What is the scope for autonomous action of the European Commission? Its independence is much more contentious than that of the European Court of Justice, which is generally considered quite autonomous. While the literature on the Commission focuses predominantly on its ability to use its agenda-setting powers, the Commission's other means to influence European integration have been less well established. In this paper, I demonstrate how the Commission can use its role as a guardian of the Treaty to coax the Council of Ministers into action. In addition to agenda setting, the Commission can manipulate the Council's default condition, or change the preferences of some of its member states. Thereby the Commission may achieve decisions from the Council that would not have come about had the Commission only agenda-setting powers at its disposal. Effectively, the Commission here uses the greater autonomy of the European Court strategically for its own ends.
Alter, Karen J.
(1998) `Who are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice', International Organization52(1): 121-147.
2.
Alter, Karen J.
and Sophie Meunier-Aitsahalia (1994) `Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision', Comparative Political Studies26(4): 535-561.
3.
Argyris, Nicholas
(1989) `The EEC Rules of Competition and the Air Transport Sector', Common Market Law Review26(5): 3-32.
4.
Arrow, Kenneth J.
(1985) `The Economics of Agency', in John W. Pratt and Richard J. Zeckhauser (eds) Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, pp. 37-51. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
Behrens, Peter
(1992) `Die Konvergenz der wirtschaftlichen Freiheiten im europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht', Europarecht27(2): 145-162.
6.
Braghini, Davide
(1995) `Abuse of a Dominant Position in Performing Handling Services in Italian Airports', European Competition Law Review16(1): 57-59.
7.
Bulmer, Simon
(1994) `Institutions and Policy Change in the European Communities: The Case of Merger Control', Public Administration72(3): 423-444.
8.
Burley, Anne-Marie
and Walter Mattli (1993) `Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration', International Organization47(1): 41-76.
9.
Caporaso, James A.
and John T.S. Keeler (1995) `The European Union and Regional Integration Theory', in Carolyn Rhodes and Sonia Mazey (eds) Building a European Polity?, pp. 29-62. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10.
Deheija, Vivek H.
and Philipp Genschel (1999) `Tax Competition in the European Union', Politics and Society27(3): 403-430.
11.
Dussart-Lefret, Corinne
and Christine Federlin (1994) `Ground Handling Services and EC Competition Rules', Air & Space Law19(2): 50-61.
12.
Eckstein, Harry
(1975) `Case Study and Theory in Political Science', in Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 7), pp. 79-137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Eichener, Volker
(1997) `Effective European Problemsolving: Lessons from the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection', Journal of European Public Policy4(4): 591-608.
14.
Eisner, Marc Allen
, Jeff Worsham and Evan Ringquist (1996) `Crossing the Organizational Void: The Limits of Agency Theory in the Analysis of Regulatory Control', Governance9(4): 407-428.
15.
European Commission
(1986) XVth Report on Competition Policy 1985. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16.
European Commission
(1987) XVIth Report on Competition Policy 1986. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
17.
European Commission
(1988) XVIIth Report on Competition Policy 1987. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
18.
European Commission
(1991) XXth Report on Competition Policy 1990. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19.
European Commission
(1992) XXIth Report on Competition Policy 1991. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
20.
European Commission
(1994) XXIIIth Report on Competition Policy 1993. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
21.
European Commission
(1996) XXVth Report on Competition Policy 1995. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
22.
Fearon, James D.
(1991) `Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science', World Politics44(1): 169-195.
23.
Garrett, Geoffrey
(1995) `The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union', International Organization49(1): 171-181.
24.
Garrett, Geoffrey
and George Tsebelis (1996) `An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism', International Organization50(2): 269-290.
25.
Garrett, Geoffrey
, Daniel Kelemen and Heiner Schulz (1998) `The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union', International Organization52(1): 149-176.
26.
Golub, Jonathan
(1996) `State Power and Institutional Influence in European Integration: Lessons from the Packaging Waste Directive', Journal of Common Market Studies34(3): 313-340.
27.
Green Cowles, Maria
(1995) `Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: The ERT and EC 1992', Journal of Common Market Studies33(4): 501-526.
28.
Hammond, Thomas H.
(1996) `Formal Theory and the Institutions of Governance', Governance9(2): 107-185.
29.
Hathaway, Oona A.
(1998) `Positive Feedback: The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Industry Demand for Protection', International Organization52(3): 575-612.
30.
Héritier, Adrienne
(1997) `Market-making Policy in Europe: Its Impact on Member State Policies. The Case of Road Haulage in Britain, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy', Journal of European Public Policy4(4): 539-555.
31.
Kerremans, Bart
(1996) `Non-institutionalism, Neo-institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-making in the European Union', Governance9(2): 217-240.
32.
Knudsen, Jette Steen
(1998) `Integrating Western and Eastern European Markets: Changing Trade Preferences in Traditional Manufacturing Sectors in the European Union', Comparative Political Studies31(2): 188-216.
33.
Leibfried, Stephan
and Paul Pierson (1995) `Semisovereign Welfare States: Social Policy in a Multitiered Europe', in Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson (eds) European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, pp. 43-77. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
34.
McCubbins, Mathew D.
, Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast (1987) `Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3(2): 243-277.
