Visual realism and character identification in science comics: an empirical study testing McCloud’s ‘masking effect’ theory

Abstract

Comics have increasingly served as a tool for delivering scientific information to diverse audiences. However, little is known about how visual elements in comics influence their persuasive potential. Inspired by McCloud (1993)’s ‘masking effect’ theory featured in Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, this study examined how different degrees of realism in comic characters, combined with background details, affected readers’ character identification. The findings suggested that exposure to comics featuring unrealistic, cartoonish characters minimized the gap in character identification between Black and white US participants. Contrary to McCloud’s hypotheses, exposure to comics with less detailed backgrounds resulted in higher character identification across conditions, regardless of character realism. The authors discuss the implications for future research and practice of using comics for public communication of science.

Keywords

character identification comics masking effect science communication visual narrative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adrian

(2015) General relativity: The comic book. Science 347(6226): 1094–1095. DOI: 10.1126/science.347.6226.1094.

Ahmad

Hibino

Koyama

(2012) Engagement while reading manga: Measuring Indonesian readers’ immersion within manga’s universe. In: Research: Uncertainty Contradiction Value – DRS International Conference 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, 1–4 July. DRS Digital Library, 10–18.

American Journal of Managed Care (2021) A timeline of COVID-19 vaccine developments in 2021. Available at: https://www.ajmc.com/view/a-timeline-of-covid-19-vaccine-developments-in-2021 (accessed 29 March 2022).

Anderson

(1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85(4): 249–277. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.249.

Bailenson

, et al. (2008) Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5): 935–961. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfn064.

Bajaj

Stanford

(2021) Beyond Tuskegee – vaccine distrust and everyday racism. New England Journal of Medicine 384(5): e12. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMpv2035827.

Brozo

Mayville

(2012) Reforming secondary disciplinary instruction with graphic novels. New England Reading Association Journal 48(1): 11.

Bruner

(1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674029019.

Buuck

Ryan

(2017) Looking beyond the scenes: Spatial storytelling and masking in Shaun Tan’s The Arrival. In: Abate

Tarbox

(eds) Graphic Novels for Children and Young Adults: A Collection of Critical Essays. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 154–170. DOI: 10.14325/mississippi/9781496811677.003.0011.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) Safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines are now available. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/vaccines/fotonovela.pdf (accessed 1 March 2022).

11.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022) Safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html (accessed 11 February 2023).

12.

Cohen

(2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society 4(3): 245–264. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01.

13.

Czerwiec

, et al. (2015) Graphic Medicine Manifesto. University Park: Penn State University Press.

14.

De Graaf

, et al. (2012) Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research 39(6): 802–823. DOI: 10.1177/0093650211408594.

15.

De Graaf

, et al. (2016) Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research 4: 88–131. DOI: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011.

16.

Deshpande

Hoyer

Donthu

(1986) The intensity of ethnic affiliation: A study of the sociology of Hispanic consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 13(2): 214–220. DOI: 10.1086/209061.

17.

Dore

(2022) The effect of character similarity on children’s learning from fictional stories: The roles of race and gender. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 214. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105310.

18.

Dorrell

Curtis

Rampal

(1995) Book-worms without books? Students reading comic books in the school house. Journal of Popular Culture 29(2): 223–234. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-3840.1995.2902_223.x.

19.

Eilam

Poyas

(2010) External visual representations in science learning: The case of relations among system components. International Journal of Science Education 32(17): 2335–2366. DOI: 10.1080/09500690903503096.

20.

Eisner

(2008) Comics and Sequential Art: Principles and Practices from the Legendary Cartoonist. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

21.

Farinella

(2018) The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication 17(1): Y01. DOI: 10.22323/2.17010401.

22.

Fisher

, et al. (2021) Preferences for COVID-19 vaccination information and location: Associations with vaccine hesitancy, race and ethnicity. Vaccine 39(45): 6591–6594. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.058.

23.

Fleming

Petty

(2000) Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In: Terry

Hogg

(eds) Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 171–199.

24.

Frederick

WAI

, et al. (2020) We need to recruit more black Americans in vaccine trials. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/11/opinion/vaccine-testing-black-americans.html (accessed 1 March 2022)

25.

Green

(2006) Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication 56(s1): S163–S183. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.

26.

Green

Brock

(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5): 701–721. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.

27.

Green

Myers

(2010) Graphic medicine: Use of comics in medical education and patient care. BMJ: British Medical Journal 340(7746): 574–577. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c863.

28.

Groensteen

(2013) Comics and Narration. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

29.

Gropper

(1963) Why is a picture worth a thousand words? Audio Visual Communication Review 11(4): 75–95.

30.

Harp

Mayer

(1997) The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology 89(1): 92–102. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92.

31.

Hoeken

Kolthoff

Sanders

(2016) Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research 42(2): 292–311. DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12076.

32.

Hoplamazian

Appiah

(2013) Viewer responses to character race and social status in advertising: Blacks see color, Whites see class. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 34(1): 57–76. DOI: 10.1080/10641734.2013.754709.

33.

Hosler

Boomer

(2011) Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science? CBE—Life Sciences Education 10(3): 309–317. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090.

34.

Humphrey

(2016) Picturing placelessness: Online graphic narratives and Australia’s refugee detention centres. In: Griffiths

Barbour

(eds) Making Publics, Making Places. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press, 49–73. DOI: 10.20851/publics.

35.

