Teachers’ knowledge of the socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL) process of learners, which consists of the task analysis, planning, elaboration, and monitoring, can help teachers intervene when students face difficulties during the collaborative learning. Students’ academic emotions have major effects on their learning motivation, cognition, and performance. This study investigated the changes in SSRL, academic emotions, and product performance of high-, medium-, and low-level groups students after they visited an educational technology center and collaboratively designed a learning environment. We recruited 36 juniors majoring in educational technology. Online group discussions were recorded using online chat tools, and a heuristic mining algorithm was employed on this chat data to determine SSRL processes. The participants were asked to express opinions on their major, and this feedback was used to obtain academic emotion information. Additionally, a scoring was employed to measure the participants’ product performance. The high-level group was discovered to exhibit all four SSRL phases and exhibit positive emotions, with activating emotions more common than deactivating emotions. SSRL was discovered to be related to academic performance; higher academic performance correlated with a more standardized SSRL process. Additionally, the higher a participants’ academic performance, the more frequently the participant had positive academic emotions. Overall, the learners in the high-level group paid more attention to the collaborative learning task.
BannertMReimannPSonnenbergC (2014) Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning9(2): 161–85.
2.
ChenMMengCYZhouC (2018) Research on ubiquitous learning environment evaluation from the perspective of effective learning. Journal of Open Learning23(4): 11–9. DOI: 10.19605/j.cnki.kfxxyj.2018.04.003.
3.
DahlKKB (2020) Mo(ve)ments in professional identification: Achieving professional identity and becoming a teacher in Danish and Kenyan teacher education. Compare50(1): 123–40.
4.
DongYYuGL (2007) The preparation and application of adolescent academic emotion questionnaire. Acta Psychologica Sinica39(5): 852–60.
5.
EfklidesAVoletS (2005) Emotional experiences during learning: Multiple, situated, and dynamic. Learning and Instruction15(5): 377–80.
6.
FengXQiuLHGuoXR (2019) Recognition method for academic emotions of students’ feedback texts based on LSTM model. Journal of Open Learning25(2): 114–20.
7.
GrauVWhitebreadD (2012) Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction22(6): 401–12.
8.
GuXQHuH (2018) Has the learning effect of e-bag occurred? A meta-analysis based on 39 domestic and foreign papers. Research on Visual Education39(5): 19–25. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2018.05.003.
9.
HadwinAJärveläSMillerM (2018) Self- regulation, co- regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In: SchunkDHGreeneJA (eds) Handbook of Self- Regulation of Learning and Performance, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge, pp.83–106. DOI:10.4324/9781315697048-6.
10.
HadwinAFJärveläSMillerM (2011) Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In: ZimmermanBJSchunkDH (eds) Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, vol.30. Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp.65–84.
11.
HathcockSJDickersonDLEckhoffA, et al. (2015) Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in a design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education45(5): 727–48.
12.
HsuTYLiangHY (2022) Museum engagement visits with a universal game-based blended museum learning service for different age groups. Library Hi Tech40: 1226–43.
13.
JärveläSMalmbergJKoivuniemiM (2016a) Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction42: 1–11.
14.
JärveläSKirschnerPAHadwinA, et al. (2016b) Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning11(3): 263–80.
15.
JärveläSGaševićDSeppänenT, et al. (2020) Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology51(6): 2391–406.
16.
JärveläSHadwinAF (2013) New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist48(1): 25–39.
17.
JärveläSKirschnerPAPanaderoE, et al. (2015) Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development63(1): 125–42.
18.
JärvenojaHJärveläSMalmbergJ (2015) Understanding regulated learning in situative and contextual frameworks. Educational Psychologist50(3): 204–19.
19.
KrangeISilsethKPierrouxP (2020) Peers, teachers, and guides: A study of three conditions for scaffolding conceptual learning in science centers. Cultural Studies of Science Education15(1): 241–63.
20.
KwonKLiuYHJohnsonLP (2014) Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good versus Poor collaborators. Computers & Education78: 185–200.
21.
LiHShiFHuZ, et al. (2018) Research on influencing factors and models of informal learning in digital venues. E-education Research39(12): 70–7. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2018.12.010
22.
LobczowskiNG (2020) Bridging gaps and moving forward: Building a new model for socioemotional formation and regulation. Educational Psychologist55(2): 53–68.
23.
LobczowskiNGLyonsKGreeneJA, et al. (2021) Socially shared metacognition in a project-based learning environment: A comparative case study. Learning Culture and Social Interaction30: 100543.
24.
