To determine how public opinion matters for the politics of European integration, we need to know what Europeans say about Europe. Yet, despite a proliferation of analyses of public support for Europe, fundamental questions remain. First, does aggregate opinion reflect a single preference for Europe? Second, is the content of opinions similar across countries? Third, have opinions about Europe become more structured over time? Finally, what are the long-term dynamics in opinions about Europe? To answer these questions, we construct a new dataset of historical public opinion since 1952 in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Over the long run, aggregate opinion toward Europe reflects one dominant underlying dimension and its content is similar across countries. We examine the trends in support for Europe.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
2.
AndersonCJKaltenthalerK (1996) The dynamics of public opinion toward European integration, 1973–1993. European Journal of International Relations2(2): 175–199.
3.
BølstadJ (2015) Dynamics of European integration: Public opinion in the core and periphery. European Union Politics16(1): 23–44.
4.
CarrubbaCJ (2001) The electoral connection in European Union politics. Journal of Politics63(1): 141–158.
5.
DaltonRJDuvalR (1986) The political environment and foreign policy opinions: British attitudes toward European integration. British Journal of Political Science6(1): 113–134.
6.
DeutschKBurrellSAKann LeeMJret al.(1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Diez-MedranoJ (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
DownIWilsonC (2008) From ‘permissive consensus’ to ‘constraining dissensus’: A polarizing union?Acta Politica43: 26–49.
9.
EastonD (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York: John Wiley.
10.
EichenbergRDaltonRJ (1993) Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization47(4): 507–534.
11.
EichenbergRDaltonRJ (2007) Post-Maastricht blues: The transformation of citizen support for European integration, 1973–2004. Acta Politica42(2–3): 128–152.
12.
EtzioniA (1965) Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces, New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
13.
EvansGCarlNDennisonJ (2018) Brexit: The causes and consequences of the UK’s decision to leave the EU. In: CastellsMBouinOCaraçaJ (eds) Europe’s Crises, New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 380–404.
14.
FranklinMNWlezienC (1997) The responsive public: Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics9(3): 347–363.
15.
GabelM (1998) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16.
GabelMAndersonCJ (2002) The structure of citizen attitudes and the European political space. Comparative Political Studies35(8): 893–913.
17.
GabelMPalmerHD (1995) Understanding variation in public support For European integration. European Journal of Political Research27(1): 3–19.
18.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 1013–1028.
19.
GaubatzKT (1995) Intervention and intransitivity: Public opinion, social choice, and the use of military force abroad. World Politics47(4): 534–554.
20.
GoertzG (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HaasEB (1968) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
HoboltSBde VriesCE (2016) Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
24.
HoogheLMarksG (2007) Sources of Euroscepticism. Acta Politica42(2–3): 119–127.
25.
InglehartRRabierJR (1978) Economic uncertainty and European solidarity: Public opinion trends. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science440(1): 66–97.
26.
InglehartRReifKH (1991) Analyzing trends in West European opinion: The role of the Eurobarometer surveys. In: InglehartRReifKH (eds) Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opinion, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 1–26.
27.
IserniaP (2008) Present at creation: Italian mass support for European integration in the formative years. European Journal of Political Research47(3): 383–410.
28.
JanssenJ (1991) Postmaterialism, cognitive mobilization, and public support for European integration. British Journal of Political Science21(4): 443–68.
29.
KeyVOJr (1961) Public Opinion and American Democracy, New York: Knopf.
LovelessMRohrschneiderR (2011) Public perceptions of the EU as a system of governance. Living Reviews in European Governance6(2): Available at: www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2011-2 (accessed 28 April 2018).
32.
McLarenLM (2006) Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
MerrittRLPuchalaDJ (1968) Western European Perspectives on International Affairs: Public Opinion Studies and Evaluations, New York: Frederick A. Praeger Publishers.
34.
MoravcsikA (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
NorrisP (1999) The political regime. In: SchmittHThomassenJ (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 74–89.
36.
PannicoR (2017) Is the European Union too complicated? Citizens’ lack of information and party cue effectiveness. European Union Politics18(3): 424–446.
37.
PuchalaDJ (1968) Factor analysis in international survey research. In: MerrittRPuchalaDJ (eds) Western European Perspectives on International Affairs: Public Opinion Studies and Evaluations, New York: Frederick A. Praeger Publishers, pp. 142–172.
38.
SchmittHThomassenJJ (2000) Dynamic representation: The case of European integration. European Union Politics1(3): 318–339.
39.
SartoriG (1970) Concept misinformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
40.
SinnottR (1995) Policy, subsidiarity, and legitimacy. In: NiedermayerOSinnottR (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SorokaSNWlezienC (2010) Degrees of Democracy: The Public, Politics and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
StimsonJA (1991) Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings, Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
StimsonJA (1999) Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
StimsonJA (2004) Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Stimson JA (2005) Policy sentiment in the UK: Reflections on the 2005 elections in longitudinal perspective. In: Paper presented at the elections, public opinion and parties 2005 annual conference, 9–11 September 2005, University of Essex, UK.
46.
ToshkovD (2011) Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics12(2): 169–191.
47.
WesselsB (1995) Evaluations of the EC: Elite or mass-driven? In: NiedermayerOSinnottR (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–162.
48.
WesselsB (2007) Discontent and European identity: Three types of Euroscepticism. Acta Politica42(2–3): 287–306.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
