-Speed Party: What Kind of Party Support Is Functionally Equivalent to Party Membership?Party Politics26(4): 355–365.
22.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR (2008) Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6 (1): 53–60.
23.
KarpJA (2012) Electoral Systems, Party Mobilisation and Political Engagement. Australian Journal of Political Science47 (1): 71–89.
24.
KarpJABanducciSA (2008) Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science38 (2): 311–334.
25.
KaufmannDKraayAMastruzziM (2009) Governance Matters VIII: Governance Indicators for 1996–2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.
26.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12 (1): 3–27.
27.
LadnerABraendleM (1999) Does Direct Democracy Matter for Political Parties? An Empirical Test in the Swiss Cantons. Party Politics5 (3): 283–302.
28.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd edn.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
MagalhãesPC (2014) Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy. European Journal of Political Research53 (1): 77–97.
30.
MairPV (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso Books.
31.
MairPVvan BiezenI (2001) Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000. Party Politics7 (1): 5–21.
32.
MarienSKernA (2018) The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the Effect of Direct Democracy on Citizens’ Political Support. Political Behavior40: 857–882.
33.
MorlinoLQuarantaM (2016) What Is the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Democracy? Evidence from Europe. International Political Science Review37 (5): 618–633.
34.
NiemiRGCraigSCMatteiF (1991) Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review85: 1407–1413.
35.
PatemanC (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PetersY (2016) (Re)join the Party! The Effects of Direct Democracy on Party Membership in Europe. European Journal of Political Research55: 138–159.
37.
PolettiMWebbPBaleT (2019) Why Do Only Some People Who Support Parties Actually Join Them? Evidence from Britain. West European Politics42 (1): 1156–1172.
38.
PonceAFScarrowSE (2016) Which Members? Using Cross-National Surveys to Study Party Membership. Party Politics22 (6): 679–690.
39.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods40 (3): 879–891.
40.
SchlozmanDYohaiI (2008) How Initiatives Don’t Always Make Citizens: Ballot Initiatives in the American States, 1978–2004. Political Behavior30 (4): 469–489.
41.
SmithMA (2002) Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen. Journal of Politics64(3): 892–903.
42.
SmithDTolbertC (2004) Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
43.
SmithDTolbertC (2007) The Instrumental and Educative Effects of Ballot Measures: Research on Direct Democracy in the American States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly7 (4): 419–445.
44.
StrömbäckJDjerf -PierreMShehataA (2013) The Dynamics of Political Interest and News Media Consumption: A Longitudinal Perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research25 (4): 414–435.
45.
TolbertCJSmithDA (2005) The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout. American Politics Research33 (2): 283–309.
46.
van BiezenIMairPPoguntkeT (2012) Going, Going, . . . Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research51 (1): 24–56.
47.
van HauteEGaujaA (eds) (2015) Party Members and Activists. London: Routledge.
48.
VatterA (2009) Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries?European Political Science Review1 (1): 125–154.
49.
WhiteleyPF (2011) Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World. Party Politics17 (1): 21–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
