Are member states less likely to transpose a European Union directive correctly if they disagreed with the directive at the decision-making stage? Existing research provides mixed answers to this question. Most of this research does not consider the role of the enforcement agent, the European Commission, and uses aggregate measures. By contrast, this study considers the impact of the Commission, and focuses on specific provisions in directives. It combines detailed information on states’ disagreement with each provision at the decision-making stage and the quality of national transposition of each provision. The descriptive analysis shows that protracted non-compliance in national transposition is a rare event. The explanatory analysis indicates that states’ policy preferences significantly affect the likelihood of transposition problems, and that this is conditioned by the behaviour of the Commission.
Bendor J. and Meirowitz A. ( 2004) Spatial models of delegation. American Political Science Review98(2): 293-310.
2.
Borghetto E., Franchino F. and Giannetti G. ( 2006) Complying with transposition deadlines of EU directives: Evidence from Italy. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche1: 7-38.
3.
Börzel TA ( 2001) Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical aretefact. Journal of European Public Policy8: 803-824.
4.
Börzel TA ( 2003) Environmental Leaders and Laggards in Europe: Why There Is (Not) a ‘Southern Problem’. Aldershot: Ashgate.
5.
Carrubba CJ ( 2005) Courts and compliance in international regulatory regimes . Journal of Politics67: 669-689.
6.
Ciavarini Azzi G. ( 2000) The slow march of European legislation: The implementation of directives. In: Neunreither K and Wiener A (eds) European Integration after Amsterdam: Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52-67.
7.
Dimitrova A. and Steunenberg B. ( 2000) The search for convergence of national policies in the European Union: An impossible quest? European Union Politics1: 201-226.
8.
Epstein D. and O’Halloran S. ( 1999) Delegating Powers. A Transaction Costs Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Falkner G. and Treib O. ( 2008) Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states. Journal of Common Market Studies46(2): 293-303.
10.
Falkner G., Hartlapp M. and Treib O. ( 2007) Worlds of compliance: why leading approaches to European union implementation are only ‘sometimes-true theories’. European Journal of Political Research46: 395-416.
11.
Falkner G., Hartlapp M., Leiber S. and Treib O. ( 2004) Non-compliance with EU directives in the member states: Opposition through the backdoor?West European Politics27(3): 452-473.
12.
Falkner G., Treib O., Hartlapp M. and Leiber S. ( 2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Fearon J. ( 1998) Bargaining, enforcement and international cooperation . International Organization52(2): 269-305.
14.
Franchino F. ( 2004) Delegating powers in theEuropean community. British Journal of Political Science34: 269-293.
15.
Garrett G., Keleman DR and Schultz H. ( 1998) The European court of justice, national governments and legal integration in theEuropean union. International Organization52(1): 149-176.
16.
Gormley Jr W. ( 1989) Taming the Bureaucracy: Muscles, Prayers, and Other Strategies . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Hartlapp M. and Falkner G. ( 2009) Problems of operationalization and data in EU compliance research. European Union Politics10(2): 281-304.
18.
Héritier A. ( 1995) Leaders and laggards in European clean air policy. In: Unger B and Van Waarden F (eds) Convergence or Diversity: Internationalization and Economic Policy Response. Aldershot: Avebury, 278-306.
19.
Héritier A. ( 2001) Differential Europe: National administrative responses to community policy. In: Cowles MG, Caporaso J and Risse T (eds) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 44-59.
20.
Heritier A, Kerwer D, Knill C, Lehmkuhl D, Teutsch M and Douillet AC (eds) (2001) Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
Heyes-Renshaw F. and Wallace H. ( 2006) The Council of Ministers, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
22.
Huber E. and Stephens JD ( 2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Politics in Global Markets. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
23.
Jensen CB ( 2007) Implementing Europe: a question of oversight. European Union Politics8(4): 451-477.
24.
Kaufmann D., Kraay A. and Mastruzzi M. ( 2006) Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996-2005. Washington DC: World Bank.
25.
King G. and Zeng L. ( 2001a) Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organization55(3): 693-715.
26.
King G. and Zeng L. ( 2001b) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9(2): 137-163.
27.
King G., Tomz M. and Wittenberg J. ( 2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 341-355.
28.
Klingemann HD, Volkens A., Bara J. and Budge I. ( 2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
König T. and Pöter M. ( 2001) Examining the EU legislative process: The relative importance of agenda and veto power. European Union Politics2: 329-351.
30.
König T. and Luetgert B.(2009) Troubles with transposition? Explaining trends in memberstate notification and delayed transposition of EU directives. British Journal of Political Science39: 163-194.
31.
König T., Finke D. and Daimer S. ( 2005) Ignoring the non-ignorables? Missingness and missing positions . European Union Politics6: 269-290.
32.
Levy M., Young O. and Zürn M. ( 1995) The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations1(3): 267-330.
33.
Lijphart A. ( 1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
McCubbins MD, Noll RG and Weingast BR ( 1989) Structure and process as solution to the politician’s principal-agency problem. Virginia Law Review75: 431-482.
35.
Mastenbroek E. ( 2003) Surviving the deadline: transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands. European Union Politics4(4): 371-395.
36.
Mbaye H. ( 2001) Why national states comply with supranational law: Explaining implementation infringements in the European union 1972-1993. European Union Politics2(3): 259-281.
37.
Nugent N. ( 1999) The Government and Politics of the European Union. London: Macmillan.
38.
O’Toole Jr LJ ( 2000) Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10: 263-288.
39.
Pollack M. ( 2003) The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Pridham G. ( 1994) National environmental policy-making in the European framework: Spain, Greece and Italy in comparison. Regional Politics and Policy4(1): 80-101.
41.
Risse T., Green M. and Caporaso J. ( 2001) Europeanization and domestic change: introduction. In: Cowles MG, Caporaso J and Risse T (eds) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1-20.
42.
Shepsle K. ( 1992) Bureaucratic drift, coalitional drift, and time consistency: a comment on macey. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization8(1): 111-118.
43.
Siaroff A. ( 1999) Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research36: 175-205.
44.
Tallberg J. ( 2003) Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and theEuropean union. International Organization56: 609-643.
45.
Thomson R. ( 2007) Time to comply: national responses to six labour market directives reconsidered. West European Politics30(5): 987-1008.
46.
Thomson R., Torenvlied R. and Arregui J. ( 2007) The paradox of compliance: Infringements and delays in transposing European Union directives. British Journal of Political Science37: 685-709.
47.
Torenvlied R. ( 2000) Political Decisions and Agency Performance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48.
Warntjen A., Hix S. and Crombez C. ( 2008) The party political make-up of EU legislative bodies. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1243-1253.
49.
Weingast BR and Moran MJ ( 1983) Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control: Regulatory policymaking by the federal trade commission. Journal of Political Economy91: 765-780.
50.
Wright V. ( 1996) The national coordination of European policy making. In: Richardson J (ed.) European Union: Power and Policy Making. London: Routledge, 148-169.
51.
Zhelyazkova A. and Torenvlied R.(2009) The time-dependent effect of conflict in the council on delays in the transposition of EU directives. European Union Politics10(1): 35-62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
