This article examines the extent to which economic or political factors shaped government preferences in the reform of the Economic Monetary Union. A multilevel analysis of European Union member governments’ preferences on 40 EMU reform issues negotiated between 2010 and 2015 suggests that countries’ financial sector exposure has significant explanatory power. Seeking to minimize the risk of costly bailouts, countries with highly exposed financial sectors were more likely to support solutions involving high degrees of European integration. In contrast, political factors had no systematic impact. These findings help to enhance our understanding of preference formation in the European Union and the viability of future EMU reform.
ArmingeonKCranmerS (2017)
Position-taking in the Euro crisis.Journal of European Public Policy25(4): 546–566.
2.
AspinwallM (2002)
Preferring Europe: Ideology and national preferences on European integration. European Union Politics3(1): 81–111.
3.
AuelKHöingO (2015)
National parliaments and the eurozone crisis: Taking ownership in difficult times?West European Politics38(2): 375–395.
4.
BailerSMattilaMSchneiderG (2015)
Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the Council of Ministers.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies53(3): 437–456.
5.
BernhardWLeblangD (2016)
Sovereign debt, migration pressure, and government survival.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 907–938.
6.
BlinderAS (2013) After the Music Stopped: The Financial Crisis, the Response, and the Work Ahead.
New York:
Penguin Press.
7.
ChalmersAWDellmuthLM (2015)
Fiscal redistribution and public support for European integration.European Union Politics16(3): 386–407.
8.
CopelovitchMFriedenJWalterS (2016)
The political economy of the euro crisis.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 811–840
9.
DegnerHLeuffenD (2016)
Keynes, Friedman, or Monnet? Explaining parliamentary voting behaviour on fiscal aid for euro area member states.West European Politics39(6): 1139–1159.
10.
DegnerHLeuffenD (2019)
Franco-German cooperation and the rescuing of the Eurozone. European Union Politics,
20 (1). 89–108
11.
De VriesCE (2018) Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
12.
De VriesCEEdwardsEE (2009)
Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism.Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
13.
De WildePZürnM (2012)
Can the politicization of European integration be reversed?Journal of Common Market Studies,
50(s1), pp.137–153.
14.
DöringHManowP (2016) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Available at: http://www.parlgov.org/ (accessed 26 November 2018).
FinkeDBailerS (2019)
Crisis bargaining in the European Union: Formal rules or market pressure?European Union Politics20(1): 109–133.
17.
FriedenJA (1991)
Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance.International Organization45(4):425–451.
18.
FriedenJAWalterS (2017)
Understanding the political economy of the eurozone crisis.Annual Review of Political Science20: 371–390.
19.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevelhierarchical Models (Vol. 1).
New York, NY, USA:
Cambridge University Press.
20.
GrossmanGMHelpmanE (2001). Special Interest Politics. MIT press.
21.
HagemannSHoylandB (2008)
Parties in the council?Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1205–1221.
22.
HallPA (2012)
The economics and politics of the euro crisis.German Politics21(4): 355–371.
23.
HallPASoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
24.
HoboltB SWratilC (2015)
Public opinion and the crisis: The dynamics of support for the euro.Journal of European Public Policy22(2): 238–256.
25.
HoogheLMarksG (2005)
Calculation, community and cues. Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(04): 419–443.
26.
HoboltSDe VriesC (2016)
Public support for European integration.Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 413–432.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2009)
A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.British Journal of Political Science39(01): 1–23.
28.
IversenTSoskiceDHopeD (2016)
The Eurozone and political economic institutions.Annual Review of Political Science19: 163–185.
29.
JonesERKelemenDMeunierS (2016)
Failing forward? The euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European Integration.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 1010–1034.
30.
KimM (2016)
Theorizing national preference formation.Cambridge Review of International Affairs29(1): 290–308.
LehnerTWasserfallenF (2019)
Political conflict in the reform of the Eurozone. European Union Politics20(1). 45–64.
33.
Leuffen D, Rittberger B and Schimmelfennig F (2012) Differentiated integration: Explaining variation in the European Union. Macmillan International Higher Education.
34.
LubbersMCoendersM (2017)
Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe.European Union Politics18(1): 98–118.
35.
LundgrenMBailerSTallbergJet al. (2019)
Bargaining success in the reform of the eurozone. European Union Politics20(1): 65–88
36.
MattilaM (2004)
Contested decisions. Empirical analysis of voting in the EU Council of Ministers.European Journal of Political Research43(1): 29–50.
37.
MoravcsikA (1998) The Choice for Europe.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
38.
MoravcsikA (1997)
Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics.International Organization51(4): 513–553.
39.
MundellRA (1961)
A theory of optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review51(4): 657–665.
40.
NölkeA (2016)
Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: The analytical contribution of comparative capitalism.Socio-Economic Review14: 141–161.
41.
ObstfeldM (1997)
Europe’s gamble.Brookings Paper on Economic Activity2: 241–317.
42.
PuntscherRiekmannSWydraD (2013)
Representation in the European State of Emergency: Parliaments against Governments?Journal of European Integration35(5): 565–582. doi:10.1080/07036337.2013.799943
43.
RodrikD (1998)
Why do more open economies have bigger governments?Journal of Political Economy106(5): 997–1032.
44.
Scharpf FW (2011) Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the pre-emption of democracy. Zeitschrift für Staats-und Europawissenschaften (ZSE)/Journal for Comparative Government and European Policy, pp.163--198.
45.
SchlipphakBTreibO (2017)
Playing the blame game on Brussels: The domestic political effects of EU interventions against democratic backsliding.Journal of European Public Policy24(3): 352–365.
46.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2007)
Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future ofEuropean integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
47.
SzczerbiakATaggartP (2008) Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. 1: Case Studies and Country Surveys.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
48.
TarleaS (2018) Low-and high-skills equilibria in central and eastern Europe: What role for the government? East European Politics and Societies Epub ahead of print 5 July 2018. DOI:10.1177/0888325418777059.
49.
Tarlea S (2019) Parties, Power and Policy-making. From Higher Education to Multinationals in Post-Communist Societies. Routledge, London and New York.
50.
VasilopoulouSHalikiopoulouDExadaktylosT (2014)
Greece in crisis: Austerity, populism and the politics of blame.Journal of Common Market Studies52(2): 388–402.
51.
WalterS (2016)
Crisis politics in Europe: Why austerity is easier to implement in some countries than in others.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 841–873.
52.
WasserfallenF (2014)
Political and economic integration in the EU. The case of failed tax harmonization.Journal of Common Market Studies52(2): 420–435.
53.
WasserfallenFLeuffenDKudrnaZet al. (2019)
Analysing European Union decision-making during the euro crisis with new data. European Union Politics20(1): 3–23
WimmelA (2012)
Deutsche Parteien in der Euro-Krise: Das Ende des Konsensprinzips?Integration1: 19–34.
56.
WinzenT (2012)
National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A Cross-national and longitudinal comparison.West European Politics35(3): 657–672
57.
WonkaA (2016)
The party politics of the Euro crisis in the German Bundestag: Frames, positions and salience.West European Politics39(1): 125–144.
58.
ZimmerCSchneiderGDobbinsM (2005)
The contested council: Conflict dimensions of an intergovernmental EU institution.Political Studies53(2): 403–422.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
