Open educational resources (OER), which are teaching, learning, and research materials that are openly licensed, are growing in popularity in higher education. Previous studies have focused on faculty and student perceptions and use of OER. In this study, we examined how actively engaging students as curators and designers of OERs through project-based learning as part of an open educational practice shaped students’ attitudes, motivation, and learning. This paper presents post-course survey data collected from 69 undergraduate and graduate students from six different courses that featured OER design projects, including: (1) A digital media online course; (2) Online tools for teaching and learning website; (3) History/social studies wiki pages; (4) Campus resources film project; (5) Professional learning networks for educators online course; and (6) Teaching with technology eBook. Findings indicate that shifting students’ roles from consumers to curators and creators of OERs increased motivation, improved attitudes about learning, aided the achievement of course learning objectives, and supported the development of valuable skills for 21st century success.
AzzamABreslerDLeonA, et al. (2017) Why medical schools should embrace Wikipedia: Final-year medical student contributions to Wikipedia articles for academic credit at one school. Academic Medicine92(2): 194–200.
2.
BaranEAlZoubiD (2020) Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education41(2): 230–44.
3.
BeethamHFalconerIMcGillL, et al. (2012) Open practices: briefing paper. JISC. Available at: OER Synthesis and Evaluation/OpenPracticesBriefing (pbworks.com) (accessed 5 January 2022).
4.
BinkleyMErstadOHermanJ, et al. (2012) Defining twenty-first century skills. In: GriffinPMcGawBCareE (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.17–66.
5.
BloomM (2019) Assessing the impact of “open pedagogy” on student skills mastery in first-year composition. Open Praxis11(4): 343–53.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
Clinton-LisellV (2021) Open pedagogy: A systematic review of empirical findings. Journal of Learning for Development8(2): 255–68.
10.
ColvardNBWatsonCEParkH (2018) The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education30(2): 262–76.
CroninCMacLarenI (2018) Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in open educational practices. Open Praxis10(2): 127–43.
13.
DillmanDASmythJDChristianL (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed- mode surveys: The tailored design method, 4th edn.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14.
DogaraGSaudMSBKaminYB, et al. (2020) Project-based learning conceptual framework for integrating soft skills among students of technical colleges. IEEE Access8: 83718–27.
15.
EricksonF (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: WittrockM (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn.New York, NY: Macmillan, pp.119–61.
GriffithsRGardnerSLundhP, et al. (2018) Participant Experiences and Financial Impacts: Findings From Year 2 of Achieving the Dream’s OER Degree Initiative. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
20.
HeathCHeathD (2007) Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. New York, NY: Random House.
HiltonJ (2020) Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development68(3): 853–76.
23.
HiltonJWileyDChaffeeR, et al. (2019) Student perceptions of open pedagogy: An exploratory study. Open Praxis11(3): 275–88.
24.
LaiERVieringM (2012) Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings. National Council on Measurement in Education: Vancouver, BC: Pearson.
NgerejaBHusseinBAndersenB (2020) Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? A performance evaluation. Education Sciences10(11): 330.
27.
PaskeviciusMIrvineV (2019a) Open education and learning design: Open pedagogy in praxis. Journal of Interactive Media in Education2019: 1–10.
28.
PaskeviciusMIrvineV (2019b) Practicalities of implementing open pedagogy in higher education. Smart Learning Environments6(1): 1–20.
29.
PelletierKBrownMBrooksDC, et al. (2021) 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition. Boulder, CO: EDU. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219489/. (accessed 15 November 2021).
30.
SongGWangCNieY, et al. (2020) Research of the course design based on project-based learning for college computer major. In: 2020 international conference on big data and informatization education (ICBDIE), pp.435–439.
31.
TliliAHuangRChangTW, et al. (2019) Open educational resources and practices in China: A systematic literature review. Sustainability11(18): 4867.
32.
TrustTMaloyR (2017) Why 3D print? The 21st century skills students develop while engaging in 3D printing projects. Computers in the Schools24(4): 253–266.
33.
TrustTPektasE (2019) Using the ADDIE model and universal design for learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education34(4): 219–233.
34.
TrustTPrestridgeS (2021) The interplay of five elements of influence on educators’ PLN actions. Teaching and Teacher Education. 97(2021): 103195.
35.
University Analytics and Institutional Research (2021) University of Massachusetts Amherst: Campus data. Available at: https://www.umass.edu/diversity/data-policies (accessed 23 February 2022).
36.
Van AllenJKatzS (2020) Teaching with OER during pandemics and beyond. Journal for Multicultural Education14(3/4): 209–18.
37.
WarrMWestRE (2020) Bridging academic disciplines with interdisciplinary project-based learning: Challenges and opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning14(1).
WileyDWebbAWestonS, et al. (2017) A preliminary exploration of the relationships between student-created OER, sustainability, and students’ success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning18(4).
