Accession to the European Union (EU) demands the adoption of a vast body of legislation. This paper analyses compliance with EU directives in eight post-communist countries during the Eastern enlargement and tries to account for the puzzling embrace of EU law in Central and Eastern Europe. Drawing on a new data set tracking the transposition of a sample of 119 directives, the paper finds effects of both political preferences and government capacity on the likelihood of timely transposition. Furthermore, important sectoral differences are uncovered, with trade-related legislation having a better chance and environmental legislation having a significantly worse chance of being incorporated into national legal systems on time. Beyond the conditionality of the accession process, the paper unveils a complex causal structure behind the ups and downs in transposition performance.
Andonova, Liliana (2004) Transnational Politics of the Environment. The European Union in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.
2.
Benoit, Kenneth and Michael Laver (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
3.
Berglund, Sara, Ieva Gange and Frans van Waarden (2006) `Mass Production of Law. Routinization in Transposition of European Directives. A Sociological-Institutionalist Account', Journal of European Public Policy13(5): 692-716.
4.
Borghetto, Enrico, Fabio Franchino and Daniela Giannetti (2005) `Complying with the Transposition Deadlines of EU Directives: Evidence from Italy', paper presented at the 3rd ECPR Conference, Budapest.
5.
Börzel, Tanja A. and Thomas Risse (2003) `Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe' , in Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli (eds) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Dimitrov, Vesselin, Klaus H. Goetz and Hellmut Wollmann (2006) Governing after Communism: Institutions and Policymaking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
Dimitrova, Antoaneta (2002) `Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU's Administrative Capacity Requirement', West European Politics25(4): 171-90.
8.
Dimitrova, Antoaneta and Mark Rhinard (2005) `The Power of Norms in the Transposition of EU Directives', European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 16(9).
9.
Elster, Jon, Claus Offe and Ulrich Preuss (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Goetz, Klaus H. and Hellmut Wollmann (2001) `Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-Communist Europe: A Four-Country Comparison', Journal of European Public Policy8(6): 864-87.
11.
Grabbe, Heather (2003) `Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process', in Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli (eds) The Politics of Europeanization, pp. 303-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2006) `The Discreet Charm of Formal Institutions. Post-communist Party Competition and State Oversight', Comparative Political Studies39(3): 271-300.
13.
Haas, Peter (1998) `Compliance with EU Directives: Insights from International Relations and Comparative Politics', Journal of European Public Policy5(1): 17-37.
14.
Haverland, Markus and Marleen Romeijn (2007) `Do Member States Make European Policies Work? Analysing the EU Transposition Deficit', Public Administration85(3): 757-78.
15.
Hille, Peter and Christoph Knill (2006) `"It's the Bureaucracy, Stupid": The Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU Candidate Countries, 1999-2003', European Union Politics7(4): 531-52.
16.
Jensen, Christian B. (2007) `Implementing Europe: A Question of Oversight' , European Union Politics8(4): 451-77.
17.
Kaeding, Michael (2006) `Determinants of Transposition Delay in the European Union', Journal of Public Policy26(3): 229-53.
18.
Kaufman, D., A. Kraai and M. Mastruzzi (2005) Governance Matters IV. Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19.
König, Thomas, Brooke Luetgert and Tanja Dannwolf (2006) `Quantifying European Legislative Research: Using Celex and Prelex in EU Legislative Studies', European Union Politics7(4): 553-74.
20.
Lampinen, Risto and Petri Uusikyla (1998) `Implementation Deficit - Why Member States Do Not Comply with EU Directives?', Scandinavian Political Studies21(3): 231-51.
21.
Leiber, Simone (2005) `Implementation of EU Social Policy in Poland: Is There a Different "Eastern World of Compliance"', Journal of European Social Policy17(3): 349-60.
22.
Leiber, Simone (2007) `Transposition of EU Social Policy in Poland: Are There Different "Worlds of Compliance" in East and West?', Journal of European Social Policy17(4): 349-60.
23.
Linos, Katerina (2004) `How Can International Organizations Shape National Welfare States? Evidence from Compliance with EU Directives', Center for European Studies Working Paper 107.
24.
Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson and Erica Edwards (2006) `Party Competition and European Integration in East and West. Different Structure, Same Causality', Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155-75.
25.
Mastenbroek, Ellen (2003) `Surviving the Deadline. The Transposition of EU Directives in the Netherlands', European Union Politics4(4): 371-95.
26.
Mbaye, Heather (2001) `Why National States Comply with Supranational Law: Explaining Implementation. Infringements in the European Union, 1972-1993' , European Union Politics2(3): 259-81.
27.
Perkins, Richard and Eric Neumayer (2007) `Do Membership Benefits Buy Regulatory Compliance? An Empirical Analysis of EU Directives 1978-99', European Union Politics8(2): 180-206.
28.
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds) (2005) Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Scott Long, J. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
30.
Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2006) `Europeanisation in New Member and Candidate States' , Living Reviews in European Governance1(3).
31.
Stark, David and Laszlo Bruszt (1998) Postsocialist Pathways. Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Steunenberg, Bernard (2006) `Turning Swift Policy-Making into Deadlock and Delay: National Policy Coordination and the Transposition of EU Directives' , European Union Politics7(3): 293-319.
33.
Steunenberg, Bernard (2007) `A Policy Solution to the European Union's Transposition Puzzle: Interaction of Interests in Different Domestic Arenas', West European Politics30(1): 23-49.
34.
Steunenberg, Bernard and Mark Rhinard (2006) `Hare or Turtle? Member States Catching up with the Transposition of EU Directives', Mimeo, Leiden University .
35.
Tallberg, Jonas (2002) `Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management and the European Union', International Organization56(3): 609-43.
36.
Thomson, Robert, Rene Torenvlied and Javier Arregui (2007) `The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives', British Journal of Political Science37(4): 685-709.
37.
Toshkov, Dimiter (2007) `Transposition of EU Social Policy in the New Member-States' , Journal of European Social Policy17(3): 335-48.
38.
Vachudova, Milada Anna (2005) Europe Undivided. Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Zubek, Radoslaw (2005) `Complying with Transposition Commitments in Poland: Collective Dilemmas, Core Executive and Legislative Outcomes', West European Politics28(3): 592-619.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
