This article contributes to existing debates on public opinion toward European integration by examining when and why fiscal transfers and public support are systematically related. Drawing on economic and identity-related theories, we develop and test hypotheses about the links between European Union fiscal transfers among countries and subnational jurisdictions, and citizens’ support for European integration. Using a three-level analysis of residents in 143 regions in 16 European Union member states, we find a positive effect of European Union transfers among both countries and subnational jurisdictions on support for European integration among those with a European communal identity. We also find that this effect increases the more politically aware individuals are. The article sketches the broader implications of our findings for public opinion research on regional integration beyond the European Union.
AiCNortonEC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters80(1): 123–129.
2.
AndersonCJReichertMS (1995) Economic benefits and support for membership in the EU: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15(3): 231–249.
3.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014) The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
4.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
5.
BerryWDDeMerittJHREsareyJ (2010) Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential?American Journal of Political Science54(1): 248–266.
BruterM (2003) Winning hearts and minds for Europe: The impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European identity. Comparative Political Studies36(10): 1148–1179.
8.
BruterM (2004) On what citizens mean by feeling ‘European': Perceptions of news, symbols and borderless-ness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies30(1): 21–39.
9.
CaldeiraGAGibsonJL (1995) The legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of institutional support. American Journal of Political Science89(2): 356–376.
10.
CarrubbaCJ (2001) The electoral connection in European Union politics. Journal of Politics63(1): 141–158.
11.
ChristinTTrechselA (2002) Joining the EU? Explaining public opinion in Switzerland. European Union Politics3(4): 415–443.
12.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven: Yale University Press.
13.
DellmuthLM (2011) The cash divide: The allocation of European Union regional grants. Journal of European Public Policy18(7): 1016–1033.
14.
DellmuthLMStoffelMF (2012) Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The allocation of European Union Structural Funds. European Union Politics13(3): 413–433.
15.
Dellmuth LM and Tallberg J (2014) The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies. Epub ahead of print 8 October 2014. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210514000230.
16.
De VreeseCBoomgaardenH (2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59–82.
17.
EdwardsMS (2006) Public opinion regarding economic and cultural globalization: Evidence from a cross-national survey. Review of International Political Economy13(4): 587–608.
18.
EichenbergRCDaltonRJ (1993) Europeans and the European Community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization47(4): 507–534.
FordhamBOKleinbergKB (2012) How can economic interests influence support for free trade. International Organization66(2): 311–328.
22.
GabelM (1998a) Economic integration and mass politics: Market liberalisation and public attitudes in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science42(2): 936–953.
23.
GabelM (1998b) Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
24.
GabelMPalmerH (1995) Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research27(1): 3–19.
25.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 1013–1028.
26.
GoldsteinH (1987) Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research, London: Charles Griffen.
27.
GuisingerA (2009) Determining trade policy: Do voters hold politicians accountable?International Organization63(3): 533–557.
28.
HarteveldEvan der MeerTDe VriesCE (2013) In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics14(4): 1–24.
29.
HightonB (2009) Revisiting the relationship between educational attainment and political sophistication. Journal of Politics71(4): 1564–1576.
30.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichA (2010) Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill expert surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 684–703.
31.
HoogheLMarksG (2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?PSOnline37(3): 415–420.
32.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues. Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
33.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
34.
InglehartRRabierJ (1978) Economic uncertainty and European solidarity: Public opinion trends. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences440: 66–87.
35.
JheeBK (2009) Public support for regional integration in Northeast Asia: An empirical test of affective and utilitarian models. International Political Science Review30(1): 49–65.
36.
KaltenthalerKCGellenyRDCeccoliSJ (2004) Explaining citizen support for trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly48(4): 829–851.
37.
KarpJABanducciSABowlerS (2003) To know it is to love it? Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies36(3): 271–292.
38.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 183–219.
39.
Loveless M and Rohrschneider R (2011) Public perceptions of the EU as a system of governance. Living Reviews of European Governance 6(2). Available at: http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2011-2 (accessed 8 February 2015).
40.
MansfieldEDMilnerHV (2012) Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Agreements, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
MansfieldEDMutzDC (2009) Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics and out-group anxiety. International Organization63(3): 425–457.
42.
Marks G (1999) Territorial identities in the European Union. In: Anderson JJ (ed.) Regional Integration and Democracy: Expanding on the European Experience. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.69–91.
43.
MaydaAMRodrikD (2005) Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?European Economic Review49(6): 1393–1430.
44.
MuñozJTorcalMBonetE (2011) Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?European Union Politics12(4): 551–574.
45.
Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A and Pickles A (2005) Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics 128(2): 301–323.
46.
Rohrschneider R (2002) The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 462–475.
47.
Scheve KF and Slaughter MJ (2001) What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics 54(2): 267–292.
48.
TomzM (2007) Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach. International Organization61(4): 821–840.
49.
WooldridgeJM (2001) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
