This article analyzes the voting behavior of Euro-parliamentarians. The roll-call data from the plenary sessions of the European Parliament (EP) during the third and fourth legislatures are used to estimate legislators' preferences. Applying the spatial models of roll-call voting to the EP, I investigate the dimensions underlying legislators' voting behavior. I focus on the relative importance of ideology (i.e. European-wide political party affiliation) versus nationality as the main factor influencing voting behavior. The results support the existence of a European political system in which the main actors are political groups, not national delegations. Also, the pattern of voting in the EP is found to be quite stable across time and issues. Moreover, after taking into account Members' political party affiliations, nationality becomes, though to a lesser extent, statistically significant in explaining legislators' ideal positions.
Attina, Fulvio
(1990) `The Voting Behaviour of European Parliament members and the problem of Europarties', European Journal of Political Research5: 557- 9.
2.
Black, Duncan
(1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bowler, Shaun
and David M. Farrell (1993) `Legislators Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impact of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator- Voter Relationship', Journal of Common Market Studies31(1): 45- 69.
4.
Brzinski, Joanne B.
(1995) `Political Group Cohesion in the European Parliament, 1989- 1994', in Carolyn Rhodes and Sonja Mazey (eds) The State of the European Union: Building a European Policy, pp. 135- 58. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
5.
Carruba, Cliff and Matthew Gabel (1999) `Roll-Call Votes and Party Discipline in the European Parliament: Reconsidering MEP Voting Behavior', European Parliament Research Group Working Paper No. 2- 99.
6.
Corbett
, Richard, Francis Jacobs and Michael Shackleton (1995) The European Parliament. London: Cartermill.
7.
Crombez, Christophe
(1996) `Legislative Procedures in the European Community', British Journal of Political Science26: 199- 228.
8.
Downs, Anthony
(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Everitt, Brian S.
(1993) Cluster Analysis. New York: Edward Arnold.
10.
Feldstein, Martin
(1997) `EMU and International Conflict', Foreign Affairs76(6): 60- 74.
11.
Greven, Michael T.
(1992) `Political Parties between National Identity and Eurofication', in Brian Nelson, David Roberts and Walter Veit (eds) The Idea of Europe, Problems of National and Transnational Identity. New York: BERG Inc.
12.
Heckman, James J.
and James M. Snyder, Jr (1997) `Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators', Rand Journal of Economics28: 142- 89.
13.
Hix, Simon
(1999) `Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses', European Journal of Political Research35(1): 69- 106.
14.
Hotelling Harold
(1929) `Stability in Competition', Economic Journal39: 41- 57.
15.
Kalt, Joseph P.
and Mark A. Zupan (1984) `Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics', American Economic Review74: 279- 300.
16.
Kreppel, Amy
and George Tsebelis (1999) `Coalition Formation in the European Parliament', Comparative Political Studies32(8): 933- 66.
17.
Lane
, Jan-Erik, R. Maeland and S. Berg (1995) `Research Note: The EU Parliament: Seats, States and Political Parties', Journal of Theoretical Politics7: 395- 400.
18.
Levitt, Steven D.
(1996) `How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology', American Economic Review86(3): 425- 41.
19.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Nugent, Neil
(1994) The Government and Politics of the European Union. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
Peltzman, Sam
(1985) `An Economic Interpretation of the History of Congressional Voting in the Twentieth Century', American Economic Review75(4): 656- 75.
22.
Poole, Keith T.
and Howard Rosenthal (1985) `A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll-call Analysis', American Journal of Political Science29: 357- 84.
23.
Poole, Keith T.
and Howard Rosenthal (1997) Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Quanjel, Marcel and Menno Wolters (1993) `Growing Cohesion in the European Parliament', Paper for the ECPR joint sessions of workshops at Leiden.
25.
Raunio, Tapio
(1997) The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-1994 European Parliament. London: Ashgate.
26.
Raunio, Tapio
(2000) `Losing Independence or Finally Gaining Recognition? Contact between MEPs and National Parties', Party Politics6(2): 211- 24.
27.
Reif, Karl
and Hermann Schmitt (1980) `Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results', European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3- 45.
28.
Spector, David
(2000) `Rational Debate and One-Dimensional Conflict', Quarterly Journal of Economics115(1): 181- 200.
29.
Stigler, George J.
(1971) `The Theory of Economic Regulation', Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2: 3- 21.
30.
Tsebelis, George
(1994) `The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter', American Political Science Review88: 128- 42.
31.
Tsebelis, George
and Geoffrey Garrett (2000) `Legislative Politics in the European Union', European Union Politics1(1): 9- 36.
32.
Tullock, Gordon
(1981) `Why so Much Stability', Public Choice37: 189- 205.
