South Korean Provincial Government’s Introduction of the International Baccalaureate and Its Educational Effects on Middle School Students: A Grounded Theory Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2024
South Korean Provincial Government’s Introduction of the International Baccalaureate and Its Educational Effects on Middle School Students: A Grounded Theory Study
In South Korea, the International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Programme (MYP) has been implemented in public education for several years. This article explores the IB MYP’s characteristics and educational effects by adopting the grounded theory research approach of Corbin and Strauss (1990, 2015). A total of 27 students from three public middle schools offering the IB MYP in one Korean city participated in interviews. Through the interviews, 151 concepts, 41 sub-categories, and 22 categories were identified. Compared to conventional Korean education, the IB MYP’s noticeable traits include student-centered classes, inquiry-based learning, interdisciplinary subjects, writing-centered tests, and an emphasis on the IB learner profile. While these differences may initially pose difficulties for Korean students, they can lead to positive outcomes in the cognitive and affective domains, as well as in interpersonal relationships. Based on the findings, it is recommended that the Korean provincial government should develop a long-term vision both nationally and internationally.
AhnKLeeJ (2021) A study on the implications of the International Baccalaureate (IB) for Korean national art curriculum. Journal of Art Education. 65: 223-259.
2.
AzzamTMansfieldMLarsenD (2020) Evaluation report: A study of the implementation and impact of the MYP: Next chapter. Report, International Baccalaureate Organization, June.
3.
BirksMMillsJFrancisKChapmanY (2009) A thousand words paint a picture: The use of storyline in grounded theory research. Journal of Research in Nursing. 14(5): 405–417.
4.
BunnellT (2011) The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme after 30 years: A critical inquiry. Journal of Research in International Education. 10(3): 261–274.
5.
ByunK (2020a) Grounded Theory Approach. Seoul: Hakjisa.
6.
ByunK (2020b) The logic and process of a grounded theory building based on the experiences of K-DEEP project (2013~2019). Korean Journal of Educational Administration. 38(3): 1-29.
ChoH (2019) Practical implementation of assessment in competency-based curriculum: An IBDP case. The Journal of Curriculum Studies. 37(4): 243-269.
9.
CorbinJStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluation criteria. Qualitative Sociology. 13(1): 3-21.
10.
CorbinJStraussA (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
11.
CreswellJWPothCN (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Daegu Metropolitan Office of Education (Ed.) (2019c) Proceedings of the Panel Discussion for Promoting International Baccalaureate Programmes. Daegu: Daegu Metropolitan Office of Education.
DicksonAPerryLBLedgerS (2020) Challenges impacting student learning in the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme. Journal of Research in International Education. 19(3): 183–201.
18.
Enforcement Decree of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act2021 s. 68.1 (ROK).
19.
Eunhee Kang, Governor of Education of Daegu (2018) Eunhee Kang, a preliminary candidate for governor of the Daegu Metropolitan Office of Education, says ‘I will reform classrooms to strengthen future competencies.’ In: Child-centered and classroom-centered Daegu education that changes the world. Available at: https://blog.naver.com/kangkorea119/221260960498 (accessed 1 November 2022).
20.
GlaserBG (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
21.
HongS (2021) Exploring ways to change school curriculum through IB PYP case studies. Journal of Education & Culture. 27(5): 49-74.
JohnsonS (2014) A case study of how an International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme and leadership synergistically promoted student learning and school success. PhD Dissertation, Grand Canyon University, US.
33.
KimWKangH (2021) A study on democratic citizenship education in schools based on the ideas of IB MYP. The Journal of Curriculum Studies. 39(3): 111-136.
KwonY (2021) Local education autonomy and introduction of International Baccalaureate. Humanities Studies East and West. 61: 127-156.
36.
LeeHHongHKimC (2021) Study on the characteristics of MYP as a curriculum framework. The Korean Educational Review. 27(2): 159-186.
37.
LeeJ (2020) Trends and issues of International Baccalaureate in the Republic of Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research. 3(1): 59-73.
38.
MonrealT (2016) Is there ‘space’ for the International Baccalaureate? A case study exploring space and the adoption of the IB. Current Issues in Comparative Education. 19(1): 26-42.
39.
PoonoosamyM (2018) Third culture kids’ sense of international mindedness: Case studies of students in two International Baccalaureate schools. Journal of Research in International Education. 17(3): 207-227.
40.
ReggioML (2018) A qualitative study examining the perception of middle school principals of the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme in Long Island, New York. PhD Dissertation, St. John’s University (New York), US.
41.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
42.
WrightELeeMTangHChak Pong TsuiG (2016) Why offer the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme? A comparison between schools in Asia-pacific and other regions. Journal of Research in International Education. 15(1): 3-17.
