Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2004-9
The Impact of the Process of Economic Integration on the Relationships between Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Trade: Cases of Japan and U.S. in European Union
In the traditional trade model, FDI and trade were substituting each other because the major objectives of the traditional model were finished goods. However, the introduction of intra-firm trade goods by multinational enterprises (MNEs), and the process of the international economic integration expanded the trade model to embrace the possibility of complementarities between FDI and trade. Accordingly, this study tries to find out the relationships between FDI and trade in the past decades by comparing the FDI and trade records of Japanese and MNEs of the United States.
BergstenC.F.HorstT.MoranT. (1978). American Multinationals and American Interests, Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution
2.
BerryHeatherSakakibaraMariko (1999). “Resource accumulation and overseas expansion by Japanese multinationals: An empirical analysis of the internalization theory,”CIBER Working Paper. Anderson management school at UCLA, No. 99–3
3.
BrainardS. L. (1997). “An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade,”American Economic Review. 87(4): 520–544
4.
CaseyWilliam L.Jr. (1998). Beyond the Numbers: Foreign Direct Investment in the United States. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press
5.
DunningJohn H. (1994). “MNE activity: Comparing the NAFTA and the European Community,” In EdenL. (ed), Multinationals in North America. Calgary: University of Calgary Press
6.
DunningJohn H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Workingham, England: Addison Wesley
7.
DunningJohn H. (1988). Multinationals, technology and the competitiveness. London: Allen & Unwin
8.
GrayH. Peter (1999). Global Economic Involvement: A Synthesis of Modern International Economics. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press
9.
GrayH. Peter (1992). “The interface between the theories of international trade and production,” In BuckleyP.CassonM. (eds), Multinational enterprises in the world economy: essays in honour of John Dunning. Aldershot: Edward Elgar
10.
HedlundG.KvernelandA. (1985). “Are strategies for foreign markets changing? The case of Swedish investment in Japan,”International Studies of Management and Organization. 15(2): 41–59
11.
HuangGene (1997). Determinants of United States - Japanese Foreign Direct Investment: A comparison across countries and industries. New York; Garland Publishing, Inc.
12.
KojimaKiyoshi (1990). Japanese Direct Investment Abroad. Tokyo: International Christian University
13.
LipseyR. E.WeissM. (1981). “Foreign production and exports in manufacturing industries,”Review of Economics & Statistics. 63(4): 488–494
14.
MarkusenJ.(1995). “The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade,”Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9: 169–189
15.
United Nations Transnational Corporations and Management Division (UNTCMD) (1993). From the Common Market to EC 92: Regional Economic Integration in the European Community and Transnational Corporations. New York: Department of Economic and Social Development, United Nations
16.
UNCTAD (1998). World Investment Report 1998: Trends and Determinants. New York and Geneva: United Nations
17.
UNCTAD (1996). “Foreign direct investment and trade: Interlinkage and policy implications,” In World Investment Report 1996. Geneva & New York: UN
18.
UNCTAD (1990). Regional economic integration and transnational corporations in the 1990s: Europe 1992, North America, and Developing Countries. New York: United Nations
19.
United Nations (2001). UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics. New York and Geneva: United Nations
