This study aims to develop and validate a comprehensive model that elucidates the factors influencing internet users’ intentions to participate in crowdfunding campaigns for tourism projects. This research utilized a quantitative methodology, collecting data from 385 participants through an online survey as well as through offline methods. The analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), enabling the examination of the proposed hypotheses and validation of the comprehensive model that identifies the factors affecting internet users' intentions to engage in tourism crowdfunding projects. The results reveal that trust, perceived usefulness, perceived risk, communication quality, engagement, and social influences significantly predict internet users’ intentions to participate in crowdfunding tourism projects. Moreover, trust plays a crucial mediating role, mitigating the impact of perceived risk on participation. Additionally, crowdfunding platform ease of use only indirectly enhances users’ participation intention through trust. These findings underscore the importance of sharing transparent information about project’s potential risk and giving users access to secure crowdfunding processes to build trust towards the promotor and enhance users’ participation in tourism crowdfunding campaigns. This study advances the understanding of crowdfunding participation in the tourism sector by introducing a novel framework that integrates co-creation theory and social proof theory. The empirical validation of this comprehensive model offers valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers seeking to enhance the effectiveness of tourism crowdfunding campaigns.
AgrawalACataliniCGoldfarbA (2015) Crowdfunding: geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy24(2): 253–274.
3.
AhlersGKCummingDGüntherC, et al. (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice39(4): 955–980.
4.
AlkaliAUAbu MansorNN (2017) Interactivity and trust as antecedents of e-training use intention in Nigeria: a structural equation modelling approach. Behavioral Sciences7(3): 47.
5.
Almeida-GarcíaF (2018) Analysis of tourism policy in a developing country: the case of Morocco. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events10(1): 48–68.
6.
AlrawadiehZPrayagGAlrawadiehZ, et al. (2019) Self-identification with a heritage tourism site, visitors’ engagement and destination loyalty: the mediating effects of overall satisfaction. Service Industries Journal39(7-8): 541–558.
7.
AnglinAHReidSWShortJC (2023) More than one way to tell a story: a configurational approach to storytelling in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(2): 461–494.
8.
AppioFPLeoneDPlataniaF, et al. (2020) Why are rewards not delivered on time in rewards-based crowdfunding campaigns? An empirical exploration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change157: 120069.
9.
BargoniAFerrarisABrescianiS, et al. (2024) Crowdfunding and innovation: a bibliometric review and future research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management27(4): 1109–1133.
10.
BelleflammePLambertTSchwienbacherA (2014) Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing29(5): 585–609.
11.
BenlianAHessT (2011) The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce15(4): 7–56.
12.
Berné-MartínezJMOrtigosa-BlanchAPlanells-ArtigotE (2021) A semantic analysis of crowdfunding in the digital press. Technological Forecasting and Social Change173: 121175.
13.
BhattVPandeySPatelR, et al. (2024) Predicting online donation intention in donation-based crowdfunding apps: a multi-stage SEM-ANN-NCA model integrating anthropomorphism, satisfaction, trust, and privacy concerns. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing37: 1–25.
14.
BuckleyR (2012) Sustainable tourism: research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research39(2): 528–546.
15.
CalicGMosakowskiE (2016) Kicking off social entrepreneurship: how a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies53(5): 738–767.
16.
CamposACMendesJVallePOD, et al. (2018) Co-creation of tourist experiences: a literature review. Current Issues in Tourism21(4): 369–400.
17.
ChaboudMCCaseauC (2018) Instrumental crowdfunding as a communication innovation: when a bank, a non-profit organization and a hotel project meet the crowd. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management26(2): 89–111.
18.
ChanCRParkHDPatelP, et al. (2018) Reward-based crowdfunding success: decomposition of the project, product category, entrepreneur, and location effects. Venture Capital20(3): 285–307.
19.
ChawlaUMohnotRSinghHV, et al. (2023) The mediating effect of perceived trust in the adoption of cutting-edge financial technology among digital natives in the post-COVID-19 era. Economies11(12): 286.
20.
ChenYDaiRWangL, et al. (2021) Exploring donor’s intention in charitable crowdfunding: intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Industrial Management & Data Systems121(7): 1664–1683.
