I extend the standard spatial model of legislative voting to account for vote-specific party inducements and procedural differences. Focusing on voting in the 1999—2004 European Parliament, I find evidence of vote-specific party inducements in a large share of the roll call votes. Furthermore, MEPs position themselves differently across procedures. As most roll call votes are taken on non-legislative votes, these estimates may overemphasize voting pattern on these votes and downplay voting pattern on legislative votes. As such, these estimates may be a poorly suited for studying within party heterogeneity on legislative votes.
Aldrich JH ( 1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bafumi J., Gelman A., Park DK and Kaplan N. ( 2005) Practical issues in implementating and understanding Bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis13: 171-187.
3.
Carey JM ( 2009) Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Carroll R., Lo J., Lewis J., Poole K. and Rosenthal H. ( 2009) Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of difference and Monte Carlo tests. Legislative Studies Quarterly34: 555-591.
5.
Carrubba C., Gabel M. and Hug S. ( 2008) Legislative voting behavior, seen and unseen: a theory of roll-call vote selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly33: 543-572.
6.
Carrubba C., Gabel M. and Hug S. ( 2009) Voting at the surface: Roll call votes in the European Parliament. Typescript, Department of Political Science, University of Geneva.
7.
Carrubba CJ, Gabel M., Murrah L., Clough R., Montgomery E. and Schambach R. ( 2006) Off the record: Unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias and roll-call analysis. British Journal of Political Science36: 691-704.
8.
Clinton J. ( 2007) Lawmaking and roll calls. Journal of Politics69: 455-467.
9.
Clinton JD and Jackman S. ( 2009) To simulate or NOMINATE?Legislative Studies Quarterly34: 593-621.
10.
Clinton J., Jackman S. and Rivers D. ( 2004) The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review98: 355-370.
11.
Clinton JD and Meriowitz A. ( 2001) Agenda constrained legislator ideal points and the spatial voting model. Political Analysis9: 242-259.
12.
Clinton JD and Meirowitz A. ( 2003) Integrating voting theory and roll call analysis: A framework . Political Analysis11: 381-396.
13.
Cox GW and McCubbins MD ( 1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
Cox GW and McCubbins MD ( 2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Crombez C. ( 2001) The Treaty of Amsterdam and the codecision procedure. In: Aspinwall M and Schneider G (eds) The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 101-122.
16.
Gelman A., Carlin JB, Stern Hal S. and Rubin DB ( 2004) Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall/ CRC.
17.
Gelman A. and Hill J. ( 2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Geweke J. ( 1992) Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments (with discussion). Bayesian Statistics, Vol 4. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 169-193.
19.
Gill J. ( 2008) Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
20.
Hagemann S. and Høyland B.(2010) Bicameral politics in theEuropean Union. Journal of Common Market Studies48: 811-833.
21.
Han J.-H (2007) Analysing roll calls of theEuropean Parliament. European Union Politics8: 479-507.
22.
Heidelberger P. and Welch PD ( 1983) Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Operational Research31: 1109-1144.
23.
Hinich MJ and Munger MC ( 1997) Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hix S. ( 2001) Legislative behaviour and party competition in the EU: An application of nominate in the post 1999European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies39: 663-688.
25.
Hix S., Noury A. and Roland G. ( 2006) Dimensions of politics in theEuropean Parliament. American Journal of Political Science50: 494-511.
26.
Hix S., Noury A. and Roland G. ( 2007) Democracy in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hug S.(2010) Selection effects in roll call votes. British Journal of Political Science40: 225-235.
28.
Jackman S. ( 2001) Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference and model checking. Political Analysis9: 227-241.
29.
Jackman S. ( 2009) Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
30.
Martin AD and Quinn KM ( 2002) Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999. Political Analysis10: 134-153.
31.
Noury AG ( 2002) ‘Ideology, nationality, and Euro-parliamentarians . European Union Politics3: 33-58.
32.
Ntzoufras I. ( 2009) Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
33.
Poole KT ( 2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Snyder Jr JM and Groseclose T. ( 2000) Estimating party influence in congressional roll-call votes. American Journal of Political Science44: 193-211.
35.
Thiem J. ( 2006) Explaining Roll Call Request in the European Parliament . Working Paper90, Mannheim MZES.
36.
Tsebelis G. and Garrett G. ( 2000) Legislative politics in theEuropean Union. European Union Politics1: 9-36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
