Ecosystem theory is becoming more prevalent in tourism as a powerful concept to explain value creation at tourism destinations, especially in developing countries. However, for well-established destinations collective action, which is a prerequisite for successful ecosystem operation, is difficult to ignite. This phenomenon can especially be observed at community-based destinations in structurally well-developed countries like Switzerland that consist of a large number of independent actors whose offerings are complementary. Together, these independent actors (henceforth called complementors) form the tourism product which is greater than the sum of its parts provided that the complementors collaborate. This study investigates if the active integration of ecosystem complementors by the destination management organization (DMO) fosters complementors’ trust towards the DMO. This is important as trust is the functional prerequisite for effective collaboration. Further, we analyze whether this effect is amplified by high levels of procedural fairness. The results show that the systematic integration of complementors positively influences complementors’ trust towards the DMO. Also, if integration processes are executed in the context of high procedural justice trust levels are further enhanced. Thus, systematic complementor integration can be a crucial and efficient step towards a functioning ecosystem at community-based destinations. The results inform DMO practitioners as well as scholars about the dynamics of successful ecosystem operation at tourism destination management.
AdnerR (2017) Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management43(1): 39–58.
2.
AdnerR (2021) Winning the Right Game: How to Disrupt, Defend, and Deliver in a Changing World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
AdongoRSam KimSElliotS (2019) “Give and take”: a social exchange perspective on festival stakeholder relations. Annals of Tourism Research75: 42–57.
4.
AkakaMAVargoSL (2015) Extending the context of service: from encounters to ecosystems. Journal of Services Marketing29: 453–462.
5.
ArenasAEGohJMUrueñaA (2019) How does IT affect design centricity approaches: evidence from Spain’s smart tourism ecosystem. International Journal of Information Management45: 149–162.
6.
Asante BoadiEHeZBosompemJ, et al. (2019) Let the talk count: attributes of stakeholder engagement, trust, perceive environmental protection and CSR. Sage Open9(1): 215824401982592.
7.
BaldwinCY (2018) Design Rules, Volume 2: How Technology Shapes Organizations: Chapter 14 Introducing Open Platforms and Ecosystems. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 19-035. (Revised January 2019).
8.
BarneyJBHansenMH (1994) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal15(S1): 175–190.
9.
BecerraMGuptaAK (2003) Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: the moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science14(1): 32–44.
10.
BeritelliPBiegerT (2014) From destination governance to destination leadership–defining and exploring the significance with the help of a systemic perspective. Tourism Review69(1): 25–46.
11.
BeritelliPLaesserC (2017) The dynamics of destinations and tourism development. In: Design Science in Tourism. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 195–214.
12.
BiegerTBeritelliP (2013) Management von Destinationen. München, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag.
13.
BlainCLevySERitchieJRB (2005) Destination branding: insights and practices from destination management organizations. Journal of Travel Research43(4): 328–338.
BridouxFStoelhorstJW (2020) Stakeholder governance: solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review47(2): 214–236.
16.
BrocknerJ (1996) Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: the role of trust. In: KramerRMTylerT (eds) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
17.
BrocknerJWiesenfeldBM (1996) An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin120(2): 189–208.
18.
CaldwellCClaphamSE (2003) Organizational trustworthiness: an international perspective. Journal of Business Ethics47(4): 349–364.
19.
CameronKSQuinnRE (2005) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
CarnevaleDG (1995) Trustworthy Government: Leadership and Management Strategies for Building Trust and High Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
CoaseRH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica4(16): 386–405.
22.
ColquittJA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 386–400.
23.
ColquittJAScottBALePineJA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 909–927.
24.
CraneB (2020) Revisiting who, when, and why stakeholders matter: trust and stakeholder connectedness. Business & Society59(2): 263–286.
25.
DirksKTFerrinDL (2002) Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 611–628.
26.
DolanSLTzafrirSSBaruchY (2005) Testing the causal relationships between procedural justice, trust and organizational citizenship behavior. Revue de Gestion des Resources Humaines57: 79–89.
27.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review20(1): 65–91.
28.
DyerJHChuW (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science14(1): 57–68.
29.
FishRChurchAWinterM (2016) Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services21: 208–217.
30.
FloresFSolomonRC (1998) Creating trust. Business Ethics Quarterly8(2): 205–232.
31.
Francés-GómezPDel RioA (2008) Stakeholder’s preference and rational compliance: a comment on sacconi’s “CSR as a model for extended corporate governance II: compliance, reputation and reciprocity”. Journal of Business Ethics82(1): 59–76.
32.
FreyV (2017) Boosting trust by facilitating communication: a model of trustee investments in information sharing. Rationality and Society29(4): 471–503.
33.
FullerJJacobidesMGReevesM (2019) The myths and realities of business ecosystems. MIT Sloan Management Review60(3): 1–9.
34.
Garcia-CastroRFrancoeurC (2016) When more is not better: complementarities, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strategic Management Journal37(2): 406–424.
35.
GetzDTimurS (2012) 12 stakeholder involvement in sustainable tourism: balancing the voices. In: Global Tourism. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 230–247.
36.
GiannopoulosASkourtisGKalligaA, et al. (2020) Co-creating high-value hospitality services in the tourism ecosystem: towards a paradigm shift?Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing (JTHSM)6(2): 3–11.
37.
GiddensA (2013) The Consequences of Modernity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
GillespieN (2003) Measuring Trust in Working Relationships: The Behavioral Trust Inventory. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne Business School.
39.
GillespieNDietzG (2009) Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review34(1): 127–145.
40.
GillespieNDietzGLockeyS (2014) Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: a case study. Business Ethics Quarterly24(3): 371–410.
41.
GreenwoodMvan BurenHJIII(2010) Trust and stakeholder theory: trustworthiness in the organisation–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics95(3): 425–438.
