This article discusses the methodological issues encountered in an AHRC funded study conducted between October 2008 and March 2010. The project used qualitative methods to explore the ways in which mourners sought, ascribed and expressed meaning through the funeral and analysed these processes in relation to evidence of religion and a broader spirituality. The research involved case studies of 46 funerals, and 29 interviews with professionals involved in the funeral industry. Each case study comprised: observation of pre-funeral meetings between families and funeral directors and celebrants; observation of the funeral; and a post-funeral focused interview with the bereaved person(s). The article considers ethical and practical factors in conducting research around a sensitive event where participants may be vulnerable. It describes the analysis process of data obtained concerning religious and other beliefs and comments on the value and difficulties of a multidisciplinary approach.
BealeBHillegeS (2004) Impact of in depth interviews on the interviewer: roller coaster ride. Nursing & Health Sciences6: 141–147.
3.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
4.
ClarkT (2010) On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research?Qualitative Research10(4): 399–419.
5.
ClarkeAEFrieseC (2009) Grounded theorizing using situational analysis. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage, 363–397.
6.
CookAS (1995) Ethical issues in bereavement research. Death Studies19: 103–122.
7.
CorbinJMorseJM (2003) The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry9: 335–354.
8.
DenzinNK (2003) Reading and writing performance. Qualitative Research3(2): 243–268.
9.
DenzinNK (2009) The elephant in the living room or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research9(2): 139–160.
10.
DeyI (2010) Grounding categories. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage, 167–190.
11.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS. (2007) Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research7(3): 327–353.
12.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS. (2009) Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research9(1): 61–79.
13.
DoucetAMouthnerNS (2008) What can be known and how? Narrative subjects and the listening guide. Qualitative Research8(3): 399–409.
14.
ElliottJ (2005) Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage.
15.
GabbJ (2010) Home truths: ethical issues in family research. Qualitative Research10(4): 461–478.
16.
GartonSCopelandF (2010) ‘I like this interview; I get cakes and cats’: the effect of prior relationships on interview talk. Qualitative Research10(5): 553–551.
17.
GilbertKR (2002) Taking a narrative approach to grief research: finding meaning in stories. Death Studies26: 223–239.
18.
GuyPHollowayM (2007) Drug related deaths and the ‘special deaths’ of late modernity. Sociology41(1): 83–96.
19.
HeelasPHoutmanD (2009) Research note: RAMP findings and making sense of the ‘God within each person, rather than out there’. Journal of Contemporary Religion24: 83–98.
20.
HollowayM (2007) Negotiating Death in Contemporary Health and Social Care. Bristol: Polity Press.
21.
HollowayMMossB (2010) Spirituality and Social Work. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
22.
JohnsonJJ (2001) In depth interviewing. In: GubriumJEHolsteinJA (eds) Handbook of Interview Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 103–119.
23.
KavanaughKAyresL (1998) ‘Not as bad as it could have been’: assessing harm and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Research in Nursing & Health21: 91–97.
24.
KrauseNIngersoll-DaytonB (2001) Religion and the process of forgiveness in later life. Review of Religious Research42(3): 252–276.
25.
MorganthalerCHauri-BillR (2007) Tapes and tables: mixed methods research on family religion. Journal of Empirical Theology20: 77–99.
26.
MunhallPL (1988) Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research10: 150–162.
27.
ParkesCM (1995) Guidelines for conducting ethical bereavement research. Death Studies19: 171–181.
28.
PeelEParryODouglasM. (2006) ‘It’s no skin off my nose’: why people take part in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research4(10): 1335–1349.
29.
RosenblattPC (1995) Ethics of qualitative interviewing with grieving families. Death Studies19: 139–155.
30.
RoulstonK (2010) Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research10(2): 199–228.
31.
Scott-HollandH (1910) Sermon at St Paul’s Cathedral Entitled ‘The King of Terrors’ and Containing the Text Used as the Poem ‘Death is nothing at all’. The sermon was published posthumously in a collection entitledFacts of the Faith (Longmans, 1919).
SwintonJMowatH (2006) Practical Theology and Qualitative Research. London: SCM Press.
37.
TanggaardL (2009) The research interview as a dialogical context for the production of social life and personal narratives. Qualitative Inquiry15: 1498–1515.
38.
TolichM (2009) The principle of Caveat Emptor: confidentiality and informed consent as endemic ethical dilemmas in focus group research. Bioethical Inquiry6: 99–108.
WilliamsBRWoodbyLLBaileyFA. (2008) Identifying and responding to ethical and methodological issues in after-death interviews with next of kin. Death Studies32: 197–336.
