Scholars have long believed that the influence of radical right parties in the European Parliament was indirect due to their internal heterogeneity, limited involvement in parliamentary activities, and the existence of a cordon sanitaire. However, the consolidation of these parties, marked by the Identity and Democracy group becoming the fourth largest group in 2019, raises concerns about their impact on European Union decision-making. This article seeks to understand the extent and conditions under which the radical right group in the European Parliament can influence policymaking. By analysing roll-call votes from the 9th term (2019 to 2024), we introduce a measure of voting influence, operationalised as the ability of a party group to sway the outcome of a vote in plenary. Our analysis reveals that while the radical right group frequently joins winning majorities in the European Parliament, its voting influence remains limited because of the low levels of conflict in plenary.
Abou-ChadiTKrauseW (2020) The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science50(3): 829–847.
2.
AkkermanTLangeSLRooduijnM (2016) Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream?London / New York: Routledge.
3.
AxelrodR (1970) Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
4.
BarryB (1980) Is it better to be powerful or lucky?: Part I. Political Studies28(2): 183–194.
5.
BehmASBrackN (2019) Sheep in wolf’s clothing? Comparing eurosceptic and non-eurosceptic MEPs’ parliamentary behaviour. Journal of European Integration41(8): 1069–1088.
6.
BörzelTABronieckiPHartlappM, et al. (2023) Contesting Europe: Eurosceptic dissent and integration polarization in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies61(4): 1100–1118.
7.
BörzelTAHartlappM (2022) Eurosceptic contestation and legislative behaviour in the European Parliament. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (eds) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.97–122.
8.
BowlerSMcElroyG (2015) Political group cohesion and ‘hurrah voting’ in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy22(9): 1355–1365.
9.
BrackN (2018) Opposing Europe in the European Parliament: Rebels and Radicals in the Chamber. Palgrave studies in European Union politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
BrackNBehmAS (2022) How do Eurosceptics wage opposition in the European Parliament? Patterns of behaviour in the 8th legislature. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (eds) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.147–172.
11.
BrackNCostaOMariéA (2023) Dealing with fragmentation: The new political equilibrium and coalition dynamics in the European Parliament during the 9th legislature. In: CostaOVan HeckeS (eds) The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.121–148.
12.
BrackNStartinN (2016) To cooperate or not to cooperate? The European radical right and pan-European cooperation. In: FitzGibbonJLeruthBStartinN (eds) Euroscepticism as a Transnational and Pan-European Phenomenon. London: Routledge, pp.28–35.
CavallaroMFlacherDZanettiMA (2018) Radical right parties and European economic integration: evidence from the seventh European Parliament. European Union Politics19(2): 321–343.
16.
ChiruMStoianV (2019) Liberty: Security dilemmas and party cohesion in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies57(5): 921–938.
17.
CostaOMariéA (2023) Is there an alternative to consensus? The impact of the 2014 coalition deal on voting behaviour in the eighth European Parliament (2014–2019). International Journal of Parliamentary Studies3(1): 36–62.
18.
DahlRA (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science2(3): 201–215.
19.
DahlRA (1961) Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
De SwaanA (1973) Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Amsderdam: Elsevier.
21.
ElomäkiAAhrensPKantolaJ (2022) Turbulent times for the European Parliament’s political groups? Lessons on continuity and change. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (eds) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.267–282.
22.
EsguerraEHagemeisterFHeidJ, et al. (2023) Accommodation of right-wing populist rhetoric: Evidence from parliamentary speeches in Germany. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/rco/dpaper/435.html (accessed 12 July 2024).
23.
FaasTRaunioTWibergM (2004) The difference between real and potential power: Voting power, attendance and cohesion. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/1667/1/dp_c130_wiberg.pdf (accessed 12 July 2024).
24.
FalknerGPlattnerG (2020) EU Policies and populist radical right parties’ programmatic claims: Foreign policy, anti-discrimination and the single market. Journal of Common Market Studies58(3): 723–739.
HanKJ (2015) The impact of radical right-wing parties on the positions of mainstream parties regarding multiculturalism. West European Politics38(3): 557–576.
27.
HixSHøylandB (2013) Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science16(1): 171–189.
28.
HixSNouryA (2009) After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(2): 159–174.
HixSNouryAGRolandG (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HollerMJ (1982) Forming coalitions and measuring voting power. Political Studies30(2): 262–271.
32.
HosliMO (1997) Voting strength in the European Parliament: The influence of national and of partisan actors. European Journal of Political Research31(3): 351–366.
33.
