Despite extensive statistical training, psychologists’ practical use of statistics and their attitudes toward it remain understudied. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine if components of attitudes toward statistics predicted the use of statistics in psychologists’ work, as well as their suggestions for the improvement of statistical education within psychology programs. From January to March 2024, an online survey was distributed to graduated psychologists (N = 1938) via email using purposive and snowball sampling methods, resulting in 602 total respondents, out of which 406 completed the whole survey. Results revealed that psychologists reported using statistics in only 10% of their working time, primarily for research and data processing, while 20% did not use statistics. The principal suggestions for improving statistical education included incorporating practical applications and user-friendly software. Lastly, the findings indicated that a greater perceived value of statistics was associated with a higher percentage of working time dedicated to statistics use. This study offers insights that can guide the development of educational interventions in psychology programs, potentially leading to better alignment between education and professional practice.
AzizA. M.RosliR. (2021). A systematic literature review on developing students’ statistical literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), Article 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012102
4.
Badenes-RiberaL.Frias-NavarroD.IottiN. O.Bonilla-CamposA.LongobardiC. (2018). Perceived statistical knowledge level and self-reported statistical practice among academic psychologists. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00996
5.
CahyawatiD.WahyudinW.PrabawantoS. (2018). Attitudes toward statistics and achievement: Between students of science and social fields. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.22460/INFINITY.V7I2.P173-182
6.
ConnersF. A.McCownS. M.Roskos-EwoldsenB. (1998). Unique challenges in teaching undergraduate statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 25(1), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2501_12
CounsellA.CribbieR. A.HarlowL. L. (2016). Increasing literacy in quantitative methods: The key to the future of Canadian psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 57(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000056
10.
DempsterM.McCorryN. K. (2009). The role of previous experience and attitudes toward statistics in statistics assessment outcomes among undergraduate psychology students. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889515
11.
DittaA. S.WoodwardA. M. (2022). Technology or tradition? A comparison of students’ statistical reasoning after being taught with R programming versus hand calculations. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 10(4), 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000327
EmmiogluE.Çapa-AydinY. (2012). Attitudes and achievement in statistics: A meta-analysis study. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v11i2.332
14.
EvansB. (2015). Student attitudes, conceptions, and achievement in introductory undergraduate college statistics. The Mathematics Educator, 17(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.63301/tme.v17i2.1915
15.
FantinelliS.CortiniM.Di FioreT.IerveseS.GalantiT. (2024). Bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application: A qualitative study in the Italian educational context. Education Sciences, 14(2), Article 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020198
FranconeriS. L.PadillaL. M.ShahP.ZacksJ. M.HullmanJ. (2021). The science of visual data communication: What works. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(3), 110–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211051956
18.
GreenH. J.HoodM.NeumannD. L. (2015). Predictors of student satisfaction with university psychology courses: A review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 14(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725715590959
19.
HoggR. V. (1991). Statistical education: Improvements are badly needed. The American Statistician, 45(4), Article 342. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684473
20.
HowellJ. L.CollissonB.KingK. M. (2014). Physics envy: Psychologists’ perceptions of psychology and agreement about core concepts. Teaching of Psychology, 41(4), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314549705
21.
HutterR. I.Oldenhof-VeldmanT.PijpersJ. R.OudejansR. R. D. (2016). Professional development in sport psychology: Relating learning experiences to learning outcomes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2016.1183152
JudiH. M.AshaariN. S.MohamedH.WookT. M. (2011). Students’ profile based on attitude towards statistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.038
Landa-BlancoM.Cortés-RamosA. (2021). Psychology students’ attitudes towards research: The role of critical thinking, epistemic orientation, and satisfaction with research courses. Heliyon, 7(12), e08504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08504
26.
LethbridgeL. E.MarshallA. D.JauchM. (2024). Attitudes towards statistics and statistical performance: A mediation model of statistics anxiety and academic procrastination. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 1208–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12714
27.
Lloyd-LewisB. L.MillerD. J.KrauseA. E. (2023). Against all odds: Students’ interest in, and perceived value of, research and nonresearch psychology subjects. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 23(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257231222647
28.
LloydS. A.RobertsonC. L. (2011). Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640
29.
MurtonenM.OlkinuoraE.TynjäläP.LehtinenE. (2008). ‘Do I need research skills in working life?’ university students’ motivation and difficulties in quantitative methods courses. Higher Education, 56, 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9113-9
30.
NuttgensS. (2023). Making psychology “count”: On the mathematization of psychology. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4065
31.
PirlottA. G.HinesJ. C. (2023). Eliminating ANOVA hand calculations predicts improved mastery in an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 52(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283231183959
RamirezC.SchauC.EmmiogluE. (2012). The importance of attitudes in statistics education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v11i2.329
34.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2021.9.0.351) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
35.
RepedroR.DiegoC. (2021). Attitudes toward statistics and statistical literacy of public senior high school students. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i3.399
36.
RobertsonI.TeohK.McMurrayI.RobertsP.SochosA. (2011). Research-informed learning in the psychology curriculum: An initial evaluation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2011.10.2.84
37.
RuggeriK.DempsterM.HannaD.ClearyC. (2008). Experiences and expectations: The real reason nobody likes stats. Psychology Teaching Review, 14(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2008.14.2.75
38.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
39.
SchauC. (2003). Survey of attitude towards statistics – 36. Available from CS Consultants, LLC, www.evaluationandstatistics.com.
40.
SchutzP. A.DrogoszL. M.WhiteV. E.DistefanoC. (1998). Prior knowledge, attitude, and strategy use in an introduction to statistics course. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80124-1
41.
SchützlerL.ChristO. (2022). Come as you are – Small groups in an online statistics course for highly heterogeneous students. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221089334
42.
SilversteinP.PenningtonC. R.BranneyP.O’ConnorD. B.LawlorE.O’BrienE.LynottD. (2024). A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland. British Journal of Psychology, 115(3), 497–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12700
43.
StiglerS. M. (1992). A historical view of statistical concepts in psychology and educational research. American Journal of Education, 101(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/444032
44.
TARG Meta-Research Group. (2022). Statistics education in undergraduate psychology: A survey of UK curricula. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 38037. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.38037
45.
ThibaultR. T.Bailey-RodriguezD.BartlettJ. E.BlazeyP.GreenR. J.PownallM.MunafòM. R. (2024). A Delphi study to strengthen research-methods training in undergraduate psychology programs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213808
WichertsJ. (2017). The weak spots in contemporary science (and how to fix them). Animals, 7(12), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120090
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