35.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1994a) `Controlling Regulatory Bureaucracies: Lessons from the American Experience', in Hans-Ulrich Derlien, Uta Gerhardt and Fritz W. Scharpf (eds) Systemrationalität und Partialinteresse, pp. 291-314. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
36.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1994b) `The European Community: An “Independent Fourth Branch of Government”?', in Gert Brüggemeier (ed.) Verfassungen für ein ziviles Europa, pp. 23-43. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
37.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1995) Mutual Trust, Credible Commitments and the Evolution of Rules for a Single European Market. EUI Working Paper RSC No.95/1. Florence: European University Institute.
38.
Marks, Gary
, Liesbet Hooghe and Kermit Blank (1996) `European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance', Journal of Common Market Studies34(3): 341-378.
39.
Mattli, Walter
and Anne-Marie Slaughter (1995) `Law and Politics in the European Union: a reply to Garrett', International Organization49(1): 183-190.
40.
Mattli, Walter
and Anne-Marie Slaughter (1998) `Revising the European Court of Justice', International Organization52(1): 177-209.
41.
Moe, Terry M.
(1990) `The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy', in Oliver E. Williamson (ed.) Organization Theory. From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, pp. 116-153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Montagnon, Peter
(1990) `Regulating the Utilities', in Peter Montagnon (ed.) European Competition Policy, pp. 52-75. London: Pinter Publishers.
43.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1993) `Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach', Journal of Common Market Studies31(4): 473-524.
44.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1995) `Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder', Journal of Common Market Studies33(4): 611-628.
45.
Moser, Peter
(1996) `The European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: What are the Conditions? A Critique of Tsebelis (1994)', American Political Science Review90(4): 834-838.
46.
O'Reilly, Dolores
(1997) From State-centric Control to EC Competence. Air Transport Liberalisation. EUI Working Paper RSC No.97/33. Florence: European University Institute.
47.
Ostrom, Elinor
(1986) `An Agenda for the Study of Institutions', Public Choice48: 3-35.
48.
Pescatore, Pierre
(1983) `La carence du législateur communautaire et le devoir du juge', in Gerhard Lüke, Georg Ress and Michael R. Will (eds) Rechtsvergleichung, Europarecht und Staatenintegration. Gedächtnisschrift für Léontin-Jean Constantinesco, pp. 559-580. Köln: Carl Heymann Verlag.
49.
Peters, Guy
(1994) `Agenda-setting in the European Community', Journal of European Public Policy1(1): 9-26.
50.
Pierson, Paul
(1996) `The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective', Comparative Political Studies29(2): 123-163.
51.
Pollack, Mark A.
(1997) `Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community', International Organization51(1): 99-134.
52.
Reed, Arthur
(1994) `The High Cost of Monopoly: Airlines Complain about European Ground Handling Monopolies', Air Transport World31(9): 93.
53.
Ross, George
(1995) Jacques Delors and European Integration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
54.
Sandholtz, Wayne
(1998) `The Emergence of a Supranational Telecommunications Regime', in Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet (eds) European Integration and Supranational Governance, pp. 134-163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1988) `The Joint-decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration', Public Administration66(3): 239-278.
56.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1994) `Community and Autonomy: Multi-level Policy-making in the European Union', Journal of European Public Policy1(2): 219-242.
57.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1996a) `Democratic Policy in Europe', European Law Journal2(2): 136-155.
58.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1996b) `Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States', in Gary Marks, Fritz W. Scharpf, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck (eds) Governance in the European Union, pp. 13-39. London: Sage.
59.
Schmidt, Susanne K.
(1996) `Sterile Debates and Dubious Generalisations: European Integration Theory Tested by Telecommunications and Electricity', Journal of Public Policy16(3): 233-271.
60.
Schmidt, Susanne K.
(1998) Liberalisierung in Europa. Die Rolle der Kommission. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
61.
Schneider, Gerald
(1995) `The Limits of Self-reform: Institution-building in the European Union', European Journal of International Relations1(1): 59-86.
62.
Schneider, Volker
and Raymund Werle (1990) `International Regime or Corporate Actor? The European Community in Telecommunications Policy', in Kenneth Dyson and Peter Humphreys (eds) The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 77-106. London: Routledge.
63.
Slot, Piet Jan
(1994) `Energy and Competition', Common Market Law Review31: 511-547.
64.
Stein, Torsten
(1986) `Richterrecht wie anderswo auch? Der Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften als “Integrationsmotor” ', in University of Heidelberg (ed.) Richterliche Rechtsfortbildung. Festschrift der Juristischen Fakultät zur 600-Jahr-Feier der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, pp. 619-641. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.
65.
Steunenberg, Bernard
(1994) `Decision Making under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics150(4): 642-669.
66.
Stone Sweet, Alec
and James A. Caporaso (1998) `From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration', in Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet (eds) European Integration and Supranational Governance, pp. 92-133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
Stone Sweet, Alec
and Wayne Sandholtz (1997) `European Integration and Supranational Governance', Journal of European Public Policy4(3): 297-317.
68.
Weiler, Joseph
(1981) `The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism', Yearbook of European Law1: 267-306.
69.
Westlake, Martin
(1995) The Council of the European Union. London: Cartermill.
70.
Young, Alasdair R.
(1994) Ideas, Interests and Institutions: The Politics of Liberalisation in the EC's Road Haulage Industry. Working Paper. Brighton: European Institute, University of Sussex.