21.
ChenLLuoFHeW, et al. (2022) A study on the influencing factors of the public’s willingness to donate funds for critical illness crowdfunding projects on network platforms. PLoS One17(3): e0263706.
22.
ChinWW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
ChoiJCSongC (2020) Factors explaining why some citizens engage in E-participation, while others do not. Government Information Quarterly37(4): 101524.
24.
CialdiniRBWosinskaWBarrettDW, et al. (1999) Compliance with a request in two cultures: the differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25(10): 1242–1253.
25.
DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8): 982–1003.
26.
De LarreaGLAltinMSinghD (2019) Determinants of success of restaurant crowdfunding. International Journal of Hospitality Management78: 150–158.
27.
Di PietroLGuglielmetti MugionRRenziMF (2018) Heritage and identity: technology, values and visitor experiences. Journal of Heritage Tourism13(2): 97–103.
28.
DorfleitnerGHornufLWeberM (2018) Dynamics of investor communication in equity crowdfunding. Electronic Markets28: 523–540.
29.
DzhandzhugazovaEAIlinaELLatkinAN, et al. (2017) Crowdfunding as a tool for promotion and development of tourism-related innovation projects. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism8(4): 896–901.
30.
EfratKGilboaSWaldA, et al. (2024) Loyalty and well-being explain serial crowdfunding backing behavior: an empirical test of complementary theories. Internet Research34(4): 1293–1312.
31.
EttahriYLaachachA (2017) Le crowdfunding comme levier De financement des porteurs de projets Marocains: etat des lieux. Revue Marocaine de Management, Logistique et Transport0(2): 0.
32.
EweSYYapSFLeeCKC (2015) Network externalities and the perception of innovation characteristics: mobile banking. Marketing Intelligence & Planning33(4): 592–611.
33.
FeathermanMSPavlouPA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies59(4): 451–474.
34.
FebriantiNMNDarmaGS (2023) Millennials’ intention to invest through securities crowdfunding platform. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)5(1): 19–30.
35.
FontXHindleyA (2017) Understanding tourists’ reactance to the threat of a loss of freedom to travel due to climate change: a new alternative approach to encouraging nuanced behavioural change. Journal of Sustainable Tourism25(1): 26–42.
36.
ForbesHSchaeferD (2017) Guidelines for successful crowdfunding. Procedia cirp60: 398–403.
37.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
38.
FullerCMSimmeringMJAtincG, et al. (2016) Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research69(8): 3192–3198.
39.
GerberEMHuiJSKuoPY (2012) Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the international workshop on design, influence, and social technologies: techniques, impacts and ethics2(11): 10.
40.
Gonzalez-MansillaOBerenguer-ContríGSerra-CantallopsA (2019) The impact of value co-creation on hotel brand equity and customer satisfaction. Tourism Management75: 51–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.024.
41.
GrönroosC (2011) Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory11(3): 279–301. DOI: 10.1177/1470593111408177.
42.
GrönroosC (2012) Conceptualising value co-creation: a journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management28(13–14): 1520–1534.
43.
GrönroosCVoimaP (2013) Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science41(2): 133–150. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3.
44.
GuentherCJohanSSchweizerD (2018) Is the crowd sensitive to distance? How investment decisions differ by investor type. Small Business Economics50: 289–305.
45.
GuptaSJaiswalRGuptaSK (2024) Digital nomads: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Tourism Review, ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/TR-12-2023-0869.
46.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review31(1): 2–24.
47.
HassenzahlMTractinskyN (2006) User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology25(2): 91–97.
48.
HsuCLLinJCC (2008) Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management45(1): 65–74.
49.
JitpaiboonTSmithSMGuQ (2019) Critical success factors affecting project performance: an analysis of tools, practices, and managerial support. Project Management Journal50(3): 271–287.
50.
JohnSPSupramaniamS (2024) Value co-creation research in tourism and hospitality management: a systematic literature review. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management58: 96–114.
51.
JuY (2022) Complexity analysis about formation mechanism of residents’ value co-creation behavior in tourism communities: based on the social embeddedness perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management53: 100–109.
52.
