BradburyH.GlenzerK.KuB.ColumbiaD.KjellströmS.AragA. O.WarwickR.TraegerJ.ApgarM.FriedmanV.Chuan HsiaH.LifvergrenS.GrayP. (2019). What is good action research: Quality choice points with a refreshed urgency. Action Research, 17(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319835607.
2.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’ BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633.
3.
Brydon-MillerM.AntalA.FriedmanV.WicksP. G. (2011). The changing landscape of arts and action research. Action Research, 9(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310396405.
4.
CottrellA. (1998). The resurrection of thinking and the redemption of Faust: Goethe’s new scientific attitude. In SeamonD.ZajoncA. (Eds), Goethe’s way of science - A phenomenology of nature (pp. 255–276). State University of New York.
5.
FrenchJ.CurdE. (2022). Zining as artful method: facilitating zines as participatory action research within art museums. Action Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503211037104.
6.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Hutchinson.
7.
GoedhartN. (2022). Fun, engaging, and easily shareable? Exploring the value of co-creating vlogs with citizens from disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Action Research, 20(1).
8.
JensenJ. (2022). Artfulness as a dimension of professional practice in organizations and action research. Acknowledging sensory aware and embodied attunement in professional organizations. Action Research, 20(1).
9.
SchneiderJ. (2022). Into the periphery: Acting into fleeting, unfinished, just perceptible movements of experience in scenes of joint action. Action Research, 20(1).
10.
SeeleyC. (2011). Uncharted territory: Imagining a stronger relationship between the arts and action research. Action Research, 9(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310397061.
11.
Van MeerP. (2022). Imaginal knowing in action research. Action Research, 20(1).
