AdamsD. (2014). First person action research. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds), The Sage encyclopedia of action research. London, UK / Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
BradburyH. (2015). The introduction to the handbook of action research: Situating and defining action research. In The handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (3rd ed.). London, UK / Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
BradburyH.GlenzerK.ApgarM.EmburyD.FriedmanV.KjellstromS., … ImonD. (2020). Action Research Journal's Seven Quality Choicepoints for action oriented research for transformations? Action Research, 18(1), 3–6.
4.
BradburyH. S.WaddellSO’ BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019).
A call to action research for transformation: The times demand it. Action Research,
17(1), 3–10.
5.
CarrW. (2006).
Philosophy, methodology, and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education,
40, 421–435.
6.
ChanC. K.LeiJ. (2017).
Contracting social services in China: The case of the Integrated Family Services Centres in Guangzhou. International Social Work,
60(6), 1343–1357.
7.
ChanK. T.IpD.LauS. M. (2009).
Social Work Professionalization in China: The case of Shenzhen. China Journal of Social Work,
2(2), 85–94.
8.
CheungM.LiuM. (2004).
The self-concept of Chinese women and the indigenization of social work in China. International Social Work,
47, 109–127.
9.
ChoM. Y. (2017).
Unveiling neoliberal dynamics: Government purchase (Goumai) of social work services in Shenzhen’s urban periphery. The China Quarterly,
230, 269–288.
10.
GrayM. (2008).
Some considerations on the debate on social work in China: Who speaks for whom?.International Journal of Social Welfare,
17, 400–406.
11.
HsuJ. Y. J.HasmathR. (2014).
The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China,
23(87), 516–534.
12.
LeungJ. C. B. (2007).
An international definition of social work for China. International Journal of Social Welfare,
16, 391–397.
13.
LeungT. F.YipN. M.HuangR.WuY. (2012).
Governmentality and the politicisation of social work in China. British Journal of Social Work,
42, 1039–1059.
14.
NowotnyH.ScottP.GibbonsM. (2001). Re-thinking science – Knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty.
Cambridge, UK:
Polity Press.
15.
PetersenA.OlssonJ. (2015).
Calling evidence-based practice into question: Acknowledging phronetic knowledge in social work. British Journal of Social Work,
45, 1581–1597.
ShambaughD. (2008). China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and adaptation.
Washington, DC:
Woodrow Wilson.
18.
SimT.LauV. C. (2017).
The emergence of social work practice research in the Peoples’ Republic of China: A literature review. Research on Social Work Practice,
27(1), 1–18.
19.
WangY. (2012). A study of the professionalization process of social work in the Chinese mainland: Interaction of the state, the society and the academic community (1978–2006). PhD Dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
20.
WuS.HuangH.SunF.AnQ. (2016).
Is social work really being recognized? Problems with social work employment opportunities in mainland China. Social Work Education,
35(2), 186–203.
21.
XiongY.WangS. (2007).
Development of social work in China in the context of new policy initiative: Issues and challenges. Social Work Education,
26(6), 560–572.
22.
Yuen-TsangA. W. K.KuH. B.WangS. (2014). Social work education as a catalyst for social change and social development: A Case study of a master of social work program in China. In C. A. Noble, H. Strauss & B. Littlechild (eds) Global social work: Crossing borders, blurring boundaries. (pp. 283–300). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.