Igarashi

Mizushima

Yokoyama

(2020) Manga-based risk communication for the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of storytelling that incorporates a cultural context. Journal of Science Communication 19(07): N02. DOI: 10.22323/2.19070802.

36.

Jaggers

(2021) COVID-19 Comics. In: Graphic medicine. Available at: https://www.graphicmedicine.org/covid-19-comics/ (accessed 29 March 2022).

37.

Jaiswal

Halkitis

(2019) Towards a more inclusive and dynamic understanding of medical mistrust informed by science. Behavioral Medicine 45(2): 79–85. DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511.

38.

Jian

Y-C

(2022) Reading behavior in science comics and its relations with comprehension performance and reading attitudes: An eye-tracker study. Research in Science Education. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-022-10093-3.

39.

Kearns

(2020) The role of comics in public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 43(3): 139–149. DOI: 10.1080/17453054.2020.1761248.

40.

Knowlton

(1966) On the definition of ‘picture’. AV Communication Review 14(2): 157–183. DOI: 10.1007/BF02769550.

41.

Kornfield

(2020) Black doctors want to vet vaccine process, worried about mistrust from years of medical racism. The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09/26/black-vaccine-mistrust/ (accessed 1 March 2022).

42.

Lin

, et al. (2015) Are science comics a good medium for science communication? The case for public learning of nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 5(3): 276–294. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2014.941040.

43.

(2009) What race do they represent and does mine have anything to do with it? Perceived racial categories of anime characters. Animation 4(2): 169–190. DOI: 10.1177%2F1746847709104647.

44.

MacDonald

(2015) Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 33(34): 4161–4164. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036.

45.

McCall

, et al. (2019) Storytelling as a research tool and intervention around public health perceptions and behaviour: A protocol for a systematic narrative review. BMJ Open 9: e030597. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030597.

46.

McCloud

(1993) Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

47.

McCloud

(2006) Making Comics: Storytelling Secrets of Comics, Manga and Graphic Novels. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

48.

Medley

(2010) Discerning pictures: How we look at and understand images in comics. Studies in Comics 1(1): 53–70. DOI: 10.1386/stic.1.1.53/1.

49.

Mikkonen

(2015) Subjectivity and style in graphic narratives. In: Stein

Thon

J-N

(eds) From Comic Strips to Graphic Novels: Contributions to the Theory and History of Graphic Narrative. Berlin: De Gruyter, 101–123.

50.

Monastersky

Sousanis

(2015) The fragile framework. Nature 527(7579): 427–435. DOI: 10.1038/527427a.

51.

Monte

(2021) Household Pulse Survey shows many don’t trust COVID vaccine, worry about side effects. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/12/who-are-the-adults-not-vaccinated-against-covid.html (accessed 22 November 2023)

52.

Nagata

(1999) Learning biochemistry through manga: Helping students learn and remember, and making lectures more exciting. Biochemical Education 27(4): 200–203. DOI: 10.1016/S0307-4412(99)00052-7.

53.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016) Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

54.

National Science Board (2020) Science and technology: Public attitudes, knowledge, and interest. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612113.pdf (accessed 1 March 2022).

55.

Nemeth

Padamsee

(2020) Ohio’s COVID-19 populations needs assessment. Available at: https://cph.osu.edu/inequitable-burdens-covid-19 (accessed 25 March 2022).

56.

Oatley

(1995) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics 23(1/2): 53–74. DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S.

57.

Oatley

(1999) Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics 26(5/6): 439–454. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00011-X.

58.

Padamsee

, et al. (2022) Changes in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Black and White individuals in the US. JAMA Network Open 5(1): e2144470-e2144470. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44470.

59.

Paivio

(1979) Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9781315798868.

60.

Ray

, et al. (2022) Designing narratives and data visuals in comic form for social influence in climate action. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 893181. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893181.

61.

Richardson

Wodak

(2009) The impact of visual racism: Visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British far-right parties. Controversia 6(2): 45–77.

62.

Riley

, et al. (2021) Socialized and traumatized: Pharmacists, underserved patients, and the COVID-19 vaccine. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 61(6): e2–e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.05.020.

63.

Schwartz

(1995) Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism. Memory & Cognition 23(6): 709–722. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200924.

64.

Singer

(2021) Superhero joins the fight against COVID-19. Available at: https://www.cdcfoundation.org/blog/el-sol-neighborhood-educational-center-creates-comic-book-superhero-fight-covid-19 (accessed 1 March 2022).

65.

Spiegel

, et al. (2013) Engaging teenagers with science through comics. Research in Science Education 43(6): 2309–2326. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-013-9358-x.

66.

Taylor

(1993) Hospice nurses tell their stories about a good death: The value of storytelling as a qualitative health research method. Annual Review of Health Social Science 3(1): 97–108. DOI: 10.5172/hesr.1993.3.1.97.

67.

Van Wolputte

(2020) Masking and the dividual: An exploration. In: Greub

(ed.) Revisionen des Porträts: Jenseits von Mimesis und Repräsentation. Paderborn, Germany: Wilhelm Fink, 55–72.

68.

Warren

, et al. (2020) Trustworthiness before trust: COVID-19 vaccine trials and the Black community. New England Journal of Medicine 383(22): e121. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2030033.

69.

Weedon

(2004) Identity and Culture: Narratives of Difference and Belonging. Buckingham: Open University Press.

70.

Wileman

(1993) Visual Communicating. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

71.

Williamson

(2022) Beyond personal experiences: Examining mediated vicarious experiences as an antecedent of medical mistrust. Health Communication 37(9): 1061–1074. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1868744.