KangMParkYE (2017) Exploring trust and distrust as conceptually and empirically distinct constructs: association with symmetrical communication and public engagement across four pairings of trust and distrust. Journal of Public Relations Research29(2-3): 114–135.
53.
KiangMYYeQHaoY, et al. (2011) A service-oriented analysis of online product classification methods. Decision Support Systems52(1): 28–39.
54.
KimHChangB (2020) A study on the effects of crowdfunding values on the intention to visit local festivals: focusing on mediating effects of perceived risk and e-WOM. Sustainability12(8): 3264.
55.
KimJFesenmaierDR (2017) Sharing tourism experiences: the posttrip experience. Journal of Travel Research56(1): 28–40.
56.
KimMJHallCM (2020) What drives visitor economy crowdfunding? The effect of digital storytelling on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Tourism Management Perspectives34: 100638.
57.
KimMJHallCM (2021) Do perceived risk and intervention affect crowdfunder behavior for the sustainable development goals? A model of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production311: 127614.
58.
KimSDJeonIO (2017) Influencing factors on the acceptance for crowd funding-focusing on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems27(2): 150–156.
59.
KimKKKimWGLeeM (2023) Impact of dark patterns on consumers’ perceived fairness and attitude: moderating effects of types of dark patterns, social proof, and moral identity. Tourism Management98: 104763.
60.
KockNHadayaP (2018) Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: the inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal28(1): 227–261.
61.
KuppuswamyVBayusBL (2017) Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter?Journal of Business Venturing32(1): 72–89.
62.
LaachachAAlhemimahA (2024) Influencing factors on tourists’ intentions for sustainable tourism destinations: moderating effects of financial constraints and moral Reflectiveness. International Journal of Tourism Research26(5): e2772.
63.
LaachachAEttahriY (2023) The effects of venture capital on firm innovation: The role of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research31(3): 407–432.
64.
LaachachALaarajNFarissiN (2024) The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on tourism entrepreneurial intention among university students: the role of entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education38(3): 246–264.
65.
LaaouinaSEl AoufiSBenaliM (2024) How does age Moderate the determinants of crowdfunding adoption by SMEs’s: Evidences from Morocco?Journal of Risk and Financial Management17(1): 18.
66.
LeeYC (2006) An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e‐learning system. Online Information Review30(5): 517–541.
67.
LeeYKozarKA (2012) Understanding of website usability: specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision Support Systems52(2): 450–463.
68.
LiYZHeTLSongYR, et al. (2018) Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in China: a UTAUT-based model. Information, Communication & Society21(3): 404–415.
69.
LiJZhouYHuJ, et al. (2024) Local bias versus home bias: evidence from debt-based crowdfunding. Applied Economics56(23): 2705–2719.
70.
MaichumKParichatnonSPengKC (2016) Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability8(10): 1077.
71.
MarchegianiL (2018) From Mecenatism to crowdfunding: engagement and identification in cultural-creative projects. Journal of Heritage Tourism13(2): 143–151.
72.
MatzlerKStroblAStokburger-SauerN, et al. (2016) Brand personality and culture: the role of cultural differences on the impact of brand personality perceptions on tourists' visit intentions. Tourism Management52: 507–520.
73.
McKnightDHChervanyNL (2001) What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International journal of electronic commerce6(2): 35–59.
74.
MillerGRathouseKScarlesC, et al. (2010) Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research37(3): 627–645.
75.
MollickE (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing29(1): 1–16.
76.
MoritzABlockJLutzE (2015) Investor communication in equity-based crowdfunding: a qualitative-empirical study. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets7(3): 309–342.
77.
NielsenMF (2012) Using artifacts in brainstorming sessions to secure participation and decouple sequentiality. Discourse Studies14(1): 87–109.
78.
NisarTMPrabhakarGBourlakisM (2022) Unravelling influential individual level factors during a crowdfunding campaign: insights from the ALS ice bucket challenge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change175: 121342.
79.
OmraniNMaalaouiAPerezC, et al. (2022) Geographic dimension, information asymmetry, and the success of crowdfunding campaigns. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business45(1): 16–34.
80.
OrdaniniAMiceliLPizzettiM, et al. (2011) Crowd‐funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management22(4): 443–470.
81.
