Understanding the role of individual factors associated with positive academic outcomes is fundamental to providing effective support for students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) throughout their academic careers. The present study aimed to investigate group differences between students with and without SLDs and to examine the relationships between study-related factors, social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) skills, and student outcomes (achievement, academic and life satisfaction, and burnout) in a sample of 752 university students (133 male; Mage = 22.28 years, SDage = 5.35; 125 with SLDs). The results of the group comparisons showed that students with SLDs reported lower scores in academic self-efficacy, SRL strategies, and self-management skills. This finding suggests that their difficulties may extend beyond the academic domain. Furthermore, we ran a multivariate regression model including study-related factors and SEB skills as independent variables and student outcomes as dependent variables. The results showed that the associations of study-related factors and SEB skills with student outcomes were comparable between students with and without SLDs, although cooperation skills were significantly associated with academic burnout in students without SLDs, but not in students with SLDs. These findings have the potential to inform the development of student-centered practice and policy.
AbrahamsL.PancorboG.PrimiR.SantosD.KyllonenP.JohnO. P.De FruytF. (2019). Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000591
AroT.EklundK.ElorantaA.-K.NärhiV.KorhonenE.AhonenT. (2019). Associations between childhood learning disabilities and adult-age mental health problems, lack of education, and unemployment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775118
4.
BairdG. L.ScottW. D.DearingE.HamillS. K. (2009). Cognitive self-regulation in youth with and without learning disabilities: Academic self-efficacy, theories of intelligence, learning vs. performance goal preferences, and effort attributions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(7), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.7.881
5.
BeaujeanA. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step by step guide. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315869780
6.
BergeyB. W.DeaconS. H.ParrilaR. K. (2017). Metacognitive reading and study strategies and academic achievement of university students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415597020
7.
BlackM. H.HelanderJ.SegersJ.IngardC.BervoetsJ.De PugetV. G.BölteS. (2024). Resilience in the face of neurodivergence: A scoping review of resilience and factors promoting positive outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 113, Article 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102487
8.
BonuomoM.MariniM.VegniN.MelognoS.TorregianiG.LiviS.Di FilippoG. (2023). Analysis of psychological and social functioning in undergraduate students with a Specific Learning Disorder (SLD). Brain Sciences, 13(7), Article 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071020
9.
BrunswickN.WilsonN. J.KrugerI.ChamberlainR.McManusI. C. (2023). The prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A study of UK Universities across 12 academic years. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kv86q
10.
CasaliN.MeneghettiC. (2023). Soft skills and study-related factors: Direct and indirect associations with academic achievement and general distress in university students. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060612
11.
CasaliN.MeneghettiC.TintiC.ReA. M.SiniB.PassolunghiM. C.ValentiA.MontesanoL.PellegrinoG.CarrettiB. (2024). Academic achievement and satisfaction among university students with specific learning disabilities: The roles of soft skills and study-related factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 57(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221150786
12.
CattellR. B. (1940). A Culture-Free Intelligence Test. I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31(3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059043
13.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.ArtecheA.BremnerA. J.GrevenC.FurnhamA. (2010). Soft skills in higher education: Importance and improvement ratings as a function of individual differences and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903560278
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
15.
CurranP. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
16.
De BeniR.ZamperlinC.MeneghettiC.CornoldiC.FabrisM.TonaG. D. M.MoèA. (2014). Test AMOS-Abilità e motivazione allo studio: Prove di valutazione e orientamento per la scuola secondaria di secondo grado e l’università: Nuova edizione [AMOS test-Abilities and motivation towards studying: Evaluation and orientation tests for high school and university. New edition]. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson.
17.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
18.
Di FabioA.GoriA. (2016). Measuring adolescent life satisfaction: Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of Italian adolescents and young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(5), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915621223
19.
EysenbachG. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), Article e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
20.
FeracoT.CasaliN.PellegrinoG.SotoC. J.NapolitanoC. M.CarrettiB.MeneghettiC. (2024). The Italian Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Skills Inventory (BESSI-I). Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2335912
21.
FeracoT.MeneghettiC. (2023). Social, emotional, and behavioral skills: Age and gender differences at 12 to 19 years old. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), Article 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060118
22.
FeracoT.PellegrinoG.CasaliN.CarrettiB.MeneghettiC. (2025). Social, emotional, and behavioral skills in students with or without specific learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 117, Article 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102581
23.
FeracoT.ResnatiD.FregoneseD.SpotoA.MeneghettiC. (2022). An integrated model of school students’ academic achievement and life satisfaction. Linking soft skills, extracurricular activities, self-regulated learning, motivation, and emotions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38, 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00601-4
24.
FiorilliC.BarniD.RussoC.MarchettiV.AngeliniG.RomanoL. (2022). Students’ Burnout at University: The role of gender and worker status. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), Article 11341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811341
25.
FiorilliC.GalimbertiV.De StasioS.Di ChiacchioC.AlbaneseO. (2014). School Burnout Inventory with Italian students of high school. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 18(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1449/78365
26.
FredaM. F.RaffaeleD. L. P.EspositoG.RagoziniG.TestaI. (2021). A new measure for the assessment of the university engagement: The SInAPSi academic engagement scale (SAES). Current Psychology, 42, 9674–9690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02189-2
27.
