This article investigates citizen support for welfare provisions, where these can be provided at both the national and the EU level. The guiding question is whether welfare provisions at one level dampen, increase or have little effect on support for assistance at the other level. Analysis of data on support for national and EU-level welfare assistance suggests only one-way tension between governance levels: generous national welfare may modestly diminish support for EU-level welfare assistance, as well as the degree to which economic insecurities encourage such support; but the currently meagre EU-level Structural Funds and other transfers have little effect on support for national compensation. This analysis clarifies the possibilities and dilemmas of welfare compensation where governance is multi-level in character.
Anderson, Christopher and Jonas Pontusson ( 2007) ‘Workers, Worries, and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries’, European Journal of Political Research46(2): 211-36.
2.
Annesley, Claire ( 2007) ‘Lisbon and Social Europe: Towards a European "Adult Worker Model" Welfare System’, Journal of European Social Policy17(3): 195-205.
3.
Aspinwall, Mark ( 2007) ‘Government Preferences on European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories’, British Journal of Political Science37(1): 89-114.
4.
Atkinson, Rob and Simin Davoudi ( 2000) ‘The Concept of Social Exclusion in the European Union: Context, Development and Possibilities’, Journal of Common Market Studies38(3): 427-48.
5.
Bieler, Andreas ( 2006) The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and EMU in Times of Global Restructuring. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
6.
Blekesaune, Morten ( 2007) ‘Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies’, European Sociological Review23(3): 393-403.
7.
Blekesaune, Morten and Jill Quadagno ( 2003) ‘Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations’, European Sociological Review19(5): 415-27.
8.
Boix, Carles ( 2001) ‘Democracy, Development and the Public Sector’ , American Journal of Political Science45(1): 1-17.
9.
Brinegar, Adam P. and Seth K. Jolly ( 2005) ‘Location, Location, Location: National Contextual Factors and Public Support for European Integration’, European Union Politics6(2): 155-80.
10.
Busch, Marc and Eric Reinhardt ( 2005) ‘Industrial Location and Voter Participation in Europe’, British Journal of Political Science35(4): 713-30.
11.
Cameron, David R. ( 1978) ‘The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis’, American Political Science Review72(4): 1243-61.
12.
Carruba, Clifford J. ( 1997) ‘Net Financial Transfers in the European Union: Who Gets What and Why?’, Journal of Politics59(2): 469-96.
13.
De Swaan, Abram ( 1990) ‘Perspectives for Transnational Social Policy’ , paper presented at the World Congress of Sociology , 9-13 July, Madrid.
14.
Doyle, Orla and Jan Fidrmuc ( 2005) ‘Who Favors Enlargement? Determinants of Support for EU Membership in the Candidate Countries’ Referenda’, European Journal of Political Economy22(2): 520-43.
15.
Edlund, Jonas ( 1999) ‘Attitudes to Income Redistribution and Taxation in Social Democratic and Liberal Welfare State Regimes: A Comparison between Sweden, Great Britain, and the United States’, in Niko Tos, Peter Mohler and Brina Malner (eds) Modern Society and Values , pp. 73-110. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
16.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta (ed.) (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
European Commission (1996) First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels.
18.
European Commission (2007) EU Budget 2007 Financial Report. Brussels.
European Opinion Research Group (Eurobarometer) ( 2002) ‘Eurobarometer 56.1: Social Exclusion and Modernization of Pension Systems (ZA3626)’, URL (consulted Aug. 2008 ): http://zacat.gesis.org.
21.
European Opinion Research Group (Eurobarometer) ( 2005) ‘Flash Eurobarometer (171): The European Constitution: Post-Referendum Survey in France’, URL (consulted Aug. 2008): http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl171_en.pdf .
22.
European Union (1999) ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (21 June)’, URL (consulted Feb. 2008): http://www.inforegio.cec.eu.int/wbdoc/docoffic/official/reglem_en.htm .
23.
Ferrera, Maurizio ( 2005) The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Ferrera, Maurizio, Anton Hemerijck and Martin Rhodes ( 2007) The Future of European Welfare States: Recasting Welfare for a New Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Geyer, Robert ( 2000) ‘The State of European Union Social Policy’ , Policy Studies21(3): 245-61.
26.
Hanf, Kenneth and Ben Soetendorp (eds) (1998) Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union. London: Longman.
27.
Hemerijck, Anton ( 2006) ‘Europe’s Semi-Sovereign Welfare States as Evolutionary Systems’, paper presented atHarvardKennedy School of Government.
