The belief that members of an ethnic group are blood relatives may seem archaic, but
it is still very alive today, and it awakens primordial feelings of affiliation.
According to this deep-rooted idea of kinship, individuals are only responsible for
members of their own ethnic group, and it is only to them that they are obliged to
show solidarity. The effects of this belief were seen at two blood drives that the
German Red Cross held at a Turkish mosque in the Ruhr region of Germany and that
were studied in an ethnographic research project. An analysis shows that the belief
in ethnic kinship represents a major barrier to integration and an important factor
in perpetuating social inequality among ethnic groups. The Turkish migrants
endeavored to initiate an exchange of gifts among quasi-relatives and based their
integration strategy on this objective, but their efforts to establish reciprocal
exchange relations provoked resistance in the autochthonous population. Herein lies
the broader relevance of the primordial belief in blood relations, which constitutes
a deep symbolic dimension of social inequality.
Altheide, D.L.
and
J.M. Johnson
(1992)
‘Tacit Knowledge: The Boundaries of Experience’
, Studies in Symbolic Interaction13:
51–57
.
2.
Becker, H.S.
(1963) Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance.
New York: Free Press
.
3.
Blau, P.M.
(1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life.
New York: Wiley
.
4.
Bourdieu, P.
(1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
5.
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) ‘Social Space and Symbolic
Power’, in
P. BourdieuIn Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, pp.
123–149.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
6.
Bourdieu, P.
(1998) Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
7.
Brown, P.
(2001) ‘Biology and Social Construction of the
“Race” Concept’, in
J. Ferrante
and
P. Brown
(eds) The Social Construction of Race and Ethnicity in the United
States. 2nd edn, pp. 144–150.
Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall
.
8.
Davis, F.J.
(2001) Who is Black? One Nation's Definition.
Tenth Anniversary Edition.
University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
.
9.
Geertz, C.
(1963) ‘The Integrative Revolution. Primordial
Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States’, in
C. Geertz
(ed.) Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and
Africa, pp. 105–157.
New York: Free Press
.
10.
Glaser, B.G.
and
A.L. Strauss
(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for
Qualitative Research.
Chicago, IL: Aldine
.
11.
Glazer, N.
(1983) ‘The Universalization of
Ethnicity’, in
N. GlazerEthnic Dilemmas 1964–1982, pp.
233–253.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
12.
Godbout, J.T.
and
A. Caillé
(1998) The World of the Gift.
Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press
.
13.
Godelier, M.
(1999) The Enigma of the Gift.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
14.
Gouldner, A.W.
(1973) ‘The Importance of Something for
Nothing’, in
A.W. GouldnerFor Sociology. Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today, pp.
260–299.
New York: Basic Books
.
15.
Healy, K.
(2000)
‘Embedded Altruism: Blood Collection Regimes and the European
Union's Donor Population’
, American Journal of Sociology105 (6):
1633–1657
.
16.
Henaff, M.
(2003)
‘Religious Ethics, Gift Exchange and Capitalism’
, Archives Européennes de Sociologie44 (3):
293–324
.
17.
Honneth, A.
(2001)
‘Invisibility: On the Epistemology of “Recognition”’
, The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume
LXXV:
111–126
.
18.
Horowitz, D.R.
(1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
19.
Hüttermann, J.
(2003)
‘Der Konflikt um islamische Symbole zwischen lebensweltlich
sedimentiertem Gastrecht und formalem Recht. Eine fallgestützte Analyse’
, Journal für Konflikt-und Gewaltforschung5 (2):
74–102
.
20.
Katz, J.
(2001/2002)
‘From How to Why. On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography’
, Ethnography2 (4):
443–473
(Part 1) and 3 (1):
63–90
(Part 2).
21.
Laidlaw, J.
(2002) ‘A Free Gift Makes no
Friends’, in
M. Osteen
(ed.) The Question of the Gift. Essays across Disciplines, pp.
45–66.
London: Routledge
.
22.
Lévi-Strauss, C.
(1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship.
Revised Edition.
London: Eyre & Spottiswoode
.
23.