MalmbergJJärveläSJärvenojaH (2017) Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology49: 160–74.
25.
MalmbergJJärvenojaHJärveläS (2013) Patterns in elementary school students′ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science41(5): 933–54.
26.
McAdamsDPPalsJL (2006) A new Big Five. Fundamental principles for an Integrative science of personality. American Psychologist61(3): 204–17.
27.
MichalskyTCohenA (2021) Prompting socially shared regulation of learning and creativity in solving STEM problems. Frontiers in Psychology12: 722535.
28.
MillerMJärveläSHadwinA (2017) Self-regulation, co-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In SchunkDGreeneJ (eds) Handbook Self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge, pp.99–122.
29.
PackerJBallantyneRUzzellD (2019) Interpreting war heritage: Impacts of Anzac museum and battlefield visits on Australians’ understanding of national identity. Annals of Tourism Research76: 105–16.
30.
PatrickBCSkinnerEAConnellJP (1993) What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65(4): 781–91.
31.
PekrunRGoetzTFrenzelAC, et al. (2011) Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology36(1): 36–48.
32.
PekrunRGoetzTTitzW, et al. (2002) Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist37(2): 91–105.
33.
PelegRBaram-TsabariA (2017) Learning robotics in a science museum theatre play: Investigation of learning outcomes, contexts and experiences. Journal of Science Education and Technology26(6): 561–81.
34.
ReimannPMarkauskaiteLBannertM (2014) E-research and learning theory: What do sequence and process mining methods contribute?British Journal of Educational Technology45(3): 528–40.
35.
RogatTKLinnenbrink-GarciaL (2011) Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction29(4): 375–415.
36.
RussellJASatoK (1995) Comparing emotion words between languages. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology26(4): 384–91.
37.
SinhaSRogatTKAdams-WigginsKR, et al. (2015) Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning10(3): 273–307.
38.
SobocinskiM (2021) Patterns of Adaptive Regulation in Collaborative Learning: A Multimodal Methodological Approach. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.
39.
SobocinskiMMalmbergJJärveläS (2017) Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low- and high-challenge collaborative learning sessions. Metacognition and Learning12(2): 275–94.
40.
SonnenbergCBannertM (2015) Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics2(1): 72–100.
41.
TanLXuXD (2022) Design of learning environment based on technology and engineering literacy cultivation: Elements and models. Journal of Distance Education40(5): 93–102.
42.
TörmänenTJärvenojaHMäntyK (2021) Exploring groups’ affective states during collaborative learning: What triggers activating affect on a group level?Educational Technology Research and Development69(5): 2523–45.
43.
Van Der AalstW (2016) Process Mining: Data Science in Action, vol.2. Heidelberg: Springer.
WeiCNiL (2022) The value implication and practice path of cooperative education between libraries and schools under the background of “double Reduction.”Teaching and Management2022(11): 13–16.
46.
WeijtersAJMMAalstWMPMedeirosAAK (2006) Process mining with the heuristics miner algorithm. Eindhoven University of Technology. BETA Working Paper Series, pp. 1–35.
47.
WillardAKBuschJTACullumKA, et al. (2019) Explain this, explore that: A study of parent–child interaction in a children’s Museum. Child Development90(5): 598–617.
48.
WuXCZengZXieJ, et al. (2009) Venue science learning: Essential characteristics and influencing factors. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)215(5): 13–19.
49.
XuWDaiTShenZ (2022) Effect sizes and research directions of technology application in museum learning: Evidence obtained by integrating meta-analysis with co-citation network analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning38(2): 65–80.
50.
XuWDaiTTShenZY, et al. (2021) Can the application of technology effectively improve the learning effect of venues? Meta-analysis based on 34 experimental and quasi-experimental studies over the past decade. Electrochemical Education Research42(12): 63–70 + 85. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.12.009.
51.
YuGLDongY (2005) Academic emotion Research and its significance to student development. Research in Education309(10): 39–43.
52.
ZhangSChenJWenY, et al. (2021) Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning16(1): 37–66.
53.
ZhengJXingWZhuG (2019) Examining sequential patterns of self- and socially shared regulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment. Computers & Education136: 34–48.
54.
ZhengLZhongLNiuJ, et al. (2021) Effects of personalized intervention on collaborative knowledge building, group performance, socially shared metacognitive regulation, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society24(3): 174–93.
55.
ZhongZZhouQ (2005) The design of resources, tools and evaluation in learning environment. Open Education Research2005(03): 62-67.
56.
ZimmermanBJSchunkDH (2011) Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
