It has been proposed that comics are a particular form of a fundamental human ability to produce visual narratives – a visual language. The expression of this visual language has received little attention outside comics. To address this matter, this work compares comics and scientific diagrams, focusing on representations of morphological transformation. Cohn’s Visual Narrative Grammar model, the role of dynamic knowledge structures and semiotics are considered in this analysis. A comic book and a diagram are investigated. Both reveal two kinds of transformation narratives: those that are depicted in the image sequence, and those that are inferred. In contrast to depicted narratives, inferred narratives do not depend on a narrative structure. Instead, they require context-specific instructions to organize subjects into narratives. Additionally, simultaneous events in visual narratives are proposed to generate concurrent narrative structures within a single image sequence.
BarthesR. (1977) Rhetoric of the image. In: BarthesR. (ed.) Image–Music–Text. London: Fontana.
2.
BartualR. (2012) Towards a Panoptical representation of time and memory: Chris Ware, Marcel Proust and Henri Bergson’s ‘Pure Duration’. Scandinavian Journal of Comic Art1(1): 46–68.
3.
BlackJ.BWilenskyR. (1979) An evaluation of story grammars. Cognitive Science3(3): 213–229.
4.
BruceI. (2008) Academic Writing and Genre: A Systematic Analysis. London: Continuum.
5.
BuxtonR. (2004) The Complete World of Greek Mythology. London: Thames & Hudson.
6.
CaldwellJ. (2012) Comic panel layout: A Peircean analysis. Studies in Comics2(2): 317–338.
7.
CatesI. (2010) Comics and the grammar of diagrams. In: BallD.MKuhlmanM.B. (eds) The Comics of Chris Ware: Drawing Is a Way of Thinking. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 90–104.
8.
ChatmanS. (1978) Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
ChomskyN. (2002) Syntactic Structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.
ChomskyN. (2006) Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CohnN. (2007) A visual lexicon. Public Journal of Semiotics1(1): 35–56.
12.
CohnN. (2013a) Navigating comics: An empirical and theoretical apprach to strategies of reading comic page layouts. Frontiers in Psychology4(186): 1–15.
13.
CohnN. (2013b) The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. London: Bloomsbury.
CohnN. (2014a) Narrative conjunction’s junction function: A theoretical model of ‘additive’ inference in visual narratives. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City.
16.
CohnN. (2014b) You’re a good structure, Charlie Brown: The distribution of narrative categories in comic strips. Cognitive Science38(7): 1317–1359.
17.
CohnN.PaczynskiM. (2013) Predictions, events, and the advantage of agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cognitive Psychology67(3): 73–97.
18.
F.DickB. (1979) At the crossroads of time: Types of simultaneity in literature and film. Georgia Review33(2): 423–432.
19.
GenetteG. (1980) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
GouldS.J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
GroensteenT. (2007) The System of Comics. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
22.
GroensteenT. (2009) The impossible definition. In: HeerJWorcesterK. (eds) A Comics Studies Reader. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 124–131.
23.
HaeckelE. (1897) The Evolution of Man: A Popular Exposition of the Principal Points of Human Ontogeny andPhylogen., New York: Appleton and Company.
24.
HermanD. (1997) Scripts, sequences, and stories: Elements of a postclassical narratology. PMLA112(5): 1046–1059.
25.
IwaakiH. (2013) Parasyte. New York: Kodansha Comics.
26.
JackendoffR. (2002) Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
JahnM. (1997) Frames, preferences, and the reading of third-person narratives: Towards a cognitive narratology. Poetics Today18(4): 441–468.
28.
JohnsonK.P. (2011) Sequential narrative in the shield of Aquilles. In: KovacsG.MarshallC.W. (eds) Classics and Comics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43–58.
29.
KosslynS.M. (1980) Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
KosslynS.M. (2006) Graph Design for the Eye and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
KressG. (2011) ‘Partnerships in research’: Multimodality and ethnography. Qualitative Research11(3): 239–260.
32.
KressGVan LeeuwenT. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
33.
LeeS. (1974) Origins of Marvel Comics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
34.
LemkeJ.L. (1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: MartinJ.R.VeelR. (eds) Reading Science. London: Routledge, 87–113.
MargolinU. (2012[2009]) Simultaneity in narrative. Available at: http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/simultaneity-narrative (accessed 21 July 2014). (Originally in: HühnP. [eds] The Living Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.)
38.
MartinJ.R. (1991) Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics1(1): 99–162.
39.
MartinecRSalwayA. (2005) A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication4(3): 337–371.
40.
MayrE. (1994) Recapitulation reinterpreted: The somatic program. Quarterly Review of Biology69(2): 223–232.
41.
McCloudS. (1994) Understanding Comics. New York: William Morrow.
42.
MeskinA. (2012) The ontology of the comic. In: MeskinA.CookR.T. (eds) The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 31–46.
43.
MinskyM. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge In: WinstonP.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw Hill, 211–277.
44.
NaamanD. (2000) Sensing Film: A Cognitive Approach to Film Narration and Comprehension. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
45.
NisbetG. (2011) An Ancient Greek graphic novel. In: KovacsG.MarshallC.W. (eds) Classics and Comics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–41.
46.
OmansonR.C. (1982) The relation between centrality and story category variation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior21(3): 326–337.
PrinceG. (1982) Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative. New York: Mouton.
49.
RichardsonM.KKeuckG. (2002) Haeckel’s ABC of evolution and development. Biological Reviews77(4): 495–528.
50.
RoundJ. (2010) Cryptomimetic tropes in Yoshinori Natsume’s Batman: Death Mask. Foundation106: 41–52.
51.
RumelhartD.E. (1975) Notes on a schema for stories. In: CollinsA. (ed.) Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press, 211–236.
52.
RyanM-L. (1979) Linguistic models in narratology: From structuralism to generative semantics. Semiotica28(1–2): 127–156.
53.
SaraceniM. (2003) The Language of Comics. London: Routledge.
54.
SaussureF. de (2006) Curso de Linguística Geral. São Paulo: Cultrix.
SchwanSIldirarS. (2010) Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual discontinuities in film. Psychological Science21(7): 970–976.
57.
TangG.SzeFLamS. (2007) Acquisition of simultaneous constructions by deaf children of Hong Kong sign language. In: VermeerbergenM. (eds) Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283–316.
58.
ThorndykeP.W. (1977) Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology9(1): 77–110.
59.
TodorovT. (1990) Genres in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WitekJ. (2009) The arrow and the grid. In: HeerJWorcesterK. (eds) A Comics Studies Reader. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 149–156.
61.
YavuzP.E. (2008) Photographie, sequence et texte. Le narrative art aux confins d’une temporalité féconde. Image and Narrative (23).
