AdlerJ. M. (2012).
Living into the story: Agency and coherence in a longitudinal study of narrative identity development and mental health over the course of psychotherapy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
102(2), 367–389.
BerryK. S. (2011). Embracing radical research: A commentary on ‘To the next level’: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. In KincheloeJ. L.HayesK.SteinbergS.TobinK. (Eds), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 279–284).
Rotterdam, The Netherlands:
Sense Publishers.
4.
BradburyH. (2015). The integrating (feminine) reach of action research: A nonet for epistemological voice. In BradburyH. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 573–582).
London, UK:
SAGE.
5.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019).
A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research,
17(1), 3–10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
6.
BurnsD. (2007). Systemic action research: A strategy for whole system change.
Bristol, UK:
Policy Press.
7.
CaillodsF.DenisM. (2016). Social science challenges inequalities: General introduction. In International Social Science Council (ISSC), Institute of Development Studies (IDS) & the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (Eds), World social science report. 2016 – Challenging inequalities: pathways to a just world (pp. 18–25). Paris, France: UNESCO and ISSC. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002458/245825e.pdf
8.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry. Experience and story in qualitative research.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds). (1999). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
10.
ErfanA.TorbertB. (2015).
Collaborative developmental action inquiry. In BradburyH. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of action research (3rd ed., pp. 64–75).
London, UK:
SAGE.
11.
FloodR. L. (2010).
The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research,
23(4), 269–284.
MillerT.BairdT. D.LittlefieldC. M.KofinasG.Chapin IiiF. S.RedmanC. L. (2008).
Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society,
13(2).
15.
NazneenS. (2016). 51. A seat at the table is not enough: gender and political inclusion. World social science report, 2016: Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world, p. 219.
16.
RindD. (1999).
Complexity and climate. Science,
284(5411), 105–107.
17.
RogersM. (2012).
Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report,
17(48), 1–17. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss48/3
18.
SantosB. D. S. (2013). The rise of the global left: The world social forum and beyond.
New York, NY:
Zed Books Ltd.
19.
Sustainable Development Goals, UN (SDGs, UN). (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution Adopted by the UN General Assembly, 25 September.
20.
WallisN. C. (2015). Unlocking the secrets of personal and systemic power: The power lab and action inquiry in the classroom. In Bradbury (Ed.)H., The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 760–769).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.