What factors explain public support for international redistribution? While the European Union has sent billions of taxpayers' money to over indebted euro countries in an attempt to avoid an economic collapse, these transfers have encountered fierce resistance among both donor and recipient constituents. However, we know surprisingly little about why citizens support or oppose redistribution within the EU. This paper suggests that domestic levels of corruption and institutional quality may be one of the most important explanations for the great variation in public support for financial assistance, bailouts and aid. Using recent European Elections Survey data merged with data on regional level quality of government, we show that the effects of institutional quality are consistently stronger than macro-economic factors, including economic development, inequality or levels of public debt. We find strong evidence that citizens in low corrupt contexts are more likely to support financial assistance to fellow member states. The results have implications for future challenges in securing public support for EU economic integration as well as for our understanding of how and why corruption undermines society's collective action capacity.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
2.
AndersonCJTverdovaYV (2003) Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science47(1): 91–109.
3.
AuyeroJ (2001) Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita, Durham: Duke University Press. .
4.
Bansak K, Bechtel MM, Hainmueller J, et al. The Ideological Basis of the Grexit Debate (January 1, 2016). Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 16–9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2715746. (accessed August 2017).
5.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
6.
BatesRLienD (1985) A note on taxation, development, and representative government. Politics & Society14(1): 53–70.
7.
Bauhr M and Charron N (2017) Insider or outsider? Grand corruption and electoral accountability. Comparative Political Studies 51(4): 415–446.
8.
BauhrMCharronNNasiritousiN (2013) Does corruption cause aid fatigue? Public opinion and the aid-corruption Paradox1. International Studies Quarterly57(3): 568–579.
9.
BechtelMMHainmuellerJMargalitY (2014) Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the Eurozone bailouts. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 835–856.
10.
BoomgaardenHGSchuckARElenbaasMet al.(2011) Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics12(2): 241–266.
11.
BrattonM (2012) Citizen perceptions of local government responsiveness in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development40(3): 516–527.
12.
BrautigamDFjeldstadOHMooreM (2008) Taxation and State-building in Developing Countries: Capacity and Consent, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ChangECCChuY (2006) Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies?. Journal of Politics68(2): 259–271.
14.
CharronNDijkstraLLapuenteV (2015) Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social Indicators Research122(2): 315–346.
15.
ChongAGradsteinM (2008) What determines foreign aid? The donors' perspective. Journal of Development Economics87(1): 1–13.
16.
DanieleGGeysB (2015) Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the Eurozone Bailouts. Journal of European Public Policy22(5): 650–670.
FazekasMKocsisG (2017) Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 24 August 2017. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123417000461.
19.
FosterCFriedenJ (2017) Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans' confidence in government. European Union Politics18(4): 511–535.
20.
GilleyB (2012) State legitimacy: An updated dataset for 52 countries. European Journal of Political Research51(5): 693–699.
21.
HarteveldEvan der MeerTDe VriesCE (2013) In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics14(4): 542–565.
22.
HeinrichTKobayashiYBryantKA (2016) Public opinion and foreign aid cuts in economic crises. World Development77(1): 66–79.
23.
HoboltSBde VriesCE (2016) Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 413–432.
24.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
25.
JægerMM (2006) Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review22(2): 157–170.
26.
Jong-SungYKhagramS (2005) A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review70(1): 136–157.
27.
KaufmannDKraayAMastruzziM (2011) The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law3(2): 220–246.
28.
Kitschelt H and Wilkinson S (2007) Citizen–politician linkages: An introduction. In: Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–49.
29.
KritzingerS (2003) The influence of the Nation-State on individual support for the European Union. European Union Politics4(2): 219–241.
30.
KuhnTStoeckelF (2014) When European integration becomes costly: The Euro crisis and public support for European economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy21(4): 626–641.
31.
KuhnTvan ElsasEHakhverdianAet al.(2016) An ever wider gap in an ever closer union: Rising inequalities and euroscepticism in 12 West European democracies, 1975–2009. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 27–45.
32.
LeviM (1988) Of Rule and Revenue, Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
McLarenL (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?. Journal of Politics64(2): 551–88.
34.
MilnerHVTingleyD (2013) Public opinion and foreign aid: A review essay. International Interactions39(3): 389–401.
35.
MuñozJTorcalMBonetE (2011) Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?. European Union Politics12(4): 551–574.
36.
NichterSPeressM (2017) Request fulfilling: When citizens demand clientelist benefits. Comparative Political Studies50(8): 1086–1117.
37.
NorthD (1981) Growth and Structural Change, New York, NY: Norton.
38.
OstromE (1999) Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 493–535.
39.
PaxtonPKnackS (2012) Individual and country-level factors affecting support for foreign aid. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique33(2): 171–192.
40.
RohrschneiderR (2002) The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science46(2): 463–475.
41.
RothsteinBSamanniMTeorellJ (2012) Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review4(1): 1–28.
42.
RothsteinBUslanerEM (2005) All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics58(01): 41–72.
43.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
44.
SerricchioFTsakatikaMQuagliaL (2013) Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies51(1): 51–64.
45.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
46.
StegmuellerD (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 748–761.
47.
StoeckelFKuhnT (2017) Mobilizing citizens for costly policies: The conditional effect of party cues on support for international bailouts in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies. Epub ahead of print 25 July 2017. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12610.
48.
SvallforsS (2013) Government quality, egalitarianism, and attitudes to taxes and social spending: A European comparison. European Political Science Review5(3): 363–380.
49.
SzwarcbergM (2012) Uncertainty, political clientelism, and voter turnout in Latin America: Why parties conduct rallies in Argentina. Comparative Politics45(1): 88–106.
50.
Van SpanjeJVan Der BrugW (2007) The party as pariah: The exclusion of anti-immigration parties and its effect on their ideological positions. West European Politics30(5): 1022–1040.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
