This article explores social anthropology’s relationship to, and conception of, language, and uses kinship as an example to show how the discipline presumes and entails a digital conception of social relations, which leaves little room for language as a constitutive phenomenon. By drawing on certain philosophies of language, the article deploys the notion of pitch to explore the published ethnography on the Lovedu of South Africa to show how language is constitutive of social relations and the manner in which these can be conceived of as analogue phenomena. On this basis, it is argued that language must be added to recent approaches as a central concern for kinship studies. Furthermore, it is held that the activity of listening can reconfigure our approach to, and conception of, language to attune ethnography to vernacular conceptual analyses.
ArgyleJPreston-WhyteE(1978) Eileen Jensen Krige: Her career and achievements, together with a bibliography. In: ArgyleJPreston-WhyteE (eds). Social System and Tradition in Southern Africa: Essays in Honour of Eileen Krige. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
2.
BamfordSLeachJ(2009) Introduction: Pedigrees of knowledge: Anthropology and the genealogical method. In: BamfordSLeachJ (eds). Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–23.
3.
BeattieJHM (1964) Kinship and social anthropology. Man64(130): 101–103.
4.
BestardJ (2004) Kinship and the new genetics: The changing meaning of biogenetic substance. Social Anthropology12(3): 253–263.
5.
CarstenJ(2000) Introduction: Cultures of relatedness. In: CarstenJ (ed.) Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.
6.
CliffordJ(1986) Introduction: Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusGE (eds). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–26.
7.
CollierJFYanagisakoSJ(1987) Introduction. In: CollierJFYanagisakoSJ (eds). Gender and Kinship: Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–13.
8.
ComaroffJL(1980) Introduction. In: ComaroffJL (ed.) The Meaning of Marriage Payments. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–47.
9.
CrickM(1982) Anthropological field research, meaning creation and knowledge construction. In: ParkinD (ed.) Semantic Anthropology. London: Academic Press, pp. 15–39.
10.
DreschPJamesW(2000) Introduction: Fieldwork and the passage of time. In: DreschPJamesWParkinD (eds). Anthropologists in a Wider World. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–25.
11.
Feeley-HarnikG (1999) ‘Communities of blood’: The natural history of kinship in nineteenth-century America. Comparative Studies in Society and History41(2): 215–262.
12.
Feeley-HarnikG (2004) The geography of descent. Proceedings of the British Academy125: 311–357.
13.
FiumaraGC (1990) The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London: Routledge.
14.
FranklinSMcKinnonS(2001) Introduction. In: FranklinSMcKinnonS (eds). Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–25.
15.
GellnerE (1957) Ideal language and kinship structure. Philosophy of Science24(3): 235–242.
16.
HanflingO (2000) Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. London: Routledge.
17.
HeideggerM (1975) Early Greek Thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
HensonH (1974) British Social Anthropologists and Language: A History of Separate Development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19.
IngoldT (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
20.
IngoldT (2007) Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.
21.
IngoldT (2008) Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy154: 69–92.
22.
IngoldT(2009) Stories against classification: Transport, wayfaring and the integration of knowledge. In: BamfordSLeachJ (eds). Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 193–213.
23.
JamesW(2000) Beyond the first encounter: Transformations of ‘the field’ in north east Africa. In: DreschPJamesWParkinD (eds). Anthropologists in a Wider World. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 69–90.
24.
KrigeEJ (1974) Woman-marriage, with special reference to the Lovedu: Its significance for the definition of marriage. Africa44(1): 11–37.
MageeB (1971) Modern British Philosophy. London: Secker & Warburg.
31.
MalinowskiB(1923) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: OgdenCKRichardsIA (eds). The Meaning of Meaning. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., pp. 296–336.
32.
MillerD (2007) What is a relationship? Is kinship negotiated experience?Ethnos72(4): 535–554.
33.
MyhreKC (2006a) The truth of anthropology: Epistemology, meaning and residual positivism. Anthropology Today22(6): 16–19.
34.
MyhreKC (2006b) Divination and experience: Explorations of a Chagga epistemology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.)12(2): 313–330.
35.
NeedhamR (1960) Descent systems and ideal language. Philosophy of Science27(1): 96–101.
36.
NeedhamR(1971) Remarks on the analysis of kinship and marriage. In: NeedhamR (ed.) Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 1–34.
ParkinD(2007) The visceral in the social: The crowd as a paradigmatic type. In: ParkinDUlijaszekS (eds). Holistic Anthropology: Emergence and Convergence. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 234–254.
39.
PocockDF (1961) Social Anthropology. London: Sheed & Ward.
40.
PottageA (2001) Persons and things: An ethnographic analogy. Economy and Society30(1): 112–138.
41.
SahlinsM (2011) What kinship is (Part Two). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.)17(2): 227–242.
42.
SchneiderDM(1972) What is kinship all about? In: ReiningP (ed.) Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 32–63.
43.
StrathernM (1987) Out of context: The persuasive fictions of anthropology. Current Anthropology28(3): 251–281.
44.
StrathernM (1992) After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
StrathernM (1995) The Relation: Issues in Scale and Complexity. Cambridge: Prickly Pear.
46.
StrathernM (1999) Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.
47.
StrathernM (2011) Binary license. Common Knowledge17(1): 87–103.
48.
TaylorC (1995) Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
TookerE (1992) Lewis H. Morgan and his contemporaries. American Anthropologist94(2): 357–375.
50.
ToulminS (2001) Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
TrautmannTR (1987) Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
TrautmannTR (2001) The whole history of kinship terminology in three chapters: Before Morgan, Morgan and after Morgan. Anthropological Theory1(2): 268–287.
53.
TrautmannTR (2005) Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
Viveiros de CastroE (2004) Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America2(1): 3–22.
