Legislative speeches are an important part of parliamentary activity in the European Parliament (EP). Using a new dataset on EP speeches, this paper offers an explanation for participation in legislative debates. We argue that floor speeches partially serve as a communication tool between members of parliament, their national parties, and their European political groups. EP group dissidents often go on record by taking the floor when there is a conflict between their national party and their European political group. In this instance, members give speeches for two reasons: to explain their national party’s position to other members of their EP political group, and to create a positive record for themselves in the eyes of the national party to serve their own reelection purposes.
Arnold RD ( 1990) The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Bowler S. and Farrell D. ( 1993) Legislator shirking and voters monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships . Journal of Common Market Studies31(1): 45-69.
3.
Carey J. and Shugart M. ( 1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14: 417-439.
4.
Carrubba CJ, Gabel MJ, Murrah L., Clough R., Montgomery E. and Schambach R. ( 2006) Off the record: Unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias and roll-call vote analysis. British Journal of Political Science36: 691-704.
5.
Corbett R., Jacobs F. and Shackleton M. ( 2007) The European Parliament, 7th edn. John Harper.
6.
Cox G. ( 2006) The organization of democratic legislatures. In: Weingast B and Wittman D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141-161.
7.
Cox G. and McCubbins M. ( 1993) The Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
Crisp B., Escobar-Lemmon M., Jones B. et al. (2004) Vote-seeking incentives and legislative representation in six presidential democracies. Journal of Politics66: 823-846.
9.
Faas T. ( 2003) To defect or not to defect? National, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party group cohesion in theEuropean Parliament. European Journal of Political Research42: 841-866.
10.
Follesdal A. and Hix S. ( 2006) Why there is a democratic decit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533-562.
11.
Gallagher M and Marsh M (eds) (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective- The Secret Garden of Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Hix S. ( 2002) Parliamentary behavior with two principals: Preferences, parties, and voting in theEuropean Parliament. American Journal of Political Science46(3): 688-698.
13.
Hix S. ( 2004) Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: Explaining voting defection in theEuropean Parliament. World Politics56(1): 194-223.
14.
Hix S. and Lord C. ( 1997) Political Parties in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
Hix S. and Marsh M. ( 2007) Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. Journal of Politics69: 495-510.
16.
Hix S. and Noury N.(2009) After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(2): 159-174.
17.
Hix S., Noury A. and Roland G. ( 2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Imai K., King G. and Lau O. ( 2007) negbin: Negative binomial regression for event count dependent variables. In: Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software . http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.
19.
Jordan AG and Richardson JJ ( 1987) British Politics and the Policy Process. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
20.
Judge D. and Earnshaw D. ( 2003) The European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan .
21.
Klebanov BB, Diermeier D. and Beigman E. ( 2008) Lexical cohesion analysis of political speech. Political Analysis16(4): 447-463.
22.
Kreppel A. ( 2002) The European Parliament and Supranational Party System . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kreppel A. and Tsebelis G. ( 1999) Coalition formation in theEuropean Parliament. Comparative Political Studies32(8): 933-966.
24.
Laver M. and Benoit K. ( 2002) Locating TDs in policy spaces: Wordscoring Dail Speeches . Irish Political Studies17: 59-73.
25.
Loewenberg G. ( 1967) Parliament in the German Political System. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Marsh M. ( 1998) Testing the second-order election model after fourEuropean elections. British Journal of Political Science28: 591-607.
27.
Martin LW and Vanberg G. ( 2008) Coalition government and political communication. Political Research Quarterly61: 502-516.
28.
Mayhew DR ( 1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
Monroe BL and Maeda K. ( 2004) Talk’s cheap: Text-based estimation of rhetorical ideal-points. 21st Annual Summer Meeting. Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University, July 29-31.
30.
Monroe BL, Colaresi M. and Quinn KM ( 2008) Fightin’ words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Political Analysis16: 371-403.
31.
Proksch S-O. and Slapin JB ( 2010) Position-taking in European Parliament speeches. British Journal of Political Science40(3).
32.
Rahat G. and Hazan RY ( 2001) Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics7(3): 297-322.
33.
Raunio T. ( 2000) Losing independence or finally gaining recognition? Contacts between MEPs and National Parties. Party Politics6(2): 211-223.
34.
Reif K. ( 1984) National election cycles and European elections, 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies3(3): 244-255.
35.
Reif K. and Schmitt H. ( 1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3-45.
36.
Scarrow S. ( 1997) Political career paths and their consequences in theEuropean Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly22(2): 253-263.
37.
Schüttemeyer SS ( 2001) Parliamentary parties in the German Bundestag. American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (Key Institutions of German Democracy, No. 6).
38.
Scully R. ( 2000) Democracy, legitimacy, and the European Parliament. In: Cowles MG, Smith M (eds) The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival Vol. 5. Oxford University Press , 228-245.
39.
Shomer Y. ( 2009) Candidate selection procedures, seniority, and vote-seeking behavior. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 945-970.
40.
Sinclair B. ( 1995) Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
Tavits M.(2009) The making of mavericks. Comparative Political Studies42(6): 793-815.
42.
Whitaker R. ( 2001) Party control in a committee-based legislature? The case of theEuropean Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies7: 63-88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