OudraySBerradJ (2023) Le Cadre Juridique Du crowdfunding: Cas Du Maroc. Journal of Integrated Studies in Economics, Law, Technical Sciences and Communication1(2): 0.
82.
PeirisPMKulkarniDde Silva MawathaCR (2015) Implications of trust and usability on E-Commerce adoption. International Journal of Business and Information10(4): 0.
83.
PrahaladCKRamaswamyV (2004a) Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership32(3): 4–9. DOI: 10.1108/10878570410699249.
84.
PrahaladCKRamaswamyV (2004b) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing18(3): 5–14. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015.
85.
RamaswamyVOzcanK (2018) What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research84: 196–205. DOI: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2017.11.027.
86.
RijantoA (2018) Donation-based crowdfunding as corporate social responsibility activities and financing. Journal of General Management43(2): 79–88.
87.
Rodriguez-RicardoYSiciliaMLópezM (2018) What drives crowdfunding participation? The influence of personal and social traits. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC22(2): 163–182.
88.
Rodriguez-RicardoYSiciliaMLópezM (2019) Altruism and internal locus of control as determinants of the intention to participate in crowdfunding: the mediating role of trust. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research14(3): 1–16.
89.
RyuSKimYG (2016) A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: birds of a feather flock together?Electronic Commerce Research and Applications16: 43–54.
90.
SadighhaJPintoPGuerreiroM, et al. (2024) Stimulating customer participation behaviour and boosting value co-creation in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management119(5): 103733. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103733.
91.
ShihHP (2008) Continued use of a Chinese online portal: an empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology27(3): 201–209.
92.
SimeoniFDe CrescenzoV (2018) Ecomuseums (on clean energy), cycle tourism and civic crowdfunding: a new match for sustainability?Sustainability10(3): 817.
93.
SkareMGavurovaBPolishchukV (2023) A decision-making support model for financing start-up projects by venture capital funds on a crowdfunding platform. Journal of Business Research158: 113719.
94.
StevensonRAllenJWangT (2022) Failed but validated? The effect of market validation on persistence and performance after a crowdfunding failure. Journal of Business Venturing37(2): 106175.
95.
TaghizadehSKJayaramanKIsmailI, et al. (2016) Scale development and validation for DART model of value co-creation process on innovation strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing31(1): 24–35. DOI: 10.1108/JBIM-02-2014-0033.
96.
VargoSLLuschRF (2008a) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.
97.
VargoSLLuschRF (2008b) Why “service”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36(1): 25–38. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0068-7.
98.
VermeulenIESeegersD (2009) Tried and tested: the impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management30(1): 123–127.
99.
WangZLiHLawR (2017) Determinants of tourism crowdfunding performance: an empirical study. Tourism Analysis22(3): 323–336.
100.
WeiJZhouLLiL (2024) A study on the impact of tourism destination image and local attachment on the revisit intention: the moderating effect of perceived risk. PLoS One19(1): e0296524.
101.
Wesemann LekkasHAntretterTShepherdD, et al. (2025) Following in the footsteps of others: social proof in angel groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice0(0): 1037–1070. DOI: 10.1177/10422587251315657.
102.
WieckEBretschneiderULeimeisterJM (2013) Funding from the crowd: An internet-based crowdfunding platform to support business set-ups from universities. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems22(03): 1340007.
XiangZGretzelU (2010) Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management31(2): 179–188.
105.
XuJH (2014) Communicating the right to know: social media in the do-it-yourself air quality testing campaign in Chinese cities. International Journal of Communication8: 20.
106.
YiYGongT (2013) Customer value co-creation behavior: scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research66(9): 1279–1284.
107.
ZhangCBLiYNWuB, et al. (2017) How WeChat can retain users: roles of network externalities, social interaction ties, and perceived values in building continuance intention. Computers in Human Behavior69: 284–293.
108.
ZhengHHungJLQiZ, et al. (2016) The role of trust management in reward-based crowdfunding. Online Information Review40(1): 97–118.
109.
ZhuCLiX (2018) The influence of design factors on the financing results of crowdfunding projects: a focus on level setting and quality signaling. Journal of Modelling in Management13(3): 587–604.
