This article largely agrees with John White’s characterizations of the relationships among philosophy of education, philosophy more generally, and the conventional world. It then extends what White identifies as the fundamental problem that should now be occupying philosophy of education – the irreconcilable opposition between education for Smithian efficiency and education for Deweyian democracy – to an analysis of the relationship between philosophy of education and education policy and research. It concludes that philosophers of education committed to realizing a Deweyian form of democratic education will most likely be stymied.
American Educational Research Association (AERA) (2006) Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher35(6): 33–40. Available at: http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/13127_Standards_from_AERA.pdf (accessed 30 December 2013).
2.
American Educational Research Association (AERA) (2009) Standards for reporting on humanities-oriented research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher38(6): 481–486. Available at: http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/481-486_09EDR09.pdf (accessed 30 December 2013).
3.
CampbellD (1982) Experiments as arguments. In: HouseERMathisonSPearsolJA (eds) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 7, pp. 117–128. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
4.
CurrenR (2009) Pragmatist philosophy of education. In: SiegelH (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, pp. 489–507. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
GarrisonJ (1986) Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher15: 12–18.
6.
GubaE (1987) What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation?Evaluation Practice8: 23–43.
7.
HoweK (1985) Two dogmas of educational research. Educational Researcher14: 10–18.
8.
HoweK (1988) Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher17: 10–16.
HoweK (2009a) Isolating science from the humanities: The third dogma of educational research. Qualitative Inquiry15: 766–784.
11.
HoweK (2009b) Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher38: 428–440.
12.
HoweKMeensD (2012) Democracy Left Behind: How Recent Education Reforms Undermine Local School Governance and Democratic Education. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Available at: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/democracy-left-behind (accessed 30 December 2013).
13.
KitcherP (2009) Education, democracy and capitalism. In: SiegelH (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, pp. 300–318. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
LagemannE (2000) An Elusive Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
National Commission on Educational Excellence (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
National Research Council (NRC) (2002) Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
National Research Council (NRC) (2004) Advancing Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
PhillipsDC (1983) After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational Researcher12: 4–12.
PutnamH (2002) The entanglement of fact and value. In: PutnamH (ed.) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, pp. 26–45. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
ScrivenM (1983) The evaluation taboo. New Directions for Program Evaluation19: 75–82.
22.
SiegelH (2009) Introduction: Philosophy of education and philosophy. In: SiegelH (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, pp. 3–8. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
SmithJK (1983) Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher12: 6–13.
24.
SmithJKHeshusiusL (1986) Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational researchers. Educational Researcher15: 4–12.
25.
SnowCP (1959) The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
StakeR (2000) A modest commitment to democracy. New Directions for Evaluation85: 97–106.