28.
Hooghe, Liesbet ( 1998) ‘EU Cohesion Policy and Competing Models ofEuropean Capitalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies36(4): 457-77.
29.
Iversen, Torben ( 2005) Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Kleinman, Mark ( 2002) A European Welfare State? European Union Social Policy in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
31.
Korpi, Walter ( 1989) ‘Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship - Social Rights during Sickness in 18 OECD Countries since 1930’, American Sociological Review54(3): 309-28.
32.
Lange, Peter ( 1993) ‘Maastricht and the Social Protocol: Why Did They Do It?’, Politics and Society21(1): 5-36.
33.
Leibfried, Stephan ( 2000) ‘National Welfare States, European Integration and Globalization: A Perspective for the Next Century’, Social Policy & Administration34(1): 44-63.
34.
Leibfried, Stephan and Paul Pierson ( 1995) ‘Semi-Sovereign Welfare States: Social Policy in a Multitiered Europe’, in Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson (eds) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, pp. 43-68. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
Lindert, Peter ( 2004) Growing Public. Volume I. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
36.
Mau, Steffen ( 2005) ‘Democratic Demand for a Social Europe? Preferences of theEuropean Citizenry’, International Journal of Social Welfare14(2): 76-85.
37.
Montanari, Ingalill Järensjö (1995) ‘Harmonization of Social Policies and Social Regulation in the European Community’, European Journal of Political Research27(1): 21-45.
38.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ] (2004) Benefits and Wages: Indicators. Paris: OECD.
39.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ] (2008a) ‘Social Expenditure Database: Online Edition’, URL (consulted Aug. 2008): http://www.sourceoecd.org.
40.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ] (2008b) ‘National Accounts: Online Edition’, URL (consulted Aug. 2008): http://www.sourceoecd.org/database/nationalaccounts.
41.
Orloff, Ann Shola ( 1993) ‘Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States’, American Sociological Review58(3): 303-28.
42.
Petmesidou, Maria ( 1996) ‘Social Protection in Greece: A Brief Glimpse of a Welfare State’, Social Policy and Administration30(4): 324-47.
43.
Pierson, Paul ( 1999) ‘New Politics of the Welfare State’, World Politics48(2): 143-79.
44.
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia and Anders Skrondal ( 2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (Second Edition). College Station: Stata Press.
45.
Rodden, Jonathan ( 2002) ‘Strength in Numbers? Representation and Redistribution in theEuropean Union’, European Union Politics3(2): 151-75.
46.
Ryan, John, Michael Hughes and James Hawdon ( 1998) ‘Marital Status, General-life Satisfaction and the Welfare State: A Cross-National Comparison’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology39(2): 224-36.
47.
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio (2000) ‘The Political Basis of Support for European Integration’, European Union Politics1(2): 147-71.
48.
Scharpf, Fritz W. ( 1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Scharpf, Fritz W. ( 2002) ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’, Journal of Common Market Studies40(4): 645-70.
50.
Schulten, Thorsten ( 2006) ‘Problemi e Prospettive della Politica Sindicala Europea’, in Associazone per il Rinnovamento della Sinistra (ed.) Quale Futuro per il Sindicato, pp. 99-123. Bologna: Futura Press.
51.
Scruggs, Lyle ( 2004) ‘Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States. Version 1.2’, URL (consulted Sept. 2008): http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/wp.htm .
52.
Steenbergen, Marco and Bradford S. Jones ( 2002) ‘Modeling Multilevel Data Structures’, American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218-37.
53.
Streeck, Wolfgang ( 1995) ‘From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy’, in Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson (eds) European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, pp. 389-431. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
54.
Streeck, Wolfgang and Philippe Schmitter ( 1991) ‘From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the SingleEuropean Market’, Politics and Society19(2): 133-64.
55.
Svallfors, Stefan ( 1997) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’, European Sociological Review13(3): 283-304.
56.
Thielemann, Eiko R. ( 2005) ‘Symbolic Politics or Effective Burden-Sharing? Redistribution, Side-Payments and the European Refugee Fund’, Journal of Common Market Studies43(4): 807-24.
57.
Zeitlin, Jonathan ( 2003) ‘Introduction: Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments’, in Jonathan Zeitlin and David Trubek (eds) Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy, pp. 1-30. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
58.
Zeitlin, Jonathan ( 2005) ‘Social Europe and Experimentalist Governance: Towards a New Constitutional Compromise?’, in Gráinne de Búrca (ed.) EU Law and the Welfare State: In Search of Solidarity, pp.213-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