HaftS. L.GreinerDeMagalhãesC.HoeftF. (2023). A systematic review of the consequences of stigma and stereotype threat for individuals with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221087383
28.
HenM.GoroshitM. (2014). Academic procrastination, emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy, and GPA: A comparison between students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412439325
29.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
30.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
31.
HuebnerE. S.ZulligK. J.SahaR. (2012). Factor structure and reliability of an abbreviated version of the multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Child Indicators Research, 5(4), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9140-z
32.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R Package Version 0.5-6).
33.
JoshanlooM.JovanovićV. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: Analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 23(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w
34.
LaRoseR.TsaiH. S. (2014). Completion rates and non-response error in online surveys: Comparing sweepstakes and pre-paid cash incentives in studies of online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.017
35.
LombardiA.MurrayC.KowittJ. (2016). Social support and academic success for college students with disabilities: Do relationship types matter?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150776
36.
LongobardiC.FabrisM. A.MendolaM.PrinoL. E. (2019). Examining the selection of university courses in young adults with learning disabilities. Dyslexia, 25(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1611
37.
MajeedN. M.HartantoA.TanJ. J. X. (2021). Developmental dyslexia and creativity: A meta-analysis. Dyslexia, 27(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1677
38.
MaricuțoiuL. P.SuleaC. (2019). Evolution of self-efficacy, student engagement and student burnout during a semester. A multilevel structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, Article 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101785
39.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586
40.
MegaC.RonconiL.De BeniR. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
41.
NamaziandostE.RezaiA.HeydarnejadT.KrukM. (2023). Emotion and cognition are two wings of the same bird: Insights into academic emotion regulation, critical thinking, self-efficacy beliefs, academic resilience, and academic engagement in Iranian EFL context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Article 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101409
42.
NapolitanoC. M.SewellM. N.YoonH. J.SotoC. J.Roberts BrentW. (2021). Social, emotional, and behavioral skills: An integrative model of the skills associated with success during adolescence and across the life span. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 679561. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.679561
43.
NiemiecR. M.TomasuloD. (2023). Character strengths and abilities within disabilities: Advances in science and practice. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
44.
OlofssonÅ.AhlA.TaubeK. (2012). Learning and study strategies in university students with Dyslexia: Implications for teaching. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.798
45.
PawlowskaD. K.WestermanJ. W.BergmanS. M.HuelsmanT. J. (2014). Student personality, classroom environment, and student outcomes: A person–environment fit analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.005
46.
PellegrinoG.CasaliN.MeneghettiC.TintiC.ReA. M.SiniB.PassolunghiM. C.ValentiA.MontesanoL.CarrettiB. (2023). Universal and specific services for university students with specific learning disabilities: The relation to study approach, academic achievement, and satisfaction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12323
47.
PinoM.MortariL. (2014). The inclusion of students with Dyslexia in higher education: A systematic review using narrative synthesis: The inclusion of students with Dyslexia in HE. Dyslexia, 20(4), 346–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1484
48.
PintrichP. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
49.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
50.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
51.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
52.
Salmela-AroK.KiuruN.LeskinenE.NurmiJ.-E. (2009). School Burnout Inventory (SBI): Reliability and validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.48
53.
SewellM. N.YoonH. J.LechnerC. M.NapolitanoC. M.RammstedtB.RobertsB. W.SotoC. J. (2024). Assessing social, emotional, and behavioral skills in just a few minutes: 96-, 45-, and 20-item short forms of the BESSI. Assessment, 32(4), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241256434
54.
SotoC. J.NapolitanoC. M.SewellM. N.YoonH. J.RobertsB. W. (2022a). Going beyond traits: Social, emotional, and behavioral skills matter for adolescents’ success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221127483
55.
SotoC. J.NapolitanoC. M.SewellM. N.YoonH. J.RobertsB. W. (2022b). An integrative framework for conceptualizing and assessing social, emotional, and behavioral skills: The BESSI. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(1), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000401
56.
StuartE. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
57.
SumnerE.CraneL.HillE. L. (2021). Examining academic confidence and study support needs for university students with dyslexia and/or developmental coordination disorder. Dyslexia, 27(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1670
58.
TopsW.GlatzT.PremchandA.CallensM.BrysbaertM. (2020). Study strategies of first-year undergraduates with and without dyslexia and the effect of gender. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1703580
59.
Van Der ZandenP. J. A. C.DenessenE.CillessenA. H. N.MeijerP. C. (2018). Domains and predictors of first-year student success: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 23, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.01.001
60.
WuM.-J.ZhaoK.Fils-AimeF. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
61.
YentesR. D.WilhelmF. (2023). careless: Procedures for computing indices of careless responding (R Package Version 1.2.2).
ZappullaC.PaceU.Lo CascioV.GuzzoG.HuebnerE. S. (2013). Factor structure and convergent validity of the long and abbreviated versions of the multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale in an Italian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0418-4
64.
ZengW.JuS.HordC. (2018). A Literature Review of Academic Interventions for College Students With Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718760999
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
