This study examined the effectiveness of using comics to communicate scientific information on COVID-19 vaccine safety to Black Americans. Although the effects of comics on interest, recall, and information sharing intention were not significant compared to expository texts and infographics, comics featuring abstract, racially ambiguous characters facilitated greater learning among participants with lower knowledge of COVID-19 vaccines, as opposed to comics with realistic representations of Black individuals. Furthermore, the effects of comics varied depending on individuals’ interest in comic reading. These findings highlight the potential of comics in science communication, but their design and target audience should be carefully considered.
AgarwalR.DugasM.RamaprasadJ.LuoJ.LiG.GaoG. (2021). Socioeconomic privilege and political ideology are associated with racial disparity in COVID-19 vaccination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33), Article e2107873118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107873118
2.
AlcíbarM. (2018). Information visualisation as a resource for popularising the technical-biomedical aspects of the last Ebola virus epidemic: The case of the Spanish reference press. Public Understanding of Science, 27(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517702047
3.
AlexanderP. A.KulikowichJ. M.SchulzeS. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313–337.
BrozoW. G.MayvilleM. T. (2012). Reforming secondary disciplinary instruction with graphic novels. New England Reading Association Journal, 48(1), 11–20.
7.
CallenderB.ObuobiS.CzerwiecM. K.WilliamsI. (2020). COVID-19, comics, and the visual culture of contagion. The Lancet, 396(10257), 1061–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32084-5
CarringtonS.AllenK.OsmolowskiD. (2007). Visual narrative: A technique to enhance secondary students’ contribution to the development of inclusive, socially just school environments—Lessons from a box of crayons. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00076.x
CohnN.MaglianoJ. P. (2020). Visual narrative research: An emerging field in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12473
14.
DahlstromM. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl. 4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
FarinellaM. (2018). The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1) Y01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010401
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
FlemmingD.CressU.KimmigS.BrandtM.KimmerleJ. (2018). Emotionalization in science communication: The impact of narratives and visual representations on knowledge gain and risk perception. Frontiers in Communication, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00003
GheorghiuA. I.CallanM. J.SkylarkW. J. (2017). Facial appearance affects science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5970–5975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620542114
GlaserM.GarsoffkyB.SchwanS. (2009). Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 34(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.026
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
27.
HarpS. F.MayerR. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102.
28.
HoslerJ.BoomerK. B. (2011). Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science?CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090
29.
HummC.SchrögelP. (2020). Science for all? Practical recommendations on reaching underserved audiences. Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00042
30.
HutchinsT. L.PrelockP. A. (2006). Using social stories and comic strip conversations to promote socially valid outcomes for children with autism. Seminars in Speech and Language, 27(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl:20065036
LazardA.AtkinsonL. (2015). Infographics center stage: The role of visuals at the elaboration likelihood model’s critical point of persuasion. Science Communication, 37(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014555997
33.
LiN.BrossardD.ScheufeleD. A.WilsonP. H.RoseK. M. (2018). Communicating data: Interactive infographics, scientific data and credibility. Journal of Science Communication, 17(2), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020206
34.
LiN.MolderA. L. (2021). Can scientists use simple infographics to convince? Effects of the “flatten the curve” charts on perceptions of and behavioral intentions toward social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 30(7), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211038719
35.
LinS. F.LinH. S.LeeL.YoreL. D. (2015). Are science comics a good medium for science communication? The case for public learning of nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.941040
36.
LuA. S. (2009). What race do they represent and does mine have anything to do with it? Perceived racial categories of anime characters. Animation, 4(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847709104647
37.
MarR. A.LiJ.NguyenA. T. P.TaC. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
MartinL. R.PetrieK. J. (2017). Understanding the dimensions of anti-vaccination attitudes: The Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(5), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9888-y
40.
McCloudS. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art (MartinM., Ed.). Kitchen Sink Press.
41.
MilkmanK. L.BergerJ. (2014). The science of sharing and the sharing of science. Proceedings of the National Academy, 111(Suppl. 4), 13642–13649. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317511111
42.
MuzumdarJ. M.PantaleoN. L. (2017). Comics as a medium for providing information on adult immunizations. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1355418
43.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23674
NeeleyL.BarkerE.BayerS. R.MaktoufiR.WuK. J.ZaringhalamM. (2020). Linking scholarship and practice: Narrative and identity in science. Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00035
PaulE.SteptoeA.FancourtD. (2021). Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe, 1, Article 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100012
48.
PavelleS.WilkinsonC. (2020). Into the digital wild: Utilizing Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook for effective science and environmental communication.Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 575122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122
RobinO.LeblancB.DumaisN. (2021). Teaching science communication with comics for postgraduate students. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 759199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.758198
51.
ScheufeleD. A. (2018). Beyond the choir? The need to understand multiple publics for science. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1521543
ShenF.SheerV. C.LiR. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467
SmithP. L.GoodmonL. B.HowardJ. R.HancockR.HartzellK. A.HilbertS. E. (2021). Graphic novelisation effects on recognition abilities in students with dyslexia. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 12(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2019.1635175
56.
SonesW. W. D. (1944). The comics and instructional method. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 18(4), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2262696
57.
SøreideI. N.HøisethM.VisA. C. (2018, August14–17). Narrative health communication: Exploring how medical comics can be designed to support children with serious illness [Conference session]. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden.
58.
SørensenK.van den BrouckeS.PelikanJ. M.FullamJ.DoyleG.SlonskaZ.KondilisB.StoffelsV.OsborneR. H.BrandH. (2013). Measuring health literacy in populations: Illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health, 13, Article 948. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-948
59.
TribullC. M. (2017). Sequential science: A guide to communication through comics. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 110(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/sax046
60.
VafeiadisM.HanJ.ShenF. (2020). News storytelling through images: Examining the effects of narratives and visuals in news coverage of issues. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4364–4384.
61.
Van LaerT.De RuyterK.ViscontiL. M.WetzelsM. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817.
