Fostering participation and change through action research conducted with youth in the foster care system

Abstract

The purpose of this note from the field is to review the current state of action research studies involving young people currently or recently involved in the foster care system in the United States. Young people in foster care often report feeling that they have little opportunity for advocacy or self-directed change during their time in the system. Action research is presented as an approach to research that appears to provide opportunities for self-advocacy and real-world change among youth in the foster care system. While noting some challenges associated with recruitment and attrition while working with youth in foster care, this note emphasizes the promising potential of action research as a tool to increase youth autonomy and well-being while generating meaningful knowledge and social change within the U.S foster care system. The note, based on a database search that included 636 articles 2013–2023, hopes to contribute to advancing youth-led research in foster care.

Keywords

Foster care child welfare action research participatory research youth-adult partnerships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Included in narrative review.

Beyerlein

B. A.

Bloch

(2014). Need for trauma-informed care within the foster care system: A policy issue. Child Welfare, 93(3), 7–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48626317

Bradbury

(2015). The Sage handbook of action research. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290

Brydon-Miller

Greenwood

Maguire

(2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002

* Clark

S. L.

Akin

B. A.

McCall

Paceley

Byers

Gomez

(2023). ‘Youth are not something to check off your to do list’: Poetic inquiry into the symbols youth, parents and professionals use to reimagine supports for youth in foster care. Child & Family Social Work, 28(3), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12986

Coghlan

Brydon-Miller

(Eds.), (2014). The Sage encyclopedia of action research (Vol. 1-2). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406

Colley

M. E.

Thompson

H. M.

Wojciak

A. S.

(2017). Risk, resilience, and complexity: Experiences of foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.030

Dickerson

S. S.

Connors

L. M.

Fayad

Dean

G. E.

(2014). Sleep-wake disturbances in cancer patients: Narrative review of literature focusing on improving quality of life outcomes. Nature and Science of Sleep, 6, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S34846

Ferrari

(2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

10.

Font

S. A.

Gershoff

E. T.

(2020). Foster care and best interests of the child: Integrating research, policy, and practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41146-6

11.

Forenza

Havlicek

(2022). Identifying the relationship between implementation and outcomes of foster youth advisory boards in the United States: The push for accountability. Child Welfare, 99(6), 87–114.

12.

* Graham

K. E.

Schellinger

A. R.

Vaughn

L. M.

(2015). Developing strategies for positive change: Transitioning foster youth to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 54, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.04.014

13.

Green

B. N.

Johnson

C. D.

Adams

(2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

14.

Greiner

M. V.

Beal

S. J.

Antommaria

A. H. M.

(2020). Perspectives on informed consent practices for minimal-risk research involving foster youth. Pediatrics, 145(4), Article e20192845. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2845

15.

Hetherington

(2002, June). Learning from difference: Comparing child welfare systems [Keynote Address]. Positive systems of child welfare conference.

16.

* Jay Miller

Benner

Kheibari

Washington

(2017). Conceptualizing on-campus support programs for collegiate foster youth and alumni: A plan for action. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.028

17.

Leve

L. D.

Harold

G. T.

Chamberlain

Landsverk

J. A.

Fisher

P. A.

Vostanis

(2012). Practitioner review: Children in foster care-vulnerabilities and evidence-based interventions that promote resilience processes. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(12), 1197–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02594.x

18.

Middleton

J. S.

Bloom

S. L.

Strolin-Goltzman

Caringi

(2019). Trauma-informed care and the public child welfare system: The challenges of shifting paradigms: Introduction to the special issue on trauma-informed care. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 13(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2019.1603602

19.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

PRISMA Group . (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

20.

* Mountz

Capous-Desyllas

Perez

(2019). Speaking back to the system: Recommendations for practice and policy from the perspectives of youth formerly in foster care who are LGBTQ. Child Welfare, 97(5), 117–140.

21.

* Mountz

Capous-Desyllas

Pourciau

(2018). Because we’re fighting to be ourselves: Voices from former foster youth who are transgender and gender expansive. Child Welfare, 96(1), 103–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48628037

22.

* Mountz

Capous-Desyllas

Sevillano

(2020). Educational trajectories of youth formerly in foster care who are LGBTQ: Before, during, and after emancipation. Child Welfare, 97(6), 77–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48626317

23.

* Mountz

Pan

Sevillano

Dyett

Kartikawatiningsih

(2023). Fostering leaders of our world: Facilitators and barriers to educational success among a cohort of foster scholars in college. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 40(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00904-x

24.

* Opara

Lizarraga

Lardier

D. T.

Herrera

Garcia-Reid

Reid

R. J.

(2022). What happens when we ask? A phenomenological focus group on HIV prevention and sexual health education among emancipated foster care youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 140(4), Article 106583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106583

25.

* Ponciano

(2013). The voices of youth in foster care: A participant action research study. Action Research, 11(4), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750313502554

26.

* Ruff

S. C.

Harrison

(2020). “Ask Me what Want”: Community-based participatory research to explore transition-age foster Youth’s use of support services. Children and Youth Services Review, 108(6), Article 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104608

27.

Russell

Macgill

(2015). Demographics, policy, and foster care rates; A Predictive Analytics Approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 58, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.009

28.

Salsberg

Macridis

Bengoechea

E. G.

Macaulay

A. C.

Moore

KSDPP School Travel Planning Committee, & On behalf of the KSDPP School Travel Planning Committee . (2017). Engagement strategies that foster community self-determination in participatory research: Insider ownership through outsider championship. Family Practice, 34(3), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx001

29.

* Samarah

S. E. M.

Schelbe

Jackson

L. A.

(2023). A photovoice study of college students who have experienced foster care, relative care, and/or homelessness. Children and Youth Services Review, 151, Article 107042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107042

30.

Shamrova

D. P.

Cummings

C. E.

(2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81(10), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022

31.

Sydlo-Ward

Schensul

Owens

Brase

Wiley

Berg

Schensul

(2000). Participatory action research curriculum for empowering youth. Institute for Community Research.

32.

White

C. R.

O’Brien

Pecora

P. J.

English

Williams

J. R.

Phillips

C. M.

(2009). Depression among alumni of foster care: Decreasing rates through improvement of experiences in care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426608320356

33.

* Williamson

H. J.

Chief

Jiménez

Begay

Milner

T. F.

Sullivan

Torres

Remiker

Samarron Longorio

A. E.

Sabo

Teufel-Shone

N. I.

(2020). Voices of community partners: Perspectives gained from conversations of community-based participatory research experiences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145245

Fostering participation and change through action research conducted with youth in the foster care system – A note from the field

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References