Magnarella, P.J.
and
O. Türkdog'an
(1973)
‘Descent, Affinity, and Ritual Relations in Eastern Turkey’
, American Anthropologist, New Series 75
(5):
1626–1633
.
24.
Malinowski, B.
(1953) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. An Account of Native
Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea.
4th edn.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
.
25.
Mauss, M.
(1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic
Societies.
London: Cohen & West
.
26.
Mead, G.H.
(1965) Mind, Self and Society.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
27.
Müller, E.W. (1984) ‘Rethinking Verwandtschaft’,
in E.W. Müller et al. (eds) Ethnologie als Sozialwissenschaft.
Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,
Sonderheft 26, pp. 240–254. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
28.
Myrdal, G.
(1962) An American Dilemma. The Negro Problem and Modern
Democracy. 20th Anniversary Edition.
New York: Harper & Row
.
29.
Neckel, S.
(1991) Status und Scham. Zur symbolischen Reproduktion
sozialer Ungleichheit.
Frankfurt: Campus
.
30.
Neckel, S.
(2003)
‘Kampf um Zugehörigkeit. Die Macht der Klassifikation’
, Leviathan31 (2):
159–167
.
31.
Neckel, S.
and
F. Sutterlüty
(2005) ‘Negative Klassifikationen. Konflikte um
die symbolische Ordnung sozialer Ungleichheit’, in
W. Heitmeyer
and
P. Imbusch
(eds) Integrationspotenziale einer modernen Gesellschaft, pp.
409–428.
Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
.
32.
Parkes, P.
(2004a)
‘Fosterage, Kinship, and Legend: When Milk Was Thicker than Blood?’
, Comparative Studies in Society and History46 (3):
587–615
.
33.
Parkes, P.
(2004b)
‘Milk Kinship in Southeast Europe. Alternative Social Structures
and Foster Relations in the Caucasus and the Balkans’
, Social Anthropology12 (3):
341–358
.
34.
Parkin, F.
(1974) ‘Strategies of Social Closure in Class
Formation’, in
F. Parkin
(ed.) The Social Analysis of Class Structure, pp.
1–18.
London: Tavistock
.
35.
Preuß, A.
(2004):
‘Zum Ausschluss schwuler Männer von der Blutspende’
, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie25 (1):
35–61
.
36.
Ragin, C.C.
and
H.S. Becker
(eds) (1992) What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of
Social Inquiry.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
37.
Richter, R.
(1989)
‘Subtile Distinktion. Zur Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit im
mikrosozialen Bereich’
, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie14 (3):
53–63
.
38.
Riesenberger, D.
(2002) Das Deutsche Rote Kreuz. Eine Geschichte
1864–1990.
Paderborn: Schöningh
.
39.
Sabean, D.W.
(1998) Kinship in Neckarhausen, 1700–1870.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
40.
Schwartz, B.
(1967)
‘The Social Psychology of the Gift’
, American Journal of Sociology73 (1):
1–11
.
41.
Scott, J.C.
(1985) Weapons of the Weak. Everyday Forms of Peasant
Resistance.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
42.
Scott, J.C.
(1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden
Transcripts.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
43.
Strauss, A.L.
(1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
44.
Sutterlüty, F.
and
S. Neckel
(2006)
‘Bashing the Migrant Climbers: Interethnic Classification
Struggles in German City Neighborhoods’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (forthcoming).
45.
Sutterlüty, F.
and
I. Walter
(2005)
‘Übernahmegerüchte.
Klassifikationskämpfe zwischen türkischen Aufsteigern und
ihren deutschen Nachbarn’
, Leviathan33 (2):
182–204
.
46.
Titmuss, R.M.
(1970) The Gift Relationship. From Human Blood to Social
Policy.
London: Allen & Unwin
.
47.
Vandevelde, A.
(2000) ‘Towards a Conceptual Map of Gift
Practices’, in
A. Vandevelde
(ed.) Gifts and Interests, pp.
1–20.
Leuven: Peeters
.
48.
Weber, M.
(1976) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of
Capitalism. 2nd edn.London: Allen & Unwin
.
49.
Weber, M.
(1978) Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive
Sociology.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
50.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical Investigations.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