HøylandB (2010) Procedural and party effects in European Parliament roll-call votes. European Union Politics11(4): 597–613.
34.
KantolaJMillerC (2021) Party politics and radical right populism in the European Parliament: Analysing political groups as democratic actors. Journal of Common Market Studies59(4): 782–801.
35.
KreppelA (2001) The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KreppelAHixS (2003) From ‘grand coalition’ to left-right confrontation: Explaining the shifting structure of party competition in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies36(1-2): 75–96.
37.
KreppelATsebelisG (1999) Coalition formation in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies32(8): 933–966.
38.
LaneJEMaelandR (2007) Towards an analysis of voting power in parliament: An exploration into coalition-making in Nordic Parliaments. Acta Politica42(4): 355–379.
39.
LukesS (2004) Power: A Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
LukesSHaglundL (2005) Power and luck. European Journal of Sociology46(1): 45–66.
41.
MamadouhVRaunioT (2003) The committee system: Powers, appointments and report allocation. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 333–351.
42.
McDonnellDWernerA (2018) Respectable radicals: Why some radical right parties in the European Parliament forsake policy congruence. Journal of European Public Policy25(5): 747–763.
43.
McDonnellDWernerA (2020) International Populism: The Radical Right in the European Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
MielcováE (2016) Spatial power indices with applications on real voting data from the chamber of deputies of the Czech Parliament. Central European Journal of Operations Research24(2): 407–420.
45.
MinkenbergMFlorianAVéghZ, et al. (2021) Depleting democracy? The radical right’s impact on minority politics in Eastern Europe. International Political Science Review42(5): 649–671.
46.
MorrissP (1972) Power in New Haven: A reassessment of ‘who governs?’British Journal of Political Science2(4): 457–465.
47.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
NovakSRozenbergOBendjaballahS (2021) Enduring consensus: Why the EU legislative process stays the same. Journal of European Integration43(4): 475–493.
49.
OtjesSVan Der VeerH (2016) The Eurozone crisis and the European Parliament’s changing lines of conflict. European Union Politics17(2): 242–261.
50.
RaunioTWibergM (2002) Controlling outcomes: Voting power in the European Parliament 1979-2000. Journal of European Integration24(2): 75–90.
51.
Ripoll ServentAPanningL (2019) Eurosceptics in trilogue settings: Interest formation and contestation in the European Parliament. West European Politics42(4): 755–775.
52.
RogerLOtjesSVan Der VeerH (2017) The financial crisis and the European Parliament: An analysis of the two-pack legislation. European Union Politics18(4): 560–580.
SalvatiE (2022) The persistent dilemma of supranational representation. Framing the weakness of the European Parliament’s representative function in light of the rise of Euroscepticism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies30(3): 445–460.
55.
Sánchez NicolásE (2024) Von der Leyen rejects extremist parties, leaves door open to ECR. EUobserver, 21 February. Available at: https://euobserver.com/eu-political/ar0f07be13 (accessed 11 July 2024).
56.
SchneiderGFinkeDBailerS (2010) Bargaining power in the European Union: An evaluation of competing game-theoretic models. Political Studies58(1): 85–103.
57.
SchwalbachJ (2023) Talking to the populist radical right: A comparative analysis of parliamentary debates. Legislative Studies Quarterly48(2): 371–397.
58.
SeebergHB (2023) The power of the loser: Evidence on an agenda-setting model of opposition policy influence. European Journal of Political Research62(2): 463–485.
StevensMSzczerbiakA (2023) Conservatism and ‘Eurorealism’ in the European Parliament: The European conservatives and reformists under the leadership of Poland’s law and justice. European Politics and Society24(5): 585–602.
61.
ThierseS (2016) Going on record: Revisiting the logic of roll-call vote requests in the European Parliament. European Union Politics17(2): 219–241.
62.
TrummS (2015) Voting procedures and parliamentary representation in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies53(5): 1126–1142.
63.
Van SpanjeJ (2010) Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics16(5): 563–586.
64.
VestergaardKT (2021) A ‘second-order’-agenda in the European Parliament? How Eurosceptic voting behaviour is moderated by issue salience. European Politics and Society22(3): 331–346.
65.
WegmannS (2022) Policy-making power of opposition players: A comparative institutional perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies28(1): 1–25.
66.
YordanovaNMühlböckM (2015) Tracing the selection bias in roll call votes: Party group cohesion in the European Parliament. European Political Science Review7(3): 373–399.
67.
ZasloveA (2009) The populist radical right: Ideology, party families and core principles. Political Studies Review7(3): 309–318.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
