This article analyzes the link between trust in national institutions and trust in European Union-level institutions among national public officials. Previous research has mainly looked at citizens; in contrast, little is known about the views national officials actually hold towards European Union-level institutions or how much confidence they place in them. Our study draws on a unique survey of 670 officials in 17 European Union member states who are involved in civil protection, a policy area which has recently emerged as one of the most important in the Union. Three mechanisms are explored: a ‘transference’ mechanism; a ‘trust syndrome’ mechanism and a ‘rational evaluation’ mechanism. Our findings confirm the existence of all three mechanisms and show that if European Union institutions are to be trusted to manage European Union-wide crises, then national institutions must be trusted too. This has far-reaching implications for the prospects of enhanced cooperation among civil-protection institutions in the European Union.
AndersonC (1998)
When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration.Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
2.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2013)
The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system.European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
3.
BackmanSRhinardM (2018)
The European Union’s capacities for managing crises.Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management26(2): 261–271.
4.
BestHLengyelGVerzichelliL (eds) (2012) The Europe of Elites: A Study Into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
5.
BeyersJTrondalJ (2004)
How nation states ‘hit’ Europe: Ambiguity and representation in the European Union.West European Politics27(5): 919–942.
6.
BoinAEkengrenMRhinardM (2013) The European Union as Crisis Manager.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
7.
BoinARhinardMEkengrenM (2014)
Managing transboundary crises: The emergence of European Union capacity. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management22(3): 131–142.
8.
BossongRHegemannH (2015) Introduction: European civil security governance – Towards a new comprehensive policy space? In: BossongRHegemannH (eds) European Civil Security Governance: Diversity and Cooperation in Crisis and Disaster Management.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–26.
9.
ChristensenTDanielsonOALægreidP, et al. (2016b)
Comparing coordination structures for crisis management in six countries.Public Administration94(2): 316–332.
10.
ChristensenTLægreidPRykkjaLH (2016a)
Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy.Public Administration Review76(6): 887–897.
11.
Commission of the European Communities (2013) New Legislation to Strengthen European Policy on Disaster Management. Memo/13/1120. Brussels, 10 December 2013.
12.
Commission of the European Communities (2017a) Civil Protection. Special Eurobarometer 454 (May 2017). Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.
13.
Commission of the European Communities (2017b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening EU Disaster Management: rescEU Solidarity with Responsibility, Brussels, 23 November 2017, COM(2017) 773 final.
14.
DellmuthLTallbergJ (2015)
The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations.Review of International Studies41(3): 451–475.
15.
DesmetPvan SpanjeJde VreeseC (2012)
Second-order’ institutions: National institutional quality as a yardstick for EU evaluation.Journal of European Public Policy19(7): 1071–1088.
16.
EgebergM (2011)
Transcending intergovernmentalism? Identity and role perceptions of national officials in EU decision-making.Journal of European Public Policy6(3): 456–474.
17.
FosterCFriedenJ (2017)
Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government.European Union Politics18(4): 511–535.
18.
GrönlundKSetäläM (2012)
In honest officials we trust.The American Review of Public Administration42(5): 523–542.
19.
HallerM (2008) European Integration as an Elite Process: The Failure of a Dream?
New York, NY:
Routledge.
20.
HarteveldEvan der MeerTDe VriesCE (2013)
In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union.European Union Politics14(4): 542–565.
21.
HixSGoetzK (2000)
Introduction: European integration and national political systems.West European Politics23(4): 1–26.
22.
HoogheL (2003)
Europe divided? Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics4(3): 281–304.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2005)
Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
24.
KritzingerS (2003)
The influence of the nation-state on individual support for the European Union.European Union Politics4(2): 219–241.
25.
KuipersSBoinABossongR, et al. (2015)
Building joint crisis management capacity? Comparing civil security systems in 22 European countries.Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy6(1): 1–21.
26.
LeviM (1998) A state of trust. In: BraithwhaiteVLeviM (eds) Trust and Governance.
New York:
Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 77–101.
27.
LeviMStokerL (2000)
Political trust and trustworthiness.Annual Review of Political Science3: 475–507.
28.
MuñosJ (2017) Political trust and multilevel government. In: ZmerliSvan der MeerTWG (eds) Handbook on Political Trust.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 69–88.
29.
MuñozJTorcalMBonetE (2011)
Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?European Union Politics12(4): 551–74.
30.
NewtonKNorrisP (2000) Confidence in public institutions. Faith, culture, or performance? In: PharrSJPutnamRD (eds) Disaffected Democracies. What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?
Princeton:
Princeton University Press, pp. 52–73.
31.
NewtonKZmerliS (2011)
Three forms of trust and their association.European Political Science Review3(2): 169–200.
32.
NohrstedtDBynanderFParkerC, et al. (2018)
Managing crises collaboratively: Prospects and problems – A systematic literature review.Perspectives on Public Management and Governance1(4): 257–271.
33.
NorrisP (2017) The conceptual framework of political support. In: ZmerliSvan der MeerTWG (eds) Handbook on Political Trust.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 19–32.
34.
ParkerCFPerssonTWidmalmS (2018) The effectiveness of national and EU-level civil protection systems: Evidence from 17 member states. Journal of European Public Policy. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1523219.
35.
PerssonTParkerCFWidmalmS (2017)
Social trust, impartial administration and public confidence in EU crisis management institutions.Public Administration95(1): 97–114.
36.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
37.
RothsteinB (2011) The Quality of Government.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
38.
RothsteinBStolleD (2008)
The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust.Comparative Politics40(4): 441–459.
39.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000)
The political basis of support for European integration.European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
40.
SandersDTokaG (2013)
Is anyone listening? Mass and elite opinion cueing in the EU.Electoral Studies32(1): 13–25.
41.
ScharpfFW (1999) Governing in Europe.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
42.
SchmidtV (2012)
Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’.Political Studies61(1): 2–22.
43.
SteenbergenMREdwardsERDe VriesCE (2007)
Who is cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
44.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002)
Modeling multilevel data structures.American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
45.
TrondalJ (2011)
Beyond the EU membership-non-membership dichotomy? Supranational identities among national EU decision-makers.Journal of European Public Policy9(3): 468–487.
46.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundation of Trust.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
47.
Van der MeerTWGZmerliS (2017) The deeply rooted concern with political trust. In: ZmerliSvan der MeerTWG (eds) Handbook on Political Trust.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–18.
48.
WidmalmSParkerCFPerssonT (2019) Civil Protection Cooperation in the European Union: How Trust and Administrative Culture Matter for Crisis Management.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
ZáveczG (2017) Post-communist societies of Central and Eastern Europe. In: ZmerliSvan der MeerTWG (eds) Handbook on Political Trust.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 440–460.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
