The European Union (EU) is assumed to suffer from a democratic deficit. It is often posited that in the EU there is only a weak and indirect connection between public preferences and policy change. This article investigates empirically whether any relationship exists between public support for European integration and EU policy output (1973—2008). Using a new indicator of policy output — the volume of important legislation produced in a semester — I discover a surprising relationship between public support and legislative production. Employing vector autoregression (VAR), I demonstrate that public EU support Granger-causes legislative output but not vice versa, and that the relationship is strong up to the middle of the 1990s but non-existent afterwards. The effect is robust to the inclusion of indicators of the state of the economy and government preferences. In addition, I discover that the average level of EU support in the Council of Ministers follows unemployment levels with a four-year delay.
Alesina A., Angeloni I. and Schuknecht L. ( 2005) What does the European Union do?Public Choice123(1): 275-419.
2.
Anderson CJ and Kaltenthaler KC ( 1996) The dynamics of public opinion toward European integration, 1973-93. European Journal of International Relations2(2): 175-199.
3.
Anderson CJ and Reichert MS ( 1995) Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15(3): 231-249.
4.
Bast J. ( 2003) On the grammar of EU law: legal instruments. Jean Monnet Working Paper9(03).
5.
Bechtel M. and Leuffen D. ( 2010) Forecasting European Union politics: Real-time forecasts in political time series analysis. European Union Politics11(2): 309-327.
6.
Benoit K. and Laver M. ( 2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
7.
Binder SA ( 1999) The dynamics of legislative gridlock, 1947-96. American Political Science Review93(3): 519-533.
8.
Brandt PT ( 2007) Multiple Time Series Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
Brandt PT and Freeman JR ( 2009) Modeling macro-political dynamics. Political Analysis17(2): 113-142.
10.
Budge I., Klingermann H-D., Volkens A., Bara J. and Tanenbaum E. ( 2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Carrubba CJ ( 2001) The electoral connection in European Union politics . Journal of Politics63: 141-158.
12.
Clarke HD, Dutt N. and Kornberg A. ( 1993) The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in WesternEuropean democracies. Journal of Politics55(4): 998-1021.
13.
Coleman JJ ( 1999) Unified government, divided government, and party responsiveness . American Political Science Review93(4): 821-835.
14.
Crombez C. ( 2003) The democratic deficit in the European Union - much ado about nothing? European Union Politics4(1): 101-120.
15.
Crosbie, J. ( 2009) Irish treaty vote puts inheritance law on hold . European Voice, 14 May 2009.
16.
Cryer J. and Chan K.-S (2007) Time Series Analysis. With Applications in R, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
17.
Eichenberg RC and Dalton RJ ( 1993) Europeans and the European Community - the dynamics of public support forEuropean integration. International Organization47(4): 507-534.
18.
Engle R. and Granger C. ( 1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica55(2): 251-276.
19.
Erikson RS, Mackuen MB and Stimson JA ( 2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20.
European Commission (2005) Better regulation for growth and jobs in the European Union. SEC (2005) 175, Brussels , 16 March.
21.
Follesdal A. ( 2006) Survey article: The legitimacy deficits of theEuropean Union. Journal of Political Philosophy14(4): 441-468.
22.
Follesdal A. and Hix S. ( 2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533-562.
23.
Franchino F. ( 2007) The Powers of the Union. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24.
Franklin MN and Wlezien C. ( 1997) The responsive public - issue salience, policy change, and preferences forEuropean unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics9(3): 347-363.
25.
Frendreis J., Tatalovich R. and Schaff J. ( 2001) Predicting legislative output in the first one-hundred days. 1897-1995. Political Research Quarterly4: 853-870.
26.
Golub J. ( 1999) In the shadow of the vote? Decision making in the European Community. International Organization53(4): 733-764.
27.
Golub J. and Steunenberg B. ( 2007) How time affects EU decision-making. European Union Politics8(4): 555-566.
28.
Granger C. ( 1969) Investigating causal relationships by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica36: 424-438.
29.
Granger C. and Newbold P. ( 1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics2(2): 111-120.
30.
Grant JT and Kelly NJ ( 2008) Legislative productivity of the U.S. Congress, 1789-2004 . Political Analysis16(3): 303-323.
Handley DH ( 1981) Public opinion and European integration: The crisis of the 1970s. European Journal of Political Research9(4): 335-364.
33.
Hellstrom J. ( 2008) Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party-electorate linkages onEuropean integration. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1127-1144.
34.
Hix S. ( 2008) What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press .
35.
Hooghe L. and Marks G.(2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39: 1-23.
36.
Jolly M. ( 2007) The European Union and the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Klingermann H-D., Volkens A., Bara J. and Budge I. ( 2007) Mapping Policy Preferences I: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003 . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
38.
König T. ( 2008) Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making: To make a long story short.... European Union Politics9(1): 145-165.
39.
König T., Luetgert B. and Dannwolf T. ( 2006) Quantifying European legislative research: Using Celex and Prelex in EU legislative studies. European Union Politics7(4): 553-574.
40.
Leuffen D. and Hertz R.(2010) If things can only get worse: Anticipation of enlargement in European Union legislative politics. European Journal of Political Research49(1): 53-74.
41.
McLauren LM ( 2006) Identity, Interests, and Attitudes to European Integration . London: Palgrave .
42.
Majone G. ( 1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
43.
Marks G and Steenbergen M (eds) (2004) European Integration and Political Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Marks G., Hooghe L., Nelson M. and Edwards E. ( 2006) Party competition and European integration in the East and West. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155-175.
45.
Moravcsik A. ( 2002) In defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies40(4): 603-624.
46.
Page E. and Dimitrakopoulos D. ( 1997) The dynamics of EU growth. a cross-time analysis . Journal of Theoretical Politics9(3): 365-387.
47.
Pfaff B. ( 2008) Var, Svar and Svec models: Implementation within R Package Vars. Journal of Statistical Software27(4): 1-32.
48.
Schmitt H. and Thomassen JJA ( 2000) Dynamic representation: The case ofEuropean integration. European Union Politics1(3): 318-339.
49.
Schulz H. and König T. ( 2000) Institutional reform and decision-making efficiency in theEuropean Union. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 653-666.
50.
Selck T., Rhinard M. and Häge F. ( 2007) The evolution of European legal integration. European Journal of Law and Economics24(3): 187-200.
51.
Warntjen A. ( 2007) Steering the Union. The impact of the EU presidency on legislative activity in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies45(5): 1135-1157.
52.
Warntjen A., Hix S. and Crombez C. ( 2008) The party political make-up of EU legislative bodies . Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1243-1253.
53.
Wessels W. ( 1995) Evaluations of the EC: Elite or mass-driven. In: Niedermayer O and Sinnott R (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
54.
Wlezien C. ( 1995) The public as thermostat - dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39(4): 981-1000.
55.
Wlezien C. ( 2004) Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. Journal of Politics66(1): 1-24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