42.
GrunewaldKBastianO (2015) Ecosystem services (ES): more than just a vogue term? In: Ecosystem Services–Concept, Methods and Case Studies. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1–11.
43.
HansenMFyallASpyriadisT, et al. (2019) Motivating stakeholder collaboration within the aerial adventure industry. International Journal of Tourism Research21(3): 311–322.
44.
HarrisonJSWicksAC (2013) Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly23(01): 97–124.
45.
HarrisonJSBosseDAPhillipsRA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal31(1): 58–74.
46.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
HayiborS (2012) Equity and expectancy considerations in stakeholder action. Business & Society51(2): 220–262.
49.
HillebrandB (2022) An ecosystem perspective on tourism: the implications for tourism organizations. International Journal of Tourism Research24: 517–524.
50.
HillebrandBDriessenPHKollO (2015) Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(4): 411–428.
51.
HsuAYKingBWangD, et al. (2016) In-destination tour products and the disrupted tourism industry: progress and prospects. Information Technology & Tourism16(4): 413–433.
52.
IansitiMLevienR (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review82(3): 68–78.
53.
JacobidesMGCennamoCGawerA (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal39(8): 2255–2276.
54.
JonesTMWicksAC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review24(2): 206–221.
55.
KharoufHSekhonHFazal-e-HasanSM, et al. (2019) The role of effective communication and trustworthiness in determining guests’ loyalty. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management28(2): 240–262.
56.
KramerRM (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology50(1): 569–598.
57.
KulkarniSP (2000) Environmental ethics and information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics27(3): 215–228.
58.
KurgunHKurgunOAAktaşE (2018) What does web 4.0 promise for tourism ecosystem? A qualitative research on tourism ecosystem stakeholders’ awareness. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management6(1): 55–65.
59.
LarsonA (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 76–104.
60.
LeventhalGS (1980) What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?Boston, MA: Springer.
61.
MayerRCDavisJH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology84(1): 123–136.
62.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
63.
McDonaldJR (2009) Complexity science: an alternative world view for understanding sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism17(4): 455–471.
64.
MooreJF (1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review71(3): 75–86.
65.
NallaMKNamY (2021) Corruption and trust in police: investigating the moderating effect of procedural justice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology65(6–7): 715–740.
NunkooRSmithSLJ (2014) Trust, tourism development, and planning. In: Trust, Tourism Development and Planning. London, UK: Routledge, 15–22.
68.
OldendickRW (2012) Survey research ethics. In: Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 23–35.
69.
ParkJSarkisJWuZ (2010) Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China’s circular economy and ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production18(15): 1494–1501.
70.
PearceDG (1992) Tourist Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
71.
PhillipsRFreemanREWicksAC (2003) What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly13(04): 479–502.
72.
Plaza-ÚbedaJAde Burgos-JiménezJCarmona-MorenoE (2010) Measuring stakeholder integration: knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics93(3): 419–442.
73.
PolonskyMJ (1995) A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing10(3): 29–46.
74.
RingPSvan de VenAH (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal13(7): 483–498.
75.
SalvadoJ (2016) Wine culture, territory/landscape and tourism, the enotourism key pillars: how to get business success and territorial sustainability inside tourism ecosystem? In: A pathway for the new generation of tourism research: proceedings of the EATSA conference 2016, Lisboa, Portugal, 26–30 June 2016.
76.
SchafferNEngertMSommerG, et al. (2021) The digitized ecosystem of tourism in Europe: current trends and implications. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2021. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 352–364.
77.
SchilkeOCookKS (2015) Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal36(2): 276–297.
78.
SchnackenbergAKTomlinsonEC (2014) Organizational transparency a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management42(7): 1784–1810.
79.
SearleRDen HartogDNWeibelA, et al. (2011) Trust in the employer: the role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(05): 1069–1092.
80.
SekhonHEnnewCKharoufH, et al. (2014) Trustworthiness and trust: influences and implications. Journal of Marketing Management30(3–4): 409–430.
81.
ShahzadKHafeezS (2022) 19 digital trust in business ecosystem collaboration. In: Trust, Digital Business and Technology: Issues and Challenges. London, UK: Routledge, 242.
82.
SheehanLRitchieJRBHudsonS (2007) The destination promotion triad: understanding asymmetric stakeholder interdependencies among the city, hotels, and DMO. Journal of Travel Research46(1): 64–74.
83.
SheehanLVargas-SánchezAPresenzaA, et al. (2016) The use of intelligence in tourism destination management: an emerging role for DMOs. International Journal of Tourism Research18(6): 549–557.
TeeceDJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy15(6): 285–305.
86.
TeeceDJ (2016) Business ecosystem. In: AugierMTeeceDJ (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1–4.
87.
ThibautJWWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
88.
TutubaNBTunduiHPMsamulaJS (2019) Business ecosystems as the approach to create value and appropriate value for small firms in emerging markets. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability14(5): 90–107.
WangP (2021) Connecting the parts with the whole: toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MIS Quarterly45(1): 397–422.
91.
WicksACBermanSLJonesTM (1999) The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review24(1): 99–116.
92.
WilliamsonOE (1973) Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. The American Economic Review63(2): 316–325.
93.
WorkuYGTessemaGA (2018) Public-private collaboration in the tourism industry in Northwestern Ethiopia. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure7(2): 1–12.
94.
World Tourism Organization (2020) UNWTO Recommendations on Tourism and Rural Development – A Guide to Making Tourism an Effective Tool for Rural Development. Madrid, Spain: UNWTO.
95.
YoonCMoonSLeeH (2022) Symbiotic relationships in business ecosystem: a systematic literature review. Sustainability14(4): 2252.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
